India vs UK Military Power Comparison 2022 REACTION | OFFICE BLOKES REACT!! 

They are building one more it's already started around 65000 tone much bigger one and the new one is 45000 tone the one got recently commisssioned

What's that armor looking like though? It can be as heavy as you want, 1 proper torpedo or missile and it's over

Modeled after those ramp ones. It’s a start but not going to shock anyone in a developed nation

@@aj897 lolz how's your day in cloud 9 🤣🤣

*has

Vikrant is retired

Which year are you living bro, INS vikrant retired long ago

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-A-d3zd56hgU.html

@@Rorschach7012 Damn, dude. Ask the f****k question to you which year you're living in ? India recently launched an indigenously made brand new aircraft carrier INS Vikrant in the month of September, 2022. And India already has INS Vikramaditya previously. Even India has planned another aircraft carrier INS Vishal and it's under construction and expected to be added in navy by 2025. Dude, be aware some geopolitics and current affairs. India is rapidly developing and you're asking a stupid goddamn query.

@UCkm0Ul79OpG-4E8zi0ixRCQ bro clam down😂 take a vaccination for rabbis.

They provide charities to christian missionaries and some environmentalists NGOs who stop and delay our indian projects, indian govt. have banned many of such NGOs.

Aid , your aids are peanuts You have to give reparition And apology from your king... If you want aids contact us

All chaps: *Reading your comment One chap: Its all down to size of the country and population innit All chaps: yea yea yeayea

The aid which uk gives us,and they dont give us any charity,they looted 41 trillion usd in todays money,nd yes the aid which they give us now is even less than what we give our farmers subsidy on fertilizers,no amount of aid can cover the loss of more than 30 million people died in british raaj nd the kashmir issue and indian national congress they gave us had almost completly destroyed india till 2014 nd still the bbc documantry appeared out of no where before elections,this documantry is propoganda done by congress nd chinese party nd bbc runs on chinese funds,ccp pumps 15 billion usd in world media where does all that goes,the thing is we left you behind in every possible competition,even after you looted money from all over the world your world war 1 nd 2 was financed by the british colonies,you didnt invest a single penny in tht,uk is turning into karachi,many towns in uk are completly clean of their local population,karma is a heatless bitch it will give you your dues with intrest just wait nd watch

@Vatsal the only reason UK is even in the index is because of their pillages. What goes around, comes around. Then again, large population brings its challenges, needs to be tackled to reach on top. Just having large population does not bring you to top of any index. If that be the case, why waste time doing anything else innit?

🤣😂

There’s nothing to enjoy! A champion works hard silently even to maintain his position…

i loved it

Colonial mindset never goes 💯

Beech vala dadu rone k liye tyaar hai bas

Totally agree

Still struggles with poverty

​@@foob5900feeling sorry for you but still don't have platforms of Only Fans of your mother's, sister's and wife's.....😅😅😅😅😅

@@foob5900tell me when there’s no poverty in your country i’ll wait

Crickets churp churp. Just Kidding….I dont Know what the hell Is going on ….But i stop and watch cricket pickup games at the park to try figuring it all out. I dont understand Why the batter runs to the pitching mound sometimes….and the batter will hang out on pitching mound until another Batter hits the ball….I literally watch cricket at the public park when Seemingly every India person in my neighborhood plays pickup games…But in Baseball they run the 3 bases and cricket batters run to Pitch base too…and then hang out. Idk what to make of it

i want see war india vs uk

But we ready for all the conditions.

@@macrobells3861 and who will compensate for the losses on both sides .

I just want to watch cricket, guys.

The f35 would smoke anything India has

India is a peaceful country, if someone starts war with India I think most of world would support India .

South Korea bhi hai kya defense mai

South Korea I didn't know we are taking help of south korea in defence

@@swati2899 k-9 vajra ,self propelled artillery

Grow up kid

@@NikhilRajp87 so u r embarrassed as well.

