Inside Russia with Ekaterina Schulmann 

Наконец-то достойная мечта

@@mr.misti.4376 есть, ради чего развиваться!)

😂

гуриев левак марксист. Он от путина ничем не отличается. Ибо путин такой же марксист. Только гуриев - Троцкист, а путин - Сталинист. Толком разницы нет. Такие, как гуриев, у власти в Европе и Америке и они изнутри разрушают эти великие Цивилизации. Потому что несут в себе большевизм. А путин так же большевик, он же КГБшник - НКВДшник. НЕТ МЕЖДУ НИМИ РАЗНИЦЫ.

Это же фрики. От них лучше держаться подальше.

What her speech ?

Андаубтэдли👍🏻🔥

In my world these words are the best compliment:).

Totally! I've been at Ekaterina's lecture live once and even got my book signed, she was absolutely like a rock star🤩

@@Sviorrlucky you!

You will never understand Russia, if you have a zionist neocon propagandist like shulman.

You certainly meant WHAT it SOUNDS like😊

@@user-ym1cq5fe8g of course

Это если давно говоришь на инглише. Мой средненький английский примерно как в Голливуде xd

@@shunseeshay угу. Щас бы на английском произносить букву Р в четыре раза жощще чем на русском =/

@@StanNotSoSaint естественно! и выговаривать чётко каждый слог, ибо язык не родной и бегло мямлить ещё не умеешь :3

До чего техника дошла! ))

😂❤

Истина не тускнеет от повторения? Всë так. Жаль только, что многие либералы предпочитают прятать глаза от еë блеска.

@@drugmaker4316 тоже самое можно сказать о консерваторам и людей без всякой иной, коме конформной, позиции, но не о многих, а обо всех

Ты перепутал смайлики 🤡💩

33 года спустя гуриевских и шульмановских реформ в российском образовании. Welcome to the colonialism..

@@iam8401 33 года назад Гуриеву было 18 лет, Шульман (Заславской) - 11 лет. А Путину было 37. Так что куда там 'велком', это ещё вопрос Методичку поправь, ботяра)

@@alexander_al 33 года назад Гурия учился воровать у команды Ельцина, на этом и спалился несколько лет назад, работая на Ходорковского. А Шульман так вообще из потомственной семьи воров, еще ее родители грабили СССР а тетка Заславская так вообще была главный консультантом Горбачева, Яковлева и Кедми.. Этот табор сионских мудрецов еще не в одно болото ваше стадо заведет. Оппозиционеры ля... квартир насосали подъездами в Москве на оппозиционной деятельности в ГазПремВНатоМедиа...Я надеюсь ты хоть ее понимаешь, or just jerking off on her Runglish?

Мегатоксияная смесь

Вытесана из малахита, каменный цветок)

Как образно, даже поэтично!

Simp detected 😂😂😂 (but she is truly gorgeous, I cannot argue 😊)

Ух ты! Бусики, сережки, платье с вырезом, макияж- браво! ..НО!..эта вечная седая гулька...доколе???

@@user-ev4hr9fv1f у нее прекрасные волосы, и причёска очень к лицу.

It's a pleasure to read your comment :) PS: pig-dog is a modern nickname Ukrainians call Russian soldiers (and sometimes all Russians). Not undeserved I must say being Russian myself.

I appreciate your comment and your genuine interest in understanding Russia. This country is much more complex than "140 mln orcs supporting the war". Big cities, like Moscow, St-Pet, Ekaterinburgh, Novosibirsk are very different from the regions, yet within regions there're national republics which are totally different from the rest of Russia. Also, there're different social groups within each. So, when I hear "the average Russian people", I always want to ask - which Russian people are you talking about.

@@Veronikatino so you agree with thesis that Russian Federation should be divided, I'm happy.

@@freikorpsdamonisch8127 No, I wonder where you read that in my comment, as I mentioned nothing on "country to be divided". Please check and maybe train your reading comprehension.

@@Veronikatino "within regions there're national republics which are totally different from the rest of Russia." "totally different" "there're different social groups within each" So, when I hear "Russian Federation" I always want to ask - why bother with this unnatural artificial monster?:D

Smart and funny + mature = hot AF

Ekaterina is ruzzian propagandist ‘soft’ one, for liberal rushists

Why is she brave?

