Тёмный

IS-7 vs MAUS | 130mm BR-482B vs The Heaviest Tank Ever Made | Armour Penetration Simulation 

SY Simulations
Подписаться 95 тыс.
Просмотров 276 тыс.
50% 1

The German Maus was the heaviest tank ever made, with prototypes being developed towards the end of WWII. Meanwhile, the Soviet IS-7 had its first prototypes made shortly after the war. The simulation presents the impact of the IS-7's 130mm BR-482B projectile on the lower cheek of the Maus, from close range.
The turret cheek of the Maus has been modelled as 232mm thick, in line with Warthunder. However, the only existing Maus was assessed to have a 220mm thick turret front, but there are various sources out there which state that the planned thickness was supposed to be higher -some even stating 240mm. It has been modelled as 220BHN good quality RHA.
As the hardening profile is not available for BR-482B, the first set of simulations show the result of the projectile having very good quality metallurgy -similar to some post-war Soviet shells (like later versions of 100mm BR-412D) which have a maximum hardness in the nose of ~650BHN. As this may have not been the case for the IS-7 in the late 40's, the last two visualisations show the same scenario with the hardness reduced to ~450BHN maximum, with poorer WWII Soviet metallurgy.
Amazing thumbnail artwork from: JEROLPOA sketchfab.com/3d-models/panze...

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

28 окт 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 321   
@SYsimulations
@SYsimulations 8 месяцев назад
What happens when two rival nations decide bigger is better...
@smsus-fn4ws
@smsus-fn4ws 8 месяцев назад
German tank desing : bigger tank better! Soviet tank desing: bigger gun better!
@Progress_or_Barbarism
@Progress_or_Barbarism 8 месяцев назад
Rival nations?
@exceptionalanimations1508
@exceptionalanimations1508 8 месяцев назад
@@Progress_or_Barbarism Nazi Germany Vs. Soviet Russia? yeah..?
@zarfivas
@zarfivas 8 месяцев назад
Rival? German nazzi tried to kill or slave every Soviet citizen
@cactuslietuva
@cactuslietuva 8 месяцев назад
​@@smsus-fn4wsYeah, but maus was probably the worst design. cause is 7 had better effective armor, gun, speed, RoF. There is really no competition
@o-hogameplay185
@o-hogameplay185 8 месяцев назад
wow, the explosive chamber was still in tact after it penetrated. i guess the turret crew would have had a significant emotional event, to quote the chieftain
@juancortapan7845
@juancortapan7845 8 месяцев назад
a very, VERY significant emotional event. Inside that proyectile there's a surprise of almost 200 grams of TNT
@o-hogameplay185
@o-hogameplay185 8 месяцев назад
@@juancortapan7845 yes
@raketny_hvost
@raketny_hvost 8 месяцев назад
IIIMOOOOTIONAL DEEEEMEEEGE
@Tom_Quixote
@Tom_Quixote 8 месяцев назад
I remember back when that was funny.
@WotansCry
@WotansCry 8 месяцев назад
​@@juancortapan7845only possible because short range scenario. Real combat distance maus would be immune to puny IS-7
@robw3655
@robw3655 8 месяцев назад
That round gave 0 f***s
@WotansCry
@WotansCry 8 месяцев назад
On such a short distance only.... Watch out who you insult
@WotansCry
@WotansCry 8 месяцев назад
@@foxy-48514 what ?! Train ? Vibration? I don't get it..
@germanonion7269
@germanonion7269 8 месяцев назад
Why censor word fuck
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 8 месяцев назад
​@@foxy-48514where you heard this BS? You better provide real reference or GTFO
@Mthammere2010
@Mthammere2010 8 месяцев назад
Zero F's about Hitler's wonder weapons
@llthk138
@llthk138 8 месяцев назад
Skill issue, should have angled the turret
@Ghostmaxi1337
@Ghostmaxi1337 8 месяцев назад
Heh, WT.
