2016.05.02 U.S Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Written Decision: cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/07/05/12-55109.pdf Important quote from decision. You can always amend or fix things: “A district court abuses its discretion by denying leave to amend unless amendment would be futile or the plaintiff has failed to cure the complaint’s deficiencies despite repeated opportunities.” Other Interesting Cases: Gangsta CPS Loses Immunity! 😳 Demands the Right to Lie to Violate Citizens & Kidnap Kids! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-llXqlKB_AME.htmlsi=q974eNTgxew4MKqE Father Exposes Santa Clara Superior Court Complaint Shredding Operation: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u4JCc4qO30o.html ----- I'm just trying to be a dad after my kids were abducted. Why I am the Father in Exile: How to Fight Corrupt Family Court (Expose it!) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pVgudZtNYiQ.html Voter Fraud and Abduction Admission Caught on Court TV in NV ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-J9FeWPKEFo8.html Judicial Misconduct & Rights Violations Caught on Court TV - Santa Clara, CA Judge Roberta Hayashi ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Zgog-NLFyC8.html Ring Camera! Kidnapping Coppers Exposed! 😳 Admit I Reported Corruption But Refuse to Investigate! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ONUR0GL9Voc.html Kidnapper Judge Cindy Hendrickson Revokes Illegal Order 😳 (2023)! Admits Denying Me Due Process! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hRaX0g7rgS8.html Secret Judge Club Exposed 😳 at Corrupt California State Bar Meeting! (2023) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LHRTQh0WTYk.html Santa Clara County California Superior Court Judges Who Deny Due Process and Participate in Misconduct and Felonies: Roberta Hayashi, Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, Brooke Blecher, Thomas Kuhnle. Transcripts and Filings Will be Released Publicly on this Channel.
“Qualified” became “Absolute” somewhere. Because pushing past the boundaries is the entire goal of an adversarial scheme in which all parties are looking to “Win” in a zero sum game.
@@bradcrosier1332incompetence isn’t & can’t be criminal in most positions. Mistakes or errors shouldn’t be the end of a person’s career by default. IMO
@@dddebz ummmm.... doctor can definitely go to jail for negligence, teachers can go to prison for said negligence, anyone in the country outside of government positions can do prison time with no immunity for their negligence. So what makes a cop's negligence more important to understand than a literal brain surgent negligence? lol what makes a officer's or DA's negligence more so understandable to make than a teacher who negligence impacts children lives? So the fact you have a a position of authority like doctors or teachers most states have literal enhancers for their "negligence" hahahahaha meaning they have statutes that add chunks of additional time because they acted poorly in situation they have been schooled and or trained to do for over long spans of years. So what since does it make for 10+ officers or DA's to fake ignorance while every arrest they made go uncheck? if they do something incorrectly in a position literally made to address literal negligence amongst the citizens with jail time, meaning they must know right from wrong since....ITS THEIR JOB lol. There are no enhancers for government positions for a reason, they are the cow herders, the slave control function and or the tyranny gang. The fact immunity literally defies the entire point of our constitution of saying all citizens are equal under the word of law which they many years later constructed qualified immunity and later "absolute" immunity due to the officers of the court and law were still getting locked up too much. If you go in a field with high authority that can literally shatter someone's life by your judgement and actions... you need a huge weight of burden so you act appropriately in all citizen encounters knowing you arent immune to the law and conduct as a officer or DA would go a long way. How many fights, shots, abvse of citizens would you think happens if a cop knows any wrong step or not double checking before arrests would lead to equal punishment for abuse of their position.
In my own Federal case, I just filed a motion for sanctions against the attorney representing the California judges I’m suing. I moved for sanctions because he filed a Motion to Dismiss in which he lies about what my lawsuit alleges, and then cites cases that say the opposite of what he claims. The magistrate judge dismissed the motion for sanctions without making him respond. So that’s fine. I will object, write a complaint to the Chief judge, file that in my case, and then post everything to YT. Everyone is gonna get exposed.
The duty of a prosecutor is to _truthfully_ sign affidavits for subpoenas. As soon as the prosecutor knowingly lies on an affidavit, he IS NOT operating as a lawful prosecutor, so shouldn't have any immunity.
