Тёмный

Introduction to International Relations: Realism - Theories and Approaches 

Michael Rossi Poli Sci
Подписаться 47 тыс.
Просмотров 65 тыс.
50% 1

Updated cuts of this lecture with better audio/video syncing are available:
Part I: From Thucydides to Hobbes - • Introduction to Intern...
Part II: From Morgenthau to Waltz - • Introduction to Intern...
Introduction to International Relations
Lecture 01: Realism - Theories and Approaches
Dr. Michael Rossi
Department of Political Science
Rutgers University
September 8, 2015
Chapter markers:
1. Introduction to the School of Realism: 0:00
2. Basic Premises: 9:54
3. Unexpected Sound Problem: 15:17 :)
4. Power Politics: 16:55
5. Sub-Categories of Realism: 26:10
6. Classical Realism - Thucydides: 26:40
7. Classical Realism - Machiavelli: 37:03
8. Classical Realism - Hobbes: 43:57
9. NeoClassical Realism: 49:57
10. NeoClassical Realism - Morgenthau: 53:18
11. NeoClassical Realism - Carr: 57:42
12. NeoRealism - Ken Waltz: 01:01:50
*UPDATE September 2018*
The audio/video unfortunately went out of sync due to post-production editing on account of music cues. I've since uploaded new cuts of the lecture that's I've broken into two smaller videos.
Part I: From Thucydides to Hobbes - • Introduction to Intern...
Part II: From Morgenthau to Waltz - • Introduction to Intern...

Опубликовано:

 