@cherno8336
@cherno8336 8 месяцев назад
​@@Ghostmaxi1337no
@Ghostmaxi1337
@Ghostmaxi1337 8 месяцев назад
@@cherno8336 Bro, wdyw?
@seba27113
@seba27113 7 месяцев назад
​@@Ghostmaxi1337WoT
@Ghostmaxi1337
@Ghostmaxi1337 7 месяцев назад
@@seba27113 Angling in WT id far more important, considdering that 1 Pen can end your run.
@pedror598
@pedror598 8 месяцев назад
It would be interesting if you showed this simulation sped up in the end, as if it was the real impact. I don't know if we would see anything since it happens so fast, but it would be cool to have an idea of how powerful these shells are
@somedudewithgrassgrowingou4177
@somedudewithgrassgrowingou4177 8 месяцев назад
There is actually a way for you to see how this would look like. First, take a screenshot before the shot has landed. Then, take another screenshot when it has stopped moving. Switch between these 2 screenshots and you would know how it would look like in real speed.
@jacqirius
@jacqirius 8 месяцев назад
​@@somedudewithgrassgrowingou4177funny but also completely true, nice
@Tom_Quixote
@Tom_Quixote 8 месяцев назад
Nice that you included a version with the actual quality of the Soviet steel at the time. Would be even better if you added a version with a firing distance of around 600 metres, which seems to have been a more typical combat distance.
@Boomchacle
@Boomchacle 8 месяцев назад
Yeah. Looks like a more direct hit would have gone through even with bad quality, but at long ranges I can see it being deflected upwards of it hit higher than dead center.
@nuraly78
@nuraly78 7 месяцев назад
More like 800-1000m for heavy tanks
@cuongle7990
@cuongle7990 6 месяцев назад
There should also be a version with the actual quality of German armor at the time. Since late in the war, German armor had inferior characteristics due to lack of additives, being either too soft or too brittle.
@cameron5802
@cameron5802 8 месяцев назад
SY, you have really gone out of your way to make this channel incredible. I remember watching with only a handful of videos up, hoping more would come out, and you have just relentlessly pumped out content for your audience. It's so entertaining. Especially the research you do to validate some of the observations made in the simulation, with photos of real world evidence and testing backing it up.
@SYsimulations
@SYsimulations 7 месяцев назад
Really appreciate it! Thank you for sticking around for so long!
@ganjalogic
@ganjalogic 8 месяцев назад
0:40 Devoured by an angry armor dragon!
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 8 месяцев назад
A simulation on the effect of armor hardness would be neat. Maybe at different obliquities and projectile types like sharp and blunt AP as well as APCR. Like T-34 and IS-2 high hardness compared to softer armor under different circumstances.
@Einwetok
@Einwetok 8 месяцев назад
Both soviet and late war German tanks had armor deficiencies, so there's no gold standard for comparison.
@chost-059
@chost-059 8 месяцев назад
@@Einwetok dont think ive ever heard anyone say bad things about american armour quality, and soviet armour issues were mostly fixed by the 2nd half of the war
@nuraly78
@nuraly78 8 месяцев назад
@Einwetok late war soviet tanks had quite good armor due to US supplied high quality steel. Especially late war IS-2 had good quality control.
@Einwetok
@Einwetok 8 месяцев назад
@@chost-059 You seem confused, there's been no mention of American armor quality. Both Russia and late war Germany had similar problems. Their industries were disrupted and supply chains were an issue. Read a bit.
@DVXDemetrivs
@DVXDemetrivs 6 месяцев назад
@@nuraly78 The United States did not supply armored steel. The USA supplied rare alloying additives in the USSR.
@undefinedxx55
@undefinedxx55 8 месяцев назад
Thank you for the projectile quality comparison at the end very insightful
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 8 месяцев назад
Armor angles slightly from 0 to 30°: AP shell: I have chosen death >_
@Rider-lo9vt
@Rider-lo9vt 4 месяца назад
Yuck, Wehraboo
@ifarded4986
@ifarded4986 8 месяцев назад
I cant begin to tell you how I cool I think your channel is. You bring to life things that could have happened but probably never will and I think its awesome. PS. The Maus is my favorite tank.