@@Enlightened23 another immature kid 🙄

@@NikhilRajp87 like Rahul Gandhi? Nope, 😂

@@Enlightened23 yes like rahul gandhi

Your aid to India is 0.04% of it's GDP. India sends aid to other countries 20 times that amount. Check your data.

@TGill22 your aid is peanut for indian economy Keep your aid to yourself And india give more aid to others than it receives First get a proper knowledge about it before speaking

@@durgeshsss WTF are you talking???? my aid

@@BOBON0101 again WTF????? and why are you saying this to me???? you high or something??????

@@TGill22 they mean the brits

No? Why would they feel uncomfortable? India and Britain are not enemies and won't go to war.

I didn't think so. I think we were somewhat equal in experience. Because Brits fought both the world wars and their special forces have gained enough experience in middle eastern countries.

@@apurba_medhi No, the western world has made everyone think in that direction only. Approximately 1.3 million Indian personnel also served in world war 1 and 0.5 million in world war 2 . So in that case India has more experience . Even the small Vietnamese Army fought very well with Americans and defeated them with guerrilla tactics.

@@apurba_medhi indian soldiers fight in frontlines in world war

@@apurba_medhi Indians are constant war against invaders from 2000 years ago.

Britain has way more experience than India

It's Brics*S for south africa..

Sir india verified chinese casualty that's approx 80-100

@@lakshchaturvedi2691 That is probably wrong but yes Chinese causality are higher - I am Indian ''' And minimum 40 were reported by many intelligence authority

@@oq9894 sir thats information about casualty were asked by the troops who fought with chinese

@@lakshchaturvedi2691 with due respect, my father was posted in Srinagar at that time ...We got many reviews from my father's friends posted there ..The number were different from everyone ...But no soldiers paid attention to it during that time...Everyone was worried how tf CO sahab ko kuch hone diya...Regiment was angry , after a month we got to know some info...which is to public knowledge as well..

@@lakshchaturvedi2691 Russia say 35 to 40 you can check on internet.

Still don't have toliets and is still a 3rd World country😂

gdp per capita go hard

@@logan3277 yea yea. Adjust it to inflation. On your face 😂

​@@logan3277PPP laughing in the corner.

​@@logan3277kid...learn the basics of economics...learn about cost of living

UK has far more superior equipment esp their US fighter jets. India could not even get within a few hundred miles of a US F35.

@@HamburgerHelperDeath ever heard of Rafael Get over your superiority complex 🥱

@@rudrakshachandrashukla3454 Yea In 2002, the Republic of Korea Air Force chose the F-15K Slam Eagle over the Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon and Sukhoi Su-35 for its 40 aircraft F-X Phase 1 fighter competition. The Rafael is not a 5th generation fighter. The US just debuted a 6th generation bomber. And the French built the Rafael, so are you bragging on their behalf? Pretty lame brag. Look you spend $70 billion on defense to the US’s $750 Billion. It’s not even a competition because it’s not competitive. You lack a blue water Navy. Remember an Island of people with a fraction of the population conquered India.

@@HamburgerHelperDeath well we rejected f15 and f16 and then chose Rafael because it was a better option for our air force ( as not all aircraft suits every airforce because of their requirements). And even now we put out an order for 100+ aircrafts where both f18 superhornet (4th gen) and Rafael(4.5 gen) are competing. Mind u Rafael costs double the amount of f18. Talking about navy we do control Indian ocean and are part of quad. Speaking of bombers Russia did offer us their T-60 ( which still hold the title for fastest bomber) but we didn't made comment on it. Also Indian Air force was ranked 3rd by SIPRI above China. But in the end of the day this all won't really mater because u simply just can't digest India being more powerful.

