Тёмный

Is Patagonia REALLY Sustainable? 

Future Proof
Подписаться 643 тыс.
Просмотров 181 тыс.
50% 1

Patagonia presents itself as an environmentally conscious brand, constantly promoting sustainability and anti-consumerism. Our question is: is Patagonia actually helping the planet or is it all just marketing?
Subscribe to Future Proof!
/ @futureprooftv
Follow our SHORTS Channel!
/ @futureproofhealth
Stay updated on our socials
Instagram: / futureprooftv
Facebook: / futureprooftv
TikTok: / futureprooftv
Reddit: / futureproof
For further reading, check out the sources for this video here:
docs.google.co...
Script: Holly Maley
Editor: Kirsten Stanley
Project Manager: Lurana McClure Rodríguez
Host: Levi Hildebrand
Want to work with Future Proof? Get in touch:
contact@befutureproof.ca

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 321   
@kenim
@kenim 2 года назад
In the end, Patagonia is JUST a clothing manufacturer. You cannot expect them to revolutionize the fossil fuel or logistics industry just by themselves. What they can do (and they are doing it) is use their resources to push for reform while doing the best they can within their industry (ie sustainable cotton).
@williamrobinson4265
@williamrobinson4265 2 года назад
exactly... they are just more neoliberal capitalists although the pickme-ass "good guys" kind of evil if they were supporting radical international organization of labor then maybe we would have dealt with the fossil fuel industry already
@jimiefoxx
@jimiefoxx 2 года назад
Agree! And from that point of view, they are already at the top of its world.
@felixbechtoldt
@felixbechtoldt 2 года назад
I love that they repair stuff from other brands. Before I knew more about all of these companies I bought a pretty expensive hardshell jacket from the north face. After a couple of weeks a zipper broke and I sent it to the norh face. Then I waited 8 weeks just to get my jacket back in the exact same condition as I sent it to them. The only thing I got was a note saying that zippers aren't covered by the warranty and that I could get a 10% discount on my next order. Then I heard about patagonias policy and boom, my jacket is fixed. I just wish I had bought from patagonia in the first place 😉
@timbushell8640
@timbushell8640 2 года назад
See... Levi, good biz even if into the global village, creates biz... some other company didn't get to sell Felix a new jacket... and by the sounds of it, Patagonia will be the brand of whatever 'high-ish tech' clothing he needs to buy next... ... long term marketing, seemingly transparent... and to date, I have no, zero, Patagonia stuff. : )))))
@richeyrich2203
@richeyrich2203 Год назад
@@timbushell8640 I tell ya, with their longer term philosophy, I am now only buying used gear from companies like this. I save the cost, I keep old gear in use. And it will be repairs or replaced when it breaks on me. I’m now buying Patagonia, Filson, rav, Cotopaxi, fijallraven, and the like. Companies that have very expensive gear but also want you to use it as long as possible.
@SuperAaron99
@SuperAaron99 Год назад
Patagonia talks a big game but they’re the same as everyone else. I bought a pair of winter gloves from them once ($70) and they tore a few weeks into owning them. I could have paid someone the stitch them back but I was curious to see about this repair policy they like to brag about. I took them to the store in Vancouver and they said they would be ready in 2-3. months lol. When I picked them up they were repaired but they had a tag from a repair shop in Los Angeles. These guys really shipped a pair of gloves from Canada to LA to put in a few stitches and shipped it back. Now they can say they repair stuff to “save the planet” and I can say sanctimoniously (like people that believe in this stuff) that instead of throwing them away I repaired them to “avoid waste”. When it comes down to it the resources taken up by this whole sham of a policy would have been less if they threw them away and gave me a new pair.
@seyadeodin
@seyadeodin Год назад
@@SuperAaron99 That's bad, but no, a new pair would still be more resourceful.
@beardedbastard7753
@beardedbastard7753 2 года назад
A video on their military ties would be an interesting one
@antoineallard8788
@antoineallard8788 2 года назад
Wait ? Military ties ?
@David-vg1wl
@David-vg1wl 2 года назад
I was thinking the same thing! My Patagonia combat shirt is essential under plate carriers. I would like to know more about Patagonia's role in GWOT.
@felixbechtoldt
@felixbechtoldt 2 года назад
Agreed 🤝
@PrimevilKneivel
@PrimevilKneivel 2 года назад
Same here, I didn't know about that.
@JDLT645
@JDLT645 2 года назад
And the garbage design of not having back pockets on their combat pants. WHY?!