@sim2003
@sim2003 8 месяцев назад
I would love to see test using the 12.8/8.8 cm apbcds experimental shell, or maybe other German ww2 experimental apds shells
@vgames1543
@vgames1543 8 месяцев назад
This is congruent to what I experiencend when meeting a Maus with my IS-7 in War Thunder. Penetrating shot through the Maus turret cheek and then the shell fuzes and performs a major emotional event.
@Lonelymariner99
@Lonelymariner99 4 месяца назад
What a beautiful simulation. Would be great to see more WWII vehicles put to the test like battleship armor
@dinokingty
@dinokingty 6 месяцев назад
Bro made this to win a war thunder debate after his round didn't penetrate
@isu152stalin2
@isu152stalin2 7 месяцев назад
I dont know if you know this, but the Is 7's 130mm S-70 gun is a naval gun
@teleman07
@teleman07 8 месяцев назад
Clearly not enough armor. They should have made 100m thick armor. 100m on top too for airstrikes.
@bigg4319
@bigg4319 8 месяцев назад
Sure, cause Germany definitely had the time and resources to waste like that 🙄
@gavinlightfoot5521
@gavinlightfoot5521 8 месяцев назад
​@@bigg4319whomp whomp.
@AeroBeII
@AeroBeII 8 месяцев назад
​@@bigg4319womp womp
@moosiemoose1337
@moosiemoose1337 8 месяцев назад
awesome sim
@oddy1637
@oddy1637 8 месяцев назад
Then Kaboom! All the crew inside the turret would be dead due to the explosive filler of the shell. Don't know about the hull crew though.
@TheChieftain1117
@TheChieftain1117 8 месяцев назад
Considering they're at the entire other end of the hull, separated from the rest of the crew by the whole engine and transmission assembly, I think it'd be pretty safe to assume the 2 guys in the hull would've been fine.
@hoshyro
@hoshyro 8 месяцев назад
@@TheChieftain1117 They still would likely bail after such a catastrofic hit in the turret, no one is mad enough to stay in a tank after such a hit, we can safely assume the Maus would be fubar
@ATruckCampbell
@ATruckCampbell 8 месяцев назад
@@TheChieftain1117 it does not matter where they are, the turret was still penned and the crew is right there.
@TheChieftain1117
@TheChieftain1117 8 месяцев назад
Except the HULL crew isn't, which is what I was saying.
@TheChieftain1117
@TheChieftain1117 8 месяцев назад
Bailing wasn't even mentioned in the original comment. Of course they would, this ain't War Thunder; you can't operate a 188 ton tank with 2 people.
@chelik5976
@chelik5976 6 месяцев назад
IS-7's projectile penetrated the Maus turret, but couldn't do same with King tigers forehead in the same simulation. NICE!!!!
@deus3xmachina
@deus3xmachina 4 месяца назад
Just 185>235
@xigrus
@xigrus 8 месяцев назад
Do maus vs frontal cheek of is7
@angusmotorsports4715
@angusmotorsports4715 8 месяцев назад
It would be neat if you simulated M193, M855, M855A1, and M318MOD1 against things like body armor and car windshields.
@TitaAguirreGarcia
@TitaAguirreGarcia 8 месяцев назад
Do you think in the next episode you could put in a link to where you get this?
@doosh2478
@doosh2478 8 месяцев назад
What program do you use for these simulations? Blender?
@Betto_333
@Betto_333 8 месяцев назад
could you test the LOSAT missile??
@EpicThe112
@EpicThe112 8 месяцев назад
Very interesting and maybe you can try doing this 130mm vs M1 Abrams Leopard 2 Challenger 1 provided they need to fight Object 785 with 130mm
@user-pw1oh2mw6q
@user-pw1oh2mw6q 8 месяцев назад
Somewhere was Jagdtiger vs M1 Abrams LFP
@user-nb1nx2rm8x
@user-nb1nx2rm8x 8 месяцев назад
abrams can destroy even an 85 mm projectile in a frontal projection, BUT for this you need to get into an unprotected gap between the hull and the tower
@user-xr5mj4fc7g
@user-xr5mj4fc7g 8 месяцев назад
​@@user-nb1nx2rm8xв боковую проекцию Абрамс возможно уничтожить даже попаданием из 30 мм пушки.
