That is correct, and also explains why there were no blast craters when they landed on the moon. No atmosphere, no direct plume straight down. Just a wide pattern of blowing dust which is what we see in all the moon landing videos.
Notice how the rocket plume and exhaust fumes continue to expand as the altitude is increased. This is a result of the decrease in pressure as the atmosphere thins out. This is an overexpanded supersonic nozzle.
I'm afraid there is no Earth. Globulists and Flatulists are in league to convince us that there's actually such a place as Earth. THEY WILL FAIL!!!!! :)
Hoping to see the sky, the star and the truth. The world is round like a globe or flat like floor. I just want the truth. But until then one thing is certain. The knowledge of Allah the All mighty god is way so superior than the human kind.
I love how calm that man announces the stages of launch. It shows how well people can really work together if they are patient, respectful and optimistic with each other. It's not like in the sci-fi movies where everyone goes, 'WE'RE LAUNCHING NOWW!!' Or whenever there's a 'launch,' it's always a weapon. I think it'd be great to have more sci-fi movies where there isn't any war and it's all just exploration and fun stuff! Why does it always have to be so serious?
@@PoundBaby6out by the moon there would only be a few atoms in a cubic meter of space, that's hardly inside the atmosphere lol The Karman line is pretty much where 99% of the atmosphere is below you.
Okay, I viewed space launches from several Sci-Fi movies including Armageddon, Intergalactic and even Spacecamp. in each case they actually used real footage from real rocket launches mixed with computer animation. The computer animation is much more polished and and uses quick succession of angle and view changes. If you know what you're looking at it's pretty easy to discern.. so yes this video is 100% real..
Hello Flat-Earth Theorists, I just KNOW you are here. I have a serious question for you: Why WOULD NASA / government / illuminati / saucer-people / whoever actually WANT us to believe the Earth is a spheroid instead of flat? What is the possible reward to them, for maintaining such a complicated scheme over centuries? And why would EVERY nation participate in it?
@HumansRstupid More like you are stupid you brainwashed freak. How about stop living in your mom's basement and go buy yourself a telescope. You can see other planets like saturn and jupiter. Why tf other planets are round but not Earth. People like you seriously need to go back to school because you are a uneducated clown.
To lie about the true nature of creation, our significance in creation, to elevate scientist above the Word of God which tells us a conflicting account and description of the earth and cosmology!
hello people, I have had lots of complaints that I'm putting up a bogus video. This video is for non profit, it's been uploaded for people who are interested in space exploration, rockets ect... There is no CGI in this video I have no reason to pull wool over people's eyes, it is what it is. If you don't like it, don't watch it if you are interested then proceed.
Really cool video, thanks for the upload. I am always struck by how "easy" and almost mundane a space launch seems, but they are anything BUT. The complexity of the equipment, the brilliant men and women who make this stuff happen...amazing.
It is, but it's not noticeable, that's not the reason why you see ice buildup. That's because the rocket uses cryogenic propellant and oxidizer. That's why you see it on the main stage, but not on the boosters or the upper stage. The boosters use solid fuel, and the upper stage uses a hypergolic mixture, so both are stored at room temperature. The main stage though, uses cryogenic RP1 and LOX.
When the ice begins to vanish as the rocket enters space, that is due to the vaporization of the water to steam as the vacuum lowers the boiling point to below the freezing point, and the sun increasing the temperature of the ice enough to sublimate it. Water takes a lot of energy to boil or sublimate, though, which means a lot of the bigger chunks stay.
@algol29 Well, the answer to your question is very simple. The scientific community didn't "eliminate" ether "to make Einstein's theories work", but rather because it was complete nonsense. As to how rockets impulse themselves and turn, the answer is fairly simple: Newton's third law. You talked a bunch of nonsense about friction ... that's not how any of this works. You don't need to impulse yourself off of anything. Any action has an equal and opposite reaction. Rockets shoot gas out very fast, and the equal and opposite reaction to that is the rocket moving in the opposite direction of the gas coming out of it. In order to point where they want to go, some use gimbaling (ie, moving the engine nozzle, so the gas shoots out in a different direction, altering the rocket's direction), or they use RCS thrusters, basically tiny ports that shoot out compressed nitrogen, thereby applying a force on the rocket through the same principle. Simple enough?
@algol29 LAWS of motion are not "bound to Earth". There isn't a caveat that says * oh this only works in an atmosphere. That isn't how LAWs work. Equal and opposite. Fire a gun in a vacuum chamber. Would you feel recoil or not? Of course you would. Friction is counter to motion.
