Is Iron Man’s Arc Reactor Possible? | StarTalk

Подписаться 23 млн

Просмотров 697 тыс.

50% 1

Neil uses physics to talk about the feasibility of Iron Man’s super power, the Arc Reactor.
➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/NatGeoSubscribe
➡ Watch all clips of StarTalk here: bit.ly/WatchStarTalk
➡ Get More StarTalk: bit.ly/NGStartalk
About StarTalk:
Host Neil deGrasse Tyson brings together celebrities, scientists and comedians to explore a variety of cosmic topics and collide pop culture with science in a way that late-night television has never seen before. Weekly topics range from popular science fiction, space travel, extraterrestrial life, the Big Bang, to the future of Earth and the environment. Tyson is an astrophysicist with a gifted ability to connect with everyone, inspiring us all to to "keep looking up."
Get More National Geographic:
Official Site: bit.ly/NatGeoOfficialSite
Facebook: bit.ly/FBNatGeo
Twitter: bit.ly/NatGeoTwitter
Instagram: bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
About National Geographic:
National Geographic is the world's premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what's possible.
Is Iron Man’s Arc Reactor Possible? | StarTalk
• Is Iron Man’s Arc Reac...
National Geographic
/ natgeo

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

21 дек 2015

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 762

@materialmanners 8 лет назад

TONY STARK WAS ABLE TO BUILD THIS IN A CAVE!! ..... WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS!!

@kaarukun1651 7 лет назад

it's called a fucking movie

@davidsirmons 7 лет назад

(insert tie-flip as best moment in whole movie)

@NickRaeff 6 лет назад

davidsirmons I’m so happy someone else catches it in that scene!! 😂😂

@stephenswamy702 6 лет назад

Underated

@bugmaster05 6 лет назад

Well im sorry, Im not Tony Stark

@LaurusHG 6 лет назад

Iron Monger: "TONY STARK BUILT THIS IN A CAVE, WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS!" Neil: "I'm sorry sir, but I'm not Tony Stark."

@noxrubbish 6 лет назад

LOL

@albertlabriola36 6 лет назад

Exactly.

@twilightzone6878 6 лет назад

Laurus

@jean-michelorlandothomas7477 5 лет назад

True that boiii

@Marcus-pv9le 5 лет назад

Dam that's sad they can't build an arc reactor and upgrade a suit with high tech computers electricity motors sheets and sheets of metal cutter flames rawer energy absorbers everything they could need and they can't build it and tony stark can build it in a cave with a box of his weapons scrap metal little tubes and spinning trash and he built a suit that broke him out of a terrorists zone

@thomasalias8492 6 лет назад

He's applying our current technology's rules to futuristic tech. Of course, Tony was able to find a way around the heat problem. That's like someone from the 18th century saying fast cars are impossible because wooden wheels will break with that much rotation per minute.

@blackheart9068 6 лет назад

Anonymous was there a calendar in the movie that indicated this.

@Niom_Music 5 лет назад

Tom Foolery I’m not entirely sure that’s a fair comparison, but I agree. One day we’ll get there! There’re few things impossible. Only problem is time, it is our biggest obstacle.

@milovanmilovanov2598 5 лет назад

with the difference that we are not even close of building that kind of technology..let alone on that small of a scale.. so with that said he is just being realistic and separates the reality from the marvel fiction.. :)

@jodjod6147 5 лет назад

You made a fantastic point.👏👏

@alphayun7401 4 года назад

what if tony stark made it to where the arch reactor was able to create an inter dimension void where all the heat goes, or its pulling power from an energy well created from itself

@gamerpro9678 5 лет назад

The first computer was super huge and bulky and had storage of like 5MB or something. Now we have 1TB hard drives, which are way smaller. If that was possible, then arc reactor could be possible.

@HarshaHarshG-tb3pu Год назад

It makes sense right.

@TheWhyme01 Год назад

Just like the evolution from lightbulbs to LED lights

@gimmepenalty Год назад

Ya we aren’t evolving enough we ain’t even using 72% of the earth energy which is 0.02% from 1973. If we used 100% of the earth energy that would be much more possible and if we started using the suns energy then we’d have a tiny stark by now

@flagrantlyvivid7195 2 месяца назад

It's all possible, the powers that be just need to figure out a way that they can monetize it while keeping other technologies suppressed.

@CryptolockerMD 6 лет назад

Keep in mind the Arc reactor tech didn't start out small. In the first movie it was a giant thing requiring a huge building to control.

