In Modi 3.0 India will go From Middle Power to Great Power | A Khanversation with Michael Kugelman 

Deep hatred for india from the professor as usual

Although Prof. Khan was born in India but always speaks bad about India. Not happy at all of India's progress. Jealous Prof.😂😂😂

Muslim thinks about muslims. He never talked about atrocities Muslim did on non Muslim in Pakistan n other Muslim countries.

Whatever Michael says. It is difficult for Islamist to digest.

India is not making moves to reduce American hegemony. That is a by product. India is making moves to improve its standing and its options. Which any country including the US would do.

India has difficulty in forgetting it's experience of America during 71 and Kargil war, America withdrawal from Afghanistan and leaving Israel in middle of war with Hamas. India has to be cautious about becoming an Ally. America with Canada area supporting separatist group of India (Khalistani) is very unfriendly act. American efforts to get involved in change of government in India with it's Allies. Strengthening of Pakistani army. These things affecting India getting too close to America. At the end India still using major arms from Russia who have never ditched India so far makes difficult for India to break away from Russia. That's why India has to walk in tight rope while dealing with America.

What about American extrajudicial killing all around the globe Mr speaker ??

Nobody stops Indian Muslims from progressing. We know greats like Kalam, Arif Khan, etc are not role models for Indian Muslims. The tragedy is with sub continent Muslims is, they don't use their Grey matter.

If human rights were American concerns then why would it have supported china over the decades. Not to mention Pakistan.

Congress in India kept Hindus oppressed and pandered to Muslims. Now that BJP is endeavouring to make Hindus realise their plight and stand up for their rights, mainly those following Abrahamic relisions are nervous.

India First Only foreign policy

All questions are asked in a negative attitude and all questions are answered in a positive attitude.Great Khan sir

The US did not help India when it was facing famine and the US dumped wheat into the sea to control prices as against helping the starving India. Under PL480 they did send some wheat but only as a token and without any sincerity. US has a skewed moral logic to what it can do and get away with as against what India cannot do. Michael has a rather skewed view of hindutva that is neither researched well nor understood dispassionately.

Mr. Khan, about 'No specific minority member' in the cabinet, what do you think would be the motivation for a political party to include those that they know would not vote for them in significant numbers, regardless of how many welfare schemes they benefit from? Also in a fully secular constitution how would the inclusion of a minority affiliated person as internal affairs, defence, foreign affairs, railways, roadways or any other cabinet post benefit that specific community? Conversely, if such a posting does benefit one community then would it not be reasonable to assume that it would adversely affect other communities?

He brings people who say exact words he says never someone who disagrees

Sir, can u do one show in which you can talk about solutions of kashmir issue. U always ask others about solution but you never speak out your opinion?

Dr Khan asked an excellent question which Micheal did not answer properly, what does being allies have to do with promoting terrorists like Khalistanis in US or Canada. If India promoted US enemies like Al Qaeda and gave them succour would the allies question play out! Ridiculous.

Prof. Its not right to say that minorities are being marginalised . I know u r referring to muslims . Regarding not a single muslim in the ministry . If muslims dont vote for BJP and if they talk hostility towards Hindus, how do you expect a muslim to find a place in the ministry. Also, prof . Please keep in mind that muslims are not a minority with 20% of 140 crore, dominating many trades and business and therefore they cannot be marginalised . If at all they feel so, they themselves to be blamed for it.

But we have diaspora like dr muqtedaaaaar also😢

The problem with US is all its ills like white supremacy, wide economic divide among it's population, ultra conservative Christians, Islamophobia , wanton aggression on countries on very spurious grounds etc are conveniently ignored while beating other democracies with human rights stick. At present with advent of economic might of China other countries will tend to push back whether US or it's allies like it or not. One another thing- nuclear power is a great leveller. However crude the tech it's potential to wreak massive casualties is immense. The differentiator now is what scale of human losses countries can take. India could withstand millions which western alliance can't. Nations could be wiped out.