@avacurtis2729
@avacurtis2729 2 года назад
I am part of a clean energy campaign for my local school district and Patagonia actually shared our petition on Twitter. Might not seem like a big deal but brands almost never will do that especially with something as small and grassroots as we are
@FutureProofTV
@FutureProofTV 2 года назад
That's actually so cool! Glad to hear your campaign got some visibility ✨
@josech
@josech 2 года назад
The fact that they have kept themselves as private company gives them more leeway to live their values. Others brands go public or get acquired by public corporations (looking at you North Face), and then everything is about shareholders value.
@hanwagu9967
@hanwagu9967 2 года назад
companies don't go into business to lose money. Sure, public companies have shareholders, but private companies have greedy private owners. The fact that Yvon has kept Patagonia as a Private Benefit Company enables him to benefit himself while doing whatever he claims he is all about, even though we all know that in order to maintain status as a Private Benefit Company the company is forced to do some public benefit, and that Yvonn hasn't given up his riches or equally divvied up among all the employees, despite how much he says he is a socialist, anti-capitalist, dislike Patagonia being so profitable.
@chrisxdm3014
@chrisxdm3014 Год назад
@@hanwagu9967didnt he recently just gave all his earnings and company to a charity ?
@RxLush
@RxLush 7 месяцев назад
If they’re not cooperative with their workers as owners is the exact same thing
@Rhino11111111
@Rhino11111111 3 месяца назад
When you work for a publicly traded company to begin to realise how everything you do is for shareholders to see growth. Corners get cut to produce more at a faster rate, quality goes down as procedures are not followed due to middle management being judged on figures. Working for these type of companies just turns into a numbers game and a quality product or ethics is throw out the window.
@theredspoon1763
@theredspoon1763 25 дней назад
FYI: Patagucci didn’t donate their company to charity. They used a clever trick to evade inheritance taxes by moving shares with profit rights to a 501(c)(4) climate foundation. In short they managed to get their taxes from 1.3 billion USD down to merely 17 million without changing a thing of the ownership and corporate structure of the brand.
@rufex2001
@rufex2001 2 года назад
If there are problems to be solved in the industry, I imagine BEING part of said industry is the first step. In this regard, I prefer that Patagonia stick around and keep showing that businesses can be profitable while at the same time trying to reduce, minimize or even reverse their impact on the environment
@cyler6127
@cyler6127 2 года назад
The transition from the Patagonia logo into a talk about fossil fuels was pretty cool 👏
@FutureProofTV
@FutureProofTV 2 года назад
Our editing team is the coolest 😎😎
@kazooduck
@kazooduck 2 года назад
@@FutureProofTV future proof editing team is top tier
@timbushell8640
@timbushell8640 2 года назад
@@kazooduck ... sorry, that transition was 'top tier', really, a little sinking feeling into the coal strata, and "oops" there is a pink nodding donkey. Low bar sunshine low bar. After all, low Barr Trump is in the same video. : )))))
@kazooduck
@kazooduck 2 года назад
@@timbushell8640 OH NO TRUMP MAN DISLIKE THE VIDEO SEND THR BATALLION. sunshine what are you saying?
@MssIAMNOBODYSPECIAL
@MssIAMNOBODYSPECIAL 2 года назад
"At least people will be buying from them and not a competitor without the same kind of corporate backbone" Agreed. Tho honestly, if all companies followed patagonia's example, a lot of problems would be so much less worse. Although I'd say: "just dont buy what you dont need, and buy whay you do need conciously". If patagonia is the most sustainable option out there (but not perfect), I guess you should go for that (while also pushing them to be better).
@Sivah_Akash
@Sivah_Akash 2 года назад
I think it just comes down to whether the presence of Patagonia is creating new induced demand for products or if are they moving people into buying their products instead of from other companies'.
@australianboy
@australianboy 2 года назад
A video on Patagonia’s new decision with their shares as well as military ties would be really interesting.
@RobBrulinski
@RobBrulinski 9 месяцев назад
Their Mil gear is awesome
@TommoCarroll
@TommoCarroll 2 года назад
Well sheet, I think it's about time I get myself SOMETHING from Patagonia - I like the honesty A LOT.
@FutureProofTV
@FutureProofTV 2 года назад
Same here dude 😌
@wetasspaddington
@wetasspaddington 7 месяцев назад
are you blind
@wiledman2430
@wiledman2430 4 месяца назад
​@@wetasspaddington are you deaf?