@Kwisss
@Kwisss 8 месяцев назад
@@user-nb1nx2rm8x Like you said its pretty much impossible to do. Though I don't think it will even destroy it, it might disable the turret ring but it wont destroy the tank. The ring is made up of 3 parts that are 200ish mm RHA LOS. The fact its also a full size round would make it hard to go through that.
@JB-qg2uc
@JB-qg2uc 8 месяцев назад
Post war tank Vs wartime tank. Result is completely as expected
@heinrichzerbe
@heinrichzerbe 8 месяцев назад
If the Maus found itself in a situation where it is only a few hundred metres from its enemy, hopes and prayers will be just as effective as its armour.
@vitanera4032
@vitanera4032 8 месяцев назад
Question could modern apdsfs penetrate t95 armor and the metal shield thing around the barrel?
@runrun7649
@runrun7649 8 месяцев назад
Cool
@Geniusinventor
@Geniusinventor 8 месяцев назад
130mm guns is from Navy destroyers those things are Super OP
@vasilbalakchiev5896
@vasilbalakchiev5896 5 месяцев назад
what program is used??
@utkarshtrivedi8870
@utkarshtrivedi8870 8 месяцев назад
The Soviets had answer to every German question. Soviet Engineers and Scientists were a force to be reckoned with.
@vladislavs3435
@vladislavs3435 8 месяцев назад
Make a simulation of firing is2 ammunition. By tigers, panthers or even pz4. ty
@JansenX12
@JansenX12 8 месяцев назад
I would guess that even a non penetrating hit would damage the bodystructure of the tank to a degree.
@user-nb1nx2rm8x
@user-nb1nx2rm8x 8 месяцев назад
when a 122 mm is 2 projectile hit a tiger or a Koral tiger, even if they did not break through, the welding sites diverged, and here 130 mm and a much more powerful gun, so the result is obvious😊
@gmikay
@gmikay 8 месяцев назад
What software is used here?
@JackRudie-im7os
@JackRudie-im7os Месяц назад
Can you do this one exactly again but the side armor on the maus turret
@user-sh6cx7qu8r
@user-sh6cx7qu8r 8 месяцев назад
Maus vs is-7 please
@CrniWuk
@CrniWuk 8 месяцев назад
80cm Gustav Gun vs Maus would be awesome.
@12-nguyenhonguc49
@12-nguyenhonguc49 8 месяцев назад
isu152-2 with BL-10 gun and Obj268 versus Maus cheek turret, please
@tfk_001
@tfk_001 8 месяцев назад
Do you work with Dejiman at all? You two are the largest channels of this genre and you both released a maus/E100 vid on the same day
@JohnSmith-ix6ts
@JohnSmith-ix6ts 8 месяцев назад
The answer seems obvious enough, unless you are suggesting that this is a mere coincidence. It's not the first time either they release videos on (broadly) same topic on same day.
@deus3xmachina
@deus3xmachina 4 месяца назад
Ну то, что оба этих канала содержит один хозяин, это очевидно.
@StaleDoritoCrumb
@StaleDoritoCrumb 21 день назад
Could you make simulations of bombs against ships and tanks?
@Sobdee267
@Sobdee267 8 месяцев назад
Can u test T80BVM against DM63?
@velvetthundr
@velvetthundr 8 месяцев назад
Would the shell still explode?
@BasTSLA
@BasTSLA 8 месяцев назад
Can you make video about object 279 please?
@trainswithjoe
@trainswithjoe 8 месяцев назад
Can you do something stupid like the maus' 128mm gun vs and L3/33 CC?