This Professor is a Pakistani born in India

Did he talk about a community voting as per religious dictat despite all the benefits they disproportionately received … NO Did he talk about oppression of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh … NO Did he talk about The Hindu Temple act, The Places of Worship Act, The Waqf Act and The Equal Rights Bill …. NO Did he discuss why USA must gave a register of its citizens but India should not … NO

Michael has invested so much in indian sub-continent now many from there learn from him.

Mr Khan is definitely unhappy. 😅

Yes . But one sad outcome of the recent General Elections in India is Not even 1% of Indian Muslims voted for Modiji although they cornered over 40 % of all the 750 + Welfare Schemes started by Modiji in the last 10 years. He is Heartbroken. It reflects in no Muslims MP in the new Cabinet. 14 % of Indian Population will continue to live in splendid isolation on False Promises of rival political parties . Probably for decades to come . Pakistan had a big role in this outcome. Jai Hind !

FACT OF THE MATTER IS USA wants to use India against china just like it used Pakistan against Soviet union during cold war.. usa want unipolar world but multi polar ASIA... India aware of the uneven relationship between India and USA, thats why it doesn't want to get into treaty allies.. India want to deal with USA in issue that are in convergence.. but usa want India to become like UK or Canada or Pakistanis to fall in line in every issues..

Islamic states should first become secular in law before they start criticising any country about their secularism in practice.

Dear Khan sir I have been watching almost all of your videos and in most of them you strongly criticise Hindu nationalism on which I agree with you and strongly believe that in a mature society there can’t be any place for religious intolerance and hate which is counterproductive and hinders the development and growth of the country. However I would also request you to do some shows on as to where the policies, attitudes, vision and approach of Muslim community has contributed towards the rise of Hindu nationalism and I cite following examples to buttress my point 1. Do you think Muslim community by supporting Jinnah and Pakistan did alienate a large section of Hindus 2. Do you think that Muslim community by not agreeing to modern personal laws undermined the very progressive and forward looking Indian constitution and by doing that they strengthened the hands of those people who always advocated that Muslims don’t want to integrate 3. Do you think by still running thousands of Madarsas and imparting largely religious education only Muslims themselves are not interested in integration with other communities thereby sending wrong signals to their fellow countrymen 4. Do you think Muslims by fighting a long bitter battle over Ram Temple ( for which even scientific evidence was unearthed by Archeologist K K Mohammed) did further alienate Hindus 5. Do you think by forcing the government to reverse Shah Bano verdict a very wrong message was sent that belief in constitution by Muslims is only superficial 6. Do you think extermination of a tiny Hindu community from Kashmir by their Muslim neighbours has also contributed to rise in Hindu nationalism 7. Do you think havoc being unleashed by terrorists in India for the last 40 years is instilling a sense of fear among Hindus 8. Do you think a significant decline in Hindu population in Afghanistan Pakistan and Bangladesh is forcing the Hindus towards rightist ideology particularly when they see that there’s no such decline in Muslim population in Nepal and India 9. I can cite many more such examples but end with a a question that do you think sometimes doing self critical analysis you are able to acknowledge the truth which also leads to reconciliation I am asking these questions from you because I believe that you are an honest and courageous person who loves to show mirror to people Regards

This professor is a Muslim first, then an Indian - It shows!

The United States isn't seeking an ally in India; rather, it's aiming for a subservient partner that aligns with its interests, assisting in upholding its dominant position globally. Dr. Khan convenietly failed to press this question.

India has lived without us and will continue to do so.

Two Indian-Americans were governors: Bobby Jindal, governor of Louisiana and Nicki Haley, governor of South Carolina.

Someone should ask Prof Khan to write an essay about his Pre-Islamic pedigree, then only he will understand BJP's policy of Bharat's Cultural/Civilizational Nationalism (not Hindu Nationalism).

How many Muslim in Biden"s cabinet

Invasion of Grenada in 1980s, under President Ronald Reagan. United Kingdom was most upset.