@doncristianugalde
@doncristianugalde 2 года назад
Awesome video! Would like to see a similar take on Apple and their sustainability & carbon neutrality marketing
@golasticus
@golasticus 2 года назад
I second this. Tech RU-vid generally regards their "sustainability" front as just marketing from what I can see and it would be interesting to inspect their claims from a different perspective. They claim they do certain things like not shipping chargers with their phones to be more eco-friendly but a lot of their other business practices say otherwise. Like making their devices notoriously hard to repair and if it ever were, it would be so prohibitively expensive you'd be hard pressed not to buy a new device instead.
@mdesmith13
@mdesmith13 2 года назад
I would be very interested to hear about Patagonia's involvement with the military. This is the first I've heard of it, but it would make sense. The military wants quality outdoor clothing and gear.
@TheBenjaminBrowning
@TheBenjaminBrowning 2 года назад
Who else is sat watching this whilst wearing at least one item of Patagonia clothing?
@FutureProofTV
@FutureProofTV 2 года назад
Nice 🤙🤙
@masoudabdun-noor8675
@masoudabdun-noor8675 2 года назад
Several lol
@Sam_u_L
@Sam_u_L 2 года назад
Love your videos man! Keep killing it. The quality and inward looking element to your content is respectable at the bare minimum. I really appreciate the perspective you have on consumerism and your efforts to share and inform folks in areas we may not pay enough attention to. Side note, impressed you can still put out the same quality content while on the road! Safe travels 🙌🏻
@FutureProofTV
@FutureProofTV 2 года назад
Wow thanks so much!! We've got a wonderful team putting in lots of work to make sure our content is always up to snuff. Thanks again for being here 😌🙌
@gastonvuidepot
@gastonvuidepot 2 года назад
I've been wearing Patagonia clothes for about 30 years, what's more, right now I'm wearing a Capilene shirt that's about 20 years old. I live in Patagonia, in the south of Argentina. Here I put all the Patagonia clothing I bought to the test. In my opinion, Yvon Chouinard did a very good thing with his company. Surely, there are more things to improve in Patagonia, but I think the path is the right one, so that we all have a better world.
@MeMe-lx2jw
@MeMe-lx2jw Год назад
If you think Chouinard did a good thing then you have no idea about what he actually did.
@athenadia4743
@athenadia4743 2 года назад
It's definitely a valid point that at the end of the day Patagonia sells things that take away from the planet, hence they can't be "sustainable", but I also find it interesting to think about the fact that we need industry leaders and presences like theirs in all industries. In the end, I will always buy secondhand, but Patagonia is definitely better than buying from many competitors of theirs.
@toneeviera8336
@toneeviera8336 2 года назад
Super awesome to see you examine your own beliefs and biases, hopefully it spurs others to do the same Also, the tie to the military would be really cool to explore and I'd watch the video
@missw.2820
@missw.2820 2 года назад
I’d love a video about Patagonia’s history with supplying the military! I didn’t know about that
@Thatdalton
@Thatdalton 2 года назад
Yeah I feel like a video on their military partnership would really open a can of worms on their ethical practices!
@brotatochip42
@brotatochip42 2 года назад
I second that motion!!!!!
@David-vg1wl
@David-vg1wl 2 года назад
Patagonia calls it their Lost Arrow Project
@daviddavis1322
@daviddavis1322 2 года назад
Sustainability is how they market things. Seems like they do as much as feasible while still being able to be a company.
@wgwells
@wgwells 2 года назад
Opposing the Keystone pipeline just means that 18-wheelers and tanker trucks will haul the petroleum instead of a safer, less-energy-intensive pipeline. Embarrassingly stupid position for Patagonia to take. Reduce petroleum? Sure. But until it can be replaced, let it be transported in the safest, most environmentally protected way. Also, companies don't have feelings. People do. Don't attribute psychological ideas to a business entity. Companies don't love, care, commit, or feel. Just greenwashing.
@EarthSurfer
@EarthSurfer 2 года назад
I have Patagonia fleece (sweater, jacket, full zip pants) that are older than Levi which I still use. Although all have had minor repairs, these well designed products are as close to sustainable as possible. (BTW: these items have been mostly hand washed to increase life and minimize creation of micro plastic waste.) I have worn out a few pieces of Patagonia tech wear, but all served far more years than I originally anticipated.