@roodycrles3465 8 лет назад

God damit thermal law of unconventional energy

@The_Viktor_Reznov 6 лет назад

Thermal law of inconvenient energy

@sil3ntkn1ght27 6 лет назад

Without it, life as we know it would cease to function.

@ToxicFlight 6 лет назад

Sil3nt Kn1ght let them freeze to death

@unadultratedtrini 6 лет назад

what happens here is that the nuclear energy, that is the radiation is being directly converted into electrical thereby not creating heat as a bit product due to the radiation not sticking around to a larger extent. neil is approaching this with a conventional power plant law. which is something that harnesses the heat from the radiation or something like a tokomak which gets the plasma to the sun's temperature. in the arc reactor what were seeing is something like a fission process (not fusion) where the electrons from the radiation are siphoned through the ark into electrical and the neutrons are fused with sacrificial materials on the inside of the reactor who probably take the neutrons and fuse dispersing more electrons in the process and form more energy.

@chetanaik 5 лет назад

@@unadultratedtrini Nope. Tyson is just talking about heat loss due to inefficiency. Even solar panels and wind turbines generate heat due to inefficiencies like electrical resistance etc. Considering the massive power densities that the arc reactor delivers, even a 1% inefficiency would vaporize Tony Stark.

@TartThread 8 лет назад

Dang, thought he would say yes.

@kaarukun1651 7 лет назад

if he said yes, we should have iron man flying everywhere now

@galvinstanley3235 6 лет назад

TartThread61 The Ark reactor is fiction,however there could be another way...small jet engines.;they are using them now for small gliders.

@abeomer86 6 лет назад

Galvin ..with Arc Reactor thrust level is redundant as it can lift anything. Let me hear you talk like that about Jet engines...

@galvinstanley3235 6 лет назад

Path Finder What's with the hate?

@abeomer86 6 лет назад

+Galvin Stanley no hate bro, it's just a sarcastic way of saying "Jet engines have thrust issues" Peace

@nikithdissanayake8211 3 года назад

Keep in mind that in the MCU , no one was able to replicate the Arc reactor , not even top engineers or governments around the world. Maybe the technology is possible , we just don't have anyone smart enough to discover it.

@psylo786 3 года назад

MIT are building a large-scale one. It doesn't melt because is uses magnets to make sure the cations never come into contact with the sides of the tokamak.

@autistichades5552 3 года назад

@@psylo786 there’s also the rise in superconductors, conductors that don’t have electrical resistance, meaning that none of the electricity transfers to heat mid-transfer.

@mffpvp4502 2 года назад

i never see that turbien can also distribute to the main electriccity. if the energy not distribute it will goes to the battry than the battry must be fully recharge so ark reactor plan is must be a battry that have a big volta and capacity. its like rraktor fusi but tiny. and its imposible coz the output is hazzard

@weebdeveloper7493 2 года назад

It was replicated by whiplash

@parzival3632 2 года назад

One tends to say that when they have no idea how physics or chemistry works. MCU is as fictional as star wars. And it's impossible to create an ARC reactor with a new element, as much as it's impossible going faster than the light. Please study real science. Then talk. The closest thing you can get is a replica.

@abcdxx1059 6 лет назад

His ego can absorb absolutely anything

@MXGGRIMZ 6 лет назад

first name is that a bad thing? (Not trynah be rude)

@atrociousconsequences4432 6 лет назад

That Arc Reactor could just his being an egotistical maniac.

@CaslavNorisavljevic 6 лет назад

Are we talking about NDT or Tony Stark?

@srijansinha6921 6 лет назад

The new element created by Tony stark in movie can absorb this tremendous energy generated by Arc reactor...... literally Tony is awesome!!!..👍😘

@nuke2625 4 года назад

, 😂😂nice

@Celestial_Wing 6 лет назад

There's always a way, it's just a matter of figuring it out.

@allfatherasia5579 5 лет назад

Unless while just storing the heat energy, we should convert it back to electrical energy, if im right, thats what the copper lining are, the react the heat and place it back to the core itself?

@mahirbaksh8712 5 лет назад

Whoever figures THAT OUT is gonna be insanely rich 😎😎😏😏

@SAG1028 5 лет назад

Mahir Baksh what about S. E. G. Searle Effect Generator........lol nah just kidding.

@centenarium 4 года назад

You're absolutely right. All that this task takes is a mastermind group of people, where each one of the members is an exceptional thinker, with a chief aim in mind, obsessively determined to make it happen.