Is there any Democracy in the World where the ruling Party encourages a Minority Religious Group to grow in size and secure a seat in the Cabinet? Man Mohan Singh as Minority PM said that Muslims must have the first charge on the resources of India. What about the Millions of poor Hindus? We don't have any right to our resources? Don't blame the Hindus,

The professor ignores the fact Nupur Sharma said about the Prophet marrying a six year old child in response to the mullah abusing Lord Shiva. Liberals and Muslims have a bad habit of only criticizing Hindus but ignoring what Muslims do and say. The irony is the Prophet’s marriage to six year old Aisha is very well documented in the Hadiths. Sahih Bukhari Vol. 7; Book 62; Hadith Nos. 64 and 65: Prophet married six year old Aisha and consummated the marriage when she was 9 and he was 56, older than her father. Nupur Sharma just repeated what is in Islamic books. By accusing Nupur of blasphemy is akin to saying Sahih Bukhari Hadiths are blasphemous.

About relationship between India and US conversation goes quite well and Mr khan ask about US want to do he does but when other nation want to do the same then there is a problem so great counter Q and the guest didn't gave a answer he ran and talk about another things so over-all good conversation ..........and about Hindutva and all you guys don't know anything so don't talk about it.....👍🍵

Dedollorization is based on the fact it provides the West a choke hold on a outcome that does not favor the West. For example, a war with pakistan, India gains major advantage, the west say's stop before the objectives are completed, the west threatens sanction to cripple Indian economy and force a settlement in pakistan favor. Dedollorization is thought to provide a way to to keep afloat that sanctioned economy and reduce the influence of the west.

Indian M with a Pakistani heart 🙈🤣🤣🤣

President Nixon , recordings of swearing at Mrs indira Gandhi on the internet

Good podcast...shld bring more such experts...

Mr Khan forgets indian partitions was based on Religious lines and it was 90 %muslims who voted for creation of Pakistan , so who is secular and who are communal is well understood.

Why is it that India needs to temper its nationalism to suit its Islamic majority neighbours. Shouldn’t they also feel the need to secularise to be in good terms with Indian people and Indian state ?!

In 1971, USA sent 7th fleet to Bay of Bengal. USA went to support Islamic Pakistan.

Fantastic discussion. Amazing

44:14 nah they were pro caa

Thanks

Sir u r true example who may be an Indian American but from inside no one can take out a true Andhra Indian.God bless you. Our country is above anything.

great conversation!

Eid Mubarak Sir

Good commentary by Mr. Kugelman

Good discussion … khan sir

This was a good show

Agreed, India is not a big player in South East Asia. Why do you have India in QUAD. USA Hyprocrats as usual . US should not include India in its scheme of things in Indo Pacific Strategy. India has survived and progressed despiteUS for the last 77 years and will continue to do so despite US. 😮😮😮😮😮😮

The prof. said that "India is trying to maintain ties with Russia while trying to get closer to US and isn't it the same in view of the US as Maldives is trying to maintain relations with india but also wants relationship with China." The difference is that Maldives has in itself no value, the value Maldives garners is because of it proximity to India which Maldives understands and is exploiting to undermine Indian national security at the behest of the Chinese. False comparison prof.

India looks at concern with the level of domestic instability in US, the consistent marginalisation of black Americans, the excessive gun violence, excessive militarisation of internal police leading to multiple human rights abuses, the abuse of rights to protest freely in campuses, the internal security situation as a result of multiple murders of students of India, the flouting of international laws like freezing of sovereign assets and the lack of free market principles exhibited by protectionists economic policies of US, the reducing democratic values as seen by elections being decided by courts etc 😁

Please talk about Kashmiri Pandit exodus.

Folks must stop watching such fundamentalists so called doctor’s show who is so biased

It is very difficult for USA to replace Russia inrespect of alliance. There is a special place for India in the hearts of simple people of Russia or CIS. I say because I have stuied there, worked there and lived for a long period. There are other objective factors like history, culture, geopolitics etc, for India not to trust USA. Most recently was the Kargil war. One of the core reasons is also that USA sees everything only through commercial and hegemony prism. India and majority of Indians understand very well that USA needs India and to use India desperately only to counter China and wants India to drag into a conflict with China, like it has used Pakistan against USSR and currently using Ukraine against Russia. Actually Ukraine is not fighting it's own war , but on behalf of USA and NATO. India is not a pet country of any country like Ukraine or Pakistan. Regarding condition or status of Muslims in India professor always crys loudly. There are so many my muslim friends, who are highly educated and well of. Reason is education, which is provided to each and every citizen of India without any discrimination , as the case with professor himself is. But if you are not studying in any education centre, which does not teach the subjects needed for a simple job, then how can you make responsible the government for your socio- economical condition?