@cuhweenuh
@cuhweenuh 2 года назад
Well looks like you’ve just convinced me to buy Pategonia anytime I need a new item. Still love thrifting- but they sound like an awesome company that I wouldn’t feel guilty giving my money to 🙂
@HerWanderlust
@HerWanderlust Год назад
You can find lots of good Patagonia stuff on poshmark and depop mercari etc for much cheaper than new, and much of it is hardly worn. That way you can have your technical gear, at a good price, without supporting a company that is still making tons of new plastic clothing
@Angus_fO
@Angus_fO 2 года назад
Coumd you do a video about sustainable everyday wear? As someone in the climbing community, it seems that sustainability is trendy and common in outdoor wear but is lacking behind in thing like tshirts. Also, maybe touch on how vague measurements of sustainability that brands like zalando and Asos use persuades customers into thinking that they're buying sustainable products when that's not the case.
@HerWanderlust
@HerWanderlust Год назад
Xusah on Etsy makes great every day wear, and she will make it to your exact measurements and color preference. I have some of her garments for 3 plus years and they still have lots of life left
@troyglim
@troyglim 2 года назад
Try doing an episode on Asket a zero compromise garments with transparency based in Stockholm, Sweden.
@rfigueroa785
@rfigueroa785 2 года назад
I used to work for a Patagonia dealer. There is a lot of plastic trash they send with there products.
@FutureProofTV
@FutureProofTV 2 года назад
Hmm that also might be worth looking into 🧐 thanks for sharing, Ryan!
@oliverbowiebello
@oliverbowiebello 2 года назад
Could you talk about REI? How they are a “co-op” but it doesn’t really seem to be a co-op in the true communal sense…maybe it once was?
@kylefull
@kylefull 2 года назад
Something I was disappointed with in terms of Patagonia: I recently ordered a hat off their website and it came in a nice recycled cardboard box. Pretty standard, but then the hat was in a plastic bag in the box - this was a bummer. Especially when other brands I've ordered from such as Prana and Cotopaxi don't ship with any plastics. I wish Patagonia would do better in that aspect.
@richeyrich2203
@richeyrich2203 Год назад
Was is a cellulose plastic or a standard acrylic?
@eriklenzen8523
@eriklenzen8523 2 года назад
Would love to see a video about patagonia's partnership with the military!
@kazuesohma2425
@kazuesohma2425 2 года назад
Please do a video Patagonia supplying the military and the morality (or lack thereof) of such a choice. I understand that it would be controversial, but I feel like not enough people talk about it. I was aware of them trying to sever their ties with Wall St. a bit ago (in a rather public way, might I add) so it's interesting (and weird) that they are okay with supplying the military.
@LieutenantLysol
@LieutenantLysol 2 года назад
Known as Patagucci to me.
@pedanthicc
@pedanthicc 2 года назад
does anyone really give a rats hiney what PETA has to say about anything tho? great vid as always~
@im093
@im093 2 года назад
Especially since PETA straight up kills almost all the animals they "save".
@ruisen2000
@ruisen2000 10 месяцев назад
Not sure about other countries, but in Canada, patagonia almost never run any sales at all. When Black Friday or boxing day rolls around and every business is dangling these amazing limited time deals to get you to impulse buy, all you get from Patagonia is silence. I think they really do embody the "only come buy from us when you need something" to the best of their abilities.
@sidequestcellars1056
@sidequestcellars1056 2 года назад
All these brands are making me want to join a nudist colony
@GeorgeHolden
@GeorgeHolden 2 года назад
I'd love to see the military link idea in a video!
@ProIific
@ProIific 2 года назад
In this video you cite pushback on Patagonia by organizations such as PETA and Greenpeace but I honestly don’t understand beyond a surface level why that is relevant. You should do a video on these organizations so viewers can understand more deeply what these organizations are and what weight their opinions carry.
@pawelltg9325
@pawelltg9325 2 года назад
Peta and Greenpeace are honestly terror organizations, dedicated to carry them ideologies at any cost, Peta have a long history of cruelty and lies for promote them ideology, for other side Greenpeace is one of the principal responsibles of nuclear energy backlash, even knowing that is the less environmental costly energy form that we know, also Greenpeace is know for ignore the environment cost of certain groups that finance them, both are organizations that are in line with lobbies and will selective change and ignore information just for impulse that lobbies, for sure not trustworthy opinions.
@jway9097
@jway9097 2 года назад
"what weight their opinions carry." 0. They're idiots.
@hoagietime1
@hoagietime1 2 года назад
Can you do an episode on outdoor brands that also supply the military or have gun industry connections? I love alot of the Nemo gear I've had but have soured on them since I found out they supply tents for the military. I really want to be depressed about more of the gear I use.
@asbestoscider
@asbestoscider Год назад
hope you don’t have any patagonia or arcteryx….
