Intel is in Trouble! This CPU is just INSANE 

Yup, RU-vid is full of hyperbolic hyperbole.

Cause debauer makes quality content. I feel the same.

Do you believe that after watching?

I had to watch as derbauer called this insane .. and he's right

So, the CPU killed its father, and then walked around the stage, soaked in his blood, singing "Il dolce voce "?

still remembering hitting 3k and being super happy xD.....

He basically made a "frequency optimized" part like the Epyc "F" parts, which run 1 core per CCD but have all the cache still available and run at higher frequencies.

Intel said they don't like HEDT they like Low end desktops.

Dishonestly not very impressed how well it performed as a 8 chip 8 core CPU. Not obvious the communications between cores wont be as good as a single pie but also Im not very amazed at how good they were.

That's the problem with AMD's choice of having few cores per CCX. Now at least they increased them to 8 vs 4 in the past, but you should still see that as 8 machines. The inter-core latency makes it a pain for applications that need to share low-latency data. But it's awesome for clouds and virtualization where its sold as portions of a physical CPU.

@@levieux1137 sure for people that do not understand engineering ...it has nothing to do about a problem....AMD has no problem....that is the wy the design works

yoda.....?

That's TSMC for you, just like nvidia's 4000 series GPUs

​@@keonxd8918yup..if they change to samsung☠️

I was about to tell everyone exactly why, but I don't give ~10x stock tips to furries.

It's not Ryxen. The thread ripper is based off their server Rome architecture.

They have to be so pissed. I don't even understand why, either. They must be getting paid by intel or be intel employees.

@@mrfarts5176 I think this is doubtful unless intel have a masterplan that involves appearing to be unhinged. In fact if it is an AMD false flag operation then that is marketing genius because I always build AMD PCs for people on principle now.

@@reggiedixon2 hehe if amd was behind this it would be incredible.

Adobe is like M$ (Dollar). Up to no good deeds.

Because GPU is optimized for raster performance over more generic cpus

@@altgm11 I meant stupid in a playful way, not a demeaning one ;). Just because gaming, while supported, is so far out of this things intended use case that it isnt even listed or discussed officially

@@altgm11 It is stupid.

@@aidenkhaal3295 any question, born out of curiousity, in my book isnt stupid.. so same here ;)

why? you can do it yourself ....n run the programs....very easy

@@atta1798 yea just spend thousands of dollars to test a stupid idea on this cpu, very easy

well who would have not.

Would yt let him curse in bosch on his english channel 🤔

It doesnt pull 270A at all. 270W.

Keep in mind Power is Volts times Amps. Your welder doesn't run at

Hmm...lets just hope Intel continues to compete, which is the best outcome for all consumers. Intel is still 2 nodes behind Amd and need to stay in business beyond Granite Rapids!!! I was maybe looking to get a xeon w-2595x next year but now definitely looking to get a threadripper 7970x instead.

NDA has fallen, thats the reason

This is in many cases a Windows problem for all the apps that use the default Windows thread scheduler, which still maxes out at just 64x threads per process (why disabling SMT on AMD's >=64-cores often helps in numerous workloads). 🤷 The only way to push past that is to instead write & use your own custom thread scheduler like the one in Blender to actually have a single app process be able to utilize >64x threads, which is a lot of work (and Blender only did this a few years ago, ala when the TR 3990X launched in early 2020 it would only use half the CPU if SMT was on). If you want to use a >≈64-core CPU for SERIOUS work, you should SERIOUSLY consider switching to a Linux based operating system. 🤷 Linux is just simply SOOOOO much better equipped to natively handle super high core/thread count CPU's than Windows! Many workloads are ≈+10-40% faster on Linux vs Windows w/ said 96-core TR 7995WX!

And the CPU only costs 5000 kidneys!!!! Absolute bargain!!!

I thought Intel W790 is a chipset, not a CPU. Which Intel CPU do you think is anywhere close to this AMD monster?

Very much so. This is done by core isolation. So when you have this many cores, if you running windows, you can isolate the ccd through task manager, processes tab. Right click, select set affinity. Turn off cores you want to dedicate to your music production programs on all processes save the music applications. Leaving just those cores on for the music applications. Then turn off automatic windows updates.

It really does. Must be some leds down there that were lighting up the vapor.

it just and LED

@EGK20 How can you write so few words and get only half of them right?

that's basically what some of epyc does. There are even server chips with 1 enabled die per CCD

what protective gear? LN2 is inert, and while cold, the Lidenfrost effect will protect you against it spraying around. Really, handling boiling water is more dangerous.

And use ryzen master to figure out which on is the fastest cores. To get even better.

*Upgrade to Ryzen 9 7950X.* The uplift in IPC performance alone will be a night and day difference. (Ryzen 5000 series pretty much killed first and second gen Threadrippers.) The problem is first gen. TR can’t run all 8 sticks of RAM at 3200 MHz. If you want to O/C RAM you need less sticks which negates the point of using TR with quad channel RAM. Owner of 1920X, 2950X, and 3960X Threadrippers.

e cores are meme cores. marketing wank and utterly useless for a gamer. waste of sand.

@@Six_Gorillion I agree for many applications e cores do nothing but support multi tasking. Some productivity apps, well compiled thread directed apps will utilize e cores as a SIMD single instruction multiple data and or a parallel array. Not all do but those that do like Adobe suite appear to do so but apps must be compiled to take advantage of e cores as a parallel processing array and most do not. mb

@@mikebruzzone9570 most devs have been too lazy and incompetent to program for multiple cores for years now. Where do in this landscape intels memecores fit in exactly? How are they benefiting the scene in any way? It's marketing wank, pure and simple.

@@Six_Gorillion Adobe all I am confident have been optimized for e core SIMD and or some form of parallel compute. Not the first time Adobe among the few. Most devs too lazy [?] well what about Ryzen 2P never has been explained and well known Epyc multiples of octa multiprocessing and or partitioning. The issue here is AMD does not want to say it 8x1, x2, x4, x6, x4, x12 etc. Why NOT because the tools exist? Most PhD contract coders and hyperscaler don't want that known on their competitive advantage of they know and no one else does. Albeit this eventually gets out from the CS/DS graduate schools. On Intel side where are the SR development cards for W 34/27xx_ mb

Wild!

The insane part to me is it completed it in like 4 seconds.

He damaged the socket when the cpu fell out of the carrier.

But the performance leap is quite astounding, you have to wait for two more generations to be able to afford this current cpu, that's the tech way.

Then just buy a R9 7950X then. 🤷‍♂ X670E's I/O capabilities are by FAAAAAR the best ever seen on a "mainstream" platform. Do you REALLY need 88x CPU PCIe lanes? O_o

If you're happy with 16 cores (32 threads), why not go with 7950X3D? It has that kind of core count and is faster than Threadripper in single core applications. 14900K is also a good option which has even faster single core performance and very respectable multicore performance.