@earth8515 4 года назад

J P I’m down if you’re down

@jacobstar2631 8 лет назад

Arc reactor can produce power, you just need to draw away the heat or use the heat as an additional power source. Just because we can't figure it out now, does not mean we won't have a Tony Stark at a future date to do so

@josephmchaileh4522 7 лет назад

Jacob Star i doubt we would be able to use it but yeah hopefully we can channel it away

@oldcowbb 7 лет назад

you cannot use the rejected heat as power, it is a law in thermodynamics

@w0ty 7 лет назад

It's not that it gives off heat as an additional energy source, the heat IS the energy that was in the arc but dissipates due to the 2LOT. Furthermore this energy dissipated was not given off in fusion but the energy put into the reactor to start it up.

@basecamp.santoshwhowrites 7 лет назад

oldcowbb not in the same system dude. Can harness it using other systems, making it primary source of energy ,not rejected!! It's not of no use after rejection from one system. Systems pass, energy is eternal

@oldcowbb 7 лет назад

Santosh Shirsath energy is eternal, useful energy isn't

@lovelywaz 6 лет назад

Just think about all the smart phones and smart gadgets with batteries we have now a days. How HOT they can get by just using them for longer period of time or doing multiple tasks / watching videos etc.. You can feel the heat on your hand from that tiny little battery sitting behind a cover. An Arc Reactor can be 1000s of times more powerful than those tiny batteries, how much heat will it produce? *Neil is right!*

@faultline3936 3 года назад

As for gadgets, it's not the battery that makes it hot, it's the processing units. Of course the batteries gets hot but not to a point that it even comes close to the heat generation of CPUs. Batteries in electric cars, however, are probably the better example. Of course, the idea is the same but it's good to know some facts revolving around it.

@glenwaldrop8166 2 года назад

@@faultline3936 they're the same batteries, the difference is the scale, the power in/out.

@glenwaldrop8166 2 года назад

The Arc Reactor can't exist without super conductors, there's just no way.

@wonderfullife5665 Год назад

@@glenwaldrop8166 arch reactor will violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics thus it can't exist. It doesn't matter how technology advances we simply can't surpass nature

@glenwaldrop8166 Год назад

@@wonderfullife5665 all I'm saying is the arc reactor *requires* some kind of super conductor to exist and Tyson stopped at that point. If you're going to discuss fictional tech you have to accept some portion of the rules of that universe. First rule would be accepting that a fundamental requirement of the tech was met. He basically just said it's impossible, which is true but why even bother if you're going to dismiss it on the first point?

@jonathancharron7360 4 года назад

The reactor is actually reversed engineered from the tesseract, an infinity stone. Howard Stark's understanding of pym particals (based on attempts to recreate pym's formula) can also play a part.

@jeremyg2236 2 года назад

So basically arc reactor is alien technology, in a sense?

@baranie1809 2 года назад

@@jeremyg2236 basically yeah. but the tesseract is technically the blue infinity stone. Called "The Space-Stone". It and the other Infinity Stones basically made up all of existence; Time,Reality,Power,Mind,Soul/-Stone.

@pain00077 10 месяцев назад

i never thought that way ☠☠

@venkatkarpe 6 лет назад

We must find a way to distribute the power to different necessary places equally and not produce too much to melt any place in the body. If that is possible then we may use it for the people with heart problems instead of anyone else donating a heart (it's not a bad thing)

@ziaw123 8 лет назад

This guy was in the Batman v Superman movie

@shauryasingh9725 6 лет назад

It's clear how much he regrets it considering who his favourite superhero is.

@DH33.0 6 лет назад

Leslie Knope He said Batman was one of his favourites. I'm sure that played a part

@edddedd7740 6 лет назад

I think you are thinking about Laurence fishburne

@vitreo1363 4 года назад

@@edddedd7740 Nah, NDGT was in BvS doing a voice over of a newscast talking about how the existence of Superman changed our view of the universe.

@chloekaftan 6 лет назад

The arc reactor is technically possible assuming we can discover or synthesize a material or isotope that is incredibly energetic and to be able to both react this material without accidentally causing fission via critical mass cascade and being able to harness all of the energy emitted, it would take ages to minituarize it to a chest reactor scale but its possible.. time will tell

@timewalker6654 6 лет назад

renogiza - oh wow so which thing is the fuel for energy creation again!

