I-87 in NC is a corridor that connects Raleigh to the Norfolk/Chesapeake area made up of US 64 and US 17. And I think they said it wasn’t going to connect with I-87 in NY
I-11 will extend south to parallel US 93 to Phoenix and extend south to the Mexican border to Sonora. This will help drivers navigate crossing Mexican and Canadian borders between Sonora and Alberta while taking I-11 and I-15 instead of keeping in I-5 between Baja California and British Columbia.
I also think interstates like I-285, I-185, and I-275 just to name a few should be included as well considering they are larger than some of the ones that are even on here already but also they are designated as Interstates.
It is that I-7, I-18, and I-53 are still active for the future interstate designations. But it will take many years from now and all of them are not giving up. I-7 could run for 428 miles from I-5 in Wheeler Ridge (about 20 miles south of Bakersfield) to rejoin at I-5 in Red Bluff California, which run concurrently with CA-99, unless CA-7 is decommissioned. I-18 will be connected from I-45 in Dallas Texas to I-10 in Lafayette Louisiana, which is about 250 miles in length, and I-53 will be connected from I-70 in St. Louis Missouri to I-94 in St. Paul Minnesota for 565 miles in length.
Athelstan Ent, I hope that it is not I-11 that is north of Reno Nevada, since the northern terminus of I-11 is at I-80 in Reno Nevada, there are no services for more then 100 miles north of Reno Nevada, whether if it is northeastern corner of California, southeastern Oregon or western Idaho before I-11 will reach to Washington.
I always wanted to go to Interstate 18, I heard it’s a pretty neat freeway. After that I want to drive through Interstate 53. Both are going to be on my bucket lists lol.
There is I-11 between Las Vegas Nevada and Phoenix Arizona. It is currently under construction on the Nevada side in the past few years. Also I-42 has been approved by North Carolina department of transportation in the month of June of 2016.
Leland Alvarez, you are right. I-11 will share with US-93 between Phoenix Arizona to Las Vegas Nevada, and I-11 will share with US-95 between Las Vegas Nevada and Couer d'Alene Idaho.
How about I-60 in Colorado and Kansas? I-60 will connect from Colorado Springs or Pueblo Colorado to Wichita Kansas, since US-60 is not in Colorado and Kansas. Somebody did mentioned I-60 in these two states.
I 69 almost ended at I-94 at Marshall Michigan. There have been numerous attempts at an I-67. One of them was between Battle Creek and Kalamazoo connecting to I-96. Another was from Indiana to Kalamazoo, which became 131.
@@edwardmiessner6502 I think that the building of I-69 ended that. I did read that it was somewhat thought about. I live just a few miles from I-69 so have read a bunch about it, but I don't remember ever hearing about T.C
There might be both I-92 and I-98 as two future interstates in Upstate New York to complete the 90s column. I-92 could connect from I-87 in Glens Falls New York, through Vermont and ends at I-95 in Portsmouth New Hampshire, and I-98 could also connect from I-81 near Watertown New York to Swanton Vermont (30 miles north of Burlington in Vermont).
Yes. This map is wrong. I-7 or I-9 will take over CA-99. It's not going from Calexico through the desert and Joshua Tree. That's totally protected land. There's only one site that mentions this and it's wrong.
Some interstates parallel US routes such as: •I-55 parallels US 51 between Laplace, LA and Memphis, TN; US 61 between Memphis, TN and St. Louis; and Historic US 66 between St. Louis and Chicago. •I-71 parallels US 42 for most of it's entire length but it connects Columbus, OH while US 42 doesn't as both I-71 and US 42 terminate between Louisville, KY and Cleveland. •I-81 parallels US 11 for most of it's entire length, but I-81 reaches the Canadian border to Ontario linking ON 401 via ON 137 while US 11 reaches the Canadian border to Quebec linking QC 223. •I-91 parallels US 5 for it's entire length as they both terminate between New Haven, CT and the Canadian border to Quebec as I-91 links QC A-55 and US 5 links QC 143.