@Alexander Straltsou +15 рублей

@@dizont Dude you've completely destroyed the titillating conspiracy

YESSS I think I am very lucky to know Russian language because I can enjoy listening to this fascinating woman every Tuesday She tells about sad things but she does it in a great way

Yea, she loves telling those « sad » things. The sadder the better and the more points she gets with her handlers.

@@Catcatcat237 Does your handler approve of this comment?)

@@Poltorashka_ne_podarok I don’t have a handler. But she does. I know it’s hard for a fan girl like you to accept, but that’s how it is.

@@Catcatcat237 Can you give me the proof? And I mean a proof, not "her husband bought an appartment, therefore she is a western agent" stuff that gets thrown around.

Exactly. The nerve.

Agreed !

This is what we usually do. Using VPN these days.

Yeah unfortunately the school is stupidly stubborn with this time limits

Ekaterina Schumann on a time travel 1812 Ukrania /END OF DOLLAR AS GLOBAL RESERVE CURRENCY 💱 is a fact cannot be challenge change neither avoided😉2023*📺 The agenda since more than 7 thousand years ago ⌚🫖😥

She uploads sometimes on her channel english content. Channel - Екатерина Шульман

Believe me, this content is not free😆 He's well paid in dollars Therefore, Shulman is trying so hard. In good faith broadcasts what her dollar employers want to hear from her

@Alexander Straltsou I am open to know that I am wrong and she is Putin's propaganda agent. Explain please, why you think so.

What Igor said. AND she is funny! I am already half in love.❤

​@Alexander Straltsou really?

"Советский человек - прежде всего трус" - Шульман. По вашему это умный человек?

@@aragorn581 "Главная проблема цитат в Интернете в том, что люди сразу верят в их подлинность." - В. И. Ленин.

She spells her last name as Schulmann

@@0xAxXxB Ну она действительно приводила такие слова)

She actually has her own youtube channel. Althought it's mostly in Russian but there's some amount of videos in English. Automated translation is available, of course, but it can't handle her colourful speech properly www.youtube.com/@Ekaterina_Schulmann

Yes, we are lucky in Russia to have such intellectuals as Sergey and Ekaterina - they do a lot to teach people about real things even living outside Russia. With great respect to both speakers from St.Pete❤❤❤

@@moonlight7671 indeed

@@moonlight7671 Russians are not interested in intellectuals. Only in murdering, raping, stealing, lying.

@@moonlight7671 i wouldn't call us lucky (those living in Russia) 😂 It's just good that we have some great individuals. However, as a whole your society is f@cked

Ну и че она делает? Потрясает воздух? Так себе достяжение

Снежная королева, женский образ тоталитаризма.

@@iam8401 почему тоталитаризма?

@@DEMOKPUTA_KOCMOC Охранитель кремлевского тоталитаризма, поинтересуйся кто ее папик и тетка.. Сильно удивишься...

@@iam8401 интересно причем здесь кремль, если персонаж был создан датским(!) писателем

This comment isn't showing except as a notification in my email, but I will reply to it, anyway: "Alex K Both stances can be normal considering circumstances. If you live in free society with lots of issues, your normal would be to have strong opinions. If your society is long since non free or free but with most issues solved, your normal would be to have much less opinions about government's actions " No, it's really not a matter of how many "issues" your society is living with. Weirdly, it's the contrary. For instance, the Netherlands and my country, Canada. The NL is one of very few places that I might choose to live other than Canada. Both our societies have high standards of living, high ratings for happiness, long life expectancies, low rates of crime and addiction, high rates of education, etc. You would think we are all pretty content and have nothing to criticize wrt our politics, but it's just not the case. It's the opposite. When people live in societies where all their basic needs are easily met and most opportunities to fulfill their desires are available to everyone, they feel a sense of agency, of belonging, responsibility, even some degree of personal sovereignty when it comes to their thoughts on public policy. It sounds a bit romantic, but I think we feel our rights and freedoms in a very personal and social way. Maksim Katz talks about how we freak out over a couple of points of inflation, and he's right. We are actually a bit silly about relatively minor problems like that, in my opinion. We also get very concerned about discrimination and infringement of personal or minority rights, even though we don't have very serious or systemic problems with that, anymore. It's hard to imagine myself into such a different perspective and then explain how democracies are different, but I guess I would put it this way: We think we own our political system, and therefore we care about it quite a lot. I think this is the basis of checks and balances within our systems: Mutual self-interest and mutual respect. Mutual concern and some sense of personal-social ownership of our cities, states, country. I hope that makes sense. It's a very different way of thinking. I've visited some less democratic countries, and people regard the government and its forces much like we regard the weather. Namely they might be awful, but it's a waste of time and emotional energy to complain about them very much. People in less democratic systems concern themselves with things that they can control on a day to day basis because it doesn't feel very rewarding or effective to complain about the weather - or about their politics. Our tendency to be highly opinionated and personally engaged is naturally beneficial. The more people complain about their democracy, the healthier it is, as a rule. But there is an important exception, and that is when there is a sense of alienation or when the society is transitioning to a different self-concept. The US struggles with racism because of its history, and most of its current problems with partisanship find their roots there. Canada is more multi-cultural and multi-ethnic than the US, but our burden of history is less heavy than theirs is, so we don't really struggle with it too much, at least so far. The UK went from being an empire and great world power to being kind of troubled and ordinary in the span of one lifetime. It's not coping very well with that, of late. So in times like that our democracies can get a bit troubled. But it's not because of our sense of engagement or our tendency to be opinionated, as such, rather it's about our sense of alienation. I hope that makes sense.