Mere allegations is not evidence. Solid concrete evidence. Credible reliable evidence is essential. Rest is heresy

And DID THEY TALK OF TERRORISM PERPETRATED ON HINDUS IN INDIA … NO

Interesting discussion, let the dust settle down on the election results in India and then make an objective analysis of it, For me most of analysis suffer from biases. When was Indian election fought on Hinduavta plank from the electorate perspective in 2014 - Achhe Din 2019 - Pulwama and Balakot The result of 2024 is primarily because of Arrogance Lives and livelihood Danger to Reservation or the affirmative action mostly localized to Uttar Pradesh. If the country has indeed moved back to coalition, Era not a bad thing. In my opinion, the BJP will be very happy with the 240 seats whenever the election is held next time, particularly when the next largest party is at 100. What changes for Indian Muslims I will wait and watch on the following parameters Political inclusion Education (self-help) Jobs (upto Group 'C' category there is no interview for Govt employment. Hence, bias is eliminated) Disposable income (smaller family size helps)

I was in India recently and I am a bit concerned about mass employment. I don’t see how any government, not just the current government, can provide employment to such a large population

सर मैं संसार में आपका सबसे बड़ा फैन हूं और रहना चाहता हूं पीआर एक सवाल है जैसा कि आप जानते हैं कि भारत की जातियों में मुझे बताया गया है कि बीजेपी केवल वोट के लिए हिंदू मुस्लिम बनती है क्योंकि उससे लोग जाति के हैं Mera ek nivedan hai ki bjp ki is majburi ko bhi dhyan me rakhe because bjp ke chief kisi fix cast ke nhi hote please reply sir

Prof Khan, how do you justify the Pope in G7 as a key speaker...in your liberal world that's justified..what a myopic view...the deep rooted hatered for fellow Indian's comes out so much in your every podcast...

In 1947,Muslims were allowed to stay in India, because Hindus are secular. Islamic Pakistan, all Hindus killed, or fled, total Genocide in islamic Pakistan. In 1947,My grandparents were lucky to escape with their lives from Islamic Pakistan.

Ha..ha...Mr Khan tried his best to present a Bokeh with answers to Mr .Michael, but the guest was wise enough to give his opinion, not to pick one from the Bokeh. This is the difference when you watch Karan Thapar and some "RU-vid for money" vloggers. Although it's injustice to compare Karan , who is a class journalist. A low profile youtube vlogger will try to sell his thoughts, even when he pretend doing interview of an subject expert. While a journalist will try to get the experts opinion unbiased. These interviews really getting fun, when the interviewer started explaining his opinions to the interviewee and speak most part of the interview and the guest looks puzzled, trying to say "Hey, I'm here !" 😂

SC/ST not eligible for reserved job because Professors misuse power give low score percentage in exam results in INDIAN Universities, No human rights in India

Interesting, focussed and impacting discussion with great articulation from Prof Khan. Well done Professor Khan.

India's view of multi-polar is not that India rejects the hegemony of the US out right but rather that the system that the west created is still a beneficial system for the world however that system that is currently in place requires major changes. India considers itself a pole in this reshuffling as well as the US. On the other hand China is an adversary of the US and the current system and WANT to not rebuilt this system but to destroy it and replace it in the vision of the Chinese. So, it's disingenuous and inflammatory of you to suggest that India wants a world without US as a power. Your interpretation of India's multi-polar comments made by the likes of Jai Shanker are incorrect. You should not infer that India wants a world order without the US.. Don't spread falsehood!

FYI, Anyday... Mr. Kugelman is Good for analyzing AF-PAK.