@@rudrakshachandrashukla3454 More powerful that who? The US has 3 air force’s ranked in the top 4 in the world and 4 of the top 10…that’s because our Army, Navy and Marines have more fighter jets than most air forces of other countries: Top 10 Air Forces based on size: 1. United States Air Force - 5,217 2. United States Army Aviation - 4,409 3. Russian Air Force - 3,863 4. United States Navy - 2,464 5. People's Liberation Army Air Force (China) - 1,991 6. Indian Air Force - 1,715 7. United States Marine Corps - 1,157 8. Egyptian Air Force - 1,062 9. Korean People's Army Air Force (North Korea) - 946 10. South Korean Air Force - 898 Russian equipment has proven to be very effective…in Ukraine…not.

Lol

@@macrobells3861 I don't understand what is "lol" about it

Bro india have two lovely neighbors

​@@harnishpatel7154and both are so much close to us😂😂 unfortunately they always defeat by us😊

These 3 clowns just exposed the level of their ignorance. No surprise there, after all you don't expect anything more from Winston Churchills ancestors.

Dude, 4th largest. PLAAF is larger.

Nope the largest air force in the world is the US Air Force and the second is the US Navy and third would be Russia you guys are maybe 4th or 5th lol

@@JohnWick-qr4yc US Naval Aviation fleet is already smaller than PLAAF at this point. How many fighters does US Navy have? I remember it was somewhere around 550. Indian Air Force has around 650 (and that is despite years of falling squadron levels). By sanctioned strength, Indian Air Force is supposed to have 850 jet fighters. This won't happen till next decade though, sadly.

@@death_parade india IAF is second 3rd in the world

🤣🤣

Victim

They didn't do anything. It was their ancestors.

Lol top at what? Not having toliets and creeping on women😂

USA and it's puppet colonies.

Not sure the UK deserves its current status as a military power. On their own they are quite unimpressive. It depends heavily on its alliances with the US and NATO. The British still bask in the glory of their former empire. They tremble at the thought of fighting anyone on it own. India would bash them in a head to head conflict.

​@a00141799 No. In a war between India and uk nothing would really happen India is unable to land in Britain and the Britain being unable to land in India. The war would just be fought on tiny islands in the water and air.

You have 1.4 billion people this isn't the flex you think it is per capita it's not even close most of you live like pigs with no toliets

Still a 3rd World country though😂

​@@aaronking2369lol kid .. First learn the meaning of 3rd world country 😂 It is not a negative term Btw india is civilizational state ...unlike uk or USA...who can't survive without each other

The ‘Great’ is just to console themselves 😂

What? You don't know anything. Do you even know why it's called Great Britain?

No not really both have good chances.

I love India. I wish the USA and India were closer than India and russia. I'm glad our armies work together though to halt any potential Chinese aggression

Not now bro USA resently declared india as a global partners not ally but Pakistan as a important ally of USA . india can not trust usa they are just playing their games .

@СМЕРШ предателям и фашистам are u from russia?? Or India???

We don't use ally word for anyone .

​@@Bhavesh2731you do for russia . So shut up

After watching only BBC, I don't blame that they don't realize that.

Bs Nato North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Now india isn't in the North Atlantic right?

No 😂

They are recruited more in the the British army😂

The geography now RU-vid site did a very good video of India. He’s American and his video about America is not good 😂 but the India one really shows how many diverse peoples places are in India.

You are a decent person to explain yourself on here so that they understand why you commented. I respect you and don't even know you. Love from Texas

@@kristisoileau6868 lol You seem pretty decent as well. How the hell am I finding such nice comments on the internet?

Jai jagannath proud to be Hindu

LOL, GHANTA!.

@@marcd5196 Care to elaborate?

