Immunity Exterminated! 😳 $9.5M! POPO Pest Control Co. Terminates Unarmed Citizen on Ground! Bodycam! 

Greetings content creator. Was wondering, how do you get these court videos to publish on your channel? Thanks in advance for your reply. All the best!

It was murder for sure!

Hey bro, I understand what your doing with your keyword terms at the bottom of the description, using certain ones to extend the reach and all that, which personally I think this needs to be seen far and wide to help you get justice, but using terms like comedy or entertainment and the like I just worry could you used against you in someway but any lawyer with the average Iq and not the average lawyer with a shoe size Iq. So just be careful dude. Keep up your work and stay strong.

​@freewillchoice8052 "hello content creator" hello AI why don't you go tell your Indian overlords to F off an stop trying to take this serious stuff to just make a quick buck...I hope I'm wrong but I really feel like this is exactly what your doing and who you are....

Holy crap, that man was begging for his life and they shot him in cold blood. If the man who shot him, wearing full body armor with an assault rifle, really feared for his life, he should have never become a cop. He shouldn't even own a gun. Mans on the ground, crying, crawling towards you as you commanded, and you're the one that's so scared you have to use deadly force? The guy giving the commands, really? You should be forced to go through that and see how well you'd comply. (I would make sure that the guy with the gun doesn't have bullets, but I wouldn't let you know that.)

I'm gonna have nightmares tonight after watching that body cam today.

@@fatherinexile I'm sort of wishing I hadn't watched it.

He was found not guilty by jury. Citizens on jury are the problem also. Don’t want police violence but vote to allow it

All that man did was walk out of a hotel room! Life ended! Family destroyed! Nobody is responsible? Three or four cops had guns! The dead man did not! You do not have to point a finger at anyone! The evidence is there! The police shot an unarmed man! But they are not responsible! With a hooded wink! The murderers walk!

They sued and the wife and children were awarded 8 or 9 million but their their family has been disemboweled because they will never have their husband and father to consult for strength and comfort again

The hardest part of the body cam for me was the vindictive orders that were being shouted at this poor man.

Wasn't the cop charged with second degree and acquitted? He was, by a jury. And then he reapplied to get hired to get a pension. And justice for all.

@@eshootziscrs2868and to add insult to injury he got a lifetime pension for PTSD over him shooting an innocent person. If you watch the trial he had zero remorse for his actions and came over as nothing more than a cold blooded and calculated killer.

@@eshootziscrs2868that’s horrible. But still better that the jury acquited him rather than qualified immunity

@@89bazoly I forgive the jury, I didn't hear the case. I can't forgive the city for giving him a pension for life. His conscience will be the true jury and his sentence life. We can expect no more.

It seems their sole strategy is to try to get the case kicked out on immunity, and if that fails, pay a big settlement to stay away from a jury, which would likely destroy them.

_"The judges were having none of that BS"_ Sure, but at the end of the day the officer was found not guilty, cops rarely face real consequences.

​@@davelordythat just means the defense got very lucky and/or planted someone on the jury. It went to trial and only a for hire would let that cop walk.

Article 6, clause 1 Article 1, section 8, clause 17 Article 4, section 4 Article 2, section 4 Article 3, Section 2, Clause 2 FRCP 38

I thought they gave him immunity for shooting Daniel..or am I wrong. I know they didn't charge him which is insane to anyone who watched the video. It was a murder..period

Bingo!

Don’t open your door don’t talk to police they’re not your friend they’re not there to do anything good for you don’t open the door

Dont answer the door.

Never open the door!!

Absolutely. The cops are NOT there to help you.

Agreed!

How can you crawl with your legs crossed

Shooter found not guilty and he’s out looking for another victim as of today

911 calls to the police are hearsay.

American government is a cancer. No accountability ever. Not with local cops, not with state agencies, and certainly not with cesspools like the Veterans Administration. I’m posting these to educate the masses and hopefully provoke some change. Thanks for watching.