@TetraSamurai 6 лет назад

renogiza - starks arc reactor is a fusion reactor, not a fission reactor

@bumbledouche3323 6 лет назад

I was under the impression that it was a somewhat cyclical, self-perpetuating power source (hence the name 'arc'), so it's only being depleted by the energy expelled from the suit via flight & repulsor blasts. Naturally, that doesn't make any sense in the real world, but since when has that been a barrier in Hollywood?

@freeloader91 5 месяцев назад

the energy tony uses doesnt generate heat, hes talking ac. thermal dynamics is a by product of the way we think energy is created. inside the arc reactor the copper acts as a coolant, those are the blocks you see in every depiction. when he melts the piladium and makes rings, im assuming to hold a charge and reaction with the later design he uses a solid piece piladium for a stronger reaction and longer charge.

@tyfenrir 6 лет назад

Perhaps Tony found a way to disperse the heat in a way that it's used to increase the energy in a cycle to a limit he installed. Hence the circular appearance.

@lalboimanlun1230 6 лет назад

Tyler James haha....that thing is too small to circulate heat. And it'll be producing a lot of heat.

@timewalker6654 6 лет назад

Tyler James there is no way to create arc reactor because there is no fuel to generate the energy in that reactor

@DiceDriizy 6 лет назад

the fuel wouldnt be a problem according to e=mc^2 ' little mass can produce an enormous amount of energy. if only we knew how to harvest the energy in small steps...

@drovid008 6 лет назад

heat is energy. He must've found a way to reuse that very heat and turn it from a byproduct into an energy supplement, kinda like hybrid cars use regenerative braking to charge the battery... hence why the arc reactors can provide that much power for THAT LONG... we just don't know how turn turn heat back into energy

@cleisztorrefranca1188 6 лет назад

Stop making conclusion from a fiction. Nothing make sense! And you will hate me because you don't even get my point! Haha

@Kal-Grayskull 8 лет назад

All we need now is an AI named Ultron to turn evil.

@WeareIF 6 лет назад

Comic boy67 and we are pretty GD close to that.

@marsulusprime 6 лет назад

Comic boy67 that and also 6 powerful stones and an gauntlet-glove

@thenerdyboii6436 6 лет назад

Comic boy67 Zuckerberg has got our back for that.

@belto3149 6 лет назад

We are IF I know right, just like 100 year away. Very close (sarcasm)

@openmind2161 6 лет назад

Lol Most Probably AI would watch Age of Ultron & Name itself Ultron

@Flash-jw3xh 7 лет назад

we would need to find an element or elements when mixed, can be able to counteract the heat produced by the energy

@snakeplissken1583 6 лет назад

It's called ununpentium.

@Dino-pq9bj 5 лет назад

Dimond?

@Ianin959 3 года назад

@@Dino-pq9bj nope

@bluepeng8895 3 года назад

@@snakeplissken1583 You mean moscovium?

@adinicic4259 6 лет назад

Since we don't know diddly about dark energy maybe arc reactor is made of dark matter hence heat it radiates dissipates into the unknown. That could be a comic book origin storyline as well since it is fantasy theory as well so far.

@Voldrim359 3 года назад

It was powered by paladium

@SIDARTMOTIONPICTURES1 6 лет назад

I can't cool down my graphic card forget about arc reactor!!!

@chloekaftan 6 лет назад

The laws of thermodynamics also apply to the laws of general physics, if you draw out all of the kinetic energy of an object no matter how hot it is it will cool down all the way to absolute zero.

@timewalker6654 6 лет назад

renogiza - do you even know what you saying?

@nilo4197 6 лет назад

Fun Fact: The Arc Reactor appears blue due to the same phenomenon that makes Dr. Manhattan glow blue- Cherenkov Radiation. Also, ARC stands for 'Affordable, Robust Compact'.

@brentjabris.ceballos 2 года назад

I would like to just point that you cannot cool something down to literally absolute zero - but just close to it.

@brianwong3441 6 лет назад

Neil: it's impossible. Trump: tony stark built this in a cave with scraps! Neil:sorry, Im not tony stark.

@ryleynations6251 5 лет назад

brian wong what does trump have to do with this?

@Baba_Yaga_123 4 года назад

Dumb.

@satya_ssp 8 лет назад

good explanation. loved it.

@masoodjalal1152 6 лет назад

"TONY STARK BUILT THAT IN A CAVE, WITH A BUNCH OF SCRAP".

