Inspector Gadget: The Movie - Nostalgia Critic 

+Channel Awesome Hey, Doug, what was the copyright claim?

Soo... RU-vid sucks now, you guys wanna bail?

God dam it I have to watch this again haha for the 17th time

Fuck yeah

You aught to do the second movie. Oddly it was Muc h better

i agree but him showing his face IS UNACCEPTABLE!!! hes meant to not be SEEN its his main trait that he is just THE CLAW!!!

Thats not the iron claw from the show

Agreed

Well we needed to know what he looks like. This movie is incredible 🥰😊😍 A masterpiece

​​@@chelsiirvine8970 No we didn't!!! That was the appeal of the character! Now go and enjoy your nostalgia blinding, poorly acted movie because you didn't know anything better than this as a kid.

The sexbots are coming

Anton LeVay was obsessed with the idea of sex androids

He almost did

Probably didn’t think of it…Claw clearly isn’t into women.

@@flyingdutchman2442 it's bizarre how many over the top villains in movies are effectively ace.

True…

And what is everyone’s beef with John Walker?

Me when talking about the entire marvel fandom

I've seen more people actually rooting for him and defending his actions (killing that flagsmasher) as justifiable. Not fit for the cap's title, but tbh neither is Falcon.

Box -71 bro you’re a box how are you commenting on a video

nah this is Deus Ex's prequel,before Human Revolution

*Slams file* 28 STAB WOUNDS!!

@@johnnyzero8853 hi my name im the android sent by cyberlife

“Of course!”

Brenda Forster don’t forget the uncomfortable void of nobody laughing

Ike Moore (Crickets chirping)

Sounds like something Channel Awesome would put on a T-shirt

"Ha-ha!" "A-hee-hee-hee!" "Eeeeexcellent!"

It was also the same exact gag with no change of tone in Critic's voice

They have to be the peak of movie transitions.

I thought more 70s show

Better than the movie

I agree when he said "could be worse, they could have Chris Tucker." That's, in my opinion, the third-most annoying voice in the acting world. With Fran Drescher in second place and Gilbert Gottfried in first.

@@EndlessSummer888 Although I can tolerate Chris Tucker's voice

@@seanreyes6866 I can't. I don't know HOW I managed to get through the Rush Hour movies. It must've been because of Jackie Chan and I wanted to see the whole movie lest I miss any of the kung fu.

@@EndlessSummer888 I love Friday and the Rush Hour films. So he wouldn't really bother me at all

Fun fact: Originally, Chris Tucker WAS going to voice the character.

😂

Nice 😂

haha

I always pictured the copyright bots more like the Squid monsters from the Matrix.....

@@tastyloaf5487 oh really

I could see him helping the car burglars happening in the actual show.

@@LadyOnikara Ditto.

This would actually be way funnier than anything in this movie. And totally in the spirit of the show.

Brain would stay with gadget

Than Gadget gets the wrong idea and chases a red herring while Penny and Brain go off and solve the crime behind his back, helping to make the movie more like the cartoon it's supposed to be based on.

Another point of trivia: Andy Heyward OK'd his casting, because he wanted someone in the Jimmy Stewart mold as Gadget. Never mind that _Danny Kaye_ would be a more appropriate idea....

And played ferris beuller and Leo bloom in the producers broadway musical.

I like him in Ferris Bueller, Project X and Glory

More importantly, he was also Ferris Bueller. How on Earth did Matthew Broderick go from a stone-cold classic like Ferris Bueller to an unending deluge of trash?

@@furioussherman7265 it's Disney. Given his Simba role, they probably had him on speed dial. Or maybe it was because someone fought that the lead voice in arguably one of the most famous animated films of all time would be a good selling point.

"No one else?"

I imagine that he’s played by the same guy who voiced Prince Charming from Shrek 2 & 3.

Maybe that's why Disney keeps buying the rights to so many corporations so they'll be able to use their material without getting a copyright strike.

@@marvinthemaniac7698 Yeah, I think its probably why. I thought about that for a while because since Doug got a copyright strike from Disney, they used this to their advantage to own the Star Wars rights.

@@samkresil6011 Star Wars used to be owned by 20th Century Fox once upon a time.

@@marvinthemaniac7698 Yeah. Then Disney bought Fox, too.

Yeah, Disney keeps buying all these companies and only creating more copyright strikes. For example, I've seen RU-vid uploads for full episodes of The Simpsons and American Dad get taken down for copyright by Disney.

Mightylink Yeah this film came out at Disney’s second dark age that was 1995-2007 due to CEO Michael Eisner was not coming up with good ideas as he did in the late 80’s and the whole failed Disney America thing.