And now, Mr Khan has lots of jealous about Indian cricket team and its fans because his Pakistani team is not doing good😂

Sat sri akaal Honorable Khan sahab, Michael sahib as well all listeners, thanks a lot for explaining the issue...

Profit. Sir why do you always speak with fake accent????

Americans be like... सारी दुनिया का बोझ हम उठाते हैं...ना जियेंगे ना जिने देंगे

Well try Professor... . You need to seed your thoughts to American Policy Makers. You know that Germination of such efforts are not guaranteed. Still You are Trying Everyday. . Good luck.

G7 may not be expanded to G8 soon as India has maintained it's relations with Russia and Iran. Independent foreign policy is hindrance for admitting India in this group.

The prof. always takes a contrarian view on Indian policy as to what were india's intentions when said policies were created however he takes on face value policies of others even though they may be a sham.

Doctor tum nahi sudhroge

Took away Pakistan for exclusive Muslims and the rest of India is for Hindus according to Partition. But if you're still concerned about the leftover nonsense then please allow them to Your country. CHRISTIANS DEMOCRATS is not communal but ....???Read history carefully.

What about Christian Nationalism, there are more missionaries ( Christian) trying to convert tribals . How many non Christian Presidents did US have. How many non Christian head of state does Europe have?

Mr. khan is always criticizing india. I don't trust him, but I do trust Michael. Mr khan stop hatred towards hindus.

Pl understand and study what is Hinduism . All are same here .

I don’t know why Pakistani Muslims keep bringing Muslims in India. Muslims in India Are treated much better than non Muslims are treated in Pakistan.In Pakistan a non Muslim can not be head of any organisation.Be it a Cricket team,Hockey,Football or the army or the Government.Even though these non Muslims have history of living there longer than the migrants(Muhajirs).who moved to Pakistan after Partition

Professor Khan is a very nice prof and wants well being of India. Criticism is also a part of it. Indian Muslim are Indians like others for example Hindu like me. So what is the issue.......

Why do you keep repeating what your interviewee says as if it's your opinion?

Dr. Khan, tell me one truly secular Islamic country? Muslim s want secularism where they are in minority, where they are in majority Muslims want Islamic state. You always talk of Hinduism negatively. India is secular because it’s a Hindus are in majority, if Muslims were in majority India would have become Islamic state.

Please add some facts while talking about Muslims just crying don't work any more. Hamas also crying but reason we all know

Dr Khan, India, UK, France, Sweden, Finland & America will be Islamic Nation by the year 2047. What is your stance Professor?

Dr Mukdar Khan does RG knows anything about foreign policy when he signed a secret MOU along his mother has not available for public why ?

This was another great interview and I believe Mr. Kugelman is more clear eyed than the title of his article Let’s summarize what Mr. Kugelman ended up saying: I am not suggesting that India will become a major power Most consequential relationship is just exaggerated oversell G8 Entry will be great but won’t really fit in India is not part of any critical formal treaty bound alliance with United States Concerns about Domestic repression before And now Trans National Repression There has to be more trust in the India US relationship At the end of the day India is not a major player in South East Asia The role of Diaspora is overstated because hardly anyone in the second generation is looking for a Hindu God King to arrive and enlighten or liberate them Most of what he ended up saying put in sharp perspective the reality of the claims about the strides made exclusively and never before in the last 10 years. Perhaps he should reframe and rewrite his article as Two Unnatural allies brought together by the fear of China..🤣 or may be Ashley Tellis did

Ture colur of converted joker

american talking about trans national repression. 🤣 It is so ironic that US tends to maintain its self-righteousness after iraq, syria, afg, lybia, carpet bombing, using pakistan as a tool against India, arming terrorists against India etc etc. US took out an american naitonal Anwar al-Awlaki on yemeni soil with an armed drone. I mean have some shame..

please expain hindutva....you are abusing Rastra without any basis

Total garbage

India may become major power but not great until it is inclusive and resolves societal fault lines.

He hiding shit

Nonsence...

khan hope world will ignore modibecause he missed majority mark in election? And he thinks he understands how world affairs are run?