One officer was prosecuted but the jury acquitted him 🤷‍♂️

And that is why no one trusts any part of the justice system.

Yeah, one officer was acquitted, but the department got to pay the wife and kids 8 million dollars.

yea no the cop WAS charged with 2nd degree murder and found NOT guilty, so he can't even be charged again this court is moot at this point.

Most definitely and Philip Brailsford gets to walk away free.

Again

It made me sick too today 😢 I had to take some deep breaths.

was this the one in the hotel or apartment building ?

@@freewillchoice8052Yes, in the hall. He was in shorts and a T shirt crawling when they murdered him.

It is! Bodycam and news stories in description and pinned comment.

great point !

Yup! We're to trust incompetent feckless incompetent lunatic tyrants! Makes some of us feel safer already! Especially an idiot who has mental hysteria who was given a badge and a gun, and then turned loose in public. Maybe they should allow tyrants to show up to work on drugs and alcohol abuse as well. Lol! I mean, qualified impunity and all! Smh!

Don't forget there is a IQ cap on hiring cops they weed out smart people and only hire idiots.

Crazy right?!

“Help me lie fam!” 😂 what a great quote u just made up! Love it!

😂😂😂😂😂

🎯

100%. If they were thay afraid the guy was armed they should have told him to just lay completely still and not to move at all. Then cops move in slowly and put the cuffs on the guy. Instead they set him up, telling him not to move but having him moving forward.

Why does everyone feel the need to attack the lawyer? Personally I would quit and find another job, but maybe he can't if he is under contract. Can a lawyer be under threat of contract and lose his license if he doesn't fully represent his client? Maybe he can't quit. I don't know but the lawyer isn't the guilty party the murdering cop is. Someone has to represent the murdering cop as everyone is entitled to representation.

No but the lawyer is making a bullshit argument that Would make this OK for other officers to do this is not just one person these things become caselaw and then get used over and over and over and

@@user-ov3cw8iy2c Lawyers make an oath to defend their client to the best of their ability. Would you want a lawyer to act contrary to that? I certainly wouldn't want a lawyer to represent me that wasn't doing their best. It is qualified immunity that is the problem, not lawyers put in a position to defend it.

The lawyer has to defend the indefensible. It is his job, disgusting as that sounds.

I don’t think it mattered in this case. The officers INTENT was to kill!! Period!!

They don't know the Constitution, most can't tell you the 5 rights in the 1st Admendment. They need 6 weeks @ least in police school to go over the Constitution since they swear to uphold it. I'm not against good police, but most are clueless to how the law works or what is even said in the Constitution. They should be tested on the law and actually have a degree of some sort about the law, not just training on how to detain a person and preserve their safety. Things need to change.

@RozeechildRN I agree the police academy gives one day for the consistution. If it was about protect and serve, they would know the consistution.

🎯

doesn't matter the cop was already found NOT guild of 2nd degree murder so he can't even be charged again. what is this court for?

​@@MrDhalli6500 This was the civil trial that follows after the criminal trial. Cops don't have immunity in criminal court, only civil. The lower court denied qualified immunity, the cop is appealing. The widow got $8 million from the city, $0 from the cop.

@al1383 Remember the courts created qualified immunity, and unconstitutional policing under RAS. If the courts are angry it should be directed at themselves, they are the biggest cause of this mess.

@@MrDhalli6500 so there you have it, murder is legal.

There sole tactic is to delay delay delay and if immunity is lost then pay pay pay before forced in front of a jury.

Because they dont have a defense, they try wording things to fit into not being a violation.

It’s because they are attempting to defend the indefensible, they grasp at straws because that is all they have got. If the lawyer wants to know what precedent disallows this shooting he should read Garner v Tennessee which set the precedent you can’t shoot an unarmed person on the ground when they don’t pose a direct threat.

That’s because their arguing the indefensible!!

They weren’t held accountable, they were acquitted and got away with murder.

@@digitalwasabi2 I did not realize they were acquitted. What an absolute atrocity the justice system is.