@@AT-bo6ww nothing, its just that some people with a colonial mentality forget that we are in 2022 now. They are still on about the 1950s,60s and 70s. People forget that the British airforce pretty much imports everything today while India has developed and is operating their own fighter jets, Attack helicopters and AEWCs systems among other things. ......things Brits cannot develop on their own. India's tactics and procedures are completely different keeping in mind the imminent threat from the north.......while the Brit's are more dependent on their allies and would fall like a straw if left alone. IAF's new tactics/procedures/training were proven first during the Cope India 2004 Exercises with US(a country that shares tactics with Uk)....and USAF was thrashed without any mercy. Even the IAF outdated Mig21s outflew the much vaunted USAF F-16. Something similar happened during the exercises with the Brits during Exercise Indra Dhanush where IAF Su-30MKI thrashed British Eurofighter Typhoons. But well, you do you.. enjoy living in the 1970s.

@@marcd5196 I never said anything about tactics. I said similar uniforms, ranking, training procedures. The SOP of IAF and RAF is similar. Go watch the videos of RAF officers talking about flying alongside India during exercises. Tactics and strategies obviously aren't considering India flies mostly Eastern Block aircraft. IAF clearly is superior to the RAF in many ways. They asked for similarities and I mentioned similarities. They didn't ask who was better. And I think I should know better considering I work for the IAF. I don't need some stranger from RU-vid who's sentiments get hurt by the smallest mention of Britain to tell me I have a colonial mentality. Especially one that needs to have a fake Western name who joined 5 months ago.

@@AT-bo6ww before calling out people by their ID you should first do the same I think. I have just checked your chennal it's just 1 year old and you are not even posted anything regarding your job or anything. With due respect if you are related to IAF then you should prove it first. And one thing I'm just saying it because you shouldn't go personal. If you wanna argue , do it with facts.

That’s just Daz

Kidding, of course

Interesting stuff. Thanks for the comment.

Like you did in Vietnam 😂😂

not what they say when they train with the Indian army they get smashed!!!

​@@chiragpatel8244in your dreams clown your Indian special forces copied everything from the brits clown😂

no they dont tho do they@@chiragpatel8244

I think you are talking too much before going through the whole knowledge about Indian Armed Forces 🇮🇳. I can feel your pain in your comment. Don't worry put some burnol 🔥 on it.

@@happy13singh93 Huh? I was criticizing the video for inaccuracy in their portrayal of both Indian and UK material. I wasn’t criticizing or denigrating the armed forces of either nation. Not sure why you’re coming so hard unless you enjoy inaccuracy in your videos.

Its good to see someone finally notice that while a lot of Indian equipment is not cutting edge, some of it is. And the proportion of that is increasing. Fun part is, much of it is now products of the Indian Military Industrial Complex.

@@death_parade Agreed, the Indian military and arms industry is a very interesting case study.

@@joshuaverkerk4532 Yep. There is a paradigm shift in the Indian MIC that happened recently. It'd be interesting to observe where it goes from here. I expect a snowball forming. Stark results will be visible when we reach 2030 and compare the state of the Indian MIC from 2010 to 2030.

None of those countries are going to war without the USA, don't know why you excluded us

@@aj897 agreed . Ignorant comment. New Zealand barely has a military

@@drinkwater9891 The U.S. military needs to be reduced by about 90%. I say let the world do what it wants and we stay out of things.

@@minuette1752 How I wish what you say could actually happen. But it won't sadly.

first you back off your economy 😂😂

Geography now India is excellent. I recommended it too. I was mad at him because me and him are america and the one he did on America is crap. His India one is great tho!

dude we understand humor, most got offended because they said uk provides aid to india and we use it in defence, humor has nothing do with it

Literally, these ignorant guys flexed in mocking way on that penny size aid of UK that India already denied to accept & requested to stop it decades ago as it was literally too small to benefit anything for india (way smaller than even smallest budget amount india allocates or spend on any sector) but UK have to face save in world & show their supremist white public that how generous enough they r to still provide some aid to nations they colonized & on records if it ain't show for any of those nations then it would be embarrassing, hurting their fake inflated ego and pride, thus even tho India is a net provider of aid not receiver & GOI does not accept or receive any aid from Britain..They still send through different channels like so called NGOs most of which usually goes to UK headquartered charities that works with UK gov. or even to missionary organizations converting indians wiping out the very ancient culture, & These fund GOI trying hard to get rid of..Like India literally gives out/provides way way more higher aid overall to more of countries than the overall aid budget UK gov have lol.

