Interference on the double play attempt or no? 

he grabbed his leg? So there was contact. lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AM-JKLXQU2uOkscyYqFeZCSYLvCWbHSHLcxz_xI8LjUKb1aPyvneRAwN5Y-Ar7XfZguNVmSQN2SFc4gLbfLL87lIMKoYFfeMWu33vmpVo6TE2wvN_sAg-NHVgyJOHsQ_fzLVccMMTDERDR8hRGPdoAxszwlM=w610-h458-no?authuser=2

@@sw48 Oh, good call. Intentional?

No. Just a video I found interesting on what the call is since its after the throw that he grabs the infielders leg.

@@sw48 That's good, I just don't like all this fighting is slo-pitch softball.

@@Melvyn53 we know Melvyn 🤣🤣

He should have dotted him in the forehead!!! He'll learn next time I promise;)

You’re a girl

He grabbed the infielders leg during the slide. lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AM-JKLXQU2uOkscyYqFeZCSYLvCWbHSHLcxz_xI8LjUKb1aPyvneRAwN5Y-Ar7XfZguNVmSQN2SFc4gLbfLL87lIMKoYFfeMWu33vmpVo6TE2wvN_sAg-NHVgyJOHsQ_fzLVccMMTDERDR8hRGPdoAxszwlM=w610-h458-no?authuser=2

Part of me feels the play was not interrupted, no big deal…but then there should be a warning, and if the runner on first was safe…should be an automatic out. I didn’t even see the ankle pick. Thanks for pointing that out.

@@goose502 even if its not interrupted there is still the intention which is slow pitch softball is ridiculous to do that bush league stuff.

No interference yet the runner literally grabbed the fielder's leg on the play. Solid call. What league do you ump again?

@@brohanfromrohan5771 the only umping I ever did was during a few benefit tournaments. I played right much though up to and including with and against the “big boys”. Had the ump called interference on that play I would not have argued but in my opinion the fielder’s throw was not interfered with, he was late on his throw to first, that is unless an elephant was running.