M26 Pershing vs T34-85

Подписаться 1,3 млн

Просмотров 1,5 млн

50% 1

It’s the evening of August 17th, 1950, near the city of Pusan, in South Korea. UN forces have been pushed back from the moment they became involved, going from just south of Seoul to cornered against the sea in Pusan in just a month. The North Koreans are equipped with Soviet T34-85s, which outnumber and outgun the American tanks, leaving the soldiers fighting them with bazookas or no anti-tank weapons at all. Lieutenant Granville George "GG" Sweet leads a four tank platoon of M26 Pershings, which have
been performing well in the defense of Pusan, but is about to face the tank that has been dominating the battlefield in the last month. An urgent message arrives through the radio, "Flash Purple!" incoming enemy armor. Sweet and his crew prepare for combat and engage in a fierce tank battle against the T34-85s. They form a wall across a road and aim straight ahead as the enemy approaches. Fullerton takes his position, when suddenly a T-34 rounds the corner before him.
Yarnhub uses the Unreal® Engine. Unreal® is a trademark or registered trademark of Epic Games, Inc. in the United States of America and elsewhere. “Unreal® Engine, Copyright 1998 - 2023, Epic Games, Inc. All rights reserved.”

Опубликовано:

29 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 2,6 тыс.

@Yarnhub Год назад

Please support us by commenting below, liking and sharing this video. Also a subscribe would be great.... and you could be even more awesome by supporting us on Patreon patreon.com/yarnhub

@gam30ver23 Год назад

Hello

@baragonkaiju4340 Год назад

@Honda Civic 1997 hellooo

@brocklaird2076 Год назад

@Patvia Год назад

Hello

@benhunter1808 Год назад

Hi yarnhub

@ALJZ Год назад

If you watch the original bf109 sparing a b17 vid or a long time viewer, you can really feel the warmth in your heart to see how realistically the animation has become

@LancelotChan Год назад

Yarnhub is full of passion and motivation!

@bx4002 Год назад

Yes

@stormus65 Год назад

@ALJZ, that video you reference led to me building a diorama of Franz Stiglers BF109-G6 escorting the Ye Olde Pub in 1/72 scale :3

@Adamwypiorkiewicz7821 Год назад

i remember the 2d animations. this is so much different. the way the people look TOO real now. i love the improvement

@wesleysayud419 Год назад

At this point, it has become war thunder graphic

@ThatGuyOrby Год назад

The M26 Pershing really was quite the overmatch for the T-34-85. It's frontal armor was essentially impenetrable to the 85mm gun and there was essentially no range that the M26 could realistically hit the T-34-85 that it wouldn't penetrate unless the shell struck at a very unlucky angle (as happened sometimes with older conventional full-caliber style AP projectiles). However, the M26 were very few in number as their production was very short lived due to the end of WW2 so there were only a little more than 4,500* ever made due to the lack of a need. Once the Korean War kicked off the M26's replacement, the M46 (which was just a Pershing with a lot of improvements) was already in production so there wasn't a need for more M26s to be made. In fact a lot of M26s were busy being converted to M46s (yes the tanks were that similar that the older M26s could simply be updated to the M46 standard). For a bit of a comparison in hard stats (these don't tell the full story but they'll give you an idea of why things unfolded the way they did). Frontal Hull Armor (effective thickness): -Pershing: 155mm (102mm inclined at 42 degrees) -T-34-85: 90mm (45mm inclined at 30 degrees) Frontal Turret Armor (effective thickness) -Pershing: 216mm+ (102mm mantlet, 114mm underlapping turret face, spall shield of unspecified thickness) -T-34-85: 180mm (90mm mantlet, 90mm underlapping turret face though coverage was to a lesser degree) Maximum Armor Penetration (best AP shell available, only using data at shared test ranges): -Pershing (T33 AP): 211mm at 100m, 200mm at 300m, 193mm at 500m, 178mm at 1000m, 174mm at 1500m, 150mm at 2000m, 139mm at 2500m, 128mm at 3000m -T-34-85 (BR-365): 119mm at 100m, 115mm at 300m, 111mm at 500m, 102mm at 1000m, 93mm at 1500m, 85mm at 2000m, 76mm at 2500m, 70mm at 3000m There are also other factors like the Pershing being considerably less cramped than the T-34-85, having actually pretty good sights for it's time (unlike the T-34-85), being an exceedingly stable platform due to it's design and weight, having decent commander's sights (again, for the time), etc. There are a lot of soft factors that go into why a tank is successful and they're often have a greater impact than strict hard stats if the tanks are even roughly comparable. Unfortunately by the standards of their day, they were not even remotely comparable even if the difference seems minimal to us by modern standards were tanks are armored to resist shells with 600-800mm+ penetration values. It's all about context. The M26 Pershing crews back then also had absolutely no way of knowing this. They likely knew that their tanks was pretty good, they might've even known that it was likely better than their opposition...but there is simply no way that they logically could've assumed that their vehicles were that much better because assuming something like that and turning out to be wrong is how you get yourself killed. It is always safer to assume that you're at best on par with your enemy when it comes to such things. After all, making such assumptions when you don't know is simply laughing in Death's face and asking him not to laugh back. As a final note there is also one last very important thing to touch on. The M26 Pershing was "practically" frontally impenetrable to the 85mm D-5T anti-tank gun the T-34-85 carried. However, there were two weak spots where it likely would've been capable of penetrating at close range. These weak spots are actually quite infamous. The bow machinegun port in the hull and the coaxial machinegun port in the turret. Both incredibly small targets but important to note regardless. There's also the obvious factor that none of this matters if they got to the M26's side because it's armor was only 76mm on the sides, still much greater than the T-34's but still completely vulnerable. No tank is invulnerable, no tank has ever been invulnerable. Some tanks have just been notably harder to kill in their time.