I mean, Germany has a population of 80 million. Good that you're finally catching up on their economy, but the GDP per capita gap is still enormous.

You're a Russian allied, not our friend.

@@Gus-op5ff so what you never act as a friend Russians did and they are our friends, when you will act you can be our friend as well. We don't discriminate for friendship.

@@nanusingh2278 OMG you're one of those naive people. Not our friends.

@@nanusingh2278 both Russia and India can go too hell.

@@Gus-op5ff i am happy and fortunate being not your friend. You can be happy with it instead of regret.

A more practical comparison is comparing the ORBAT of both sides:- Indian Army for example, can field 45 Divisions. British Army can field 2 Divisions. UK does have a slight overall advantage in tech for the time being but it isn't nearly enough to overcompensate for those paltry numbers. And even the slight technological edge of British Army is rapidly evaporating due to Indian military modernization. Indian Artillery is already better than British Artillery, and Indian Army Air Defences have also started fielding more advanced and capable systems than British Army. Edge in infantry forces is also falling due to Indian infantry modernization. Only area where British Army will hold an advantage is armour and mechanized forces. And even there, UK has problems. I am talking about the grand failure of Ajax. Meanwhile, India is struggling a bit there as well with FICV. And then the Indian numbers just blow the UK numbers out of the water. A meagre tech advantage cannot supplant a 20:1 advantage we have in our favour. I can do similar comparisons with Navy and Air Force as well. In short the only two platforms that give UK a major tech advantage over India are the F-35B (which currently lack any anti-ship missile capability) and the Nuclear Attack Submarines. And this advantage won't exist by 2035. India is catching up fast. Just an example, UK plans to have around 150 tanks in service in near future. That is the number of tanks India can manufacture in just one year. Yes India can make T-90S only (at least currently) while the UK fields the more capable Challenger 2 and then 3 is round the corner. But the difference in tech isn't enough to supplant the advantage in numbers.

@@death_parade idk about that, there’s been stories of the most updated tanks taking out tons of inferior ones (for every one tiger tank in ww2 they took out 12 enemy tanks)

@@kevinprzy4539 There have also been stories of most updated tanks in larger quantities getting absolutely plastered by Indian Army with inferior tanks in quality and numbers (Battle of Asal Uttar). But lets go into a more detailed comparison:- Challenger 2 is better, but by how much? What does India field? T-90S, T-72Ajeya, Arjun Mk1 and Mk1A. T-90S can shoot first thanks to its capability to fire ATGM from the main gun. Its armour is inferior but by only 200mm at most and that too only at the front. From the sides, top and rear, pretty comparable. T-90S also has a weaker APFSDS round than can penetrate 530mm RHAe at 2km, compared to 630mm for the Chally2. But are just these disadvantages enough to offset a 20:1 disadvantage in numbers? Its not a large tech gap. Its not T-34 vs Maus. And Indian Army has won the largest tank battle between WW2 and Desert Storm against a technologically superior tank force in Patton Nagar. So a slight tech edge don't mean $hit when we outnumber you 20:1 and your armour and APFSDS is only slightly better while we have a higher range on our main gun.

@@death_parade control of the skies and sea is what matters and you must have superior technology roaming those two areas to win, if the UK got the US involved (due to their old and strong bond) India will be wiped out, the US Airforce is the largest in the world and the US Navy is the second largest Airforce in the world. We don’t even have to discuss the US’s navy size and technological superiority over Indias either. Not to mention the average Iq of an Indian is 82 which is extremely low compared to the US and UK and intelligence matters most when it comes to war, large quantities of forces have been known to be completely wiped out by forces 1/4 their size due to tactics and intelligence.

@@death_parade The Indian military is called a “paper tiger” for a reason.

Still no toliets 😂