I-87 still has a future design for NC to NY. There is one in NC that ends on I-40. The NY one may take several years to connect to NC. I-87 is still in construction.
Eventually, CA 99 from Wheeler Ridge to Sacramento is going to become I-9, and I-40 is going to be extended west of Barstow, to one of three options, furthest option is US 101 in Paso Robles, middle option is I-5 in Buttonwillow, and cheapest option is CA 99/Future I-9 in Bakersfield
I think Sumter South Carolina do need Interstate 18, since they have 2 Military Facilities and the population is about 40,000 in Sumter. South Carolina is one of the fastest growing southern states, along with North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. Since I-18 is located between I-16 (or future I-14) in Georgia, and I-20 in northern South Carolina. It is a correct grid pattern for I-18.
Regarding I-7, I-18, and I-53, there is a fantasy Interstate web site with made up freeways. It reads as though they really exist. These 3 freeways and their routes are on this site. The creator of this video took them for real.
@@BlandingCassatt - You need a better source. I can confirm, as can a quick gander at Google Maps, that I-53 does not exist. Intertropolis & Routeville says it intersects I-80 at Killington, Iowa... which also doesn't exist, and I-90 at Winona, MN, which DOES exist, but doesn't have any interstates running through it. I-90 sits about five miles to the south, and -- again -- there's nary a sign of the fictitious I-53.
@@SIUMoose I can totally explain this procedure. You see, I was about to create an animated television series about highways and roads with some fictional routes and interstates like I-48 and US 86. I certainly feel bad about tricking roadgeeks into I-7, I-18 and I-53 being real so I'll try to make a video like this and the US Route video only with real routes, and other roadgeeks are asking me about three digit number routes so I'll eventually make those videos too.
Three digit interstates are loops around and can be in multiple cities, for instance I-240 in in Oklahoma City and also in Memphis Tennessee. Three digit interstates that begin with a "1" are normally spurs.
In the future, I-11 will connect from Phoenix Arizona to Las Vegas Nevada, via US-60 and US-93, and I-11 will connect from Las Vegas Nevada to Couer d'Alene Idaho, via US-95 as well as I-80 between Fernley or Fallon and Winnemucca Nevada, since Washington does not interested to have I-11 because of lack of highway funding.
The following future interstates are potential or true. They are: 1). I-7 or I-9 will replace CA-99 for 428 miles from I-5 in Wheeler Ridge (about 26 miles south of Bakersfield) to rejoin I-5 in Red Bluff in California. 2). I-14 will connect from El Paso Texas to Myrtle Beach South Carolina in 6 states (New Mexico is not included for I-14) for 1,500 miles. 3). I-28 in North Carolina, just north of South Carolina border. 4). I-31 could connect from Wichita Kansas to Sioux City Iowa. 5). I-42 will connect from Raleigh North Carolina to Morehead City North Carolina for 142 miles. 6). I-48 could connect from I-35 near Perry Oklahoma to Fayetteville Arkansas for 180 miles. 7). I-54 will be in Kentucky, it could be for Western Kentucky Parkway from the junction of I-69 & I-169 near Nortonville to I-65 in Elizabethtown in Kentucky for 136 miles. 8). I-58 could run connectly with US-60 between Springfield Missouri to the junction of I-55 & future I-57 near Poplar Bluff Missouri. And 9). I-67 might connect from Indianapolis Indiana to Grand Rapids Michigan.
I've read proposals that I-57 may eventually end in Little Rock, AR from its current terminus. If what you said of an I-67, wouldn't that follow US 31 which is mostly at interstate grade in both Indiana and Michigan (until I-94) at least but doesn't connect to I-94 near I-196 because of some butterfly?