We are in a new Disney dark age with the star wars sequels, all the pointless remakes, and so much focus on representation and diversity instead of focusing on story and character

Trevor Thornley and I'm afraid they won't get out of this one

Mightylink Yeah! This movie was pretty bad, but it was still loads of fun!

@@trevorthornley8835 they don't do diversity. They do tokenism.

If I recall, the sequel did exactly that.

@@DoctorTex I didn't even know there was a sequel. Go figure.

Kinda reminds me of the neighbor guy from Home Improvement

@@curtissiebold4460 He was the best part of that show for me :)

FUCKIN' BUBBLES

I've made sure to regularly mock scream that joke in my day to day life and I'm very pleased I decided to start all those years ago.

Electronic Arts might actually _be_ a division of MAD.

@@nicholastosoni707 M.A.D. actually stands for Merely A Distraction so I think it could be the other way around.

Look OOOUUT!!

RU-vid really has nothing better to do except to give copyright strikes to people that have videos out for years.

@@jetecho2081 it just makes me sad

mcBUFFfluff I agree

Yeah.. RU-vid sucks now you guys wanna bail?

@@waddupjd nope

And your little cat too! AHAHAHAHA!

The whole thing was a joke. The Yahoo billboard was the closest thing to _something funny_ therein. :)

The Yahoo billboard is *so* dated. Only people who saw the Yahoo commercials from 1998 and so will know the reference.

PROOOOP DECOOOR! 😂

@@MatthewTheSkunk I thought he said "Product Whore"...

I was actually getting some good laughs from the end credits, just look at how the minion support group characters are named

Agreed

Same here

I remember i was kinda disappointed with this movie when it was new, i loved the cartoon. Back then i thought the movie was servicable but has aged horribly.

He reviewed it as part of Disneycember.

.........that’s a thing? Has Satan conquered Hollywood and everyone’s just too afraid to admit it?

And somehow the sequel managed to get much worse. I'm also shocked that Doug didn't mention there was a reboot to the 80s cartoon a couple years back.

@@yoda908 The new series is not a reboot, it's a sequel.

@@AndreiPopescu my mistake. Your'e right

I remember watching this film when I was five years old, unaware of the 80's cartoon, and I asked my parents for "Inspector Gadget video" for Christmas. They actually bought me a video of the TV show, and I remember being shocked how different they were.

It is servicable but terrible with how much jokes they left out of the cartoon

I knew it was and I still liked it!

The movie already did that.

The One guy that's always offline getting nostalgic for the nostalgic critic. Nostalception.

The sequel was better

@@waddupjd boi

The first Inspector Gadget movie is way than the sequel by a land slide.. The only credit I give the sequel is that they hide Claws face like in the cartoon show but everything else about Inspector Gadget 2 still sucks

@@waddupjd and by better you mean MORE DESPERATE AS NC Would describe

@@waddupjd no they suck

Make it the dog. It would be hilarious.

And also have Pete Davidson as Inspector Gadget

They write themselves.

Shrek cumfirmed in inspector gadget

And they dont stop comming ,and they dont stop coming (x10)

Disney take a lot of advantage a get Dr. Claw already 😁

Voice actors for DJ Octavio 7:12 Avery Waddell 7:13 Kevin Michael Richardson 7:15 GaoGaiKingTheGreat

*intense cat meow*

That'll give you your money's worth unlike this forgettable piece of Disney schlock!

Who is etika

@@Karmy. not a rapper

Man, I miss Etika...

@@invock but who are they

Brown brick jokes? This is the first time I'm hearing of that.

It’s because DIC was actually a French company back in it’s early days before Andy Heyward owned it.DIC actually did a few French Japanese co productions which were Ulysses 31 and Mysterious Cities of Gold.Some Inspector Gadget character designs has a Franco-Belgian comic style to it.

Same

Hey Paizannos! It’s the Super Mario Super Show! *They developed a Disney movie.*

Copyright can suck balls. "No copyright law in the universe is going to stop me." -Sonic from Sonic Colors.

@@valenzuelasstudios1838 I remember that game. Especially “BaLdY nOsEhAiR?!”

