Тёмный

Is Minimal Facts argument for the resurrection reliable? | Minimal Facts #1 

Sanctus
Подписаться 34 тыс.
Просмотров 804
50% 1

Does the Minimal Facts Argument for Jesus's Ressurection hold up? Today we'll be exploring this and more! This video is part one, in the next video we'll look at the opposing theories to this argument.
‪@MikeLiconaOfficial‬ ‪@garyhabermas1473‬
The book I used for the video: www.amazon.com...
Links
Discord Server: / discord
TikTok: / sanctus.dominus

Опубликовано:

 

30 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 31   
@SanctusApologetics
@SanctusApologetics Год назад
Comment Feedback!
@amypetty5013
@amypetty5013 Год назад
Absolutely nothing you've said here is any kind of minimal fact. It all hinges on the pure assumption that every word of the Bible is literal fact, and that's where the entire argument shatters. The Bible is not an objective historical document which can be taken at face value. Scholars DO agree on several things, but NOT the way you've falsely presented it here.
@SanctusApologetics
@SanctusApologetics Год назад
@@amypetty5013 I never said everything in the bible is a fact , in this video i just showed 5 facts which are accepted by the majority of scholars , so yes everything in this specific video is a fact according to historical scholars , even skeptical ones , they just come to different conclusions.
@amypetty5013
@amypetty5013 Год назад
@@SanctusApologetics I heard everything you said. You're just another pseudo-intellectual charlatan the small number of details accepted by actual Biblical scholars to assert claims those facts DO NOT support. This isn't intellectual rigor. It's just more apologetics nonsense.
@iamcatholic_
@iamcatholic_ Год назад
I like the new thumbnail!
@SanctusApologetics
@SanctusApologetics Год назад
thank you!!
@mtdouthit1291
@mtdouthit1291 4 месяца назад
Where can I download the background music of chants ?????
@marcokite
@marcokite Год назад
very good but let's remember that St James the 'brother' of the Lord was his cousin or very close relative. Hail Mary, EVER VIRGIN Mother of God! I don't believe St Joseph was an old man with children before he married Our Lady either.
@SanctusApologetics
@SanctusApologetics Год назад
he was a half brother , not by mary
@Apollos2.2
@Apollos2.2 6 месяцев назад
​@@SanctusApologetics what? Then by who?
@rafexrafexowski4754
@rafexrafexowski4754 2 месяца назад
​@@SanctusApologetics I can see how the Eastern tradition of Joseph being an old widower with other children might seem quite convincing, but to me, the Western view of Joseph being young and not previously married and the brethren being cousins makes more sense. First, them being stepbrothers would call into question why John had to be adopted by Mary, as she supposedly had four stepsons who could have taken care of her. One argument I've heard is that the brethren were non-believers (John 7:5), but that is unlikely. First, John's adoption is clearly permanent (John 19:27), but James, even if he was not an Apostle, saw the resurrected Jesus in a private meeting (1 Corinthians 15:7), so John taking care of Mary would have only taken 43 days at most, not the rest of Mary's life. This means that Jesus had to have been the only child of Mary and John 7:5 most likely refers to other, more distantly related members of the family, as James was likely an Apostle (Clopas and Alphaeus are the same name, both have a brother named Jude, and the title "the Lesser" highly suggests the existence of only two very important people by the name of James in Jesus' life).
@rafexrafexowski4754
@rafexrafexowski4754 2 месяца назад
​@@Apollos2.2 He probably meant stepbrother
@Apollos2.2
@Apollos2.2 6 месяцев назад
Nice job putting this together!
@focus9375
@focus9375 Год назад
ave Christus
@apostolicfollower
@apostolicfollower Год назад
another W
@jhake67
@jhake67 Год назад
THE RESSURECTION IS A MATTER OF FAITH AND IT IS NOT BASED ON HISTORICAL FACTS. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE A MIRACLE AND THUS CANNOT BE VERIFIED even paul, the earliest source cannot describe clearly what type of body it is of his vision of the risen christ. he just made it up as he goes along...
@SanctusApologetics
@SanctusApologetics Год назад
It is both faith and evidence. Because if it was just faith then islam , hinduism and any other religion would be just as valid. But the evidence suggests Christianity is the truth.
@jhake67
@jhake67 Год назад
@@SanctusApologetics SADLY my friend... THERE IS NO TRUTH! only interpretations! AND EVENTUALLY ALL GODS DIE!
@chaldeang7687
@chaldeang7687 Год назад
@@jhake67 There is no truth? Is that statement true?
@THEWOKERIGHT
@THEWOKERIGHT 10 месяцев назад
​@@chaldeang7687yea actually
Далее
Five Resurrection Facts That Occurred by 36 A.D.
50:38
Просмотров 499 тыс.
Дикий Бармалей разозлил всех!
01:00
КВН 2024 Встреча выпускников
2:00:41
Muslim tries to "refute" Thomas Aquinas @syfetalk
19:40
10 Theology Books for beginners
10:15
Просмотров 25 тыс.
How Augustine Proved the Trinity
7:10
Просмотров 113 тыс.
Argument from Motion for God's Existence
14:25
Просмотров 4,6 тыс.
How Tertullian proved the Trinity
7:36
Просмотров 14 тыс.
The Philosophical Failure of Islam's God
9:46
Просмотров 52 тыс.
Дикий Бармалей разозлил всех!
01:00