How about I-570 in Missouri, including the loop to and from Jefferson City, Missouri's State Capitol? Even they delayed it several times, but they will not giving it up. It is about 66 miles of future I-570 which begins at I-70 in Columbia at milepost 128 and ends and rejoins at I-70 at Kingdom City (north of Fulton) at milepost 148. Also I-570 does share with US-63 between Columbia to Jefferson City, and I-570 will share with US-54 between Jefferson City and Kingdom City. Jefferson City is one of 4 Capitol cities that not have an interstate highway and they are: Annapolis Maryland, Dover Delaware, and Pierre South Dakota. Missouri does have the auxiliary routes of I-170, I-270, I-370, I-470, and I-670, but not I-570, I-770, I-870, and I-970, off I-70 the major artery or route in Missouri.
If they going to have I-31 which connect from Topeka Kansas to Sioux City Iowa, via Lincoln Nebraska, then I-129 will be decommission and replace it with I-31 between Sioux City Iowa and South Sioux City Nebraska. It is about 400 linear miles of Kansas/Nebraska border stretching from Colorado on the west to Missouri on the east and without interstate highway for the longest two state border. Cities in eastern Kansas and eastern Nebraska are fairly growing and they need the interstate highway.
I-73 in Michigan has been cancelled since the turn of the century I-69 still has many places between it's original southern end in Indianapolis and it's 3 pronged end in Texas where it will be awhile before it's built
I'm not sure what purpose it would serve but I think Interstates 82 and 27 should be extended to at least Nebraska with 82 paralleling or multiplexed with US 20 in areas, terminating at the intersection of US 6 and I- 680 in Omaha (via US 275) and 27 paralleling either US 385 or 83. Terminating at either North Platte at I80 or at Valentine at US 20 . (If I want to go the extra mile, I'd say I90 at Murdo, SD ) And as of 2021 (this year) I-49 will run from Kansas city to Fort Smith, multiplexed with US 71 in areas
Like to see they add more of 30s and 50s as well as more of 8s as of interstate numbering system. In the 30s column, add I-31 which connect from Topeka Kansas to Lincoln Nebraska, two Capitol Cities is not connected by an interstate highway, I-32 might connect from Texarkana Arkansas to Tuscaloosa Alabama, I-34 might connect from Amarillo Texas to Fort Worth Texas, and I-38 might connect from Memphis Tennessee to Huntsville Alabama. In the 50s column, they should add I-53 which connect from Jackson Mississippi to Little Rock Arkansas, two Capitol Cities are without an interstate highway, and I-58 might connect from I-49 in Joplin Missouri to I-64 in Lexington Kentucky.
This video shows the western terminus of I-64 is at I-270 in St. Louis County, when it really is further west at I-70 at Wentzville in St. Charles County, MO. U.S. 40-U.S 61 was brought up to Interstate standards to MO Hwy 94 by 1993 and west out to I-70 in 2009, with the removal of the last at-grade intersection at Callahan Rd on October 14, 2009.
I-100 could become like a north south highway like beginning in Louisana (Baton Rouge) and ending in Minnesota or Wins consin (Minneapolis) (Minnesota) Winscosin (St Paul)
100 is a even number and even numbers go from east to west. 100 would not be in the middle of the country like you said due to the Highway Numbering System. Interstate 100 would most likely run Adjacient to the Canadian border due to its high numeral, But the traffic in that area is already controlled by I-94 and I-90, and there simply isn't enough traffic or population there to justify a new Interstate Highway.
@@edwardmiessner6502, no. That will not happen. Odd numbers go north-south and even numbers go east-west. Increasing numbers of main Interstate highways go from down to up and left to right.
Besides adding interstate numbers which have a "4s" and "6s" as the last digit of the interstate numbering system, they should add more of "2s", "8s" and a couple of "0s" as the last digit of the interstate numbering system for the even numbers of the future interstate highways. Especially the 8s. We already have I-8 in Arizona and California, I-68 in Maryland and West Virginia, I-78 in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and (2) of I-88, one in Illinois and other one is in New York. I-18 is planning to connect between Dallas Texas and Lafayette Louisiana, I-28 will replace I-74 and Spur I-74 in North Carolina, I-48 might connect from Tulsa Oklahoma to Hayti Missouri, and I-58 might be in Virginia which will run concurrently with US-58, just like I-41 and US-41 on the same highway in Wisconsin. I-98 was supposed to connect from I-81 in Watertown New York to Burlington Vermont, but it was scrapped. I-38 is no word about it, and it is out of the question.