@DeathGhost809 7 лет назад

It can be made though on a smaller scale, doesn't need to be a nuclear reactor attached on your chest, but to produce energy like lithium battery is good

@raulcalderon8702 6 лет назад

A lithium battery doesn't produce energy, just storage it

@countchocula2169 6 лет назад

You can say tony designed The arc reactor to not generate a lot of power while it’s in him powering him, like a pacemaker. It’s on a minimal setting and dissipates heat through his chest and the open metal sides with some water cooling or something. When the suits on, there’s a major water forced cooling system or something like that

@debendragurung3033 6 лет назад

Count chocula the Heat generated in the arc reactor is insane. It would take more than 50 conventional radiators spread over at least two basketball courts at ambient room temperature and pump the size of a washing machine , and 500L reservoir coolant to cool it down or even more.

@doomslayer1984 3 года назад

Wow! Interesting that I have something in common with Tyson. I have always been a much greater admirer of the more human heroes in comics than those with superpowers as well. You can see yourself in those characters much more than the more fantasy-based ones.

@Gencoil 6 лет назад

Take away "tal" from "StarTalk" and you get... "Stark". Boom! Mind blown.

@hip-hophighlights3394 6 лет назад

Bat boys are like "what? What did you say, i don't like you anymore Neil" hahahaha

@fatboyRAY24 6 лет назад

I don't know what cold fusion is, but it sounds like it could solve this problem.

@mahirbaksh8712 5 лет назад

It's a hypothetical reaction which means it can't be implemented 😒

@Ianin959 3 года назад

If it was real then oh boy could we solve many problems

@tonystark3655 7 месяцев назад

Solving the thermodynamics problem would be creating a room temperature superconductor. As for energy Einstein equation of E=MC^2 backs up the theory of a material/object small as the arc reactor producing the insane amount energy. All is left a really smart person to create and apply this new material.

@TheMMAHawk 3 месяца назад

ai will probably be that really smart person

@RoScFan 6 лет назад

A magnetic anti matter storage unit equiped with the means to turn gama rays into usable energy and distribute it would EASILY fit the properties portrayed of the arc reactor. Then again, if it were ever crushed like in "civil war" the whole planet would quite literally go kabloom.

@Bryle_ 2 года назад

"Tony Stark was able to build it in a cave.. With a bunch of scraps!" "Well sorry sir, I'm not Tony Stark"

@NishantSengar 5 лет назад

Never knew such a complicated question can have can a simple answer, just beautiful

@milovanmilovanov2598 5 лет назад

yeah, simply NO :)

@vijeykrishnaa2230 6 лет назад

Wow! Seeing Jason Silva after a long time!

@alexthomas8619 6 лет назад

It's possible just need to distribute the energy in space time continuum by that way distributed energy can be used very efficiently and in different time frame.

@ProGamer-wv8br 6 лет назад

Hacksmith: Hold my beer.

@J-izzy 8 лет назад

Can vibranium be a form of metal (captain america shield)

@WeareIF 6 лет назад

Yes it's metal!

@eboooo 6 лет назад

Yeah with Adamantium

@lasarith2 6 лет назад

EDZIB the real life equivalent is D3o

@lawyerlawyer1215 6 лет назад

graphene would be close to the claimed specifications of Fictional vibranium , if they did a solid 2 inch wide shield of graphene , good luck going through that a 50 bmg bullet wont even scratch it of course it wouldnt be as strong as the fictional vibranium is said to be , but it would be the closest you can get in real life

@RangerDanger720 6 лет назад

when a asteroid from outter space hits earth with that material then yes

@NY_7 6 лет назад

Batman doesn't have an exoskeleton, he wears a suit.

@XMelchiahX 6 лет назад

Maybe I am off base but aerogel internal shielding might be able to not allow the heat transfer. It shouldn't need replenishing like coolants do, it's practically weightless also. If the brittle nature is undesired then the other bendable pliable version could be used instead like nanotube or graphine aerogel.

@ryashaum 7 лет назад

Which show is it?

@no-winteronly_snow5061 3 дня назад

I would answer that question in a very different way. First form and function of his reactor requires a completely different definition of what a reactor is and what type of reactor is actually in his chest. Remember fireflies produce a vary high number of lumens without producing any heat. And what type of reactor is being viewed when looking at the reactor that is actually in his chest? Once those questions are answered then we may proceed with the rest of the equation that is Tony Stark heart.

@alpha5664 Месяц назад

There might have been cooling properties to counteract the heat like that force field stuff we saw on droids in star wars revenge of the sith during Anakin and Obi Wans fight on Mustafar. That was vital to keep the droids that close to the lava without melting.