It's better to be apolitical than a nationalist, isn't it? I think no one would be upset if Hitler decided not to participate in the politics of his country.

She is empty-head talking machine.

There is documentary about Navalny

Young people watch TV less than older people, and they use the internet to read news, so they are not brainwashed so severely.

She has translated them. What's problem? And these picture are not their statistics, pictures from sources maybe like russian media or yandex, google photos, and etc.

Actually Ekaterina is always baffled when someone says her words are positive. It's just her manner of speaking is lively and her voice is high. But what she's actually saying is usually quite depressing.

@@nayastill151 exactly, there was nothing positive at all in what she said, nothing which would indicate a change in collective mind about the genocidal war the regime is subjecting to the Ukrainians to.

@user-kq6pz3ku3g in which ways is she spreading imperialism? Thanks for the reply

@user-kq6pz3ku3g in this lecture she laments the support of the war in the elderly population. If she is in favour of Russion expansionism then I would agree that she is supporting Russian empirialism, but from the (2) lectures I have seen she has not said anything to this effect. Do you have any links to sources supporting your accusation? Once again, many thanks.

@@GingerDrumss you could notice, this lecture attracted quite a lot of views. And when that happens with any material that dares to criticize (or even analyze) russia, on ANY social media platform, one thing is certain... The bots are coming. These people are often literally being paid by the russian government to shift and form the public opinion. It's highly likely this is one of them. Regardless, as someone who is somewhat familiar with the context of it all, I can assure you that she never supported any of those things, it's just a lie. As for the "burning house" comment, it is completely taken out of context, like they usually do. It was an answer to some question and the illustration of a point that every country deals with its own set of problems first etc... It's just a caution to you and anyone else reading this comment: be aware of this issue anytime russia is being openly discussed on social media platforms. You can actually scroll through the comments under this video and see for yourself. I'm not saying every critical comment is a troll, but the nature of the majority of the negative comments is... questionable. They don't even criticize the lecture, they attack the character. Calling her "traitor", "working for the west", or even "defending russia" (which is the opposite opinion, yet it still paints her as biased and untrustworthy as a presenter, because that is their goal) and reminding everyone of her Jewish last name as proof of something (??). You wouldn't normally expect this type of people under a university lecture in these amounts. One last thing that can sometimes help to distinguish these types of accounts: just check when it was created. For some reason, they often create a new one for every mission they're given. This one was created **checks notes** 11 hours ago.. Coincidence? It could be, but I have my doubts.

@whodis5503 what a Disaster for heterodox public discussion. I honestly had not considered that I might be engaging a bot. Many thanks, best from Berlin

@@whodis5503 the bot seems to have rethinked and deleted their comments... or they were flagged

"Советский человек - прежде всего трус" - Шульман. По вашему это умный человек?

@@aragorn581 у нее сотни часов выступлений о которых не имеет смысла судить по одной фразе. Да и к фразе этой претензий особых нет.

@@aragorn581 отлично умеешь выдирать слова из контекста. А теперь брысь отсюда

игнорируйте ботов)) это тоже два моих любимых спикера

Желаю вам двух подвыпивших бурятов с месячным воздержанием в качестве собеседников. "Наши мальчики"(с).