Notice how the rocket exhaust gets wider as the air gets thinner ? The air actually restricts the exhaust gasses but when it gets out of the atmosphere the rocket actually works more efficiently.
@@thetrashtalktvshow You never know if the spaceship will crash, explode, or malfunction in the launch process and just watching from their POV also adds a little more anxiety for me lol
Sugarloaf Mountain Films Some flat earth guy launched himself into a rocket in order to prove that the earth is flat. His rocket blew up and fell right into the ground along with him.
***** You talking to me? If so, Ever heard of the RU-vid App on mobile? If so you should now theres a bug that says the comment hasnt been posted, But in reality, it has, And just like any other FE's, You only came back with insults and no proof whatsoever, And you even upvoted your own comment! You're pathetic, And before you reply to me, If your only thought process is insults dont you even dare reply to me;
I don't think it's bogus. I think it's quite fascinating, especially with the external cameras on the rocket. Awesome video. Thanks for posting this 999metalme.
What is amazing is this is so routine now . I am nearly 80 when I was a child this would have been seen as science fiction ! I remember a conversation with a scientist . When I was a child , who was researching atomic energy. He said we would never get to the moon it was imposable !
same here now spacex are doing dozens of launches and landing boosters routinely its incredible and what's more incredible is people still say its fake,
rstevewarmorycom About 70 years ago scientists didn't know what the hell was possible and not possible But I guess they're smarter than us now since nobody thought the earth was flat back then
thats probably why he was a mathematician and not a scientist. in science you must be able to admit you are wrong otherwise youre holding everyone else back.
@So No are you a real "flat earther"? or just trolling? i cant believe that some people are still believing that earth is flat. Please, are you guys (flat earthers) joking or what? i believe human nowadays are not that dumb. Please stop these jokes, its not funny!
i dont need NASA or anything man.. i just can prove it to myself with my cheap Celestron Powerseeker 60AZ telescope! i can see if our earth is a globe by seeing a lunar eclipse one month ago (mid August). I can see the shadow that earth is round. I can see with my cheap telescope that moon is 1000% globe, because it have curvy shadow (disc will never have curvy shadow), i can see Mars with my telescope, its like a ball not disc. Saturn, it really has a ring that go around it.. if its not a ball or globe, the ring will not be like that. Etc. So, why only earth is flat if other planets are like a ball you dumb dumb? thats more than enough proof! except for an unsound mind people. I climbed many mountain in my country (Mt. Lawu, Mt. Slamet, Mt. Salak, Mt. Rinjani, etc.) if i see the horizon, it really curvy not flat!!! thats a proof. My father have a yacht, so twice a month i ride it and once i see a tanker ship goes by with my binocular, the bottom is gone first, are you telling me that sea is flat? Commercial airplane (the simplest).. you can see it with your fucking own eye that the horizon is not flat. its curvy. Flat earth? wheres the proof? man, i think you are being serious.. not joking. I suggest you to go to a doctor to check your damaged brain.
@So No there are proof, but you do not have that simple.inteligence to understand. Go to school. Never hesrd of time zones, curved rainbows, horizon that disapears, planes, atmosphere abover your head and falling in the horizon, wind, moon that changes position, seizons, sun, days, snow in winter. Etc.
I like these comment sections. I can get the urge to argue out of my system in arguments which have zero actual bearing on real life, and sometimes it even makes me think about my preconceptions and refresh my memory when trying to think of a way to frame my comments. Although I admit that sometimes the very vocal minority of flat earthers makes me a little sad at how far some of us seem to have backslid.
You can literally see the Water Freeze on the outside of the Rocket and then Melt and eventually just break off what didn't melt earlier, ALL in real time And people still call it fake
Are you telling me that it all this time there wasn't one rich flat earther who rented a helicopter and went to the edge of the ice where the world ends supposedly and filmed what was on the other side as space being there?
My best proof of a globe shaped Earth is that if it were flat and the sun and moon hovered above this flat disc, they sun and moon would start off very small in the sky each day and night and as they move through the sky they will get bigger and bigger until they are as directly above you as possible. After that, when they start moving away they would get smaller and smaller until they disappeared. They do not do this. They stay the same size and even look larger as they come up or go down sometimes and this is not possible with the flat Earth theory. Also, a lunar eclipse is impossible. A lunar eclipse happens far more often than a solar eclipse. The Earth's shadow on the moon. If both su nand moon hovered above the disc, how do we have a lunar eclipse? A solar eclipse would still be possible, but not a lunar eclipse because the sun would have to somehow get to the other side of the disc which would make it night time all over the world at the same time, cast the shadow and then hop back over to the proper side. I can't believe this is something that people even think about these days. I almost wonder if the government pays these so called flat Earth people just to start shit so we will never all be able to work together. It was probably the government that started all this flat Earth bullshit lol. People are so fucking dumb. A little bit of logic is all it takes to know the planet isn't flat, but they must not be capable of that. I love how they say we should question everything and not just blindly follow the "globe Earth bullshit" yet they blindly follow something as fucking stupid as the Earth being flat. We are failing as a species lol. Maybe we should've blown up the planet and started over from scratch.
