Encyclopedia Brittanica Films 1957 re-edit of an original 1938 "World Windows" short subject entitled "A Village in India". Source: 16mm dye-transfer Technicolor print
But they wouldn't show how they taxed 50 % of the produce from farmers and took their land if they didn't . They wouldn't show how Indian cotton was so popular in the European market that they had to fine people using even a handkerchief. Because otherwise people wouldn't buy their products. They wouldn't show that europeans fought against indian king and lost. Then promised not to do it again and begged the king to permit them to continue their trade.
Its most common false propaganda, most people assume British colonized to enlighten the benighted heathens. However fact is India was more civilized society than West(even after Islamic onslaught)& British East India company resisted any Christian missions. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pY2SmhleAus.html The renaissance was triggered by the direct exposure of the West to Indian Hindu texts when the Ottoman lay seize on trade routes and they had to directly find routes to India by passing the Turks and Arabs Initially 6K British officials ruling over 200 million Indians, As one British Governor General who lived here put it "If each black man were to take up a handful of sand and by united effort throw it on the white faced intruders we should be buried alive" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-F7GOh8qlLwQ.html
@@thestudybuddy75 this is your beloved nehru's india when countries like japan germany bounced back by industrialization india was stuck in failed socialism and corruption
@@sharad7340 I'm not lobbying for Nehru. But just care to look at the time stamp. When you are constantly looted by an imperial power of your wealth, for 150 years it would take time to get out of that. And it is reasonable that you wouldn't follow the same path as your aggressor who chose to loot you to fuel their capitalistic economy back in England. You would definately try to keep an ideology as distant as possible. But to our disadvantage that was not the right choice yet the choice that should be taken.
@@thestudybuddy75 that's why the gandhi parivar got free hand to loot the nation further for another 50yrs till 1990s?? Isn't it From nehru to indira to Rajeev everybody knows their track record??? Isn't it Socialism & nationalization didn't work in extremely corrupted environment
@@thestudybuddy75you needvto do research better here they brought india to bankruptcy till 1991 🗿🗿 Indira Gandhi doesn't even have money to pay indian world cup winner team 😡😡😡