Да, тоже удивило сравнение по абсолютным значениям. Если пересчитать в %, то окажется например что Минфин исполняет 73% своих поручений, а Роскосмос - 65%, то есть Минфин на самом деле более исполнительный :) А самым неэффективным с этой точки зрения ведомством окажется Минобрнауки

Тоталиратрные режимы построены на лояльности и подчинении интересам правящего класса. Как в армии. Путина готовили в роли Пиночета еще в 1991м, но сначала надо было сломать социалистические демократические механизмы в стране, поэтому проводили колонизацию с помощью советников Горбачева, в числе которых и были эти двое... Поэтому поручения на публику никогда не выполняются, ибо в мире воров власть работает против народа... а не на него. Поэтому в утюгах сионские мудрецы аля Шульман и Гуриев, фарисеи..

@@linnet911 что-то мне подсказывает, что по влиянию на жизнь одно поручение минфину сильно перевешивает примерно все поручения рогозмосу, так что дело тут не в процентах, а именно в штуках.

Такое часто случается, когда хочется обосновать свою позицию данными, а данные твою позицию не подтверждают. Если читать научные исследования, такое встречается везде и всюду (потому что publish or perish), поэтому в науке сам факт публикации (включая и peer-reviewed) никак не подтверждает верности выводов, в каждом случае надо оценивать аргументацию самому.

@@elrond12eleven But her point was that the percentages followed a pattern. They don't as Alina pointed out. I suspect her point may still be valid, it's just not supported by that data.

😂😂😂когда то и Ельцин был примером ,но получили совсем другое

Аминь

😃😃😃 Голосую за такое правительство всем, чем можно голосовать!)

@@annkar1917 Я уверен, что ему было также приятно видеть как над Ельциным ржут в американском конгрессе.

How could you😥

@@pavelkravchenko2810 I’ll be back 😀

she's laughing because she can't believe you're buying this

@@zelenicaljubljanica5410 Perhaps your English isn't good, but "funny" doesn't mean things make her laugh but that she says things that make other people laugh, and they are, patently, laughing with not at her. I note that for someone who is bold about holding a negative view of what she's saying, you are cowardly when it comes to actually saying what you think is laughable. A sure sign that you don't like what she's saying but have nothing to counter it with.

@@mikehjt my English is clearly leagues above your own but thank you for the lesson.

@@zelenicaljubljanica5410 Once agan, you have nothing to actually say. I can only take it that you are aware you have nothing.

TBH I hadn't bothered reading beyond your absurd insult of my language skills. Now that I have, I can see that you're just cruising for a bruising. To someone competent with statistical data her charts and such are all laughably inconclusive. The data is misleadingly presented in order to sell a pre-defined narrative. She's a pure propagandist and anyone educated on the subject (there are many books, read one!) would be able to recognize it from afar. Finally, if you believe that this French institution would invite any actual Russians telling people the truth rather than what a very hostile audience wants to hear, you're too naive to opine.

Thank you for sharing such an interesting fact, I didn't know it. Though I noticed that current situation in Russia is similar to US during America's war in Vietnam in a way - people are changing their opinions over time from supporting the war to have an opinion in the middle, and from the middle to peace supporters. I'm sure once soldiers and those who have the physical power will have enough of that it - the government will have no choice but to stop it at once. However we have to rework the whole government either way.

if she were a competent statistician, that would immediately cause her to question the veracity of her data.

для тех, кто верит в Бога - читать после Отче Наш, для тех, кто не верит - читать вместо) хотелось бы видеть ее во главе временного правительства, или президентом, или премьер-министром. между ней и Навальным - я выбираю Шульман.

@@ArseniyKropachev не нужно выбирать, в демократической системе они могут пригодиться оба, на разных местах.

Рамен! 😊

@@effacat4724 ох, как бы вы хотя бы на ваших западных площадках писали все это от своего имени.. це бы вам всем, красавцам, не сложить)

@Developing Media пруфы? ваши оценки не вызывают ни интереса, ни доверия но спасибо за продвижение контента своим высером

She doesnt live in Russia anymore and cannot be objective in any way.

@@littlerussianmax5831 it seems that the ones living in Russia cant be objective either

Вот эта балаболка - great mind?