@Rider-lo9vt
@Rider-lo9vt 4 месяца назад
No
@barrylinkiewich9688
@barrylinkiewich9688 8 месяцев назад
My question is how many Maus would a modern sabot round go through before stopping. I assume it'd cut through the armor like butter, but enough to go through the other side?
@doobs5342
@doobs5342 8 месяцев назад
Modern sabot could easily deal with the total armor thickness of the maus several times over, but the empty space inside and equipment like the engine would probably make it unstable. I predict it would stop in the first or second maus depending on luck.
@adodgygeeza
@adodgygeeza 5 месяцев назад
Do this with a 20pdr APDS, that would have been in standard British service tank in this hypothetical tome period
@handsomeivan1980
@handsomeivan1980 8 месяцев назад
For a second I thought you changed your mind n decided to change the target to an AK magazine 💀
@NN261
@NN261 8 месяцев назад
"Best" armored tank vs different caliber naval shells?
@MrEdis88
@MrEdis88 8 месяцев назад
What's the distance the shell traveled?
@SYsimulations
@SYsimulations 8 месяцев назад
~350m
@jeffhitchcock7937
@jeffhitchcock7937 8 месяцев назад
Hey if you could play it in real Time for a better effect I think it would look cooler
@kangaroo_jesus35
@kangaroo_jesus35 8 месяцев назад
you should do a kv2 AP shell vs the maus front plate
@kanestalin7246
@kanestalin7246 6 месяцев назад
No pen
@kangaroo_jesus35
@kangaroo_jesus35 6 месяцев назад
su-152 ap?
@kanestalin7246
@kanestalin7246 6 месяцев назад
@@kangaroo_jesus35 nah they dont have the penetration power but they might have the explosive mass
@misael1307
@misael1307 6 месяцев назад
En qué aplicación haces esas animaciones bro
@user-uf7qu1lu2s
@user-uf7qu1lu2s 8 месяцев назад
And I've been looking for the name of this program for a year now, and no one writes the name. I will be glad if you tell me, thank you in advance!
@Redduck_XD
@Redduck_XD 8 месяцев назад
Can you make Panzer 4 H bullet hitting the side of the T-34-85???
@bakelite1488
@bakelite1488 8 месяцев назад
I would love to see a contemporary round hitting the UFP of the T80bv with the contact one package. Source say that the t80b has slightly weaker armor than the t72. Plenty videos have been done with the t72 but i havent seen much for the t80bv
@jintsuubest9331
@jintsuubest9331 8 месяцев назад
I assume you are talking about tbe 60 50 hull vs the 60 45? The little bit of steel provide more protection simply because 50 > 45.
@jimmcneal5292
@jimmcneal5292 6 месяцев назад
I'm not sure about in being able to pierce M103, even with good shells
@exoticdachoo007
@exoticdachoo007 8 месяцев назад
I mean regardless of the distance, the Maus would have no real chance of going through the IS-7 frontal armor right (Since it uses the same cannon as the Jagdtiger and it couldn't easily penetrate the IS-3)? Considering how this round just said "Screw your armor" at 350m away, I doubt it would be too much different at 500m or more, but if it did struggle all the IS crew needs to do is close the distance and the IS-7 wasn't all that slow (This is all if both of the vehicles worked fine).
@IorangeXbot
@IorangeXbot 8 месяцев назад
Where can I test out these simulations myself?
@chrisdeeyt4392
@chrisdeeyt4392 Месяц назад
Its ANSYS
@sidewinderyt
@sidewinderyt 6 месяцев назад
What happen in Wot ? Me use a Maus try to angle turret :
@yulzthedaffy9586
@yulzthedaffy9586 8 месяцев назад
I expected a shot trap 😂
@cristitanase6130
@cristitanase6130 8 месяцев назад
Or you know, hit the damn thing from the sides, is not like you can miss it!
@noahsawesomevids422
@noahsawesomevids422 8 месяцев назад
Can you do the American m60a2 shileigh missle against MAUS
@ivan5595
@ivan5595 8 месяцев назад
The armor slowed down the round well, but the crews may still be wounded.