@vaibhavx1783 6 лет назад

okay, that's hilarious what you said just now. because its possible. all you need is to create a barrier so that plasma does not touch the walls of container. as we know the plasma is negatively charged. we can create a magnetic field to keep the plasma from touching the walls. the other thing we can do is cold fusion. so before saying anything just do some research. all we need is a good superconductor.

@dymaxelmi 6 лет назад

All those things are possible but not actually properly made nowadays. There are prototypes but as we stand now. With our technological level. It would melt for sure.

@Chetann93 6 лет назад

VAIBHAV X dude, can you even imagine the amount of radiation energy emitted by it? I mean, to seal it only it's gonna be a nightmare. Secondly, cold fusion only exists with a limited amount of energy. But here, we're talking about huge amount of energy, to control that much of heat, no mechanism will be able to neutralize it given the size of the reactor.

@vaibhavx1783 6 лет назад

Chetan Chaudhary see to achieve that much power to hold that plasma, you will have to go through nightmares. Its not an easy task. There is no chance of radiation if you contain it.

@fitrianhidayat 6 лет назад

VAIBHAV X you don't even know what you're saying, do you?

@vaibhavx1783 6 лет назад

fitrian hidayat ya i know ! I am Sorry if you don’t understand English

@damyenhockman5440 6 лет назад

Idea: the reactor isn't always full blast, and most of the time puts out just enough to keep his heart safe.

@namelessone5968 2 года назад

suddenly thought of Doc Ock's line about the "power of the sun" while watching this.

@Iamtheboss0777 5 лет назад

basically, a nuclear fusion reactor can hold 100 million celsius degree with magnetic field. probably arc reactor should have similar technology.

@milovanmilovanov2598 5 лет назад

3 gigajoule per second is supposedly the energy generated from the arc reactor. which is pretty much the same as the energy fields producing in USA, which is around 3.3 gigajoulee, sooo the answer is still NO, to whatever questions related to: Is the arc reactor even remotely possible? NO, NO AND A BIG NO!

@Voldrim359 3 года назад

Maybe it can be possible, more likely how much energy is made and how much is the maximun energy made... May be, we don't understand the ark reactor from Tony, it could be absorbing that heat energy to be more efficient

@MannyCLopez 5 лет назад

Rip Ironman love you 3000!!!!

@myleswu9957 8 лет назад

is Vibranium & adamantium possible?

@livinglightning9312 7 лет назад

myles Wu No.

@youtubecgamer6326 6 лет назад

Not the exact metal being portrayed in the film, but with the advances in technology creating such alloys can be in similarity to vibranium and adamantium, So no, but creating something similar can be done by composing the different properties and forming/combining the metals together!

@MasterPiece-rg7ed 6 лет назад

myles Wu yes. But not on earth

@lasarith2 6 лет назад

myles Wu as metals currently no but there is D3o that absorbs all impacts.

@amarsmkbp56 6 лет назад

Graphene is the nearest we can get..i guess?

@streetjustices1706 8 месяцев назад

Makes sense

@Flash-jw3xh 8 лет назад

but he made it with cold fusion which won't melt anything

@amirhamza-hw8cz 7 лет назад

Flash85 71 then it would freeze anything, right?

@royk7712 7 лет назад

cold fusion mean it can still fuse while it has low energy state which mean it can fuse at low temperature which mean you can produce huge amount of energy in a low temperature. if you produce that much of energy , you have to remove it or capture it somehow else it will explode instantly like a nuclear weapon

@geohiekim8705 6 лет назад

Flash85 71 cold compared to regular fusion but it's still pretty high.

@mho... 6 лет назад

you sure?! whats his fuel then?!

@hemantsharma3261 3 года назад

Love you Tyson sir

@SandyRiverBlue 4 года назад

I'm on my third run through the MCU. This time I am rewatching the saga from the point of view of Tony Stark. The first time I watched it it really his character really bugged me from Civil War on. This time around I'm seeing the story of the birth and growth of a hero who is trying to atone for the mistakes of his past, a hero who is destined to die. It's like the ending of Robin Hood where he finally wins only to die in the last story.

@tjk9008 4 года назад

Heat consumption for any electronic device has been for many years the main problem when it comes to nanotechnology holding a large amount of energy. However I still think its possible.

