INVENTOR BUILDS Breakthrough MOTOR - IS it REAL!? 

They won't. It's just snake oil.

The motor itself sure, but as of now the total system efficiency of a Tesla is around 80% and Tesla has the most efficient motor used in a electric vehicle currently. The motor is 97% efficient and the rest is system losses bringing it down to 80%

Any engineer that designs electric motors with just 50% efficiency wouldn't keep his job very long. Electric motors and Electrical transformers are some of the most efficient machines that have ever been produced. Anyone attempting to make them even more efficient are just hitting their heads against a brick wall.

​@@KenFullman motor will burn very quickly

@@KenFullman 30 40 years ago whenever I ordered a “AC” motor the P.F. was very important. The P.F. Now days is much smaller.

Ai clip

I like the background music, but he's right, keep the music for video transitions and self-describing animations

Most people are simpletons. You can't watch any entertainment now without music. Most people don't like to think, so it distracts them. Music keeps them relaxed like rocking a baby and keeps the painfulness of thought away.

There is nothing wrong with the background music

⬆️ this is why there is bg music in all these videos where there shouldn’t be… But it adds high frequency over his low voice with little excitement or emotional ranges aside from squeaking for some reason. This steady speaking with no pauses , breathing or changing… is hypnotic and can put people to sleep too. I find it extremely annoying but this is precisely why it’s there. To keep you engaged. And not clicking away… only certain people find it intolerable. I about clicked away tho. Just because of it. I don’t like anything subliminal or designed for specific things. Lol who would of thought putting elevator music as bg music as a good thing ? Pied piper effect 🤔

​@@letswakeup⁹😊

Thanks for the info!

@@Tech_Planet This is interesting, everyone copies each other waiting for someone to come up with a new idea and steal that new idea and claim it for themselves. This all goes back to a robot from 1980 found and disappeared with advanced capabilities, it was basically walking down the street hidden, observing to humans in their habitat and they managed to obtain data on their anatomy. But this robot magically disappeared. The data collected on its operation was incomplete but sufficient to investigate and spend millions of dollars. Until now, drone technology and artificial muscles were born. air that until now have come to nothing and the motor is brushless, but the human intellect had a limit like that of any animal and they could not understand many things, the motor with a larger perimeter with the same energy was slower and consumed gigantic amounts of electricity, basically you need a tow truck for the batteries or a long plug, this means that this motor that we see from the Chinese, if it were real, is very slow and a power plant would be needed to give it energy, it could also be a copy of an engine that was never real that appeared in a popular mechanic in 1960, analyzing the Chinese engine apart from its slowness, if it were real, it would last running for a few seconds since the plastic structure would melt due to the heat...therefore it is It's a fraud, it's a chimera, it's like the fantastic Chinese plasma engine that everyone talks about and promotes. This supposed plasma engine doesn't push grams, it pushes tons. The problem is that there are no photos, drawings or videos. It's just Chinese propaganda.

@@Tech_Planet The motor is fake, the transparent plastic gives it away, it melts, it is plastic for a 3D printer and those coils will heat up to more than 90 degrees.

@@gatoninja4387 or it can just be a demonstration model in that image rather than actual product

@@fakestory1753 If you analyze with Photoshop you will realize that 1 single coil has more copper than 5 percussion drills, I mean we are talking about a motor with extreme heat and slowness if it were real and to coordinate those coils you would need an ESC the size of a tower PC and To supply that with electricity you would need a mini power plant because the electrical network of a house would not be enough. Most likely, as you say, it is a model taken from the Internet. The Chinese government has infiltrated a team of Western scientists or inventors in each team. spy who copies the invention and sends it to China but they have no idea how they work or the criteria of the inventions, it takes them decades to do reverse engineering and then they are awarded it or they create incredible news about inventions that there are no photos or videos

Wait till you hear about magnetic gears...

@@gringene_bio Right?!

Agreed. That was brilliant. Got me thinking of tweaks and mods that could work and power so many things if they can get it right.

@DITECOProjects - Have you seen the guy in Shetland who uses a small rotary kite to get 450 watts" I am sure that he could easily get 2000 watts if he went for centripital rather than centrifugal flow.

@@christopherd.winnan8701 yeah, ive seen the video. Interesting isnt it. It seems using it to waisted on as torque.

@@DiyEcoProjects Have you had any thoughts on effective ways to funnel such a wind stream? What would be the optimal geometries for the vortex?

@@DiyEcoProjects I assumed by the fact you were replying to RU-vid comments meant that you were quite happy to invest your time in related conversations. That and your moniker. I did not realise that there was going to be a selection process.

@@christopherd.winnan8701 The onus is on you, as you initiated the conversation. From the previous message it appears you are asking me to do the research for you. Is this the case?

Which is already negligible

​@@benoitavril4806it's negligible unless you just so happen to need that extra 18km to reach the next EV charging station

@@benoitavril4806 Depends on whether weight is important (e.g. electric aircraft). Small improvements in efficiency can greatly increase the usable power, or conversely reduce the weight of the motor for the same power.

@@vueport99 or you are taking the sum total of losses from a million cars driving 20,000 km a year.

Just keep politics out of it. Progress will be possible.

Remake it back up your work

your right except it would require rethinking the cheapest ways to mass produce them! That's the key!

No, it wouldn't

How? There is not much percent left to gain.

