Insane Cockpit View of US AH-64 Apache in Scary Gunnery Exercise 

I'll hopefully get to one day. I'm planning on joining the army next year to be a 68w, and eventually I'll submit a packet to try and be a warrant officer so I can fly helicopters for the Army. The AH-64 would definitely be my first pick

@@ChickentNug I wish you the best of luck. You won’t regret becoming an army aviator. Best flying ever. Just remember the studying, and learning never ends in aviation. Wherever you path takes you remember to be an expert in your craft.

@@jamestorres4705 will do. Thank you

@@ChickentNug Good luck!

@@SPCv4 thanks!

All hype by a know-thing Gen-Z wonder... It's all they know.

You can do it too just Play warthunder

@@mrdanger2686 Nah because russian bias exist in warthunder, and that means if its better than russian it's going to be nerfed to the ground or missing key components

@@KenshinExpressshut up

Shut up you don’t know what he went through unless you did what he did keep your mouth shut

@@KenshinExpresscoward

@@youmad8255 Keep crying

@@KenshinExpress lmao not crying just stating the fact that you have a roblox profile picture and just called someone who served in the military a war criminal, you a very much a loser 😂

@@tryingtotryistrying maybe melts was the wrong word, but it only got to that point if you fire to much. The way my friend explained it is that he would only do a certain amount of burst fires from the cannon before not using it for a certain amount of time, preventing any possible malfunction. But if you do fire it for to long, he said the barrel would droop, a round would get stuck, and then the next round fired would explode on impact, basically destroying the helicopter.

Nothing worse than a hot, droopy barrel.

I mean, that's pretty much every fully automatic weapon

@@brock2298 cool comment Brock. Added a lot to the conversation.

All guns are like that, welcome to gunpowder and heat since the 1400s LOL.

Not their fault you read too slow smdh.

Down read like a neanderthal

Tell us you read at a 5th grade level without telling us you read at a 5th grade level

Or promtly get shot down

Or civilians of any country that don’t want to bend over for the USA

Martin pobre ardido migrante tus gringos nunca han podido con rusia 🤣😂

it already did in 2018 against Wagner😂😂

So if you are wall trained you can survive hit by rockets ?

Did you work on engine or electronics? I was a 68j worked on firing systems on Ah1f. Did my training at Ft Eustis Va. I think Apache were X ray I forgot the number and letter

Then manpads are launched and the A-10's are shot down and the women pilots, well you know what happens. The A-10 cannot survive in contested airspace and barely survives against insurgents.

@@warfarenotwarfair5655 When have A-10's operated in contested airspace?

@@BonesTheCat Plenty of times sustaining lots of damage. The USAF doesn't need nor want a one trick pony aircraft when it has a superior platform such as the AC-130U model and the army maintains artillery and attack helicopters. Even the B-52 can loiter for hours dropping JDAMS.

@@warfarenotwarfair5655 Contested airspace means enemy aircraft. You'll always have ground to air fire as long as there's someone left to shoot in the air with a .22 let alone anti-air ordnance. I can't find any reference to an A-10 being shot down by an enemy aircraft. I found 12 by AAA and SAM at a loss rate of fuck all given the missions they've flown over the decades. Less than 0.06%. That 0.06% was gulf war and there were 7 losses, so there's only been 5 after that conflict as far as I can find which would add up to 10's of 1000's of sorties with 5 losses. Happy to be corrected. Is just what I found on a quick search. But, suggesting it's a redundant "one-trick-pony" aircraft is clearly complete bollocks. Boots love air support regardless of the platform. They all have their role. Out to you.

@@BonesTheCat It has taken significant damage enough to send it to the boneyard more than once since 1991. It relies on F-16s, and F-15s to clear the airspace which makes it a redundancy and nothing the USAF wants. The only people who want it are corrupt politicians using the military as a jobs program for their constituents and their allies constituents and ignorant people such as civilians in the media. The USAF has all of the data and shows the A-10 being obsolete for 20 years. This is intelligence/statistics versus corruption and WWE self-educating opinion types. This isn't even a debate, the A-10 is obsolete.

Eustis. Now pretty much all the training is at Rucker.

Lol yeah. It’s the only time R’s get to chill out, and the only time Y’s actually do anything

Best part of being at gunnery as a 15T is actually taking part in the gunnery 😎❤

No it isnt

The A-10 is a political creature and you are too dumb and lazy to even research the stats the USAF presents in it's Budget Overview and Senate Arms Committee hearings. You have allowed corrupt politicians primarily from Arizona to force an aircraft like the A-10 onto the USAF as a jobs program regardless of it's inferior performance to the F-16, F-15E, and B-1 during the War on Terror. Never let Congress create an aircraft! Another abomination is the KC-46, Boeing corruption anyone?!

@@astra6485 The F-16 has superior air support stats than the A-10 as does the F-15E and B-1. A lot of dopes watching media and movies think the A-10 is superior when I have seen the actual statistics in Senate Arms Committees and the USAF's own Budget Overviews. All of this information is available to the public but then again much of the public are complete ignorant dopes!

Well.:. There is a reason they shifted focus real damn quick from the gun to the AGM Hellfire missiles..

@@astra6485. What's better, I'm very curious

If only we had these bad boys protecting our shores from those immigrants.. would make fantastic target practice

Ships? No. The AC-130 cannot survive in contested airspace just like the A-10 cannot. Aircraft like the F-15, F-22, and F-16 must establish air dominance for anything like an AC-130 or A-10 can survive which is why the A-10 is also useless as there are no more Soviet tanks to fight in Germany.

You're pregnant???

I would take an F-22 raptor because its literally invisible and can out fly, out shoot, anything in the next 20 years. The A-10s are vulnerable to pads, sams, anti-air of any sort, F-22 is not vulnerable to anything

And you would be shot down in seconds without air dominance from superior aircraft such as a the F-16 and F-15E. The A-10 is another Congress created aircraft to create jobs on the backs of the USAF and the civilian public is completely ignorant self-medicating watching WWE and Football daily too stupid do anything else.

Donald Trump appears and grabs your private parts

Pilots always better

You get to be both if you become a apache pilot.

Each person in the apache can do both

Wind is the helicopter occuring

I agree. The attack helicopter is not very effective in a conventional war. Expensive, requires lots of maintenance and vulnerable. Only useful against guys in sandals with AKs.

​@@a330flyguy2 Also useful against commi rioters too.

@Duffelbag Drag I'm a retired Captain with 6000 hours fixed wing time but okay, you win.

It's a D, the Es have slightly different fairings

@@brock2298 thanks

Apaches can attack targets out of line of sight and from 40km away using Brimstone missiles. Manpads would have to me as common as RPGs.

That statement should instead say the pilot can see a human at 3,000 meters at night.