Two subjects here. I-19 will soon be renumbered I-11 as a new southern extension of that interstate highway. North of that I-10 and I-11 will be co-signed for a distance until I-11 will veer off to the northwest somewhere south of I-8 to bypass the metro Phoenix area. Eventually I-11 will take over the U.S. 93 corridor north of Wickenburg, AZ all the way into Las Vegas, NV. North of that I-11 is slated to continue likely to go into and through Reno either following U.S. 395 north or U.S. 95 north to the Canadian border. I have even seen a proposal to route I-11 in a northwesterly direction until it meets U.S. 97 in Washington and then take over that designation to the Canadian border. Right now there is no telling what the final routing of I-11 will be for sure. On another subject, San Jose, CA is not served by a one or two digit interstate, and it is the 10th largest city in the nation. One could argue that the major artery in San Jose is U.S. 101, a route that twice was submitted for interstate approval and denied both times. The other thing about San Jose is that it is connected to I-80 in the north via I-280, I-680 and I-880. Yet maybe 40 miles to the east is I-5 in a very rural area with no direct connection to San Jose. Why has nobody ever proposed building an interstate (even a 3 digit one with an unused number such as I-705) between I-5 and the San Jose metro area? That interstate could easily be extended east of I-5 to CA 99 (former U.S. 99) somewhere between Modesto and Merced.
I think they should re-sign I-97 as I-83, making it concurrent with I-695 on the western half of the Baltimore beltway around Baltimore and the part of I-83 inside the Baltimore beltway should be re-signed as I-583
I-97 is a direct freeway link between Annapolis and Baltimore. What about renumbering I-895A and I-895B into I-97 to make it clearer? Even though I-895A and I-895B are both tolled.
I think they need to look at some of the numbers being duplicated ( i.e. 74, 84, 86, 87, 88) and consider renumbering some of these to avoid confusion.
I don't think that Maine, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Washington (State) will not add any future interstate highways because of budget cuts for the highway funds. New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine originally planned to have I-92, but I-92 will only be in New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire. Missouri will not add I-570, the auxiliary route of I-70 to go to Jefferson City, Missouri's State Capitol, however it will be I-48, I-49, and I-57. I-57 will connect from Sikeston Missouri to Little Rock Arkansas. I-31 supposed to connect from Salina Kansas to Lincoln Nebraska, but it was scrapped out. New Mexico will not connect I-14 between Las Cruces New Mexico and Copperas Cove (Fort Hood Military Facility) in Texas, and Washington will not get I-7 or I-9, nor I-11. NOTE: if CA-99 will get I-7 between I-5 in Wheeler Ridge and Downtown Sacramento, then US-395 in eastern Washington will get I-9 which connect from I-82 in Kennewick to I-90 in Ritzville in Washington. If CA-99 become I-9, then eastern Washington will get I-7, but it will not happen in Washington State, and besides Washington State Route 7 is in Tacoma/Pierce County, plus Washington does lack of budget and highway funding. Neither does future I-11 which suppose to go from Arizona at the Mexican border to north central Washington at the Canadian border.
Interstate 86 doesn't really exist east of Binghampton. It's called NY-17 Not yet to interstate standards and there is an area just east of Binghampton that has traffic lights. They are also looking for a grade waiver for some of the steep sections and the median needs 'Jersey Barriers' instead of the single wire fencing. This is as of May 2019.
@@KoJesko : It's supposed to become an Interstate as part of the Southern tier Interstate project. The section West of Binghampton is complete to Erie Co. NY.
@@gregorywright3012 That's odd because I-86 exists east of the interchange for about 5 miles. I haven't been on the 'Kamikaze' curve since the construction so I don't know if it still exists.
