Infantry Squad Tactics - Level 3 - Training Video 

one of the best tutorial video for squad tactics i´ve ever seen! Compact and well explained. In our milsim team we re doing the same stuff, so we can recommend it to new members as starter tutorial. Thank you guys, great job!

this looks so fire ! good job this is very pleasing to the eye

Fantastic Squad tutorial. Thank you

You’ve done an amazing job, man. Congratulations.

Just stopping by to say I've used this video to help teach some of the players in my Arma Unit over the last year the importance and basics of squad tactics. Thank you for this great teaching tool and I hope to see more of this style of video soon!

Splendid content, man! My squad will already take these into practice in our next drills

Splendid content.. very informational.. keep it up!

That was a pretty good iverview ans example, good job! Do more!!

Squad needs to hire you to put these on steam and yt!!!!! amazing work

Cannot wait for videos 4, 5 & 6 in this series.

God i wish everyone did this, i feel like im apeaking to myself when im trying to get people to work with that.

Mega content returning squad player would love to play with like minded people like that on the regular!

so good!!!

im here trynna to get my SL to use his mic and u already god-moding dis shit..amazing luv it

Nice video!

If its a limitation or an added point, I think you using both us and uk forces is really intresting and seeing that as a gamemode in squad would be awesome

The formation will not have a disadvantage if you're in line formation. As long as their first guy takes prone position, the second time takes kneeling position in a third guy takes standing position. The fourth guy stands by and or opens up but both those two have to reload at the same time. The other two can open fire so you have machine gun almost firepower out of see my automatic using a formation that's in line using traditional battle tactics😊 Not only that, but your formation is staggered. So if you're taking contact from the front, you have one man on his belly. One man on his knee and the other two are standing up. If there's a jam or a misfire, one of the other men can supplement the man that suffered the misfire and start sports application to the weapons system to bring it back online and re-engage the enemy if he cannot. However, you still have two men firing, but you have close to machine gun firepower at that point But a ambush doesn't necessarily mean killing the enemy because if you kill the enemy, you might subtracting four men that can move forward on your position. Or if you don't kill the enemy, you just put them down. Some countries require that they're evacuated to and a medical zone and that would require that four men carry them out. So sometimes it's actually better if you only wound certain individuals that way you're losing because of attrition the enemy that's advancing on your position 😊 An ambush is a hit and run tactic. Has anybody explained that to the Ukrainian killzone and then expecting them to retreat with the equipment? When you get nothing back, why would you send in more? Just remember if you hear a bee fly over your head somebody has crossed the line😂

I love the video. Do you have footage of you using these tactics in a live game?

Great content. Well done!

The content was high value and very useful. I felt distracted by the soundtrack in the background - it was very repetitive and I felt it didn't add value to your quality of content.

Cant wait for part 4!

Amazing work!

My depression has the greatest infantry tactics. Alwways stealthy, always effective.

Nice video. I like the structure, I like most terminology, except for fire-and-movement vs. fire-and-maneuver. However, one can see a huge impact from coop gaming experience and the misbeliefs it brings into pvp. That is the next level I suppose, you have to start somewhere and relearn it entering pvp once the coop basic is established.. Or learn it the right way from the start? 7:40. Successive bounding = pepper potting, alternate bounding = leap frogging, ... merging bounds are missing (how to bound in three elements). In regards to military simulation having two (combat) medics per squad is not a good choice in my opinion. If only one person survives the encounter he can bring up the medic and therefore revives the whole squad. A second medic will only decrease the time that the whole squad will be back up and tends to "save" the medic from the firefight and not focus on fighting through the enemy and stop the attack to heal or revive each other instead. I would rather have another designated fighting man in the squad. Giving every single person an own call sign for the squad radio net is complicating the radio communication and making it the main communication platform. The advantage of decentralization of communication in a radioless combat environment is left out completely and therefore dependent on it, which creates problems when technology or situational awareness fails. It also creates a problem in understanding and learning communication which is the basis in every army. Learning the things without technology first. While in coop this is fine, In regards to the pvp argument I bring, 2:33 a stack vulnerable to dead space from the overwatch element or someone throwing a grenade out of window/ around the corner, 3:20: the overwatch is not using cover or concealment, the saw is providing flank security and the team leader is kneeling. The minimum thing that should be done better here is an immediate entry, instead of stacking up. 5:01 The single file is not something that should be used, unless you are in a thick forest, elephant grass or the jungle, or in wider terrain during the night. In squad, it has so little application that I would not even teach it due it being used in the wrong context and therefore gets people killed. 5:18 a staggered file can be used all the time, avoiding trails, roads should be the priority, having a formation mainly for a linear danger area is coop style. 8:50 It is even for me hard to imagine an enemy team entering the killzone. If it was done this way to show the structure, it displays a very unreal imagination of an ambush. The assault element is not tasked with initiating the ambush with fire. Instead the assault element is tasked with assaulting through the killbox, but only in a deliberate ambush. Making the distinction between a hasty and a deliberate ambush is vital in understanding this (snap vs. deliberate). The left buddy team and the right buddy team are bunched up and kneeling. The right element would initiate the ambush by fire, therefore no communication is needed whatsoever. This would simplify everything. In a real ambush you don't want to talk neither do you want to even charge a weapon to maintain the element of surprise. Rear security and flank security elements is more of a thing for an area ambush in which you have several point ambushes and hang around in the same area for days. Would love to see more, see you on your server.