@someturkishguy8638 Год назад

Tldr the T-34-85 is a medium tank, with rushed production and design due to the brutal war going on when it was designed. The M26 is a heavy tank produced very late into a war that was already guaranteed to be won by the point it was made, and had many amentities unavailable to the 85. Both North Korean and UN tankers were both extremely brave and fought hard with both machines

@Красиваясоветскаядевушка Год назад

Why dont you compare a Renault FT to a Tiger I?

@geraldl33playz79 Год назад

The T-34-85 APCR(BR-365P) has a penetration of 187mm at 100m

@ThatGuyOrby Год назад

@@geraldl33playz79 and I didn't choose to use APCR for either tank because it was rare and expensive to produce and it just hurts the T34 even worse because the Pershing's had over 300mm at a similar range. Permitting APCR makes it even more of a slaughter.

@ThatGuyOrby Год назад

@@someturkishguy8638 yep

@thatdumbQ Год назад

i cant believe how high quality this is for a small channel, you truly deserve so much more than this. appreciate the hard work and thanks for making such entertaining content :)

@tom_wt3811 Год назад

637K subs is for you small channel?

@cnlnews8967 Год назад

Small Channel!? Small?

@jesserutt7413 Год назад

@@tom_wt3811 compared to other animation channels that is small, especially at this high quality For example look at the infographics show, it has over 12 million subs and yet their stuff is super low quality and poorly researched

@thatdumbQ Год назад

@@tom_wt3811 with such high quality work, compared to other channels this is small yes

@karantikoo9302 Год назад

@@jesserutt7413 subs=/=quality

@JetS_Gamer Год назад

I really love how the detail and effort in these videos are getting butter and better, especially liking the detail of the shells fired flying towards their targets

@sadloli1762 Год назад

Yeah it's really smooth like butter

@professorperry4790 Год назад

Did you see the shadows of the shells when two Pershings fired simultaneously? That was such a small, yet cool detail! Hats off to the Yarnhub crew!

@JetS_Gamer Год назад

@@sadloli1762 why have now after a month, I’ve only realised that typo

@Hockeyguyspencer Год назад

It used to take them like a full month to get a video that was like in 2D but now they're cranking out these videos in like a week this is just amazing

@LancelotChan Год назад

Thank you for such a detailed story, even with the reigniting fire on the side of the tank. Man, you guys are great!

@BasedBlackPrism Год назад

A literal movie. Fantastic job Yarnhub, absolutely crushing it with these untold stories.

@wadimgrig5972 9 месяцев назад

only pindos can incorrectly evaluate the battle of the lance of heavy vehicles against the lance of medium tanks...And if there were IS-2, pershings would burn. The Pershing was originally created as a medium tank, but at the end of 1944, to raise the confidence of the crews, it was reclassified as heavy. In May 1946, due to the changed American concept of tank forces, the Pershing was again reclassified as a medium tank. He is 10 (!) tons heavier than his opponent!

@WolfBlade84- Год назад

Dude I remember watching these guys years ago. Ive kept watching them until now, but this video really hit home to me just how much they've improved. These animations are amazing!

@tkthegk_1394 Год назад

I’m impressed every week by the quality of the videos. Great bloody job Yarnhub

@reddrn620 Год назад

Do not take the comparison seriously: the T-34 was handed over as an outdated weapon. T-34 = M4. The USSR already had the T-44 and T-54. The T-54 was superior to the M26 and caused panic if it was delivered to Korea.

@ANimaturrlul 9 месяцев назад

the attention to detail is crazy! you can see the material

@maheshdwic 3 месяца назад

Can we take a moment to appreciate how much better these videos have gotten over the years? BUT If you watch the original bf109 sparing a b17 vid or a long time viewer, you can really feel the warmth in your heart to see how realistically the animation has become

@maheshdwic 3 месяца назад

🍓

@jinfengqu3349 3 месяца назад

I got to say that was some high quality animations right there!

@Bertik96. Год назад

u guys always astonish me how fast u manage to produce the videos, my question is how do u guys manage to find all these great stories?

@Yarnhub Год назад

A lot of them are recommended by the viewers

@ThomasCorfield Год назад

I love watching tank battle documentaries with real footage, but there's something about these that is even better! So well narrated and animated.

@Idothingys Год назад

Ive been a follower since the bf109 sparing ye ol pub and the graphic are so much better and interesting

@Anti_Everything 5 месяцев назад

So you want to say that the Pershing fired 3 shots, and the 34s fired none in response? The dialogues and events in the film are a bit too detailed. In addition, the US authorities disseminated information that they destroyed more T-34s in Korea than there were in total.

@SonyBartolata 24 дня назад

Pershings in War Thunder: I have armor that is pretty good and my 90 mm gun can penetrate Tigers and Panther from distances Pershing in real life: My armor is useless if my engine always breaks down!!!

@HappiKarafuru Год назад

By ww2 standard, the Pershing is heavy tank but pretty much after the war, it standard more of that like the T-34, a medium tank

@AFT_05G Год назад

Even Panther at 45 metric tons and 50 short tons was heavier than Pershing to be fair.

@allenjay896 Год назад

DUDE THAT FACIAL DETAILS ARE SO DAMN SICK

@theironflea3802 Год назад

Damn your animations look soooooo good dude 😎

@MrSamcooly Год назад

Wow it’s really nice like from the OG b109 sparing a b17 to the 3D vids but the people weren’t that realistic to now everything realistic Also is it okay you make a video about the Pearl Harbor attack ik you already made a vid about the first black man in the us navy to get the Medal of Honor but if you don’t want to make one it’s okay

@Daviboy12345 3 месяца назад

that North Korean gunner must be tough. the bazooka guy has a good shot especially since it is a dumb bomb

@BobdabuilderWWIfellah Год назад

0:01 look at thoose goofy ahh tracks yarnhub really forgor to add graphics to tank tracks💀

@BobdabuilderWWIfellah 3 месяца назад

@Aziz.memebro.-_ oh dam I didn’t expect a relply after a YEAR.

