How do you factor in the greater impact of using different energy stores in the 400m sprint vs. Consistently using aerobic energy (if im not mistaken) over longer distances?
In real life, if you mix several critical mistakes such as being too tense, using suboptimal race pacing and bad running technique, etc, it does not matter what energy systems you factor in. You are going to fall apart far before the finish line.
@Sebastian Henkins i dont understand your question. the message of the video is that pacing is a.crucial skill, in fact the most important skill in running. this channel already has various videos about each phase within a short sprint, and the importance of pacing properly so as to maintain speed rather than maximize speed. there is nothing to "factor in" really.
Guess why I'm here. I just blasted out of blocks like a rabbit yesterday being first for the first 80m, then I got second place for running in slow motion the last 20m.
At 3:33 in this video, Nijel Amos of Botswana was on pace to break 1:40 in the 800m. Usain Bolt tied up in the last 30m but still broke the world record in the 200m. Kirsten Warhol went out fast and broke the WR in the 400 hurdles. In the concluding stage time trial in the 1989 Tour de France Greg LeMond told his support car not to give him his splits. He won. In the 400m freestyle in the 1988 Olympics Janet Evans set a world record that stood for 18 years. Ideally you want to run out of gas one step after the finish line. Leaving something in reserve is the safe way to get to that point. Breakthrough performances happen when courageous athletes take a chance that they might collapse before the finish.
What you say makes a lot of sense, but it's all outdated and gone. Unfortunately it does not work in modern high performance athletics. New world records require much higher precision. You can't run out of gas and break world records anymore. Amos was on 1:36 pace and that's why he failed so badly.
@@TheWayToWin you can't just pace yourself and beat them either. In reality you're going to have to run hard from the start and just have god tier speed maintenance ability. No one is gonna beat Bolt but running slower at the start on purpose
Bolt's coach was Glen Mills. Ben Johnson's coach was Charlie Francis (I've actually talked to one of the athletes that Francis coached in the 80's on RU-vid).
One of the problems is human body’s muscle efficiency, in that we are stronger at the beginning of physical exertion than at the end. For example many of have done this, in the bench press, if I am going to do 10 reps at 200 lbs, and I add 10lbs for the first 2-3 reps then take it off and will barely be able to finish all 10, in the end of a race that would appear as I am crashing, but I would have accomplished more or ran a faster time, however if I were to put the extra 10 lbs on for the last 2-3 reps, and attempt to save my energy for the end, I would not be able to do all ten or my time would be slower, Meaning you can’t make up at the end what you could have done at the beginning. So saving it for the end is less efficient. Which makes the concept of this vid, more applicable by finding the optimal pace for the whole race that will produce PB or near PB consistently.
Woah that really gives me somthing to think ab bc theoretically speaking if I remove the limitations from my mind I can remove the limitations on my body ? Seems like a good challenge thank you for your response
@Меня зовут - Алекс правильнее было бы сказать что человек давно достиг максимальной силы, примерно лет 50 назад, однако рекорды с тех пор улучшались в большей степени благодаря нейромышечному совершенствованию и развитию техники. Современные рекорды в этом смысле очень далеки от идеала, поэтому результаты будут расти и дальше без всякой медицины.
I think you're right Im from a boxing background so I'm not an expert but I'll compare the two In boxing, what separates a beginner from a world champion? Or an amateur from a world champ? or in general, why does one fighter get tired and the other doesn't? Let's go back to the basics, if we see a new fighter starting out(Or a LESS Skilled fighter) he will get tired much faster compared to a world champ, why is that? Is it because the new guy doesn't work hard? doesn't do "endurance" stuff to avoid fatigue? No, it's because he's not efficient he doesn't have the skills of the world champion who's able to use a lot less energy to get his job done. So the new fighter(or less skilled fighter) has to use a lot more energy to throw his punches and to avoid punches which is one of the HARDEST skills in boxing, to punch your opponent and avoid his punches. If you look at Mike Tyson, his defense is so skilled that he can punch and avoid his opponent's punches with minimal effort, compared to a beginner/less-skilled fighter who doesn't have the same skills so he has to RED line it to match that. Therefore, he starts to fatigue MUCH faster and so the MORE skilled fighter is able to win
@@Singh0958 Adding on, have you ever seen sprinters fade towards the end of a 100m dash? That means they accelerated too quickly and used too much gas in the process. The only way the term "all out" would apply here is if you take it to mean that the athlete gave an all out effort, which they can certainly do if they want to win the race. But again, an all out effort is not all out acceleration from the gun.
we don't believe in speed endurance. There is speed efficiency which is better biomechanics, relaxation, and controlled breathing. All these things combined make you run longer with greater speed. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-e_Vo8u5lF0w.html
@@JesusChristIsLord777. don't listen to them these guys are dumb lol, obviously you can increase your speed endurance through training. Also any gimmicky exercises are unlikely to improve speed on the track, at least not by much compared to just simple sprint training. Running fast in training leads to running fast in competition. Actually learning to push hard on every rep of a workout and taking long enough breaks to do so are two things that have helped me personally.
I wanted to know the answer to this too so I did some looking around. Seems the strategy is the same as that of 100m: get out hard, steadily accelerate to about halfway, and then maintain speed.
@@KuIJohnQ yeaaa. But in 200m your acceleration phase must be a lil longer. Nd you gotta make use of momentum at the ending point of the curve to slingshot you.
On a short distance 50m or somit like that I’m fucking fast but my stamina is famously bad, so on a 100m I have to slow it for the first 40 ish meters then I do a rlly fast sprint but I wish I could keep up my speed the whole way 😕. I do a lot of sport but stamina is an overall problem for all of them 😅
@@Faustin-ju5dx Right, the point of it was to see in the most optimal conditions and scenarios, is a sub 2hr possible and it showed that it was. Simple as that
At 25 mph you would be running 8.9 seconds over 100m. At 25km/h you would be running 14.7 seconds. That's considering you're running at that pace over 100m.
