Yes India's per capita income is less than England but you should also keep in mind that in India the cost of living is very low in comparison to Britain
Moreover, a person earning 30k comes in top 10% of the income group. So the cost of living one can see how much change it brings. Yet we are still very far from the UK which is all urbanised, educated and very less inequality etc
India is still developing country and thriving for more day by day this not our whole power yet even after being developing country we overpowered our former colonizers in military for info top 4 india, china, Russia and USA are true heavy weights in world below india their is no nation that can overtake anytime of top 4...
@@chandansahoo655 India's per capita will be 17 18 k dollars in 2050 if India's GDP growth is constant at 7%. If India does exceptionally well then per capita will touch 20k mark.
@CJJK cry and cry ... .. we are not like USA or UK who looted others to make themselves rich and militarily strong.. we are hard working people.. we were richest on this planet for thousands years... we r civilized way before europe started to learn how to eat... and we promise u... just wait for 20-30 years... we will show you our rise... and we believe in world is our family.. so a prosperous Bharat aka India will make this world more beautiful✌
@CJJK actually there is no such data analysis which on reallity depict the actual income of countrymen.. so u can not clearly say uk's income is this and the others is that..
What about Ahoms. Ahoms of India is the oldest and continuous Hindu empire who wasn't conquered by the Mughals. We need to stop glorifying individual sects.
This is the country that ruled us once and now we are ahead of them!!💁♀️ Btw thanks to our neighbors that because of them we have to make ourself stronger!
you indians are really powerful military .I didn't know you were that strong.I personally love indian culture especially your movies I recently saw the movie RRR that's one of the reason I am here.But at the same time I feel sad for your neighbors like Bangladesh who wouldn't resist if India invade it.
@@sdd1819 in history of our country india has never invaded any country or attacked them first!!! Bangladesh was once part of India but got seperated with Pakistan and then india helped them gain independence so i don't think we will harm them!!! Until and unless they want something wrong
You’re not ahead of the U.K. you spend more money but have way more catching up to do militarily, you still have 430million people living in abject poverty, your capabilities in science and technology is nowhere near the capability of the British, you have no world class universities. Your relevance to global financial markets is less than Australia’s whilst London remains the worlds most important financial district. 82% of Indians work in low paid and low skilled jobs and have an average IQ of 89 which is 12 points behind the British. The English/British have won 96% of their wars Indian has lost 87% of its. History would likely repeat itself again, the Indian military is untested, the British are one of, if not thee most experienced in the world. India has a lot of corruption and doesn’t rank in the top 20 whilst the U.K. is number 5. Forget GDP per capital as cost of living isn’t factored in- British people are still on average 17x wealthier. There is a reason why some many Indians try to move to the U.K. whilst pretty much no British move to Indian. India isn’t s great power it just has lots of people that’s all
@@jKDC1987 nice joke our technology and science is far more better than uk We have more billionaire We have 1 billion literatures We have a best space organization isro who surpassed nasa soon Isro make world record You theif First gave 45 trillion that you loot from india And our mathematics is Farr more better than western You never defeat any Indian in maths That my garenty We are developing faster than you Our total local airports, railway,roadways are much better than you we just 75 years of grinding After independence now see how india surpassed uk in every level Let see per capita of uk and india in 2100,2050
Lets give you a lowdown of a possible UK-India military conflict:- India has a larger economy and a larger military budget than UK. And India is growing both these figures at much faster rate than UK to the point that by end of this decade alone, India will comfortably be more than twice the UK GDP and military budget figures. Just as a short example: today while UK has slightly better tanks, Indian tanks aren't far behind and India can manufacture as many tanks as exist in entire British Army within just one year. But lets dive deeper. Naval warfare: Indian Navy is larger, but numbers alone don't tell the full story. India has a larger and more technologically capable maritime recon aircraft fleet and surface warship fleet today and in the foreseeable future (and if you want details, I can get down to the the tiniest of details on that so do ask if you find it hard to believe but a tiny example is the multifunction radar, MF-STAR, of the Indian destroyers that is slightly superior to the UK's SAMPSON and this advantage will continue in the next generation of destroyers both nations will field). However, what UK has an advantage in is Aircraft Carriers and Submarines. India has more submarines, but they are not technologically near UK right now. This is set to change to where India will, in next 10 years, significantly close the tech gap (but not completely). By early next decade, India will have double the submarines that UK does (6 Nuclear and 12 diesel-electric vs just 7 nuclear in UK) but I'd still say it'll be a 50:50 battle if only submarines are involved. Luckily for India, Anti-Submarine Warfare involves a lot more than just submarines and there, India completely blows British capabilities out of the water, especially if UK is trying to fight in Indian Ocean. So in submarines we are behind for now but will be tied by next decade and overtake UK in the decade after that. Finally aircraft carriers. We both have two each. But what matters is their size and air wing. British carriers can each carry 12 more jets than Indian ones. But this gap is temporary as India is building its third carrier, and by next decade will match the number of jets that British carriers can field. And this is where the superior quality of the British air wing: the F-35B comes in. Its a 5th generation fighter. And while India is planning to field 4.5th generation fighters like the