@BobdabuilderWWIfellah 3 месяца назад

@Aziz.memebro.-_ wait wut 0_0

@BobdabuilderWWIfellah 3 месяца назад

@Aziz.memebro.-_ ayo

@aarontheamazing1985 Месяц назад

I did not see the issue

@BobdabuilderWWIfellah Месяц назад

@@aarontheamazing1985 it’s fine

@TheNotoriousNemo Год назад

I love these videos and I love yarnhub

@mambalamba2451 Год назад

I love this channel

@ДмитроПодорванський Год назад

And now almost the same take place in Ukraine... And russian T-72 and T-90 burns very well with the help of Javelin and other US weapon. Glory to US weapon! Victory to Ukraine!

@xcr8ivex708 8 месяцев назад

One little caveat that really bugs me, but I am not sure if it was on Yarn's side or just the person who told the story side. (Probably the latter) At 6:34, it is stated that the HVAP 90mm (Or APCR, if you want to call it that) hits the turret cheek with such force that it quite literally spins the turret around. Here's why I think that might be incorrect. The way HVAP works is that it has a soft outer "shell" to deal extra damage by causing more shrapnel when hitting lightly armoured targets. But, when hitting tougher ones, the soft "shell" deposits at the armour, and a much harder core breaks through, enhancing penetration at the cost of damage. Here, I would assume that the T-34's armour would be enough to break the outer "shell", allowing the core to pass through, but I doubt that it would have enough kinetic transfer to actually spin the turret more than just a few degrees. ***But***, let us say that it somehow does have enough kinetic transfer to spin the turret, at 6:50, it is stated that even after taking another volley of 90mm HVAP, the T-34's turret is somehow capable of rotating back to the Pershing's. I don't have to say that if a turret is able to be forcefully spun around more than just a few degrees, that the turret drive would be, at the very least destroyed. I would like all of those who are going to reply to do it in a civil manner and to actually give fact and reasoning rather than being *unreasonable*. Thank you.

@jadeasereht4638 Год назад

Hey yarnhub team I have a few questions for you all. Has your staff increased compared to the earlier days when you guys did 2D animation? If so, how many members do you guys have working in the researching department, animation, and scripting? Have you gotten sponsor offers by gaijin / war thunder? Will there be another April fools video? Lastly, Do you guys plan to release a slightly longer episode like around 20 minutes? Thank you for your great work in keeping the history of those who sacrificed their lives! Hua!

@Yarnhub Год назад

Yes we're bigger than when we were 2d but then there were 3 weeks between videos and we weren't doing major commercial projects too. In doing the 3d films we need more animators and slightly less artists. We also need mocap and we have to spend a lot of time on characters and uniforms. We have 2 full time historians and 1 scriptwriter and a ton of other roles including storyboard artists and musicians / sound etc. Our staff numbers change depending on the workload (if we're working on something like the Sabaton film we need more) although we have a core staff of over 20 people working on these wirh 3 separate animation teams and directors working on 3 films at any one time. We're regularly sponsored by warthunder. I think the last time was about 2 or 3 months ago. Im not sure if we'll do April fools yet. It's a lot of work. Right now 10-12 minutes is our sweet spot. Even with all the staff its a load of work to get these out every week. We need all the support from our viewers we can get. We have some ideas for longer videos but we wont be able to do them in this format unless there is 2 weeks between videos and we've found views tail off if we leave too much time between publishing. I hope that answers all your questions !

@jadeasereht4638 Год назад

@@Yarnhub Thanks a lot!

@Slevwy 8 месяцев назад

Lets face it, a t-34-85 has never stood a chance against larger canons. Despite the t-34-85 being one of the best and most efficient tanks, it didn't have the armor or canon to do too much itself.

@jessiesheriff2117 Год назад

I'm a 71 yr old woman and retired truck driver who began watching RU-vid videos of gardening and such to find a hobby to fill my days. I was curious when one of your earliest videos showed up in my feed. I was impressed and shared it with my son. A few months later I went to visit him, his girlfriend and her 9 yr old son. Being a typical 9 yr old, he loves anything military, especially aircraft and was excited to show me his collection. He began to tell a story and demonstrating maneuvers. It didn't take long for me to realize that he was telling one of your stories. When he finished I asked if he got it from Yarnhub. When he realized I liked you too, we spent the time before dinner to rewatch a few of his favorites. My son told me recently that he has shown interest in other areas of history and is reading above grade average. You and your team have lite a spark. Your love of history shows in every episode. Thank you

@triplus198 6 месяцев назад

thats sweet like Lt. Sweet.

@shepard2023 5 месяцев назад

That story is an instant mood booster, I’m glad that y’all were able to spend some time together

@justacat2 5 месяцев назад

this is so wholesome

@tomkosourek 3 месяца назад

hes gonna be a great war thunder player

@hualiu-w7c 15 дней назад

@@tomkosourek thats what i was thinking

@Commander9013 Год назад

I love how the gun is so effective that it's ineffective at first

@YukarisGearReviews Год назад

It wasn't really "ineffective" the HVAP round probably traveled through the turret and killed everyone in it, with the driver probably unaware of what happened

@owo1744 Год назад

@@YukarisGearReviews What you said. None of the NK crewmembers were really that smart. Probably didnt even know they were hit, and if they thought they were hit, probably thought the round did no damage.

@Bellator_of_the_Shadow Год назад

@@owo1744 it isn't that they weren't smart. its that they were inexperienced

@AFT_05G Год назад

This was the tunsgten cored HVAP round which had insane performance against flat armor. Main AP fired by Pershing’s 90mm gun wasn’t that strong,it was toe to toe with Tiger I’s 88mm Pzgr 39.But still very effective against T-34s rather thin armor.