@saradindusarma3856 3 года назад

He never said it's impossible He just explained how it works

@Mikasks 6 лет назад

“They both use technological exoskeleton” “Exo yea yea yea tottaly”

@civilxoxo6884 6 лет назад

wow

@aravindhkathirvelu 2 года назад

Why need to cool the heat with coolant? Try converting the heat to electricity

@user-pq6hy4hx8n 6 лет назад

Also, has no one asked why The Arc Reactor is not melting or vibrating so hard it will melt tony's chest? If we consider logic, no metal that thin would be able to protect his chest from heat and vibration from a nuclear reactor, especially one that small.

@inigoelias5690 2 года назад

One of the great challenges... my favorite Nel frase.

@ipostwhateveriwant99 7 лет назад

at 00:47 . "nuclear". Clearly the woman knows nothing

@ryashaum 7 лет назад

Lee You Ren lol, she doesn't even know who batman is

@nyadambagra2178 6 лет назад

"nuclear..." "Any kind of power plant" "uh huh..." I laughed too hard😂😂😂

@yawoelevn 6 лет назад

Lee You Ren you obviously didn’t see what was written under her name.

@leaveme3559 6 лет назад

@WeareIF 6 лет назад

Just don't mention the fact that Tony created a completely new element. So the argument is mute as no-one knows what properties that element has.

@tanaka6691 4 года назад

Without that thing that makes us unable to do it, like the law, we would be able to

@nickdelasalas8975 6 лет назад

There you go, my dreams killed by a minute and a half long video...

@LofiWurld 2 года назад

Comment: “maeve your hair looks great” Neil: “no hahahah”

@manggala3775 6 лет назад

Well we just have to get rid the law of thermodynamic

@shubhamsingh3635 6 лет назад

Thank you.

@maclovermcellen8417 7 лет назад

isn't the triangle thing was for in iron man 2 to absorb heat.

@WeareIF 6 лет назад

No it was a new element. Like I said in another comment it means that this discussion means nothing as we don't know the properties of this element.

@lordgarion514 6 лет назад

We are IF We know it's not actually real. And we know that to contain that much energy in that small a space whatever properties it has had to violate the laws of physics in some way., And it is a LOT of energy. It lasts a long time and he flies many thousands of miles including breaking the sound barrier. Not to mention using the control thrusters in his gloves as weapons. We're talking the energy equivalent of many tens if thousands of gallons of jet fuel at least and probably more like hundreds of thousands.

@locasenior8229 6 лет назад

arindam Remo It wasnt chemical he was having palladium poisoning. That triangle thing is a new metal he found that is not radioactive but still produces energy? I dont know if that is possible in real life but okay

@whatisbow2865 6 лет назад

Probably vibranium.

@locasenior8229 6 лет назад

Whatisbow 28 No it wasnt vibranium it was some other not radioactive material that produces energy i dont know the name of it..

@MrGrownman455 6 лет назад

Would it not depend on the metal that was used to incase the small reactor because certain metal materials can withstand extremely high temperatures. So how hot does he believe the energy in that small reactor is going to get? We're not talking about a huge Power plant . I'm sure if they really tried they could find a material or maybe develop some type of material that could incase it.

@chrisferreira4178 6 лет назад

What about with cold fusion?

@SachiPathmajan 4 года назад

My actual issue with the arc reactor is where it's positioned.Its right in the centre of his Rib Cage which should be ridiculously painful and even impossible right???

@andrewmcandrew7642 2 года назад

Me yelling in Obadiah: Tony stark was able to build this in a cave! With a box of scraps

@tyfenrir 6 лет назад

Perhaps the heat it produces powers the suit but that doesn't explain how Tonys chest doesn't melt when he sleeps.

@adlerjohnagustin947 3 года назад

There will be always a way

@HungryHelpings 6 лет назад

Tony is so cool that he doesn’t need any cooling equipment to cool down his reactor core.

@Kris592gy 8 лет назад

when i get old i wanna be like neil...he's a chill guy

@LJdaentertainer 8 лет назад

chill my ass.

@Kris592gy 8 лет назад

@MrVish1991 6 лет назад

That guy really likes Tony Stark over BATMAN

@SolarisSaber 6 лет назад

Vishvaditya shah yeah and he was in BvS

@kevindefrancesco75 6 лет назад

Tony Stark is better tan Batman in comics in almost everyway possible

@drdoomgoat38 6 лет назад

Marvelita De Francesco dumb MCU fanboy

@Lipidwave 6 лет назад

drdoomgoat 38 Personality wise I'd pick Stark over Wayne anyday

@DW-vl2wi 6 лет назад

drdoomgoat 38 I just don't see Batman fighting Thanos. Sorry.