Interstate 24 and the eastern segment of interstate 86 dip into an adjacent state for a couple of miles then go back to the previous state l-24 is in Tennessee then all of the sudden dips into Georgia then goes back to Tennessee and l-86 splits off from l-90 in Pennsylvania then goes to New York then in waverly New York it dips into Pennsylvania then goes back to New York but ends but resumes near Binghamton
I think they Need to Extend I-87 In NY to The I-87 In North Carolina. Then extend that to Rockingham NC At I-74 or I-73.Camden SC At I-20 or North of Columbia, SC At I-77!
They do need to extend interstate 87 from North Carolina all the way to new York it makes sense that way it want throw people off they gonna wander why you have interstate 87 in north Carolina then you have interstate 87 in the new York why they all not connected with the other cities and states traveling up and down the east coast
So now there's an I-7 in California. As if California needed yet another crazy interstate! But I'm pretty sure this one is designed to be an alternative to some of those other highways.
There is no existing I-7, perhaps planned, but it will never get built, not in that location and not in California. They can't even finish I-40 past Barstow.
Future Hawaii Interstate ideas: H4 from Honolulu to Waimanalo H5 from Aiea to Kaaawa H6 from Waianae to Wahiawa H7 from Waialua to Kahuku H8 from Pupukea to Akupu
devilsteak k, I-27 will covers Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota as of US-385, and US-85 from Laredo Texas to Canadian border, north of Minot North Dakota. Actually, I-27 will run concurrently with US-83 between Laredo and San Angelo Texas, then I-27 will run concurrently with US-87 between San Angelo and Lubbock Texas, I-27 has been opened between Lubbock and Amarillo Texas in the 1960s and 1970s in sections, then I-27 will run concurrently with US-287 and US-385 between Amarillo Texas and Lamar Colorado, then I-27 will run concurrently with US-385 between Lamar Colorado and Spearfish South Dakota (between Rapid City South Dakota and Wyoming state line), and then I-27 will run concurrently with US-85 between Spearfish South Dakota and Williston North Dakota near the Canadian border. Now it is make sense with better detail. Sorry for the inconveniences.
My coustom interstate highways I-50 running from Baltimore Maryland to Seattle Washington I-60 running from cairabou Maine to Portland Oregon I-67 running from maiami Florida to Greenville South Carolina
One problem, those interstate numbers don't line up with the current numbering system. 50 would be in the middle of the US, 60 just north of it, and 67 running just east from I-65.
Ice and lightning, I think that I-50 might be running with US-58 in Southern Virginia, just north of North Carolina state line from I-77 in Hillsville Virginia to I-64, & I-264 in Portsmouth Virginia. I-60 should be between I-40 (I-44 in Missouri and Oklahoma) and I-64 in eastern Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia, or between I-40 and I-70 in the western states. And I-67 could run from Indianapolis Indiana to Grand Rapids Michigan.
I’ve got a conclusion that is more higher score on its Interstate is more northern (for even), and eastern (for odds). And every fold rate 5 of Interstate (like I-5,10,15,20,25,...,etc.) has longest length then other ones. In a big cities have Interstate in 3 digits (e.g : I-285,...) and typical Interstate like in Alaska (A1-A4), and Hawai’i (H-1,...)
Thinking of having I-48, which replace I-238, near Hayward California, merge with I-580 and I-205 between Hayward and Manteca until it will merge with CA-99 to south of Madera, then I-48 will go east to the southern part of Death Valley in eastern California and into Pahrump Nevada, then it will merge with I-15 from north of Las Vegas to St. George Utah, head east across southern Utah and northeastern Arizona, and I-48 will go through Farmington New Mexico,
In my opinion, I-48 will run parallel to its brother route US 86 starting from CA 1 in a far future city Ooscondio, California, CA 33 near Avenal, California, CA, I-5 near Kettleman City, CA, CA 43 near Corcoran, CA, CA 99 in Tulare, CA, through the southern Sierre Nevada Mountains, through Death Valley, entering into Nevada near Death Valley National Park, through the deserts, through the far future metropolis of Highway City, where it meets I-248, a beltway that surrounds the city, through Intertropolis, city of the Interstates, where it meets I-21, then enters into Utah at the Town Separator, a toll highway that borders Nevada and Utah, where it hits Routeville, city of the U.S. Routes, where it meets I-23, last it meets I-248 again, then leaving Highway City, then it meets I-15 near Cedar City, Utah just near Zion National Park, north of Bryce Canyon NP, then it heads south through the monuments, meets US 89, and it enters into Arizona near Page, meets the famous Route 163, all of northeast Arizona, enters into New Mexico, near Shiprock, Farmington, Bloomfield, through Los Alamos, and like you said, it ends in Santa Fe. I-48 might be a famous scenery and US 86. But US 86 ends in Colorado Springs.