Great information here.

good s**it, keep it up guys! :)

Amazing video, cant wait for the next one in 4 months time! i hope the guy who jumped outta the window is ok

Awesome vid! You nailed the tone. It feels immersive if that makes sense?

What rank is usually a squad leader? Do commisioned officers lead in real life?

Oh HELL YA!

what game is the footage from?

Hey dude, So your Video editing and cinematics are really impressive. Looks like you put alot effort learning squad SDK and creating this Video. So the technical aspect is actually great. The actual content tho is sadly not representing good squad gameplay at all. Maybe look into competetive Squad and either watch some good teams like AK, RvN or Old Knights or ask one of those players to help with your guide. Currently there isn't a squad guide even close to your quality level. So keep up the work but get someone with more experience.

Wow an amazing Squad guide and you didn't even steal the script from another youtuber. Gorlami should take notes.

We want Part 4! 😎

Make more foo

Lol, have you tried playing arma. You might find more positive support pertaining to your tactics. You are marketing a Milsim guide to a PvP game. I’m not here to say your tactics are wrong but I am skeptical that these videos would find large success.

Good made MilSim Guide. Video is top but with this you will not win games

shnazy

Good if you want to play MilSim. Not functional in Live Game because Meta dictates play style. Game is to arcady for this type of playstyle. Your Squad is to slow and static. But if you play against an enemy who plays like this to it could be fun. Otherwise you get stomped :/. But nice Editing.

Nice editing but the tactics don’t actually work against players that shoot back and or experienced players

Copy floppy doppy

have u even played squad//////////../?

Moist server, banned for griefing when trying to play tactically. Kept on getting killed by teammates

Hi. When I saw the high ratio of dislikes, and reading through the comments, I nearly didn't bother watching the video, and I expect you lose quite a lot of views due to this - which is a shame. This guide is a good basic introduction to concepts, but can easily be misinterpreted as too rigidly 'by the book' and unfairly criticised for the way you illustrate certain examples (eg running in the middle of a road when there's a route through good cover only a few metres away). It kinda seems like you're just reading from a manual. You also need to slow down the narration - it sounds like you're rushing through as quickly as possible. There are a few inaccuracies if your intention is to simulate a British Army Section - eg Fireteams are named 'Charlie' and 'Delta', Section Commander is 'Alpha', 2ic is 'Bravo'. There are numerous modifications to these 'textbook tactics' which help them become far more effective in games but also especially useful for RL training. Even the proper British Army Infantry training is too inflexible - especially when facing an 'asymmetrical' enemy rather than a rigidly organised 'cohesive' enemy. Current Military tactics are a bit out-of-date, but that's the nature of established traditionalist organisations. It's similar to how the Army early in WW1 still thought the best tactic was just to march forward in formation straight towards the enemy - and they hadn't yet modified their tactics to take into account more modern weaponry like heavy artillery and machine-guns. A good example is how hard it was to convince the Army that they needed to invest in drone technology. Initially this suggestion was ridiculed and they would've rejected ANY investment in drones for several years. The initial allocation of funds for developing drones was dismal, but then we saw their effectiveness in Ukraine by both sides and now the BA has significantly increased their funding in this area. The best advice I can offer is to continue researching and testing new ideas - you need to avoid getting stuck in the 'textbook tactics' phase, and continue developing/modifying/improving your drills/procedures/tactics.

Please stop creating this misleading content. It does not represent how this game works in any way. None of that would work on a public game. There is no use case for formations, callsigns, etc. in the game, except if you try to play as ineffective as possible or troll your team and provoke any player that plays objective-orientated. New players or potential buyers who see this will get a completely wrong impression of the game and damage the community and the experience of others if they buy the game try this, and in the end these new players will quit because you taught them how to play as bad as possible, how to completely ignore the core gameplay mechanics and how to work against your own team.

Good luck organizing this in a public lobby 🫡