Isn't the whole point of axial flux that you can have a stator in the middle sandwiched between two rotors, meaning you want the electromagnetic force going out both sides to both rotors? It sound like using a halbach electromagnet would actually perform worse. This would only be good for radial flux it seems.

bros pfp

I believe A RU-vidr made one already. I don't remember his channel currently tho:\

This is called an asynchronous motor commonly used in industrial applications to adjust power factor in generation

Thanks for pointing these things out. I was just going to add how I managed to make a magnet attract itself to a steel shielding plate blocking a magnets field which would have repelled it, then with its momentum it moved past the attracting point to where the repulsive forces on the other side took over, and this magnet did attract then repel ITSELF past the other Magnet, due to focusing the shape of the field to be asymmetrical. Soon I plan to resume working on that, and I like the ideas you pointed out here, I may just combine all of these together, and make my next design(s), thank you! Oh and I should add how you can use Pyrolytic Carbon to always repel a magnetic field, along with Soft Iron/Steel in order to compress and attract the field, combined with Halbach Arrays, to make magnetic motors/generators even more efficient. I am working on mine, and calling it the "Mag-Gen Motor/Generator", for Magnetic-Generator. I also have another design using rotating magnets on gears, with iron plates to block the fields between them for half the rotation on one side and the other half on the other side, so the forces between round magnets will cause the maximum torque thus power output on both sides almost 100% of the time (a small bit less). This I think will gain the most electrical power that is possible from between Permanent Magnets. I think there are better ways to obtain energy from the Fluctuations in Earths Magnetic field and Ionosphere like Nikola Tesla's Wardenclyffe Project was going to do, or from the "quantum foam" like a NASA Eagle Works patent I saw (but is THAT one Real? IT could derive enough energy to vaporize any material I think!).

What is the best kind of motor to generate electricity from Water spinning a shaft?

@@MrEagleeye58 An external excitation synchronous motor/generator is the easiest and most reliable way to go about it in most cases where you need regulated output. Most power on the grid generated by rotating machines is handled this way.

@@teardowndan5364 Ah so most people use a Car Alternator, if you generating power from hydro what would you get that is readily available. Or would you simply use a car alternator and simply put a few of them on the same shaft?

@@MrEagleeye58 If you hack an alternator to substitute your own higher-voltage diodes, you can get 50+V out of them to directly charge a 16S 48V LFP pack and get 3-4X as much power per alternator.

It is just an engineering solution for coil structure. Coils do flex, but as before, an engineering application. All good stuff for people who like to be challenged!

Its going to be a nightmare trying to cool the thing since it won't be running at 100% efficiency and all that loss ends up as heat within the motor...

Source? What should i search for google for the original design? I found a combustion motor patent with the name. Well its not necesarilly bad if it inspired this electric motor design, but yeah dont say its original if its not your idea like for 90%

Still, somebody had to make it electric its a win

Wound so it just works, there is no point in anything else as it always needs to be on together.

@Modelights : The behavior of magnet : like sign (+ & + ... or - & - ) = repulsion/ push effect... Unlike sign = attraction/ pulling effect.. In short, the magnet have "natural pressure" push/ pull effect, with fellow magnet... Inventors, engineers, etc. simply utilized such "magnet behavior" , convert it to mechanical action- the result, the common electric engine, using elec' to produced strong magnetic field... Almost all modern engines/ machines are "pressure" operated- such pressure coming from : magnetic field, fuel detonation, winds, waters, gravity (hydro. electric dam), boiling water, photo. electric, etc..

@@arielhermoso4262 LOL As if I need someone who understands far less than me to 'explain' motors to me. Remove your head from your rear. The video said 'magnet free motors', as if there haven't been motors that operated with stator coils instead of magnets since the early beginnings of motors.

Well, the back EMF is driven by the magnetic fields from the rotor. These magnetic fields aren't aligned with the rotor magnetic fields in the same way, so I would expect the back EMF to be small compared to the axially aligned coils...

Or not!

Great point!

@dekutree64 : So, your idea is to replace the iron core of the elec. motor, with that of nano carbon- just coating the iron core with nano carbon, or 100% replacement of said iron core, by nano carbon materials?... Is the said nano carbon a good magnetic materials- identical to iron when it comes to magnetic field induction?...Is such nano carbon a good conductor of elec'ty , like gold, silver, copper, aluminum, etc...

@@arielhermoso4262 I mean constructing the motor almost entirely out of carbon. Like coreless copper windings, plus using halbach pattern in the rotor and stator to direct the magnetic field where you want it without needing back iron. Carbon nanotubes can theoretically be something like 1000x more conductive than copper, but so far there aren't any techniques to produce long continuous tubes, and yarn made from short tubes has relatively poor conductivity due to the high resistance of jumping from one tube to another.

@mrhassel - I would respectfully have to disagree with you there. How much is the dark matter motor at retail, for example? The guys who are really pushing this tech are the ones using old CDs and speaker magnets. RU-vidrs like Robert Marshall Smith and Carl Brujeja. This is where the next gen of axial flux PCBs will come from

Bro these are more power efficient so will require lesser/smaller batteries and therefore loser cost.

Of course, it would. However, a vehicle using an alternator to charge and power an auxiliary uses a combustion engine to power the vehicle down the road AND turn the alternator. Let's say you put this highly efficient design in place of an alternator.... what would you do with the extra electricity? My point is that it's not needed, which is why they make very durable, less efficient alternators for combustion vehicles. For a hybrid vehicle, it would clearly be amazing.

true