Interstate 18 is not giving up. So I-18 will begin at I-20 near Downtown Dallas Texas to Lafayette Louisiana for Dallas-New Orleans Route. The distance from Dallas Texas to New Orleans Louisiana is 520 miles. Currently there is no interstate freeway that connect from Dallas to New Orleans and Texas is a fastest growing state between 2010 and 2020. I-18 will be less then 500 miles from Dallas to New Orleans in direct route.
Everyone is arguing and wondering why some interstates have yet to be added to the map and I'm just here wondering why's theres no Interstate 1, 3, 6 and so on.
Project_Calais, I think they add more of 8's as the last digit of the interstate numbering system. I-98 was supposed to connect from I-81 in Watertown New York to I-89 in Swanson Vermont, which is north of Burlington Vermont. However they are working to add I-18 to connect from Dallas Texas to Lafayette Louisiana, since they are adding car pool lanes along US-175 in Dallas Texas, I-28 should replace I-74 which connect I-26 in Columbus North Carolina to Wilmington North Carolina, and I-48 might connect from I-44 in Tulsa Oklahoma to I-55 in Hayti Missouri.
Intertropolis & Routeville will premiere on Nickelodeon and Blanding Cassatt's Sintopia TV in the 2020s. Intertropolis is the western city of Highway City in Nevada. City of the Interstates.
I think they should have future I-53 which connect between Little Rock Arkansas and Jackson Mississippi, and they are working on it. Both cities does have a population of more then 200,000 people each, and both Metro area are more then 1,000,000 people in population. Mississippi already have US-51 which running across the center of Mississippi, so they can't use I-51 because of illegal to use the duplicate of the same digits of two different routes within Mississippi. I-53 is between I-55 in Mississippi and I-49 in western Arkansas in the grid pattern. I-53 is currently under construction between Little Rock and future I-69 in Monticello in Arkansas going southeast direction. The distant between Little Rock Arkansas and Jackson Mississippi is about 258 miles.
Cases where Interstate and U.S. Highways share a number: Interstate 74 and U.S. Route 74 (North Carolina) Interstate 69 and U.S. Route 69 (Texas) Interstate 49 and U.S. Route 49 (Arkansas) Interstate 24 and U.S. Route 24 (Illinois) Interstate 41 and U.S. Route 41 (Illinois/Wisconsin) In ALL but two cases, the routes are in separate regions of the state, and do not intersect, although this is likely to change with I-69 in Texas in the future, as I-69 and US 69 may overlap for 3.7 miles (6.1 km) in the Lufkin area. I-69 in Texas is being built, with construction in the Nacodoches, Diboli, and Corrigan areas, slowly but surely. It means at the end of the decade, Texas will have completed parts of I-69, even if other states take longer to get equipment moving for the highway, and will provide another route for residents of the Texas coast to evacuate in the next hurricane.
They could use more interstates with a 1 as a last digit we already have H1,41,71,81 and 91 there could be I-31 in Midwestern USA and I-61 form Jackson MS to Biloxi MS
Blanding Cassatt, I don't know there are going to have two new interstates in Nevada. I-11 might go from Las Vegas Nevada to Twins Falls Idaho, via US-93, and I-9 might be from Las Vegas to Reno Nevada, via US-95. Sometimes it is subject to change without notice. Since both Idaho and Nevada are two of the fastest growing states in the west. So does Arizona. Nevada, unlike California does not have State Route 9 anywhere in Nevada.
