@@ufyyrud1254 The Muslim woman is required to cover her face in front of men who are non-mahrams to her. If she is in ihram for Hajj or ‘Umrah, she should cover her face with something other than the niqab, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) forbade the woman in ihram to wear niqab. This has been explained, with evidence, in fatwa no. 172289 If the woman in ihram covers her face with her head cover, jilbaab and the like, then she does not have to create a distance between the cover and her face, because there is no report from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to indicate that this is required. Rather the actions of women at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) indicate that this is not required. ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: The riders used to pass us when we were with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in ihram. When they drew close to us, one of us would let down her jilbaab from her head over her face, and when they had passed us we would uncover it again. It is well-known that the jilbaab that is let down from the head over the face will inevitably touch the face.
The Muslim woman is required to cover her face in front of men who are non-mahrams to her. If she is in ihram for Hajj or ‘Umrah, she should cover her face with something other than the niqab, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) forbade the woman in ihram to wear niqab. This has been explained, with evidence, in fatwa no. 172289 If the woman in ihram covers her face with her head cover, jilbaab and the like, then she does not have to create a distance between the cover and her face, because there is no report from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to indicate that this is required. Rather the actions of women at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) indicate that this is not required. ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: The riders used to pass us when we were with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in ihram. When they drew close to us, one of us would let down her jilbaab from her head over her face, and when they had passed us we would uncover it again. It is well-known that the jilbaab that is let down from the head over the face will inevitably touch the face.
The problem is the translation for the translation is wrong the prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said it is is not permission to wear the niqab for a woman in ihram and the translator translated it is not permissible to cover the face. Imagine if perophet were to say it is not permissible to wear the salwar,kameez for a women in ihram he would have translated it is not permissible to cover the body for a women in ihram😂 so remain naked. If prophet forbade a special kind of dress then it means we would have to wear something else and not to leave our face naked as it is prohibited to show the face.
Leave the face naked lol. Give a single verse of the quran which commands women to veil their faces. Why would men be told to lower their gazes then if women covered their faces in front of them.
@@mohammadfarooqi6255 Is covering the face obligatory? You should note that women’s observing hijab in front of non-mahram men and covering their faces is something that is obligatory as is indicated by the Book of your Lord and the Sunnah of your Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and by rational examination and analogy. Evidence for covering the face from the Quran · Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces , necks and bosoms) and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husband’s fathers, or their sons, or their husband’s sons, or their brothers or their brother’s sons, or their sister’s sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e. their sisters in Islam), or the (female) slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who lack vigour, or small children who have no sense of feminine sex. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And all of you beg Allah to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful.” [al-Nur 24:31] The evidence from this verse that hijab is obligatory for women is as follows: 1. Allah commands the believing women to guard their chastity, and the command to guard their chastity is also a command to follow all the means of doing that. No rational person would doubt that one of the means of doing so is covering the face, because uncovering it causes people to look at it and enjoy its beauty, and then to initiate contact. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “The eyes commit zina and their zina is by looking…” then he said, “… and the private part confirms that or denies it.” Narrated by al-Bukhari, 6612; Muslim, 2657.
@@mohammadfarooqi6255 If covering the face is one of the means of guarding one’s chastity, then it is enjoined, because the means come under the same ruling as the ends. 2. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “…and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms) …”. The jayb (pl. juyub) is the neck opening of a garment and the khimar (veil) is that with which a woman covers her head. If a woman is commanded to draw her veil over the neck opening of her garment then she is commanded to cover her face, either because that is implied or by analogy. If it is obligatory to cover the throat and chest, then it is more appropriate to cover the face because it is the site of beauty and attraction. 3. Allah has forbidden showing all adornment except that which is apparent, which is that which one cannot help showing, such as the outside of one's garment. Hence Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “…except only that which is apparent …” and He did not say, except that which they show of it. Some of the salaf, such as Ibn Mas’ud, al-Hasan, Ibn Sirin and others interpreted the phrase “except only that which is apparent” as meaning the outer garment and clothes, and what shows from beneath the outer garment (i.e., the hem of one’s dress etc.). Then He again forbids showing one’s adornment except to those for whom He makes an exception. This indicates that the second adornment mentioned is something other than the first adornment. The first adornment is the external adornment which appears to everyone and cannot be hidden. The second adornment is the inward adornment (including the face). If it were permissible for this adornment to be seen by everyone, there would be no point to the general wording in the first instance and this exception made in the second.
@@mohammadfarooqi6255 4. Allah grants a concession allowing a woman to show her inward adornments to “old male servants who lack vigour”, i.e. servants who are men who have no desire, and to small children who have not reached the age of desire and have not seen the ‘awrahs of women. This indicates two things: I.1 - That showing inward adornments to non-mahrams is not permissible except to these two types of people. II.2 - That the reason for this ruling is the fear that men may be tempted by the woman and fall in love with her. Undoubtedly the face is the site of beauty and attraction, so concealing it is obligatory lest men who do feel desire be attracted and tempted by her. 5. The words (interpretation of the meaning): “And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment” mean that a woman should not stamp her feet so as to make known hidden adornments such as anklets and the like. If a woman is forbidden to stamp her feet lest men be tempted by what they hear of the sound of her anklets etc., then what about uncovering the face? Which is the greater source of temptation - a man hearing the anklets of a woman whom he does not know who she is or whether she is beautiful, or whether she is young or old, or ugly or pretty? Or his looking at a beautiful youthful face that attracts him and invites him to look at it? Every man who has any desire for women will know which of the two temptations is greater and which deserves to be hidden and concealed.
its strange; it is one of the fewest irrational things i have found within islamic rules; *God says doing sexual stuff during ihram is forbidden, but wearing niqab and cloth too is forbidden which can provoke sexual desire somehow during the ihram* !!
@@FF-le3ps i use the symbol to show that our revolution which occured years back had nothing to do with the current regime of rafidha which has got deviated from the pillars of islam
There’s a difference between engaging in sexual *actions* and only having thoughts without acting upon them. But besides that, muslims whether men or women should avert their gaze and not stare and gawk lustfully to begin with.
Ya akhi be carful what you say. Saying there is something irrational in Islam is dangerous and can possibly be a statement of kufr. These are the laws of Allah swt and nothing that Allah legislates is irrational
I saw a video before and I need a link please someone send because I forgot the name of the video and I can not find it! Description (Details might not be exact) Sheikh Assim where the video was asking question about (Sahîh Al-Bukhâri, Hadîth No. 44, Vol. 1) where the question was like that person did only three things then someone like is Haji required bc Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said that person goes to paradise if he said is the truth.