@lol-un6nl 10 месяцев назад

@YukarisGearReviews it probably went all the way through without killing anything

@Sllammyy Год назад

This channel is growing to be very, very impressive. Not just the incredible animation, but also the way that Yarnhub is able to make such interesting and easy to watch video while still being very informative. I find that with many RU-vidrs, documentaries, etc I get bored very quickly watching and never get to learn the full story.

@GoofySillyGuy Год назад

exactly

@astartes2781 Год назад

Yet, no reactionary RU-vidrs who care about history react to any of the Yarnhub's' videos.

@Thermotriangle Год назад

This is so true

@Symphinitystug_III Год назад

@@astartes2781 the Infographics show is trash....they literally milk the time out of you just to tell 1 thing in the end

@emmeriankiwi6993 Год назад

I also love how some stories told here have had help from the person's own family, especially with how diverse yarnhub can be. I can't wait for the future of YH!!

@visassess8607 Год назад

The Korean War is too overlooked there are some absolutely incredible battles to be told about it. Glad you guys are getting stories like this out there

@hawkeyeten2450 Год назад

It needs studied and talked about 10x more than it is. Korea was one of the largest and most influential conflicts of the 20th Century outside of the two World Wars. Plus, the tank battles were absolutely furious engagements, like the one in this video.

@InsideYourClosetRn69 Год назад

@@hawkeyeten2450 agreed

@ZeroScotland Год назад

Filipino's comtributed by like alot in this war

@InsideYourClosetRn69 Год назад

@@ZeroScotland like that one time where Filipinos held the line against chinese soldiers

@GoogleGebruiker Год назад

Chosin Reservoir campaign

@daboogieman4743 Год назад

Bro, the t34's got an uptier

@notasoviett34trustme 5 месяцев назад

poor t34 squad after realizing they got a full uptier

@Armymenandplanez 3 месяца назад

Lol

@Thesquirrelgames Месяц назад

Lmfao

@nelsons548 Год назад

It is absolutely amazing how fast your team can fix bugs. Thanks for another amazing video!

@BattleHistories Год назад

You did it again!! Another great little detail of a much larger conflict that was the Korean War. It's great how you guys tell these smaller stories and bring them to life. After just having watched Devotion in the cinema, I also remembered your video on Jesse Brown and rewatched it. Now, this new video about a war not often covered here on RU-vid. Keep up the great work, as it's really inspiring to see this channel grow and mature.

@СергейВампир-л6в 10 месяцев назад

О настоящем геноциде, который принято не замечать Одно из самых любимых обвинений, которые выдвигают пропалестинские демонстранты - это обвинение в геноциде мусульман в Израиле. Давайте я вам расскажу, что такое настоящий геноцид мусульман. Против которого почему-то сотни тысяч людей не выходят на демонстрацию. Да. Я про геноцид уйгуров в Китае. Огромное количество уйгуров и других граждан Китая, исповедующих ислам, заключают в трудовые «Лагеря перевоспитания». Все это делается без проведения следствия, без решения суда, без предъявления обвинений и каких-либо ограничений срока пребывания. Китай уничтожил тысячи мечетей. Кстати, халяль в Китае преследуется. Мужчин арестовывали за ношение бороды, а женщин - за покрытую чадрой голову. Один уйгур был отправлен в «центр перевоспитания» после того, как он закрыл свой ресторан на время рамадана: это, как было сказано в документе, свидетельствовало об «опасности экстремистских мыслей». В лагеря отправляли уйгуров, совершивших хадж, или поездку в какую-либо исламскую страну. Но это еще цветочки. Сотни тысяч детей были разлучены со своими родителями и отправлены в специальные школы-интернаты, где из них пытаются сделать «настоящих китайцев». Некоторых мусульманских женщин насильно стерилизуют. Распространены и принудительные аборты. Нет? Ничего не ёкает у вас, любители слогана про реку и про море? Судьба почти 35 миллионов мусульман вас не беспокоит? С плакатами «От Синьцзяна до Тибета для уйгуров будет лето» на площадь выйти не хотите? А теперь давайте в Израиль перенесемся и посмотрим, как живут тут мусульмане. Никто мечети в Израиле не сносит. Никаких препятствий для ислама не существует. Мусульманские кладбища не оскверняются. Почти все надписи в стране на трех языках - на иврите, английском и арабском. Четыре арабские партии имеют своих представителей в Кнессете. И был случай, когда именно голоса арабских депутатов решили судьбу правительственной коалиции. На нужды арабского сектора из бюджета страны ежегодно тратятся миллиардные суммы. Арабы освобождены от службы в армии. Хотя бедуины, например, служат - они отличные следопыты. Кстати, специально для бедуинов Израиль построил семь «городов развития». Добавлю, что израильские друзы не принимали участия в жестоких столкновениях между евреями и арабами. А многие записались добровольцами в создаваемую израильскую армию. И ни одна друзская деревня не была разрушена или выселена. Законодательством Израиля установлено, что государственные телевизионные каналы Израиля должны часть эфирного времени выделять для передач на арабском языке (или обеспечивать перевод ивритоязычных передач). В ивритоязычных школах с седьмого по девятый классы преподают арабский язык. При этом все желающие могут продолжить изучение арабского до 12-го (выпускного) класса и сдать выпускной экзамен по арабскому языку. Рождаемость у мусульман в Израиле выше, чем в соседних Ливане, Египте, Иордании и Сирии. Не очень вяжется с геноцидом, правда? За последние десять лет число арабских студентов в вузах Израиля увеличилось на 82%. Каждый шестой учащийся в стране - представитель арабской общины. Специализируются в основном в сфере здравоохранения (дипломированные медсестры) и образования (24%). За ними следуют медицина (16%), бизнес-менеджмент (15%) и гуманитарные науки (14%). Не буду врать - еврейское и арабское население Израиля почти не пересекаются. Но это происходит, прежде всего, по желанию самих арабов. Но область, в которой арабы и евреи активно пересекаются - здравоохранение. 20% врачей, 25% медсестер и медбратьев и 50% фармацевтов в стране - израильские арабы. Пандемия коронавируса стала поводом для еще большего сближения. Арабские и еврейские медики создавали совместные бригады. Арабы очень боялись, что после 7 октября евреи будут им мстить. Но никто в Израиле не призывает к мести. И еще два слова про геноцид. До середины ХХ века в арабском мире проживало около 820 000 евреев. Сейчас там не осталось практически никого. Евреев выгоняли из своих домов, их имущество отбирали, многих убили. Вот, что такое геноцид. А два миллиона арабов, проживающих сегодня в Израиле, являются доказательством того, что никто геноцидом в стране не занимается. Сегодня идет война с террористами, а не с мусульманами.