Blanding Cassatt ... Are you from the Jacksonville, FL area? I was stationed there in 1969-70 and Blanding Blvd and Cassatt were major streets located to the west of Jacksonville NAS.
I'm 13 and ready to drive. I have a question? Is every interstate dangeorous? I always have to go on I-70 with my dad around indianapolis. And it is always packed?
Interstate 7 or 9 will replace state route 99 South of Sacramento and interstate 18 will replace California state route 18 East of Victorville and north of san Bernardino
Why not upgrade the flordia turnpike into I-93 even though we already have I-93 in New England but we have two I-74s I-76s I-84s I-86s and I-88s so we can have two I-93s one in New England and the other as the flordia turnpike
Maybe I-6 will be the Florida Turnpike as I-4 is already in Florida from Tampa, in Orlando, to Daytona Beach. I-4 and I-6 will be called the Florida Crossing Highways, Florida Crossways, or Florida X-ways. All good options. Since I-4 is diagonal instead of west-east, I-6 should become, but still be called Florida's Turnpike.
@@jaygee7028 A better location for I-67 would be along the U.S. 31 corridor north of Indianapolis, Indiana perhaps as far north as where U.S. 31 intersects I-75 in Michigan. Much of U.S. 31 is already up to interstate standards, and other parts of U.S. 31 are currently being upgraded to interstate standards.
thejzboy, there could be (2) of I-83 which will connect I-95 in Savannah Georgia and I-40 in Knoxville Tennessee, and (2) of I-87 which will connect from Raleigh North Carolina to Chesapeake Virginia in which already exist.
I never recall i53 existing only main interstates around me are i80 and i74 however would be nice to have an interstate to the town I live in since it’s basically only 2 lane roads to town which is almost 30k people
@@benhuffstetler3282 once you get out of Chicago by Madison and Wisconsin dells its not bad I drove to Wisconsin dells from Ann Arbor Michigan it was bad in Chicago but once I got out of the metro area it started to get better
I know that I-53 does not exist in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, because there are not too many people living up there, and there are no city more than 20,000, except for Marquette, which is the largest city in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. It make more sense to have I-53 from St. Louis Missouri to St. Paul Minnesota, or from St. Louis Missouri to Fond du Lac Wisconsin by following US-61 and US-151, passing through Dubuque Iowa.
UnitedStates FactArchive, you are right. Can't use I-53 Freeway as a future interstate, because of US-53 which begins at Dubuque Iowa at the junction of US-20, US-61, and US-151 as of south terminal. US-53 does go through western Wisconsin and into Minnesota, and US-53 does end at International Falls Minnesota at the north terminal. Most states don't like to use duplicated numbers on two different highway numbers, such as I-41 and US-41 in Wisconsin.
I-75 is supposed to be part of I-73’s northern extension from Grayling. Which means there would be two interstates going to the U.P.: the future I-73/I-75 duplex.
In my opinion they should extend I-81 either option A replace I-59 with I-81 following route 11 or option B instead of having I-98 why not just make it a 81 extension
They already planned I-11 in the states of Arizona, Nevada, California (northeast corner), Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. They might change WA-11 into a different route number to either WA-15, WA-533, WA-541, or WA-547, if I-11 will go through the state of Washington. WA-547 used to be there at the northern tip of Washington, near the Canadian border, and in some maps, it does not show, or it is decommissioned. Future I-7 or I-9 are also been mentioned in eastern Washington years ago, but there is delay problems. About 90 percent of freeway is completed from I-82 in Kennewick to I-90 in Ritzville Washington, which is currently US-395 of that stretch of highway.
Francis Louis, they should extend I-85 from Petersburg Virginia to Harrisburg Pennsylvania. Also, I-85 will replace I-83 between Baltimore Maryland to Harrisburg Pennsylvania. Washington-Baltimore Parkway should be I-95 and currently I-95 should change it to I-85, since it is west of I-95. I-85 and I-95 does merge together for most of Virginia between Petersburg to Washington D.C. Same thing goes to future I-11 which replace I-19 between Tucson Arizona to Nogales Arizona near the Mexican border, since I-11 will go from the Mexican border in Arizona to Canadian border in Idaho.