@saqib.. 3 года назад

so did you solve the heating problem?

@mexicanmuslim 6 лет назад

Radiation too

@lazyboy1060 8 лет назад

Is Jurassic park's dinosaurs possible?

@GandalfTheTsaagan 8 лет назад

Well, since we can't get actual non-avian dinosaur DNA, not as it's portrayed in the film (and yes, I'm aware that we found TRACES of T-rex DNA inside a femur, but with that you can't clone anything), what we cand do for now though, is making birds look like non-avian dinosaurs by supressing the gens that supress the developing of a snout, tail and fingers and modify its posture (Jack Horner is working on that, look out for his "chicken-o-saurus")

@bluepeng8895 3 года назад

We technically can, but we need dinasour dna, which is going to extremely difficult, if not impossible, since it has to be preserved very well for 60+ million years

@S_M_23_ 6 лет назад

But there are metals that don't conduct heat aren't there? Or maybe other kinds of materials

@chefsergiosilva 4 года назад

My thoughts are.. We have managed to store terabytes in small sd cards in just a few years. Dont think it will take long until we have a powerfull portable & small fusion reactor. The thing is what we think we know, the military is already 10-20 years ahead of us.

@mipan-9371 Год назад

That's a good perspective 👍 Totally makes sense

@neeladrimukherjee7813 6 лет назад

Sir what about cold fussion? Will it also produce a lot of heat?

@jonathanrayne 2 года назад

Unless the heat is being converted to energy thats utilized at a rapid rate or it's a form of cold fusion.

@anomolisagag2270 4 года назад

so when we give an AC to the arc reactor, i mean we transfer the heat to somewhere else, would the power transfer to somewhere else to?

@rajarshiroy6300 2 года назад

this is where fiction stops and science takes over

@snowdjagha 6 лет назад

Well...

@nesseihtgnay9419 8 лет назад

i loved tony stark and Neil argue about the ark reactor.

@arraneon7982 8 лет назад

You mean, the drug dealer who was let out of prison because it was full?

@ballingwisdom4804 4 месяца назад

I would like to hear Elon answer this question think he would say yes and give a good explanation as to how he is going to do it in the next decade

@collinator68 2 года назад

I think Neil actually kind of dodged the question because he REALLY didn't want to have to explain the complexities of what it would take to make it reality,.......... that, or he's secretly working for the government.

@angelesaaron6737 6 лет назад

Exactly. You would be producing that much energy. Supposing that you are able to produce this technology in a finalized stage like that, you should be smart enough to make a counter measure for all of that heat produced. Anyone with intelligence to create this kind of reactor should be able to produce a cooling system that is powerful enough to oppose the said possibility that everything in its range would melt.

@rxonmymind8362 6 лет назад

Aaron Angeles Why oppose it? Flow with it, use it, turn the energy to your advantage. In the break room use it to instantly heat up water for tea. Endless hot showers.... Lol. Seriously, put it on a cold as planet like Pluto and we've got a great source of heat, energy etc...to make living on a planet viable. Got heat, will travel!

@milovanmilovanov2598 5 лет назад

@@rxonmymind8362 People often like to entertain their thoughs with ideas about things they dont' fully understand or at all. I challenge you to channel YOUR energy into something achieveable and USEFULL in your life time. That'll be something truly remarkable more than the fiction itself :)

@Destinedhellfire 2 года назад

Per the Marvel wiki: The armor has evolved from a bulky iron suit to a highly complex matrix of molecularly-aligned fully crystallized ultra high carbon iron/steel hybrid alloy enhanced by magnetic fields over layers of other ultra hyper alloys like titanium alloy and or tungsten/vanadium alloys reinforced with carbon nano-tubes creating a shell that is pliable, yet capable of amazingly high resilience and protection. Most of his armor are powered by a combination of solar converters, electrical batteries and an on-board generator that uses beta particle absorption as a fuel source.The armor is also able to absorb and convert nearby or far away energy sources, such as heat, solar, electrical, magnetic, geo-thermal or kinetic energy or energy from the planet itself into electricity, or even drain energy directly into the batteries for recharge.

@kingartison 6 лет назад

I got the answer I was looking for

@Phat_trick910 4 дня назад

Tony Stark has Arc Reactor to supply power for Powerful Blow, but doesn't have a suit that's strong enough Batman has a suit that's strong enough but he doesn't have an Arc Reactor to power his suit