I have a new and improved Transformations video here: • Transformations of Fun... Also, please check out my new channel, MathWithMrsGA, here: / @mathwithmrsga I have lots of new and improved videos!
Bless you! Thanks so much! I was in tears yesterday over this topic. Now I understand not just this topic, but my brain is exploding beyond this topic. Today, I again believe that math is beautiful and exciting.
wow!! i didn’t understand this topic at all today in school and i have a test tomorrow but after watching this video and doing a few practice problems i feel completely knowledgeable about the topic! thank you so much!
Thank you so much! I have newer videos on this channel and even newer ones on my new channel here : ru-vid.com/show-UCuQ5RS6WE8xBoRcTAEc9e4A?view_as=subscriber
Math videos on RU-vid are more popular the more useful they are allowing more people to see and understand, this sucks by comparison and I'm surprised you could get much out of it.
@Vipul Konnur i know your intentionally ignoring the "by comparison" part of my sentence but just for arguments sake: it's crappy overall because it's harder to understand which is all that matters in a math video. well that is unless you have some fetish for fancy graphics in math videos or something?
@Vipul Konnur well different people have different understandings of math even if it all ends the same so it might just be easier for you to learn from here while i can't pick up nothin from it. oh well such is life.
Thank you at my school we had a test on this i got an 100 on the test, at first i didn't know anything about this, the next day i watched this video. This video saved me from getting a 0 on the test. Thank you once again
Sorry! I realized I had made a mistake! I have a new and improved Transformations video here! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HEFaRqI8TQw.html
It is confusing because you do not realize what is taking place. It is describing the effect of changes that affect the x and y values. The a(ax-h)^2+k is changed by changing any of the variables in that equation. You must know the role of the variables in the shape of the graph in order to understand the transformations.
Excellent video! Now, I may be off my hinges here, but are you, by chance, the SAME Lisa Ruddy who used to be a prominent cast member on "You Can't Do That on Television"? If so, then I owe you my childhood on top of my academic life, because before watching this video, *I didn't know* a whole lot about these transformations! Thanks for the help!
If you look at 13:15, the phase shift is 1/3 left, not 1 left. The reason for this is because you MUST factor what is in the brackets. So instead of (x) = -(3x+1)^2+5, it will be f(x)-(3(x+1/3))^2+5
Hi, I didn't watch the video all the way through, but for ex 2 (the downward facing quadratic), the horizontal shift is actually to the left by 1/3. You must factor out the 3 from 3x+1 first to become 3(x+1/3) before confirming your horizontal shift :) You can confirm by graphing!
Hey Lisa Ruddy, I'd like to follow this series however you don't have a playlist showing which videos we should follow. Could you please let me know how i can follow this series? Would love to learn from your video step by step. Could you possibly make a playlist with an order of videos to follow? thanks!
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU
Alright so I came here with 12 minutes before I needed to know how to solve this, I waited 8 minutes before she explained and she doesn't seem to care if you know the difference between expanding or shrinking so here I'm left probably flipping the equation instead and having no idea how to do the most basics things when somebody with a brain could've taken 4 seconds to be like "put the there negative and boom." Still have no idea how to "compress horizontally"
@@unknownvariable2456 to apply a vertical stretch u change the a value outside the bracket. if the value of a is > 1, it is a vertical stretch where the y value is multiplied by the factor of a. if the a value is between 0 and 1, it compresses- i think of it as multiplying the y value by the a, which in this case is a fraction, so the whole graph will be flatter (and so: compression). horizontal stretches are related to the a value inside the bracket- it affects the x value. but the horizontal is very counter intuitive. if that a value (again, all inside the bracket) is a fraction, then it actually stretches along the y axis, so you'd have to multiply the x value by the inverse, so 1/a. if the a value in the equation is > 1, it would actually /compress/ the graph horizontally along the y axis, since again you'd multiply the x by the inverse of a, which in this case would be a as a whole number. does that make sense?
edgy t first of all you really on needed to say the value your multiplying it by needs to be less than 1 not ALL THAT, second of all: you're a bit late.