19 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 39   
@jeremybumpermanpub7144
@jeremybumpermanpub7144 3 года назад
“Reality is always dictated y the most insane person in the room...” -love it.
@ninazawadi7616
@ninazawadi7616 4 года назад
thank you for this, I understood you better than my actual lecturer.
@roberth9814
@roberth9814 2 года назад
After spending years reading abstract theory that leads to endless contradictions, realism is a glass of sobering but refreshing lemonade
@Princessweaz
@Princessweaz 3 года назад
Thank you ~ Most of the readings I've been given in my class are very heavy and convoluted and this lecture was much easier to understand.
@thekec5230
@thekec5230 3 года назад
thank you for that,I understood better than my IR Theories lecturer, this is a great summary of Realism,I took notes and I'm watching without bored
@paolotrivisonno2421
@paolotrivisonno2421 4 года назад
This video sent me back to 1994, università di Bologna, International Politics, professor Angelo Panebianco. Thanks for posting.
@MrAlf30
@MrAlf30 4 года назад
This video brought back memories of my lectures at the University of Geneva Switzerland, International politics with prof Jean Francçois, it was fun with books. Time flies.
@BharCode09
@BharCode09 5 лет назад
Thanks for a beautifully delivered lecture and the video upload.. Is there a way to get the PPTs of your lectures?
@VemundVR
@VemundVR 5 лет назад
This is very helpful! Thanks
@vanessanthala3176
@vanessanthala3176 3 года назад
Throughly enjoying your class
@mns8732
@mns8732 3 года назад
I'm going to enjoy this. Thanks for posting.
@MichaelRossiPoliSci
@MichaelRossiPoliSci 3 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it
@robingunnarsson7776
@robingunnarsson7776 3 года назад
Great lecturer. Wish I could have live lectures... Being stuck at home with zoom-life sucks.
@WoonieGaming
@WoonieGaming 2 года назад
Writing a report on this, thank you so much
@fredbloggs8369
@fredbloggs8369 6 лет назад
As for "nothing being personal" and it "all being business" as a Neo-classical realist I would argue thus - it is both personal and business. The two do not have to be binary alternatives. Structural factors impose certain perimeters but the leaders of Great Powers and their psyches play a highly influential role. Neo-classical realists are not enamored with instrumental rationality either - leaders do not necessarily act rationally at all. Power corrupts.
@BharCode09
@BharCode09 5 лет назад
Why liberalism fails in IR is bcz, the liberalism is first off based on "social contract" theory, but there is nothing like social contract in international politics, which ensures Nation state's natural rights from being impinged by bigger/dominant states. Except for some moral grounds and some principles there is nothing concrete in International politics. It's almost the "state of nature", individual Nation states are always under constant threat fro each other, some of the Nations really try to encroach into other Nations "natural rights" and the Dominant ones make the rules and it's always biased towards themselves. Very much evident from the current politics, where USA the forerunner of "Globalization" post WWII, when it knew, the most benefits will be reaped by itself is completely against it now, bcz it started seeing the threat growing, challenging it's dominant role. So yeah, "Realism" for IR!
@joudachieck4309
@joudachieck4309 3 года назад
its very helpful lecture thanks a lot dear professor
@khinepwintphyu8733
@khinepwintphyu8733 4 года назад
very helpful.thank u very much and suscribed
@qwerty46.
@qwerty46. 4 года назад
sir, thank you for your endeavours but is it possible to add a subtitle?
@keelanwaldron8941
@keelanwaldron8941 4 года назад
When you said Morgenthau was a "neoclassical realist", do you mean classical realism? Because neoclassical realism originated from Gideon Rose (1998) and it grants primacy to the structure of the international system, but argues that systemic pressures are refracted through intervening domestic variables before becoming state behaviour. Neoclassical realism borrows insights from classical realism and neorealism but it is distinct from both. I'm not sure morgenthau is a neoclassical realist. Great lecture, anyway!
@OmgAuntySuzanne16
@OmgAuntySuzanne16 3 года назад
Nicolo Mach' and Thucydides are classical Realists, Morgenthau and Carr IMPLEMENTED the ideas of Classical Realist to create Realism Theory. Neorealism (structural realism) was a theory invented by Waltz and Mearsheimer. ie Defensive and Offensive.
@bheemraj4726
@bheemraj4726 2 года назад
Nice lecture
@fredbloggs8369
@fredbloggs8369 6 лет назад
Not a bad intro lecture, but I disagree with some of Dr Rossi's typology. Also, I know this is an intro lecture, but do think some of the realist positions Dr Rossi presents as absolute are a little more contentious among realists. On the typology - 1) I've rarely seen Thucydides described as a Classical realist. He is usually depicted as an early forefather of a vague and tentative realism - an "ancient realist", perhaps? (although I've not seen that label applied to him either) 2) Morgenthau, Carr and a few others are most frequently referred to as the Classical realists 3) Waltz - no argument here - definitely the granddaddy of Neorealism. 4) Gideon Rose et al. - Neo-classical Realists, distinguished from other schools by their attempt to reconcile the historicism (and "great man" approach) of Classical realism with the structural insights of Waltzian Neorealism - although Waltz would tell them they are just repeating the errors of the forebears.
@MichaelRossiPoliSci
@MichaelRossiPoliSci 6 лет назад