@juusolatva
@juusolatva 8 месяцев назад
it's still going around 150m/s
@hoshyro
@hoshyro 8 месяцев назад
That shell is still travelling pretty fast and the amount of shrapnel it would have sent flying inside of the tank is generally considerable a much higher dose of iron than the daily recommended one for a human
@WelcomeToDERPLAND
@WelcomeToDERPLAND 8 месяцев назад
Turret crew would be almost certainly dead, especially if the explosive filler went off, perhaps the gun breech could protect the person on the other side of them somewhat- and the driver way down in the hull may live.
@AeroBeII
@AeroBeII 8 месяцев назад
apcbc explosive chamber still intact so i think it'd be a significant emotional AND physical event for the crew (200g of explosive)
@anonimotm8171
@anonimotm8171 8 месяцев назад
@@WelcomeToDERPLAND obviously, the war thunder aphe is fake, the explosive area just make a bigger cone of spall, not a 360 degrees sphere of death
@killerqueenin3007
@killerqueenin3007 6 месяцев назад
Stalinum ammo💀🗣🔥
@iwaniscool7780
@iwaniscool7780 8 месяцев назад
Can you do IS-2 122 mm cannon vs MAUS? I cant test it on war thunder
@thedoomofvalyria6466
@thedoomofvalyria6466 8 месяцев назад
Impossible to pen in any point from the front of the Maus. The best IS-2 can do vs Maus is side shot with little to no angle and closer than 700m.
@faze_malitoclippedu25
@faze_malitoclippedu25 6 месяцев назад
Crew knocked out
@M551_Sheridan
@M551_Sheridan 5 месяцев назад
WHERE DO I FIND THIS
@Darkel45
@Darkel45 18 дней назад
If the round was the tiger II‘s it would also pen (238mm pen)
@MrSeanfish
@MrSeanfish 5 месяцев назад
Let’s do Maus vs a 16 inch naval gun
@joaoguilherme9034
@joaoguilherme9034 5 месяцев назад
The maus crew forgot to angle the turret.
@user-cp7bc7qq1h
@user-cp7bc7qq1h 8 месяцев назад
For some reason, quality of latewar German armour is assumed to be perfect.
@fxsektor
@fxsektor 8 месяцев назад
Я не понял, а что там отломилось внутри снаряда? Донный взрыватель? Тогда он не сработает?
@donjorge8329
@donjorge8329 8 месяцев назад
Ninja VS Knight….coming soon!
@doce7606
@doce7606 8 месяцев назад
was an APCR developed for the 88-mm and 128-mm german guns..?
@SYsimulations
@SYsimulations 8 месяцев назад
88 yes, 128 dont think so. But there was a prototype 128mm APDS which essentially fired the 88 projectile out of the 128 gun though
@doce7606
@doce7606 8 месяцев назад
@@SYsimulations when and which units got the 88-mm APCR..?
@ThatZenoGuy
@ThatZenoGuy 8 месяцев назад
@@SYsimulations The 128mm APDS fired a modified 88mm projectile with a thicker cap, to prevent shattering.
@robiiify
@robiiify 8 месяцев назад
is this a point blank shot or from what distance is this simulated
@Querulouss
@Querulouss 8 месяцев назад
it has the statistics in the beginning 350 m, so very close
@robiiify
@robiiify 8 месяцев назад
@@Querulouss thanks seems I missed them
@bemusedpanda8875
@bemusedpanda8875 8 месяцев назад
Maus forgot to angle the turret
@AlbertChang17
@AlbertChang17 8 месяцев назад
Artillery: It's free real estate
@Traumatizedbanana
@Traumatizedbanana 6 месяцев назад
What is the simulator name
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 8 месяцев назад
But isn't it strange how the soft 130mm shell barely penetrates the armor but the 122mm flat shell went easily through the Tiger IIs 185mm turret in Dejmian XYZ Simulation? Maybe you can also do the same simulation with a 122mm BR-471B vs. Tiger II (H) turret and then everyone can fight who is right 😂
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 8 месяцев назад
At what range?