@Tasteful_Edits Год назад

Wow, the tanks are looking AWESOME. The extra day of waiting was worth it!

@Yarnhub Год назад

Thanks 👍

@ponycentaur1456 Год назад

fun fact: alot of crews preferred the upgunned sherman over the pershing due to the reliability, and (for some) familiarity of it due to the previous war. In addition, alot of bridges were too weak for pershings, so many had to keep using SHerman tanks until better ones were constructed for the heavy beast.

@AFT_05G Год назад

If even Pershing was too heavy for bridges at barely 42 metric tons i wonder how would Tigers and Panthers would’ve fared..

@ponycentaur1456 Год назад

@@AFT_05G IT WAS A NIGHTMARE for tiger crewmen. ALot of the time, they had to wait for engineers to make sure a suitable crossing was available. And if there wasn't, costly train rides or long detours had to surfise. It was one of the main reasons why tiger tank encounters were rare on the western-american front. Other than lack of numbers, they were often used on the eastern front for heavy tank combat and alot more suitable crossings.

@HanrryMG42 Год назад

@@ponycentaur1456 that the asian bridges of that time, they made with wood or poor concrete. That ehy they cant handle tanks, im surprised that the T34 reached the Pershings without problems, i think he is less weight though..

@selfdo Год назад

@@AFT_05G POORLY in Korea. The lack of good bridges and roads, and the hilly terrain largely negated the armor/firepower advantages of the German "big cats". Mobility, especially the ability to traverse hilly terrain, is what counted the most, and the Sherman had that above even the Soviet-made T-34/85. Using HVAP, the Shermans M1 76 mm gun also out-ranged the D5T 85mm gun on the T-34, and was more accurate. However, it was leadership, training, doctrine, logistics, and close air support that accounted for the reason(s) why, in the August-September 1950 battles along the Naktong river in SE Korea, why the Shermans creamed the DPRK armor.

@christopherchartier3017 5 месяцев назад

@@selfdoYeah Sherman’s were amazing tanks. I definitely prefer them over the T-34

@nazizombie102 Год назад

Can we take a moment to appreciate how much better these videos have gotten over the years?

@mrcus7839 8 месяцев назад

Офигеть М26 Першинг против Т-34-85 вы там чё курили? У них бл*ть разница во времени, Першинг так-то один из первых ОБТ и основа к М46 и М60 Паттон. Вот поставьте Т-55 либо ИС-3 против М26Е3 Першингом тогда и увидим насколько персик крут. Тоже мне нашли с чем сравнивать Першинг

@Keep3r1438 8 месяцев назад

M26 is not an MBT my guy 👽

@Afraglis 7 месяцев назад

'Mbt" that is concerning that you say that 😥

@generalfluffyproto 7 месяцев назад

Cope

@carguy9219 Год назад

The Korean war is one of the most overlooked conflicts of the 20th century

@flyawayandyk2916 Год назад

🙏🏼🇰🇷🇺🇸👍🙇‍♂️🙆

@mikewizz1895 Год назад

A lot of people don't even know it exists

@hawkeyeten2450 Год назад

Which is crazy, since in scale it was MASSIVE compared to most other wars of the last 100 years. The whole British Commonwealth, US, half of Europe, and even Colombia and Ethiopia were backing South Korea, while China and the Soviet mercenaries were backing the North. I sometimes refer to it as "World War 2.5", because of just how influential, wide-ranging and huge in sheer size it was. For America, it was actually the 5th-deadliest war we've ever fought (behind the Civil War, the two World Wars, and Vietnam).

@dulguunjargal1199 Год назад

21st century* Edit: Smartest RU-vid shorts viewer

@demonemo9812 Год назад

@@dulguunjargal1199 Bruh

@BytzDrawz Год назад

3:34 I thought this was live action for a sec! So much has improved over the years and it's so cool

@punbug4721 Год назад

_The lighting! It's beautiful!_ Omg that's absolutely amazing!

@thatchywood Год назад

first video i ever saw on this channel was the medics inside of a church, it's so nice to see how the channel's evolved, both animation wise and storytelling. Keep it going!

@anniekoenasdi2403 Год назад

Omg same

@envitech02 Год назад

Same here. I remembered that one.

@어린그림쟁이 Год назад

Thank you for the great video! 좋은 영상 감사합니다! Many countries are truly grateful for participating in the Korean War. 많은 국가들이 한국전쟁에 참전한 것에 진심으로 큰 고마움을 느끼고 있습니다. I hope people remember this war and I look forward to good videos in the future :) 사람들이 이 전쟁을 기억해주기를 바라며 앞으로도 좋은 영상 기대하겠습니다:) 감사합니다!!

@ScottRothsroth0616 Год назад

Like other commenters I have seen a huge improvement over the years. For me the bigger things are the researcher or research team finding the stories to share with all of us; the animator or animation team for bringing theses stories to life, and any other roles I didn’t mention. Thank you.

@Cklk_1 5 месяцев назад

the first two t-34's definitely had russian bais

@CoffeeMug2828 Год назад

The Pershing's was so powerful it over penetrates the armor ironically making it ineffective at killing the enemy in one hit. Though that T-34-85 is already combat ineffective from that first hit because the shell that over penetrated had likely turned the turret crew into minced meat.

