LEO 1 was designed from the start , to speed into and out of battle positions, especially if its ban NBC environment. Typical thinking in the 1960s , when it was designed. ...just like the AMX-30. Going from "turret down" to "hull down" and back again ; is the only way to fight.
Very nice playing. I also like so much leopard 1, but i use cumulative every time. I really hate this ammo,) but sometime i have many oneshots. But anyway i think your choice is better.
FYI Nukenus, when you put those alternate font titles in, it breaks the title for viewing on tvs via casting. Shows up as boxes with an X in them for all characters.
People saying it got 0 armor stop being f...g ridiculous. This tank has absolutely great mobility, gun, gun handling, zoom, technology, ammo, reload, lineup, gun depression and all that. How is armor a balance when my is3/is4/t10 has said useless armor, lowest pen ammo, worst mobility, 0 gun depression, 20+ reload, worst turret rotation, worst gun handling e.t.c how can someone be stupid enough to think leopard armor is a equal disadvantage against this?
@@maxwellmaragia2272 are u hate soviet or something? Is3 is4 t10 have aphecbc as main shell And it have good damage (t10 have heatfs) because they are heavy tank and need to fight at close range or front line When leopard have apds which is good When leopard main job is sniper which need stay at far range
