Infiray PFN (Rico Micro) Multipurpose Thermal Imager 

The RL is a 2X and the RH is a 1X. That's why it looks different.

The 384 has a 2x zoom built into the lense

yeah any idea why tho

There's definitely more detail and contrast in the image.

We are located at EU. RH25 and PFN640+ are basically the same. RH25 is just name for the US market. Here in EU we only have black housing. About Rico Micro mounting set: It's ITAR so unfortunately no, we haven't been able to try it. With included picatinny mount we can build clip-on set up with unity riser for the LPVO.

@@falconclaw_ geez even that thing is ITAR? Do we have any other option to attach the PFN to a flip to side mount (like Wilcox)?

This. The manufactures blabber of feature-multiverses but crown their queens with crappy viewfinders you have to literally poke into you eye(s) to see 95% of what the screen actually has to offer. Which basically can be considered an insult. But i guess a classy eyepiece like pvs-14 style does cost the equivalent amount of money, ... which scares the customer away and will be the reason no brand wants to take this first step. But anyways, dear falcon crew, could you please answer mhe0815's question? ...

MH25 can't stand rifle recoil so it suits only as handheld or helmet mounted thermal. When running protective goggles etc, MH25 original rear optics will be bit too far and to counter that we have MH25 PVS14 eyepiece upgrade. With PFN such rear eyepiece upgrade is not necessary, even with goggles. If user feels PFN original "circle" view is not perfect, PFN "clip-on (square)" view behaves exactly the same as MH25 after the PVS-14 eyepiece upgrade. PFN downside next to MH25 is size and weight, but pro is reticle option and recoil tolerance.

@@falconclaw_ Thank You for clarifying. Additional questions: 1.) Does the RicoMicro have a 1:1 representation of the area one is looking at (like for example the PVS14 does) in both modi, the rectangular AND the circular view? 2.) Is there a European version of the Micro and an US-version on the market (because i saw pictures with different looking Micros) and if, what are the differences?

@@Vorname_Nachnahme Very good questions, I would like to know that too!

3.) What is the shortest distance the Micro can deliver a sharp image? Hopefully somewhat in the armlength-range so that one is able to actually get some "work" done with thermal eyes.

Honestly it might be just the iRay but PF became a vendor for them.

Same product, different name.

They are in the correct order yes, the 384 might seem better at some distances and heat signatures, it is also not 1x but more like 1.3x zoom baseline. The sensor in them is slightly different, the 384 has 384×288/17um and 640 640×512/12um so they identify some aspects differently.

Now you know how we feel😂 I just bougt a nightforce atacr 1-8 for 4k ""euro's"" and a rmr for 1k ""euros""

There are cheaper but not better ones, if you buy new this will outperform others in this price range, I have yet to see one that does. If you know of one let us know, we will try and make a comparison side-by-side.

384 is not actually 1x baseline, it is more like 1.3x zoom.

Quite similar, but "clip-on square" feel is same, which PVS14 eyepiece upgrade gives to MH25.