@AFT_05G Год назад

I mean it wasn’t really that powerful.Pershing’s gun when firing standard APBC rounds had very similar performance to 88mm mounted on Tiger I.Though it had much stronger tungsten cored rounds high velocity rounds than Tiger I such as T33 and HVAP,but they were rather rare in quantity. But either way it was indeed a bit overkill for T-34s armor.

@gabriels5105 Год назад

@@AFT_05G the gun not being good due to lack of pen assumes that they dont have pleanty of ap to use. Its like thinking m1 garands in ww2 arent as powerfull as they were because they dont penetrate as much when firing standard ball which forgets that almost everyone had ap and were firing ap so theres no reason to expect them not to be firing ap cause ap was everywhere. Its also is easy to forget that the 75mm sherman had a better gun than the 76mm and the tiger because it makes alot of shrapnel which is the point because your fighting infantry not tanks. It is also easy to forget that those ordnance bureau like to under powder rounds so the barrels lasts longer. Bad comparisons happen all the time with American stuff. Its the whole Iowa has huge advantages over Yamato but everyone forgot what they were including the people who crewed her.

@TheGXDivider 5 месяцев назад

@@gabriels5105 are you for real ? The 75mm gun was shorter and quite inferior to the long 76mm Sherman gun. Even against infantry, 76mm HE > 75mm HE.

@galatian5 5 месяцев назад

I guess they geared up the Pershings to kill King Tigers so much that it ended up as overkill for T-34s

@AlphaHorst 3 месяца назад

it is actually estimated that the first T34 lost ist entire crew to death and injury with that first shot. the driver simply stiffened up on the controls so it kept moving. the same probably happaned to the second T34 as well, but due to the HE bombardment it is harder to tell as the crew inside was littered in shrapnel and burns.

@Disappointing925 Год назад

It’s been great to watch this channel evolve from 2d to full on cinematically keep it up guys ❤

@paleoph6168 Год назад

From the duel at Cologne to the battlefields of Korea. The M26 Pershing is America's answer to combating legendary enemy tanks, whether they be German or Soviet.

@r.j.dunnill1465 Год назад

The Pershing was evolved into the M47 during the Korean War, but glitches kept M47s from the conflict.

@gibbon8827 Год назад

comparing the Pershing of 1945 with the T-34 of 1943 is of course strong, but something tells me that the fight would be more honest if instead of the T-34 there was an Is-3, which, like the Pershing, was also created in 45. no, I understand that this is not a competition who is cooler, but be proud that a tank of 1945 defeated a tank of 1943, well, that’s it ...

@lector-dogmatixsicarii1537 Год назад

@@gibbon8827 You mean IS-2 mod 1944, not IS-3. If we're being serious, NorKs actually had IS-2, if you really want to dick ride the heavy classification. Not that would mean that much when you pick apart the reality of glaring Soviet foibles. IS-3 was effectively Armata vaporware until the IS-3M. M26 was re-designated as a medium tank by the time of Korea. Pershing is 4th quarter 1944 mass production after over a year of preproduction fucking around by the bureau. T-34-85 S-53 mass production that the iconic T-34-85 parade diaspora really descends from is 1944. If we include test batches, M26 precursors are also found in 1943.

@r.j.dunnill1465 Год назад

@@gibbon8827 Except the Soviets chose to supply their North Korean allies with T-34/85s, because they did not expect any intervention on behalf of the South Koreans. Against the South Koreans, they were more than enough. If they'd known the U.S. and its allies would intervene, they would have restrained the North Koreans from invading.

@redalert6706 Год назад

И все равно мировые "демократы " получили пизды и от т34 и от несломленных северокорейских товарищей.

@Mike23443 Год назад

the pershing is a whole 2 tiers above the t-34-85, of course it's going to dominate. T-34s would need to spam gold the whole time to even have a good chance of penning.

@AFT_05G Год назад

How is M26 even Tier VIII in WoT?As a War Thunder player this thing isn’t even that better than my Panther at 5.7 let alone being as strong as Tiger II…

@Mike23443 Год назад

@@AFT_05G I mean... You're not wrong. It really, really struggles at tier 8. Power creeped out the ass. It would be fine as a tier 7 but at 8 it lacks penetration and armor. the patton at tier 9 used to be good with the 105mm gun, but now it's also pretty far behind.

@shinixb.6500 Год назад

Amazing! The Animation is worth an animated movie! I hope you feature the Philippine Expeditionary Forces in Battle of Yultong which was hailed as the first battle won by Filipino soldiers in a foreign soil.

@communistpotato3204 Год назад

This!

@communistpotato3204 Год назад

This is beyond mind blowing production quality in comparison to the already amazing production quality i've watched from at least two years before!

@communistpotato3204 6 месяцев назад

@ThatCool_rasictWatermelonCat what

@Autser1 Год назад

This is soooooo much better than just 4 years ago. I love the massive improvements on the facial expressions and facial features.

@iBeReaper Год назад

You guys have grown so much. The animation and storytelling is on point as usual

@meshuggahshirt Год назад

The M26 Pershing is such a handsome tank

@Игорьсуздальский Год назад

Compare with old t34-85 to be fair

@itzpilly 9 месяцев назад

Fr, its as handsome as the tiger 2 and the ms1

@SomeLostInesh Год назад

This event actually happened; not fairy tale

@가니메데 Год назад

One of your best animations so far, a minor issue I have is with Pusan being portrayed as somewhat of a barren landscape, even though it's usually very green.