Many people watch RU-vid on a TV, which means they have no access to the comments. Consequently, those watchers have NO WAY TO FIND OUT what the court decided. It would be helpful for those watchers if you were to put in the video a short summary of the actual court decision.
Do you have access to the video description? Long-term I can do as you suggest. Right now though my priority for my time is my own civil rights lawsuit.
Focusing on your own troubles is reasonable, to be sure. But I do want to second this.... A few seconds at the end of the video announcing the finding would be great. It doesn't have to go into great detail just a simple statement of the decision would be cool.
@@fatherinexile Naturally you should prioritize your clients' cases above your (quite welcome) RU-vid content. As an often "YT-on-TV" watcher, the short answer to "do we have access to the descriptions" is "yes", but it's quite cumbersome and generally doesn't allow for following links (to PDFs or otherwise). I wouldn't trouble you to have to go in and edit an "epilogue" into each video that's already been posted, but a quick voice over or title card at the end would be very welcome going forward to folks where getting into the descriptions is inconvenient.
That is the joy, the immunity is even when they act unlawfully placing immunity doctrine higher than every actual law. Therefore suggesting that the supreme court is the only legislative body, as everything else submits to their rule.
I have studied the immunities at length for my own ongoing federal lawsuit. The Supreme Court has repeatedly said that Congress could at any time get rid of the immunities. Everyone blames the courts but it is Congress’ fault. They have the power under the 14th amendment to enforce federal rights on states and to create causes of action to do so.
@@fatherinexile Yea Scotus has , in many cases told, in rather clear terms, "congress get off your butts and do something" In regards to many different legislative/policy type actions. I don't think SCOTUS, as it is, really likes the way QI has developed but they only hear so many cases a year.
She didn't even bother to write a warrant, she assumed that here presence was the warrant. Case is out of the 4th Circuit. She got denied immunity, censured by the state supreme court, and awarded a judgement against her of something like $200,000. Assuming that you are referring to the Goldston case.
Claiming immunity by court officials or the police basically says, " I lied, I broke the law, but you can't touch me for doing it " Now tell me how that should be allowed ?
100% - why and how do they keep over complicating it? My guess, is because all public services are staffed by people, and I think some members of the courts may be concerned about losing a blanket protection that they shouldn’t have ever given themselves in the first place. Just because they didn’t say *specifically enough* that we can’t, doesn’t mean we should toe the very edge of a line that results in harm to other people. I mean, why shouldn’t DA’s be able to show why they make the choices that they do? Same with judges. Running loops to make the regime’s lives easier isn’t really serving justice to the ordinary citizen at all.
So, the Model Rules of Civil Procedure say that a lawyer has a duty of candour to the court - in other words, whenever a lawyer is doing Official Court Stuff (tm) they aren't allowed to lie.
What i think is really pathetic is how judges think there so smart and high on the hog . Why should i ever have to approach a judge saying YOUR HONOR SIR , shove that where the sun dont shine . No judge is my honor thats a fact. Judges are so corrupt but yet give sentences and lectures to people fighting there charges , when they are corrupt and discrimatory. How can you honestly go home at the end of a day and be proud of yourself for handing out lots of sentences when the judge is as much s criminal as the people he sentenced that day. Half these judges are alcoholics , law breakers , so why should they be held at such a high standard. Here is the line of corruption COPS - JUDGES - PROSECUTORS - AND POLITITIONS. these people are the reason our countries are falling apart . I cannot stand hw judges think there so above everyone else.
I mostly agree with you. However one of the reasons I am posting these cases is to teach the public that the appellate court routinely strips government scumbags of immunity. And I always link the decisions. If you read the decisions you will see a trend of the 9th circuit routinely asserting individual rights in the highest of regards. But that being said, lower court judges are for the most part 🤢🤢🤢🤢 at least in the state courts for sure. I’m reserving judgement on the federal courts until I get further along in my own civil rights case.