Why not use more interstates with the last digit 1 we already have H1 41 71 81 and 91 I-11 is being built from Las Vegas to phenoix we could use I-51 running from Baton Rouge Louisiana to Memphis Tennessee running on the western side of Mississippi I-61 from Jackson to bolixi MI and I-101 from Wilmington DE to Charleston SC
I imagine that we could have Interstate 1 from Dana Point, CA to Grant Pass, OR paralleling closely to the Pacific Coast and Interstate 101 from Savannah, GA to Edison, NJ paralleling closely to the Atlantic Coast. So I-1 and I-101 could be considered major Interstate Highways and coastal Interstate Highways. Those are great ideas.
thejzboy, Phoenix Arizona to Albuquerque New Mexico does run more of West to East then South to North. Actually it's going East northeast from Phoenix to Albuquerque, and it should be an even number such as I-28, or I-38, since there is no state highway 38 in Arizona nor in New Mexico. I used to visit Albuquerque New Mexico many years ago as my vacation, and exploring much of New Mexico along US-60 and I-40, and there is no NM-38 anywhere in that state. Hint: it will not be I-14 because it is too far to the north.
LA Lakers est 1948 animation, I agree with you. They should add more of "8s" as the last digit of the interstate numbering system, such as I-18, I-28, I-38, and I-48, but I-98 will never going to be build between I-81 in Watertown New York to I-89 in Swanton Vermont, south of the Canadian border. They also need I-6, I-31, I-32, I-34, I-42 (already progress in North Carolina), I-46, I-50, I-53, I-54, I-60, I-62, and I-67. I-92 might be connected between Sioux City Iowa to Madison Wisconsin, via US-20, and US-151.
Rafael Caceres, I-14 will be only in Texas from either I-10 near Fort Stockton, or I-20 near Midland Texas and it will ends at I-45 in Huntsville Texas. Can't go beyond that point, because of the Sabine River which separate Texas and Louisiana it has a wildlife preserve, and a State Recreation Park in both of these states. Instead of having I-14 from Alexandria Louisiana to Augusta Georgia, it will be I-18 as of future interstate designation, since it will be between I-16 and I-20 in Georgia.
They might change I-14 to I-135 for 25 miles from Fort Hood Military Facility in Copperas Cove to I-35 in Temple in Texas. It is too short to have a two digit interstate numbering system, if they have delay problem and it should a auxiliary route from I-35 in Texas in order to be a short interstate highway.
The following future interstates could be possibility, and they are: I-6 could connect from Laredo Texas to Corpus Christi Texas. I-7 or I-9 could replace CA-99 for 428 miles which connect from I-5 in Wheeler Ridge to rejoin I-5 in Red Bluff in California. I-11 could connect from Nogales Arizona to I-90 in Ritzville Washington. I-14 will serve 6 states from El Paso Texas to Myrtle Beach South Carolina. I-18 will connect from Dallas Texas to Lafayette Louisiana. I-28 might connect from I-26 in Columbus North Carolina to Wilmington North Carolina. I-31 might connect from Topeka Kansas to Sioux City Iowa. I-32 could connect from Texarkana Arkansas to Tuscaloosa Alabama. I-34 could connect from Amarillo Texas to Fort Worth Texas. I-42 already connected from Raleigh North Carolina to Morehead City North Carolina. I-46 or I-48 might connect from I-35 near Enid Oklahoma to I-49 in Fayetteville Arkansas. I-53 could connect from I-20 in Monroe Louisiana to I-30 & I-40 in Little Rock Arkansas. I-58 could connect from Springfield Missouri to Lexington Kentucky. I-67 could connect from Indianapolis Indiana to Grand Rapids Michigan. I-92 is now cancelled which originally planned to connect from Glens Falls New York to Portsmouth New Hampshire. Now is scrapped. I-98 is now cancelled which originally connect from Watertown New York to Swanton Vermont. Now is scrapped.