@iamthehype3684 Год назад

Well to be fair the landscape probably had no shortage of bombs and other explosions at the time. It can take anywhere from a couple years to a couple decades for the fauna and flora to come back after a fierce battle/war

@duyeongkim2941 2 месяца назад

Not Pusan busan

@jehoiakimelidoronila5450 Год назад

Little known fact here: Filipinos defending yultong pass almost got their hands on them Pershings but since only 4 were ever sent at that time, (& courtesy of Korean tsnks approaching), they ended up being gg sweet's tank platoon instead Aforementioned Pinoys on the other hand, became a heavy weapons platoon/company (memory's hazy), I. E. : using ma deuces, bazookas, mortars & maybe even howitzers; & proceeded to beat the shit out of the Korean/Chinese commies for the next few days

@andysnyder4603 5 месяцев назад

That's the Fighting Filipinos for you!

@TyrannoJoris_Rex Год назад

9:09 5 years after the end of WW2 and they *still* thought the T-34-85 was invincible…?

@johncarter4956 Год назад

They ARE invincible against American weapon at the time. They only have Chaffee, whose gun caliber could not penetrate their armor and all 9 Chaffees available at the time are destroyed, early to mid-WW2 variant Sherman (M4A1-M4A2 and such), and a Bazooka which is barely effective against Panzer back in WW2. All crewed by rookies or veteran of the Pacific War who TOTALLY did not prepare to fight against T-34 which is far superior than any Japanese tanks they fought. Against a post-war 1945-1947 T34-85 variant crewed by veteran of Sino-Japanese war (Korean Volunteer Army fighting under Chinese command).

@TyrannoJoris_Rex Год назад

@@johncarter4956 They weren't using 75 Shermans at that point. The 76 Shermans were completely vulnerable to the 85, yes, but were more than capable of dealing with the T-34 even at extreme ranges

@johncarter4956 Год назад

@@TyrannoJoris_Rex They're capable yes. But like I said, from August to October 1950, most of those Sherman will be crew by those who is inexperience or ineffective in combating Soviet tanks. So Sherman 76s capabilities to fight T-34-85 are limited.

@AFT_05G Год назад

T-34/85 wasn’t even invincible during WW2 let alone after it.German anti tank guns from 75mm PaK/KwK 40 to 88mm PaK 43/KwK 36/43 were able to destroy with ease. It’s just a myth coming from 1941 Operation Barbarosaa where short barreled Panzer IIIs and IVs struggled against it in frontal engagements.

@randomvidsidk8448 Год назад

Gotta hand it to you Yarn, your videos keep getting better and better, and these men along with all of those who fought have guts of steel to make it this far into the war, keep up the amazing work

@captain_commenter8796 Год назад

Those faces of the characters! I can see the improvement! The style is literally perfect! Perfect balance of realism and cartoon! Applauds to you!

@PolymurExcel Год назад

I know it’s been talked to death at this point, but a video on The Battle of 73 Easting would be cool. Particularly the part where a Bradley ambushed a T55 and blew it open with its 30mm chain gun.

@lieutenantkettch Год назад

The production value just keeps getting better and better. The videos from a few years back have their own distinctive style and charm, but the recent ones are History Channel (back when they were actually a history channel) worthy.

@aapopesonen2902 Год назад

You're for real one of the best private animators that I've seen. I got some experience from 3d modeling and animating and what you've done, is extremely good.

@ClenchingHalo45 Год назад

I can’t believe how far yarnhub has gone from 2d animations to almost hyper realistic 3d animations.

@neeevirus Год назад

Holy heck I havent watched yarnhub's content in probably a year When I clicked this video I thought I was just gonna get some cartoony 3d style, which is pretty decent Instead I get this high quality stuff sheesh I commend them for their amazing content

@frankmiller3367 Год назад

I'm going to say this now. Yarnhub. Your animations are so perfect, at 3:14 you captured the expression of these M26 Pershing crewmembers, and also added sort of a blur to it. You really captured the moment right there. From your earliest video to this video. This has been a Improvement. You should keep on making more of these videos!

@frankmiller3367 Год назад

*Wow. I've gotten a heart from Yarnhub. I feel accomplished.*

@braedynhoward3644 Год назад

Wow, the animations are getting better and better and more realistic looking. I remember a year or two ago thinking the animation of the people looked funny, but now they look great. The way the eyes, hair, and skin look makes it feel like they are real people. The effects also Mae it look like a real combat scene. Great job!

@Iwannabuyabugatti Год назад

Not only is everyone commenting something positive about the video, but Yarnhub is also taking the time to heart them too. That's just even more dedication, easily the best war animation channel ever!

@Yarnhub Год назад

Thank you

@Minizzile Год назад

You guys are doing great things!! This gave me a nostalgic feeling for the type of shows The History Channel had(when it was good lol) or like the type of show your teacher would show you in class in high school but ya know this is something actually interesting. You guys are killing it and the progress you guys are showing on your animations and detail is amazing! Keep on keeping on!

@varunprakash6207 Год назад

M26 Pershing vs T34 85 The Battle fight between Armor vehicle to enemy The war animation 👌 voice 🎤 narration of stories Battle between the enemy The way of narration feels like we are in the war " Enemy Ahead Fire " Striking the enemy Excellent animation 👌 by Yarn team Team 👏The Historical wars with back stories semma super

@sworder33 Год назад

The Waffle House Has Found Its New Host

@cpconner93 Год назад

The pershing had huge advantage over the t34 85 in terms of fire power armor ergonomics. It was heavy vs medium tank

@Manu10900 Год назад

An IS2 would have been a more even match

@Optimusprime56241 Год назад

Yeah it was not very even

@drmaulana2600 Год назад

pershing is medium tank, tha thing was intended to replace aging sherman. also, US didnt field any heavy tank during both korea war and WW2 (i dont think Jumbo is considered "heavy tank" by US Army)

@Optimusprime56241 Год назад

@@drmaulana2600 correct, main reason being transporting heavy tanks across the sea wasn’t a very good idea, a lot of prototypes tho

@cpconner93 Год назад

@@drmaulana2600 The Pershing was considered a heavy tank by US Army standards and they even fielded a modified variant called the SuperPershing with an even more powerful gun. It was never meant to replace the Sherman which was readily upgraded with HVSS and the 76mm cannon. The US Army did not feel the need to replace it as a medium tank.