American SuperHornet and the Indian TEDBF, I'll have to give this one to the Brits. This is the only serious advantage that the Royal Navy will continue to hold over the Indian Navy for the next two decades. But if Indian Navy decides to fight within 1000 km of Indian mainland, this advantage gets shortened to only this decade (explained in next section). Air warfare: India has a much larger Air Force, and its technologically almost at parity with UK (barring the Royal Navy's F-35B), which means the slight tech edge of Royal Air Force doesn't manage to overcome the sheer numbers India can field. Training wise, Indian fighter pilots are just as well trained and fly just as many (if not more) hours per week as their British counterparts. But the Indian Integrated Air Defence System is on an entirely different level compared to UK. Problem is, UK can counter it to a certain extent using its F-35B advantage. And India doesn't have an answer to the F-35B in this decade. The Indian answer to it, the 5th generation HAL AMCA fighter jet, is still under development and will enter service early next decade. So for next 10 years, UK has an advantage India doesn't have an answer to. And even after that, the Indian answer won't be flying from Indian carriers for the foreseeable future. Space warfare: UK has no innate capability here. Meanwhile, India has a massive space launch vehicle program and proven anti-satellite missiles, radars and killer-sats. India wins here hands down. UK does have some satellites but for now, they are defenceless. Land warfare: India wins hands down. Indian Army is only slightly behind UK in terms of tech and that is bound to change within just this decade with Indian artillery, aviation and air-defences becoming insanely strong in terms of technology compared to the UK. Moreover, Indian Army can field 45 Combat Divisions, compared to just 2 Combat Divisions that UK can field. Indian Army has 20:1 advantage in tanks, artillery, armoured vehicles, electronic warfare equipment, etc. And in infantry, anti-tank guided missiles, tactical ballistic missiles and army air defences, its even larger advantage in numbers that India has. India is investing heavily in drone swarms technology and the technology to counter drone swarms (such as lasers and non-nuclear EMPs based on explosively pumped flux compression generators). Point is, Indian Army is the largest Army on Earth (larger than Chinese or American Ground Forces) and it is an all-volunteer force, unlike the conscripted force of Chinese. So quality of commitment and training is not the issue. If UK attempts to invade Indian mainland, it'll be a David vs Goliath battle for them. Assuming they can even land on Indian mainland in one piece. In conclusion: Today* UK could possibly hope to maul our Navy and harass our coastline, but can't go beyond that. By early next decade, Royal Navy will struggle to do even that and getting close to Indian coastline will become suicidal. Only USA and China could ever hope to threaten India conventionally today and in the future. No other nation comes close to being a major threat for now. Do note, I completely ignore geopolitics in this analysis, because this question is outlandish enough to demand it, because its hypothetical. *By today, I mean the day the Royal Navy's trump card: its F-35B fighter fleet actually gets an anti-ship missile. Because right now, its still not installed and until it is installed, other than the submarines, India will eat the Royal Navy for breakfast.
@@jagdishprajapati9574 You are the one who is dumb if you think I wrote it just for this one video. I recycle my comments. And since I love to teach ignorant Brits some humility, I have a ton of saved up comments to show them how wrong they are about India and UK because they rely on trash like BBC instead of hard facts.
@@johnsaley5087 Aghni P is ballistic missile and i dont think ballistic missiles are used for moving targets. I dont know the answer for your question but Indian Navy recently ordered $2.5B worth BrahMos missiles. And as per Chinese estimates, India has 14000 BrahMos missiles so as we can see, Indian defence trust this missile a lot. Even China fears this missile.
Trident-2 missile, is not made in Uk missile 😑, Trident2 is a amarican missile, UK just purchase this missiles and using in there submarine 🙄, But, Agni-5 is made in India missile 🔥 So india have all the technology of long range missiles 🇮🇳❤️
The video Thier reacting to is not one of military power but of military numbers, those sort of videos (if they want to use the word power) should talk about the type of vehicles the quality of training of the personnel, they types of aircraft and why one is better than the other, the types of vessels and how modernised they are and what weaponry they have not just number.
Whole Europe is dependent on america, so they thinks america will rescue them just like ukrain😂😂 But india is not the part of any group We are alone so we have had to establish this army and we succeed
Near 200 years British were stayed in India and they destroyed india toally. They stole everything frm India.Before that India was called a golden bird. Because India was the richest country in the world. British destroyed india. They stole 45 trillion dollar. Not only money, they took everything. After getting freedom in 1947 India was trying to get back how India was before British raj. ( You should react to How British destroyed India by shahi Taroor) You will get to know how India suffred by british. Pls react to this
even though population matches the militiary but see the expense also and also who has more money per capita so u cant say india is big so it is powerful than UK but also see how india cope ups with expense and still beats UK
India is the developing country and uk is the devloped country but india also powerful country then uk so next 30 years india is the powerful country in the world
@@Gp1937_Og Stronger? no offence but india is considered one of the biggest jokes of a nation. Most people live in poverty and dont even have toilets instead using the streets. the least desired people all around the world
What's the point of per capita income, u spend in same thing in which u earn, even after that big gap it's not like an average citizen is having big ass saving then an average indian.
UK = India never because India is big country and 35-40uk make one part of India 😁.. UK and USA alone never win war ..they all in top because they combat team call NATO..but one country Russia destroy whole NATO 😁