Excuse my parasocial troglodyte take here, but I would definitely subscribe to an Onlyfans where Ms Schulmann just calmly tells russian jokes and lengthily explains their meaning and nuance.

Знать английский не очень хорошо не грех. Не стремиться к новым знаниям вот это уже гораздо хуже. А у вас с этим все хорошо! P.S. я сам живу заграницей и хорошо говорю, в нем ничего такого нет, нужна только мотивация (и практка) You can do it Ilya

@@darinaknabe3071 🤦‍♂️ людей судят по грамотности речи, а не по акценту. А с этим у Сергея и Екатерины все отлично. P.S. какой же у нас все таки народ. Лишь бы упрекнуть

​@@amanshilanov6237, И хавье ван панкаке, ю хавье фиве панкакес - это грамотно.

Ну "прекрасный" трудно сказать. Форма страдает из-за этих ее речевых особенностей

​@@Sir-Kosichka Youp! Couldn't say better than U

​@@Sir-Kosichka she does have her accent but she speaks eloquently and is perfectly understandable. I wonder what your level of English is to criticise someone giving a lecture in a foreign language at one of the best universities in the world.

@@amanshilanov6237 its not about her russian accent. По моему комментарию это очевидно, но тебе захотелось вы**нуться

@@Sir-Kosichka ну и колхозник

Сама ЕМ говорит, что предпочитает анонсировать в последний момент😣 тч надежда только если на Максима Курникова

Nicely put 😊

на всех это как и где?

А что делать? Слушайте и занимайтесь своими делами

No, western democracies, at least in theory, are based on participation and responsibility. If you voted for a dummy you shouldn't blame others.

The statement is absolutely factually wrong. There could be no social contract in authoritarian regimes. The do meddle in people's affairs, and that is THE reason why authoritarian regimes are bad.

As I have re-intensified my lifelong amateur studies of Russian history during this (phase of the) war in Ukraine, there are two things which continually astonish me. One is how VERY many parallels there are between the conquest of Russia's internal empire and those of the USA, and the other is how VERY determined Americans are not to recognize these. The conquest of lands, the subjugation of peoples, the bureaucratizing of local governance by means of federal financing and programs, the extreme inequalities between urban middle class and rural poor, the conspicuous rule of oligarchies permanently installed in power, and the ongoing claims by an idiotic, corrupt and entirely ignorant central regime that everything is going just fine, or if it isn't somebody else is to blame.... All we have that Russia doesn't is better access to the world oceans. An accident of geography is all that makes the USA an apparent consumers' paradise, where purchasing power equals freedom, or close enough. True liberty according to our own founding documents is something most Americans have only the most primitive conception of, or none at all. Ask an American what the First Amendment says, and they'll usually say 'freedom of speech.' Yes, and a number of other specific things, which include 'the right of the people to petition their government for the redress of grievances', but mention that to your average American and you're likely to get a blank stare followed by a changed subject, like back to college ball or something, that matters more to them....

@@klarachiamarsi5935 Exactly. The US is good and the countries the good US is against are bad. The good countries like the US cannot meddle in people's affairs, because they are good, and the bad countries cannot do without meddling in people's affairs, because they are bad. It's as simple as that.

Ahhh...not to take anything away from the valid points you make about the sorry state of U.S. democracy, but I don't buy the moral equivalency argument when I see Russian tanks rolling across borders in the name of "Denazification" and systematic war crimes in Irpin, Kherson, Bucha, Dnipro shellings. The Russians/россияне have no monopoly on imperialism, but I think I would rather be an Iraqi in US-occupied Baghdad than a Ukrainian in Mariupol or Bucha.

❤️

it's because she knows it's not true

"Objective," you've got to be kidding

@@zelenicaljubljanica5410 It is the core of her personality and reputation. She is quite objective and very knowledgeable.

@@ekaterinasergeyeva453 core of her branding, maybe

good riddance

@@earforenglish5867 Take Guriev for example - he's a pocket expert and pr agent of a notorious criminal Khodorkovsky, a murderer and thief, who stole billions from the Russian state and Russian people. If people who have no moral values, who hate the country and its people, leave - it's only for the benefit of the country.

@@earforenglish5867 he's just envy

Russian-speaking students of SciencePo.

@@Alexandra_Indina yep, I understand that. but I was talking more about the Internet audience. they are still mostly Russian-speaking.