@georgeouroussoff3830 Год назад

"The myth of t-34/85's invincibility has been spectacularly shuttered". Well if it took multiple shots from numerous American tanks to destroy a single WWII Era tank, than, no, it hasn't been shuttered.

@reconzero5699 Год назад

More like heavy tank vs medium tank lol

@minisaiju922 Год назад

They were using an ap shell without the high explosive in it thats why it killed 1 or 2 crew and went out through the back of the turret

@Xpumpkin1 16 часов назад

Ngl, I found him randomly and watched one of this videos now I’m obsessed with watching yarnhub

@whisperingforest9909 Год назад

1:49 CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT ON A PERSHING

@APFS-DS Год назад

6:08 that beard texture is insane

@CatShak Год назад

this is one of my most favourite animations and story, just beside the Cologne Tank Duel, your teams animations are 🔥

@vladimirhricak565 6 месяцев назад

But in Korea, Pershing was starting while t 34 was ending. The Russians were already starting production of the T 54

@movableorigins4194 4 месяца назад

No use explaning, they need to feel good about the Korean fail 80 years later...the myth of the invincible t34! Don't recommend channel all i could say

@Keith-jp6jw 3 месяца назад

It doesn’t really matter, the Pershing wasn’t some technological marvel and was actually designed to be a ww2 tank. They just used thicker/spaced armor and a bigger gun.

@movableorigins4194 3 месяца назад

@@Keith-jp6jw T34s weren't the "invincible tank" the day they came out!

@НиколайПундани 9 месяцев назад

Некорректное сравнение танков разных классов. В данной "весовой категории" в СССР использовался тяжелый танк ИС-2 (IS-2). Весом более 40 тонн как и Першинг. Т34-85 на 10+ тонн легче обоих. С "равным по массе" сравнивать не так красиво, конечно. Не будет такого "явного преимущества", хотя ИС-2 имел много своих недостатков так как был создан во время войны под производство военного времени и его компромиссы.

@ジョニージョニー-z7n Год назад

8:45 best shot by the way

@itzpilly 9 месяцев назад

I agree

@PhilipRosene2013 14 дней назад

Yea

@wendelldig591 10 месяцев назад

Soviet tank t-34 is no match against pershing

@vitoperez7969 4 месяца назад

Si lo fue y mucho.

@abnwil3873 Месяц назад

No, no lo fue

@1996FordCrownVictoria 9 месяцев назад

Look at all the Russians that are mad lol

@TheFinnishTanker 9 месяцев назад

Ikr?

@BarryAllen__1A23 8 месяцев назад

They thought warthunder was real life lmao

@joshuanewman1273 Год назад

As a korean I wanna thank all the Americans for holding Busan

@lurtzy_ Год назад

Its spelled T-34-85, If you spell T34 without the dash its the American version.

@VKSgtSLaughter Год назад

4:48 The slo-mo shots of the shells flying through the air reminds me of the 2019 movie T-34. If you haven't seen it, check it out as the battle sequences are amazing! Great video! 👍

@pedroalbornozramirez8895 9 месяцев назад

a man of culture

@charlessapp1835 Год назад

Fantastic! Your quality is becoming amazing! It is guys like you that make RU-vid the REAL History Channel. If only they would appreciate you guys. Can you do some more Korea stories? The Battle of Fox Hill would be a great topic!

@elwoodjardeo6133 Год назад

7:13 literally made me flinch i thought someone was shouting behind me

@sithumthathsarakoswattage3678 Год назад

LOL me too. Genuinely sounded like 3d sounds.

@ITZZX71 10 месяцев назад

T-34-85 gets shot From the fuel setting the engine compartment on fire "🗿" Getting shot straight in the turret front by a 90MM HVAP "🗿" Getting shot in the turret front again with a 90MM HVAP "🗿"

@Matvey_658 Год назад

Обидно за наших т 34 85 они могли пройти всю войну с фашистами , но сгореть от бывших союзниках. При чём м26 в разы превосходил т34 по ТТХ.🇷🇺

@sithumthathsarakoswattage3678 Год назад

Terrific work guys 🤍 By the way, I think battle for Greece is one of the least discussed of all the ww2 stories. There weren't any glorious aircrafts involved but allied wings were completely outnumbered. I'd very much like to see a video on the topic. Maybe Roald Dahl would be best to make the story around because he has recorded many of the events in his writings?

@Comrade_Mittens Год назад

8:21 that was cool

@gacasandumpor6840 Год назад

0:10 GG boys

@RUSS-Wolfwrestlr 3 месяца назад

The issue with the HVAP (high velocity Amour piercing) is that it wouldn’t explode inside the tank. The HVAP simply goes straight through one side and comes out the other.

@tomaszmurzyn9123 Месяц назад

Ye but crew is dead/unable to fight Unlike in war thunder

@viper2148 Год назад

There was no ‘myth of the T34-85’. Shermans had already been defeating them easily.

@AFT_05G Год назад

T-34s could do the same thing to Shermans too.I feel like Sherman fanboys are putting too much faith in Sherman's rather meh firepower and armor protection these days.Remember main strength of your tank was it's reliability and versatility.

@viper2148 Год назад

@@AFT_05G you may “feel” that way, but history doesn’t care about your feelings.

@reddrn620 Год назад

The M4 also easily lost to the T-34.

@Игорьсуздальский 10 месяцев назад

@@viper2148yep, it isn't. Sherman just outdated tank, that was late to the battle

@viper2148 10 месяцев назад

@@reddrn620 yeah, no. On at least three occasions in 1950-51 when Shermans met the T-34 in battle during the Koran War each time the M4 Sherman came out victorious.