All the governments around the world have control of Antarctica and nobody is just allowed to go there like that. Research Admiral Byrd he went on a expedition there and discovered more than just that the earth is flat,why do you think all of the world leaders meet there? Research it on here
@@erictalkington5674 You shouldn't despair like you do at the end of your comment. All that is happening is that the internet has made us all suddenly aware of how stupid many people actually are, even though it has always been that way. It also shows that new communication methods can spread bad ideas just as much as they can spread good ideas. But just like the printing press, the overall results will be beneficial fairly quickly - and permanently.
Every space video I see so special take it in slow. Even watch it sometimes and enjoy music while I immerse. New band too and legend like the delta parole tool foofighters nirvana and other.
Bro you literally can’t find a video of them just going straight up all the way till u see the entire earth, you can’t find a video like that u can only find videos like this that show a quarter of it, I wanna see the entire thing bro
Technically to reach outer space (or leave earth’s orbit) you need to go up to a certain altitude then the rocket curves to use earths gravity to help the rocket slingshot into space. The real reason for that is because of the expanse (firmament) that the heavenly creator made that cannot be broken by man. That’s probably why nasa is in Florida and they most likely land somewhere in the Bermuda Triangle where no one can see the rocket land.
+Robert Kitchen agreed. Some actual footage of space would do alot to backup the claim nasa can actually go there. . . . The apollo stuff doesn't cut it for me.
+Robert Kitchen Considering that MECO (main engine cut-off) had just happened, my guess is that the stage was spent at that point so it was jettisoned, and the camera was attached to it.
***** Well duh, you _need_ to go sideways to reach orbit. Orbit means moving sideways so fast that as you "fall", the ground curves faster than you fall, so you keep "missing" it.
the rocket stops going up and away from the earth and starts going across before cutting out.probably cuts out right wea you would notice it hit a wall
@@filipeemerick4483 notice earth stays the same size doesnt get smaller rocket just changes angle.thats as far as they can go lol.no one has ever been to the moon.space exploration blows
@Ron McCaffrey desperate in what way.clearly pointing out that theas no full view of earth from any footage of any launch from start to finish.launch to space with full footage earth as a whole..no..point is why not.theyv been into deep space havnt they?...the moon...do you know of any footage?oh just snipits and shortfilms oh what they couldnt afford 24/7 4k camers to film any mission recently.yeh ok.oh and im not a flat earther btw just think nasa is full of shit and ppl are dumb enough to believe thea money is being spent on "real" space exploration.what a joke
@Ron McCaffrey gofast 2014 rocket? so have u seen full footage from launch to deep space unedited no cuts.. no 1 minute launch footage to all of sudden in space landing on the moon lol..when did they last go to the moon? oh the say they dont evn have technology to get the thea rite now 2019....seems your the desperate one..to proud or something? find the rest of this video wea it shows the rest of the mission.wea does the rocket go after this video ends...?
@Ron McCaffrey would of hit a wall.it stops...as in the footage stops ......u follow? weas the rest of the footage.iv been sifting and cant find the full footage of every single nasa rocket launch.have u seen them? no firmament..have u been up thea? have u seen the footage? once again why do all nasa rocket launch to deep space exploration only have cut scenes...yawn no1 wants to answer this they just keep defend all the irrelevant "points"
The first time I ever saw this footage was around 1998 on a channel 4 programme called Mirror Ball. The soundtrack used over this launch was epic! Would love to know what the song was!
Excellent. Shame it ended so soon. Last velocity call was about 9,000 mph, but orbital speed is over 17,000 mph (5 miles per second) - how did it achieve orbital speed after that 2nd-stage engine cut off?
you r right...i balloon a Lot and once i almost died when the balloon was punctured when i got too close to the pointy edge...but i coasted to Australia and made it back home,,it is a cube.
James Djinn how about you google it, the information is out there, no one wants to educate lazy minds like yourself. Get your ass up and do some work lazy bum.