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 8 месяцев назад
@@AKUJIVALDO I think it was from 100m :D
@xigrus
@xigrus 8 месяцев назад
350m is very close on combat almost rarely the minimum combat distance as far as i know is 1000m up to 1800m and some claim to be 800m which i think the is7 shell would definitely still dented the maus but not penetrated
@WotansCry
@WotansCry 8 месяцев назад
If the soviet optics and gub precision would actually allow for aimed hits above 800m. Chances are Maus would due to sophisticated cripple IS-7 long before it would even reach 800m.
@user-nb1nx2rm8x
@user-nb1nx2rm8x 8 месяцев назад
​@@WotansCryif you did not know that the IS 7 was designed so that it could not be penetrated by the projectiles of the mouse cannon in the frontal projection, which was confirmed by the shelling
@khaelamensha3624
@khaelamensha3624 8 месяцев назад
Yes and no. At the time the mais would have been fielded, combat would largely been in towns, so it would even have to face rocket launcher from roofs. Not quite the best position and in field, the allied jabos...
@Mecha_for_nothing
@Mecha_for_nothing 6 месяцев назад
​​@@user-nb1nx2rm8xwhat kind of shelling? Simulator,game or reality?
@barbarapitenthusiast7103
@barbarapitenthusiast7103 6 месяцев назад
​@@WotansCry It did allow for it.
@ZombieSlayer-dj3wb
@ZombieSlayer-dj3wb 8 месяцев назад
Spalling , every tankers nightmare
@tainguyen-iz9mf
@tainguyen-iz9mf 7 месяцев назад
Those round simulations looks like my sister at night (she always go at her night shift idk why she said that when i showed her the video and i wonder why🤔)
@duderino743
@duderino743 8 месяцев назад
would it be possible to do simulations on the javelin or atgm missiles vs the tanks the russians are using in ukraine?
@crymieze9003
@crymieze9003 8 месяцев назад
This is impressive the guns calibre soviets had. MAUS/E100 pure homogeneous steel armor would have been quickly outdated at the begining of the cold war with the new HEAT shells/missiles. Of course there are many other parameters to take into account such as the capacity of germans heavy tank to engage at long range distance, poor optical quality of soviets tanks or crew training.
@RdClZn
@RdClZn 8 месяцев назад
How are your mesh generation specifications? Not saying it's inaccurate (most videos match real penetration well), but the FE mesh is a very important parameter.
@serdarcam99
@serdarcam99 8 месяцев назад
absolute weakest part of the maus when its turned its armor to you vs absolute best tank cannon in the era and it still struggles to penetrate
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 8 месяцев назад
What era best tank cannon? 130mm wasn't there...
@serdarcam99
@serdarcam99 8 месяцев назад
@@AKUJIVALDO late ww2 before the 50s
@dirkkania3822
@dirkkania3822 5 месяцев назад
NAME OF WEBITE?
@kwestionariusz1
@kwestionariusz1 8 месяцев назад
Litle bit short 350meters
@vaninec
@vaninec 8 месяцев назад
After IS shot, everything would stop working for sure
@Snailman3516
@Snailman3516 8 месяцев назад
In my opinion, unless you have a really robust bridgelaying capability, heavy tanks are usually a bad idea. Their weight is just too much for them to be operationally or strategically mobile. The one exception for me is the IS-2 which was the same weight as a panther but with more armor and firepower. This is also why I think western tanks need to go on a diet. 70 tons has so many problems. I think the west needs to get over their fear of heavy ERA. Replace some composite with the ERA and you will have a much lighter tank. Pair that with an autoloader(the kind in the k2, type 90/10, and leclerc, not the carousel types.) And an APS and you have a much lighter tank with the same protection level and firepower.