Attention viewers: Please subscribe to the channel- helps Father In Exile to post more of these cases- This is one way to support his channel please-- Also- like And whenever you leave a comment- this also helps the algorithm-- helps his channel grow- Please-- these cases are educational-- and interesting too listen to-- Thank you all- 🙋♀️👍 How many listen while driving-- and on the move-- All it takes is a flick here and a flick there!!!! Share the videos-- to educate others-- there’s variety of topics here-
I'm confused why do these judges find everything that can not to hold these public officials accountable just straight sad a liar hurting citizens world going to hell
History is fascinating. Did you know, that solicitors (England) and soliciting(prostitution) have the same root? This came about because solicitors and prostitutes in England, used to practice their trades in the same way, from the same locations and, in fact, solicitors' modus operandi was very much modelled on that of the prostitutes of the day.. Point being, how can we reasonably expect morality, from a profession whose genesis was effectively entirely immoral? PS. I've often wondered whether the American legal profession chose attorney, as opposed to solicitor, because they were aware of, and sought to escape the stigma attached to the word/concept, solicit (solicitor).
Its not prosecutorial duty to fabricate evidence supporting one side when prosecutors duty is not simply to convict its to seek truth justice rosecutorial acts are not fulfilled acting vlearly biased
The concept of immunity to lawsuit would only ever be relevant if the prosecutor or judge etc was actually prosecuted for the same. But since prosecutors, judges etc do not get prosecuted for their crimes means that there needs to be further methods to keep them honest. That is on top of the fact that the judicial supplyong any sort of immunity to the legal sector is a clear conflict of interest as they are the same club. If immunity to actual law were possible for the courts, which is not within their power, then even in that case the bar being the same professional body means they should lobby the legislative bodies to get immunity.
Immunity to lawsuit should ONLY be allowed when the person they want to sue obviously did nothing wrong, else the case should go to trial, whatever the case is.
@@terryhayward7905 or go the extra step. in australia, if you sue and lose you usually have to pay some or all opponents legal fees. so you need big bank accounts or lots of confidence in your case.
He shouldn't be talking to these judges, should be talking with judges that really knows the laws, he talking to three judges that are paid by LA and will not help in any way
I'm reading the case here. While, the prosecutors absolutely engaged in misconduct, the victim shouldn't win either. She was potentially engaged in criminal action (perjury and obstruction of justice). The solution is for these prosecutors to be fired and sanctioned (2 year suspension and having to reapply to practice law), and for the woman to face criminal investigation.
Hail Michael! 🇺🇲 One of your Dad abilities has keeping TRUTH Rocking. *Thanks!* Any Claimed Immunity *not* written in Constitution is *Unconstitutional.* 0:11 *"absolute prosecutorial immunity",* < How Arrogant sounding. _must take care of that_ 0:40 "public policy" 'underlies warrant "granting" of absolute immunity'. < Who's not tired of hearing this? 1:14 [Courts]' *underlying policy objectives^* that are *Advanced by granting* absolute immunity. < Sounds *Treasonous.* 3:15 *'Traditional protections^^* Supreme Court has emphasized make immunity *appropriate'.* *^ WHO Wrote these "Policy[ies]"?* *^^ WHAT *lawful* Tradition?* When *lawfully* "appropriate" ... . 1967 SCOTUS acted as KING, using term "Doctrine"to recognize qualified immunity as *"Defense"* for public *servants.* SCOTUS has *NO Authority,* power, or jurisdiction, *Nor do they make law.* What US History, (Constitutionally) pardoned our *servants* for Violating One's Rights? *US bows to NO KING;* The people hold the power. 1967, 1976, 1982: scotus' hand in 'granting' immunity for public *servants.* 1982 SCOTUS created silly 'Test' 1988 Congress added More ABUSE to the people by enacting, *FELRTCA,* 'Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act', *Extends* "Absolute Immunity for common law torts to *ALL Federal Employees Regardless* whether *conduct* at issue was discretionary."* [justice gov] [when absolut not 'fit', qualified is used] ... that's our Maladministration, Treasonous government. One signing document that causes harm to another ... would that be like One''s *Failed Duty of Sworn Allegiance?*
Thank you! They just denied me again, so I have to wait until the end of May now. Once I get some wins in federal court and build up the subs some more, I might post affiliate links, ask for donations, or something along those lines. Not really a priority right now. Staying laser focused on Fed court case.