James Djinn if they go straight up its harder to leave earth gravity so they use a slight angled trajectory which is more efficient overall and gets them into the orbit they need to. It's out there in google to learn
James Djinn the horizon was straight right up to the very end. Hold a straight edge to it, and you can see the curve at 4:57. Your fisheye cry is tiresome.
James Djinn they didn't go straight up you dumb fuck because they are entering Earth's orbit. And since the earth is a globe it would allow them to enter into orbit while still gaining momentum and maintaining speed. If they were to go straight up they would just fly away from earth. At some point they would have to make a hard turn to enter orbit. Which would be impossible at that speed. If you fly in a curved trajectory you follow the shape of the planet, therefore entering into a synchronized orbit around the planet at the speed at which you were traveling. You conspiracy theorist ass hats are among the most uneducated people on the planet. Your theories and doubts don't even make sense. If you fucking knew anything at all at least some of this will make sense to you.
Tramseskumbanan it doesn’t take long to reach a low earth orbit for a rocket that travels 7.9 kilometers per second which is several times the speed of sound, and the further up in the atmosphere you rise the lower pressures you have to fight against.
DonkeyFilms It still needs a few more minutes to reach low earth orbit. I think a record holder is the Titan II Gemini that had meco in about 5:34 minutes. The astronauts were then exposed to up to 8G. US shuttle: 8:25 Titan IB: 10 Saturn V Apollo: 12 Soyuz: 9 For launch vehicles that carry (or used to carry) upper stages such as the Titans, Ariane V, Delta IV, AtlasV and Proton M it usually take a few more minutes.
For on the screen now was a strange sight, a great pallid plain of stone… the edge of the plain flashed with the brightness of light on water, light across a distant sea. The stone plain was no longer plain but hollow, like a huge bowl full of sunlight. As he watched it grew shallower, spilling out its light. All at once a line broke across it, abstract, geometric, the perfect section of a circle. Beyond that arc was blackness. This blackness reversed the whole picture, made it negative. The real, the stone part of it was no longer concave and full of light but convex, reflective, rejecting light. It was not a plain or a bowl but a sphere, a ball of white stone falling down in blackness, falling away. It was his world.
This launch is a bittersweet launch. Such a beautiful launch to be ruined by mission failure when the Orbiter plunged into the Martian atmosphere because of a fucking conversion mistake between metric (SI) and imperial units.
+Revanchist8525 It was bothering me that they were calling out the velocity in mph. I was trying to roughly translate to m/s. Science is no place for a clumsy unit system defined by a better one. A mile is exactly 1,609.344 metres since 1959.
+Michael Frederiksen I prefer metric too. But they were probably narrating (and still are) the launch in imperial for the general public's sake. NASA has learned from this stupid mistake! I know that they're now going metric for all mission operations since 2007.
Are you making a joke? Either answer can be as accurate as you'd like. The math for km to m is much more simple. Without a calculator, there are 333 1/3 metres in 1/3 of a kilometre. How many inches are in 1/500th of a mile. Anyone can do the metric equivalent without a calculator. Answer is 126 ft 8 21/32" to the nearest 1/32 of an inch which is not only a pain to calculate, but also difficult to type. The problem with Imperial is which units to use? decimal miles? decimal feet? decimal inches? 1/32 inches? thousandths? a combination of the above? There need be no distinction in metric: To change units you simply move the decimal place.
To close to see the curve the horizon has to come around to meet itself or the horizon would look like the golden arches! Wake up and think outside the box!!!! You have to be a thousand miles or more away to see the curve! They don't go above 275 miles according to them!
Most interesting is the change in exhaust plume when the rocket is in thinner and thinner atmosphere - nearly no flames visible (only hardly at 3:00), and it stretches out more and more to the sides (as it should). Very instructive, thanks!
yes it is and the strongest delusion is that there is a god especially one that knows everything sees everything loves everyone and watches kids being raped and does nothing but still loves everyone now that's a delusion.
was I there and watching it like god claims to be, am I all-powerful, all-knowing and all-seeing? - have I ever claimed to be? your god has Have I claimed to be loving and just? your god has and yet he watches and does nothing day-in day-out - even in churches proclaiming his goodness, your god did nothing whilst kids were raped by the people spreading your god's word. that's some delusion
and yet even as a 14 year old I know that watching kidsgetting raped isn't good and that it should be stopped - apparently your loving god doesn't know this. or doesn't care or doesn't exist and will never do anything. maybe you should find something worth worshipping? or something that is real? either one would be good. the truth - the biggest truth I know is that there is no evidence for the existence of your god. you've not shown me any for example that's a truth even for a 14 year old.