Thanks for the comment. I certainly can't disagree with your position on Thucydides being more of a "forefather" than a member of Classical Realism. Certainly Classical Realists draw from his writings, but the school of thought existed long after his time, so his position as a Classicist is certainly post hoc. My placing of Morgenthau et al within the group of Neo-Classical Realists has more to do with their writings and thoughts being published after the era of Wilsonian Realism. In this instance, neo-Classical Realism adds a sense of cynical reaction to the "utopian" beliefs of Wilson's visions of the future. I also can't disagree with your identity of Rose within the Neorealist camp as well, but time and the need to be clear to a group of 100-level undergraduates necessitated a more straightforward introduction to the study.
@fredbloggs8369
@fredbloggs8369 3 года назад
@@MichaelRossiPoliSci Hey Dr Rossi - I missed your courteous and considered reply until perusing my old comments feed. Call this a slightly belated response. Lol! I should point out I was in the throes of writing my apologia to neoclassical realism at the time :) aka my Phd thesis. I was refuting the notion realism had been repudiated by liberalism - aka the Global 'rules-based' order of which so many have been enamoured. I was also a little cross at some of the critiques of realism - reducing it all to chauvinistic machtpolitik and all of that. Plus Fukuyama has long seemed delusional to me and the past year has borne out a pet theory of mine - prepare yourselves for the revenge of realism! Indeed, I am now writing a paper with this very heading. Of course I appreciate, an intro undergrad lecture does not have time for arcane arguments over typology, so I sympathise completely with a condensed version. To be fair, I am a little defensive of realism (does that make me a Defensive Realist?) because I think many of the criticisms levelled against it have been straw man depictions. Any rate, on rewatching I found many of your arguments succinct and apropos so please do not imagine me one of those snide detractors of which academia is replete ;) Just defensive of my realism :)
@michaelg7520
@michaelg7520 2 года назад
"war is a continuation of policy by other means."
@kevinstuart1966
@kevinstuart1966 2 года назад
Just a pity it was so hard to hear.
@darryljones8369
@darryljones8369 2 года назад
States are not the most powerful entities, corporations, intelligence contractors, religious enclaves and secret societies typically have more power than national governments. The idea that war is natural is not hard to debate either, war is certainly the least ecological practice there is. The problem with academia is that it is prone to orthodoxy and group think. Some of these assertions are more outdated than wrong. Claiming we don't have, or will never have a world government was pretty bold.
@MichaelRossiPoliSci
@MichaelRossiPoliSci 2 года назад
Which is why I'm pretty comfortable saying it, but more specifically, I qualify that statement with saying it is extremely unlikely there will be a "world government" in our collective lifetime unless there is a some cataclysmic event that brings one to necessity.
@ruxandracucu3000
@ruxandracucu3000 3 года назад
it s funny how those Americans see realism as super feasible and everything else like crap, when in France or Nordway it's totally opposite.
@mvrts
@mvrts 3 года назад
Because America would stomp France and Norway's army, they can't afford to do that
@Oners82
@Oners82 5 лет назад
At 5:00 he is talking nonsense. I'm English and the word, "clever" just means intelligent, or "smart" as Americans might say; there is no implication of slyness whatsoever in the word. If we mean clever in a nefarious sense then we use other words such as "calculating", "manipulative" or "devious". I've no idea where he gets this bizarre idea from, but he's wrong.
@MichaelRossiPoliSci
@MichaelRossiPoliSci 5 лет назад
I actually was told many years ago the British use of the word "clever" meant "smart" but also "calculating" and slightly "ambitious", by someone from UK. So yes, "clever" is rooted in intelligence and being smart,, but carries more varied meaning than the American version.
@Oners82
@Oners82 5 лет назад
Michael Rossi Poli Sci No, it really doesn't. "Clever" in England means intelligent, smart, astute, knowledgeable etc., exactly as it does in America. I actually showed my mate this thread earlier and he was laughing at the strangeness of it, as he (like me) genuinely didn't understand where you got this bizarre idea from! In fact the only use of that word that has any negative connotations in England is when it is used by chavs (whose use of the English language I would not take as authoritative lol!), and they sometimes use phrases like "fuck off, clever cunt", which basically means in street lingo, "fuck off you idiot before I knock you out". But "calculating", "ambitious" etc.? Nope, we just don't use the word that way, but feel free to believe whatever nonsense you want to. P.S. I'm an English guy who has lived all over Britain (and Ireland briefly), and I can categorically tell you that what you are saying isn't true. It may be handy to stick to your area of expertise rather than trying to argue with people about their own dialect when your entire knowledge of it stems from a single anecdote. Very unwise, especially for an academic...
@lucym911
@lucym911 5 лет назад
What?! We definitely use the world "clever" to mean calculating/cunning/crafty! He described it just right
@nailakhan6864
@nailakhan6864 4 года назад
Strange..... if you understood what he wants to say, why would you make a fuss about it? Just to boast that you are more knowledgeable and he is not? Start your own channel then. We shall follow you
@OmgAuntySuzanne16
@OmgAuntySuzanne16 3 года назад
Oi ! you lot are really rude! I get what PROFESSOR has said! Do you think when Putin calls Trump 'clever' do you believe he is complimenting him on his intellect? Or do you think that he has made a backhanded compliment loaded with cynicism? So, therefore when we call an American 'clever' is it an expression of shock and disbelief by Australians.
Далее
Introduction to International Relations: Why Study IR?
59:24
Final muy increíble 😱
00:46
Просмотров 4,7 млн
I Built a SECRET Tree House in My Backyard!
26:09
Просмотров 7 млн
Conversations with History:  Kenneth Waltz
59:07
Просмотров 161 тыс.