@@jamiefairest9109 who doesn't remember such a cringy English line? -_-

That & merging itself with elements from classic spy shows ("007" James Bond/Secret Agent Man [for example, Dr. Claw being like one of Bond's famous baddies], Mission Impossible [the self-destructive letter gag, although in the former, the mission was always relayed using an audio cassette inside of a tape recorder that would explode], Get Smart [Don Adams as hapless agent Maxwell Smart saddled with ridiculous items as tools of the spy trade whose far more intelligent better half, Agent 9, actually solves all of his cases for him meanwhile he gets all of the accolades despite his obliviousness & clear-cut ineptitude for the position he holds, which is carried over to Inspector Gadget in the form of the cyber lawman's child prodigy niece Penny & their sentient dog Brain, who is capable of running on his hind paws, being able to disguise himself with dunce bucket Gadget often wrongly mistaking him for a M.A.D minion & communicating with Penny via her precursor to the modern smart watch in a manner akin to Mystery Inc. being able to understand their own talking dog Scooby-Doo when a mystery is afoot]), meanwhile Inspector Gadget's original character design was a deliberate ripoff/homage to equally hapless detective Inspector Clouseau from the _Pink Panther_ films [which in themselves don't even actually feature the pink cat with the catchy instrumental theme song that the Inspector is trying to capture in the _Pink Panther_ cartoons despite the shared name], so much so that MGM threatened to sue DiC for character infringement, so to avoid a second lawsuit presenting the differences between the two clueless Inspectors [as the first lawsuit saw _Inspector Gadget_ under scrutiny from the beginning just because it was purposely created to supplant the cancellation of the drastically toned-down _Lupin the 3rd: Lupin the 8th_ anime dub, which provided some of the basis for the foundation of _Inspector Gadget_ in spite of the fact that _Lupid the 3rd_ by itself, despite being animated, is certainly not family-oriented fare on the grounds that the titular gentleman thief turned outer space private investigator is noticeably sexist & rape-y in terms of how he acts around women], all DiC did was replace a much more competent baritone Gary Owens with Don Adams reprising his lovable bungling idiot archetype from _Get Smart_ & getting rid of Inspector Gadget's mustache that he only sported in the pilot episode, which was later edited again for a 3rd time to explain Inspector Gadget sporting facial hair for those who had only watched the 1983 cartoon in reruns but had never seen the _Winterland_ episode in rotation). As for Dr. Claw never revealing his face, that was a Saturday morning holdover, since certain characters were always seen just from the waist down or constantly hidden in the shadows, which Dr. Claw was supposed to represent. The 1999 movie even spoofed this once Sanford "Claw" Scolex had captured the bionic cop & when Inspector Gadget told his nemesis that "Whatever you're doing, you'll never get away with it", Scolex leaned over the cut-open Inspector Gadget sprawled out on a table (so as to create the robotic body double Robo-Gadget so that Metro City's citizens would turn against Inspector Gadget upon seeing his evil twin destroying the town) & snidely commented, "Oh please, Inspector. It seems as though someone's been watching too many Saturday Morning cartoons before Scolex, his hefty minion Sykes, and Inspector Gadget himself looked at the camera to acknowledge the viewing audience, some of whom may have legitimately grown up with the source material & naturally, expected something better than what we got from a live action adaptation of the silly cartoon series.

Well.. it is a Disney movie

Or it could've been universal or Netflix since they made that new show

When his hobby is working in gooey meat then yes

The Segway reminded me of Austin power

@@nathanchavez6171 cause it parodies it

*Y E A H B A B Y, Y E A H !*

It legitimately is the only funny part in the movie

He should never have come back from his day off.

let's not forget lion king. glory was meh

The only role he's good as!

And as Leo Bloom in The Producers

Honestly Matthew boderick is great in a lot of movies. It’s really only Godzilla and IG he was bad in, but that’s expected, every actor is gonna have at least one fuck up in their career.

That would be peak humour today.

You have anime as your profile pick so you don’t have a opinion.

Al’s Toy Barn oh please do

David Belknap that’s cool but I wasn’t directing you...

yessss

I want him to review Doogal

Ha, in the _Pink Panther_ movies, Clouseau's boss turned supervillain just so he could off Clouseau once and for all.

REALLY? Chris Tucker actually WAS considered to be the Gadgetmobile? 🤣🤣 Was Chris Tucker also considered to play Snails from "Dungeons And Dragons?"

That is true.

Omfg 💀💀💀

Me too. I was so stupid.

No

@Sailor_Moon_2020 Same!

honestly I still like it, I mean most of the critics complaints are that it doesn't follow the cartoon (i'm not familiar with it), hating Mathew Broderick before he even does anything (i'm pretty whatever about him), complaining about the transitions (not a problem for me)

@@FalconFlyer75 The segues were a little over-the-top, and a few of the special effects were too cartoony, but other than that, yeah, it was a good movie.

Yeah they edited it out. I found it in a different upload on youtube. It would be right around 16:55 in the video.

@@sk84ever515 That's what I thought :) Thanks a lot for confirming it!

MINECRAP I feel bad for all the people who aren't gonna get this.