The bodycam is so so so hard to watch. That poor man!

the coward cop had him playing simon says, " crawl like a dog"!, oops didn;t say "Simon Says " BLAM BLAM BLAM !!!

Lawyers rarely get in trouble even though there are rules about candor to the court and not bringing meritless legal arguments to waste the courts time.

If your child was on trial would you rather the lawyer gave the best defense he could or just make sure your kid isn't railroaded too badly? Even if your kid is guilty, odds are you find excuses and reasons why it's not their fault and you would be very glad the lawyer helped get an acquittal. Btw, the officer that pulled the trigger was charged, tried and found not guilty. Pretty sure the criminal trial is already over.

AGREED!!

@@Anomoomin do you mean like the 4000 exonerated people who were wrongfully convicted of crimes like murder when they were innocent? Or are you suggesting someone like Kyle Rittenhouse just say, yep I did it, guess we don't need a trial. Some idiots would say that was murder, most say that was entirely self defense. I guess without a trial and a real defense the truth will be whatever you like?

@@Anomoomin Then why are you arguing? Or did you mean to ask it as a question of something you don't understand? You don't see the point in exactly what you are doing? I'm not sure I can help, but I'll give it a shot. You think something, you even believe it. Yet here we are, having different perspectives. This is why we argue, we listen, we share we discuss. Because even a video can show different things. Ever hear of " one movie, two screens"? There is a famous example of a Japanese movie shown from two different perspectives. The exact same things telling a completely different story. It is perfectly fine to not defend yourself, just don't cry about the outcomes being unfair. Honestly I don't know exactly what you are trying to say, I suspect it's not as pointless or ridiculous as it might seem. It would be wonderful if people were always honest but unfortunately this is the real world. Not even the police, the prosecutor or the judge can be or should be trusted to be honest. When you get politicians, judges and cops to be honest, we will stop arguing. That's how I see it, you can't, we won't, now what?

If the notice has been given to the officer. You suggest the officers have read and are capable of comprehending something that limits their authority.

​@@eshootziscrs2868they are required knowledge, to atleast having read the bill of rights and swear to it, before becoming an executioner of the state...

@@Rob_Moilanen Required how? Is there a test that if they fail they will face consequences and punishment? You can say they are required because it is something you dearly NEED to believe. But can you offer any real, tangible and unquestionable proof that such a requirement is upheld? The reality we see in video after video, thousands and tens of thousands of times, the reality suggests that officers not only don't know the constitution but that they have zero interest in learning or upholding the principles put forth in the constitution. Here's an analogous situation. Years ago I took a class to get a professional license. The first thing the instructor said was this. If you want to know how to do this job, you are in the wrong place. If you know nothing at all about this industry but want a license in the industry, you are in the right class. I'm not here to teach you the job, I'm only here to make sure you can pass the test. This is what government regulation really means. I didn't have to know how to do the job, do the job safely or correctly. I only needed to know the answers to the questions asked, I missed two, got a license and was considered an authority because of that. Cops get training. Trained how not to get caught violating rights, taught what can be excused not what is necessary. Trained how not to leave incriminating marks, how to mute or remove body cam, how to answer questions without giving answers...... You say cops are required to know and understand something you can't even prove they are required to read. And every bit of factual evidence available as empirical and indisputable on video, says exactly the opposite. Why would you believe they are "required" except you really want, maybe you need it to be true? But what if it isn't? What if the top most law enforcement agent of the world said, no, cops are not required to know, understand of interpret the constitution, just the laws. Would you be shocked? Currently as far as we are concerned the order of law enforcement goes president, Director of the Department of Justice, The attorney general..... Trump famously said regarding red flag laws, take the guns first, due process second. Clearly not in alignment with the constitution, the DoJ and Attorney General have backed equally unconstitutional positions. They lied to the people regarding matters of national importance and acted as the armed enforcers of unconstitutional policies put forth by the government. Is the president required to know, understand and uphold the constitution? Maybe we want to think so but since George Washington every single president has found the constitution to be a burden and obstacle for their own desires. Every single president has tried to erode and pervert the constitution for one purpose or another, always shielded in benevolence and protection but in reality motivated by cowardice and authoritarianism. Lincoln decided to suspend the constitution and override the very basis of it. Roosevelt stripped citizens of their rights, suspended/repealed the constitution in order to lock up innocent citizens without charges, trials or any form of due process. The list is long and expensive. The crimes against the constitution, indisputable and obvious. Yet these crimes have been sanctioned and warranted by the courts, another branch of the government. . I'd love to agree with you and know that if a cop actually violated the constitution that officer would face criminal and civil consequences. The fact is, they don't. The fact is there is nothing you can point me to that will make me believe there is such a requirement. If there is, please share. But I think I can show you ten videos, all new within the last week, showing officers who either don't know the constitution/law or don't care to abide by it because they clearly don't have to. Give me that thing I can point to and have these officers charged. Show me the consequences, the charges of not knowing the constitution that one would expect if your claim had merit. I would love for it to be so but I find no actual evidence that it is.