@Tiberium_Tiger
@Tiberium_Tiger 8 месяцев назад
‘Heavy’ MBT’s in the 70 ton range seem much more survivable than Russian ‘medium’ MBT’s weighing 40-50 tons. Sometimes bigger is better
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 8 месяцев назад
​@@Tiberium_Tigertell that to Israelis. They are mounting "cope cages" on their tanks. Tanks top and belly are the thinnest armour on the tanks.
@user-xy3kb4tg9g
@user-xy3kb4tg9g 8 месяцев назад
​@@Tiberium_Tigerигры - ложь). Выглядят - не значит являются. Кроме глаз, нужно иметь ещё и развитый мозг. Советские танки воевали гораздо больше, чем танки НАТО. Поэтому, может создаваться и такое впечатление. У большинства западных танков больше масса из-за большей башни, которая должна в себя вмещать заряжающего. Больший танк - большая вероятность в него попасть и поразить, меньше возможности спрятать. Относительно массы, у танков НАТО малая площадь хорошей брони, большая вероятность поражения из-за, в том числе, гораздо большей длины, когда танк стоит под углом, а не строго лбом. Советские танки более универсальны и больше подходят для большой войны. У них различаются назначения. В автомат заряжания в развитой башне, так же, - легче попасть, т.к. он сложнее скрывается складками местности, тем более, если танк высокий.
@Tiberium_Tiger
@Tiberium_Tiger 8 месяцев назад
NATO tanks are also built with defense and use of terrain in mind while Russian tanks cannot do this as well due to their size and gun elevation and depression. So while western MBT’s are bigger targets with softer armor in most places they are still more survivable due to their tactics and safety features. I doubt any Russian tanker would want to sit directly above the carousel loading system in a Russian MBT if they had the choice, it just makes it a death trap if you’re hit anywhere but the front. Even the Leopards and Challengers destroyed in Ukraine don’t have their whole turrets ripped off making the tank a total loss.
@ImRandomDude
@ImRandomDude 8 месяцев назад
0:40 set playback speed at 0.5, watch how evil barracuda enters the tanks and spits fire
@oddsquadOlive
@oddsquadOlive 8 месяцев назад
i wibder what will happen if 3 FLAK 88 ROUNDS AIM FOR T-28/T-95 FRONT HULL
@Sh4quille0atmeal
@Sh4quille0atmeal 8 месяцев назад
"target undamaged"
@elij457
@elij457 18 дней назад
can crew get injured by these tiny shrapnel pieces?
@WilRiv5286
@WilRiv5286 8 месяцев назад
It's no surprise that the IS-7 can pen a Maus cheek
@WotansCry
@WotansCry 8 месяцев назад
On 300m distance you mean ... Real combat distance no pen possible... .
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 8 месяцев назад
​@@WotansCryshh, or commies will start crying...
@anonimotm8171
@anonimotm8171 8 месяцев назад
@@AKUJIVALDO stalinium won again
@xigrus
@xigrus 8 месяцев назад
​@@anonimotm8171stalinum in real life is fucking trash and brittle
@andthenhedead6076
@andthenhedead6076 8 месяцев назад
@@WotansCryin real life the IS7 would never even in gauge they would just get behind cover and call artillery or CAS
@llamallama1509
@llamallama1509 8 месяцев назад
Thus demonstrating why superheavy tanks aren't worth it
@user-sc5fi7wr9n
@user-sc5fi7wr9n 7 месяцев назад
Это анимация? Или приложение? (Как называется 9
Далее
когда мучает жажда // Eva mash
00:58
Просмотров 331 тыс.
Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: The Mighty Maus
9:27
Просмотров 2,1 млн
Gearless Magnet Bike
17:57
Просмотров 6 млн
M26 Pershing vs T34-85
9:46
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: IS-7 Part 1
10:37
Просмотров 1,6 млн
Yellow Powder: Let’s solve unsolved alchemy
19:32
Просмотров 302 тыс.
OZON РАЗБИЛИ 3 КОМПЬЮТЕРА
0:57
Просмотров 868 тыс.
S-Pen в Samsung достоин Золота #Shorts
0:38