There is a special place in Hell for that man...

Great point!

Not even their own policies!

@@fatherinexile Amen. There is no situation that the police cannot or will not make worse.

The mcsc judge disallowed evidence against the shooter, Brailsford. One was that Brailsford used his own rifle. The barrel was engraved with "Your F++k+d.

@paulhanson4676 actually the dust cover on the ejection port, but yeah. Any juror who saw that video should have seen right through all their games though.

As I recall the judge refused to allow the body cam footage into evidence..to inflammatory I guess 😮

Agreed!

Agreed!

No. This is their training. It's disturbing to say the least and it must end. We The People must Abolish and Disband the F.O.P. As an Unconstitutional organization and Govern ourselves as it was intended to be under the Constitution.

they are trained. they just dont give af..

They are trained to act this way. They are doing what their told.

Unfortunately, this yammering idiot, is just doing his job, albeit very poorly, in pleading the controlling Sgt case, that he is entitled to immunity for having set the rules to which another officer violated the defendant rights and executed the defendant....

AGREED!!!

Without access to competent defence we may as well have mob rule. Even if it turns the stomach of the lawyers defending these awful officers it's his job and their right. The cops didn't go to prison, but that's the fault of a broken system where to many of the population still believe cops tell no lies and do no wrong, combined with the ludicrous invention of qualified immunity by the supreme court.

@chancejensen3779 I suppose if he got sick and tired of losing his cases he could always apply to be a cop. He seems to have the right attitude of mind to make an excellent candidate i.e lying through his teeth, not giving a straight answer and as you pointed out - flexible morals.

Most cops on these you tube videos can't even get past the first amendment. If you want to see a real example of this, look up Donald Milazzo ! Jennifer Larson. Those two cops make law enforcment look like a joke!

The lawyer is a pol ice union schill and can only learn to be more pathetic.

👆this is a commenter who knows what’s up!

Right! Like how? The bodycam video is so heartbreaking they knew that young man wasn’t a threat. They gave so many bad directions.

A LOT! Taxpayers have no idea how big the number really is! One of many reasons I am posting these! Great comment! Thanks!

​@@fatherinexileI googled it. $320,000,000 a year. Probably more than that

@@al1383 I looked it up and its 3.2 billion not 320 million

OMFG and Jebus. Sounds right now it's in front of me. Thanks for the research! Best Regards and Best Wishes!

Correction, the tax payers pay for the lawsuits and for the paid vacation while they are investigating themselves.

Request noted!

Yes!

@@fatherinexile great, I remember that trial. I Was shocked over the verdict.

The parents and widow filed civil lawsuites and appears they settled. 1.5 million to the parents and 8 million to his widow and kids. However, you make agreements that either they did no wrongful acts and such. I get the settlement is a common sense of admitting guilt. I'm glad the family got a settlement, bit this officer needs to lose his pension.

Great to hear! You’re welcome!! And thank you for the support!