@ziksy6460
@ziksy6460 2 года назад
Patagonia: We hate ourselves :( People: Awww don't be so hard on yourself *buy*
@jeetpatel6087
@jeetpatel6087 2 года назад
The components in your electric cars are made from fossil fuels. Plus electric cars require 3 times more resources to make than a standard gas powered car. Just give a gas powered car a 2nd life which is even better for the environment and my wallet
@masoudabdun-noor8675
@masoudabdun-noor8675 2 года назад
Everyone’s focused on what big companies are doing, but what are we doing ourselves to make the planter better. Calling awareness to issues is perhaps what they do best, then it’s up to the consumers to better their own practices.
@Trailer__Swift
@Trailer__Swift 2 года назад
This video needs an update…😅
@sweetchariotengland
@sweetchariotengland Год назад
I have to play devil/trump advocate here. Consider the toxic practices that happen in other people's countries so that those lands remain untouched. He isn't the one doing all the consuming. Patagonia is in at least pointing in the right direction. Transparency is absolutely crucial
@Waffles4903
@Waffles4903 10 месяцев назад
I think that Patagonia is obviously not a utopian business, as none on Earth are, but choosing them over the boatload of non-sustainable fast fashion megaliths is definitely the better choice.
@kkawai7
@kkawai7 Год назад
No talk stink about Patagonia!
@DezaRay24
@DezaRay24 2 года назад
I waited & found my Patagonia jacket at Savers for $15 👌🏽 That was a win/win price for me And yes a military video
@AndyMBurgess
@AndyMBurgess 2 года назад
Been waiting for you guys to make this video. Great job team!!
@BenNuProductions
@BenNuProductions 2 года назад
Patagonia is the best so far in terms of major clothing brand sustainability.
@sn0lder
@sn0lder 9 месяцев назад
nice cope for consumerism :)
@jduarte1506
@jduarte1506 6 месяцев назад
Good video Patagonia is a brand that I love, I'm looking at a Patagonia jacket but a few days ago I started looking at a Jack Wolfskin brand that is German and in their jackets they don't use GORETEX. Now if you could help me between Patagonia and Jack Wolfskin for a jacket for normal rain, not something intense, which is better quality
@benpeterson3646
@benpeterson3646 8 месяцев назад
Businesses "take from who they can". Well spoken from someone who doesn't understand basic economics. Apple and McDonald's don't take my money. I give them my money in return for something I want more than the money. please please please start using your platform for good and not spreading lies. And if you don't understand what youre saying, I support you to do that. But please don't pretend to know what you're talking about, because clearly, YOU DO NOT.
@seanleal2292
@seanleal2292 2 года назад
Patagonia is also a pioneer for new more eco friendly materials, chemicals, etc. So that the industry as a whole can be driven to lower carbon footprints.
@seanleal2292
@seanleal2292 2 года назад
And yeah activism is why I buy it. Making the brand reach more ears allows more people to learn from Patagonia why clothing is such a problem, why they should buy less and buy more durable clothing, and hopefully even repairing instead of replacing.
@RxLush
@RxLush 7 месяцев назад
First of all, stop using the name Patagonia as a brand when you don’t have any link to the actual Patagonia. And second, there’s no sustainability in ANY company that makes his owner a billionaire. And no, its not better because their “activism”, it actually make it worst. The fake sensation of doing something makes you don’t ACTUALLY do nothing. Just buy any cheap jacket and focus in learning how republicans and democrats are the exact same crap.
@mysteri0861
@mysteri0861 Год назад
Thrashing fossil fuel while being a big consumer of fossil fuel. So, it's not OK to drill and process oil here in the US where we actually have more waste/pollution regulations? But it's ok to buy oil produced from else where outside of our control, then waste more oil to have it shipped here? What are the viable form of affordable energies that can replace fossil fuel at this time? Is producing batteries clean? What do we do to dead batteries? What happen to solar panels and wind turbines when they reach their end of life? Let's face it, most big corps all use 'green' as marketing scam. Is it greener and cleaner having products produced in China or other 3rd world countries? How are 3rd world countries handle product manufacturing waste/pollution? Consumers are bombarded with ads to get the latest shiny items every year. Are products designed to have swappable/upgradable parts? Mostly no.
@circedge
@circedge Год назад
At the end of the day, Patagonia unlike some smaller companies, but even some on par with them, uses massive quantities of polyester, doesn't matter if it's recycled or 'circular'. They're also not even close to a leader in recycled goods. Alternative brands have managed to offer completely plastic free wares, but Patagonia is unable to and are somehow seen as an example. Of what exactly? The most succesful greenwashing campaign in history?
@febrikriss1781
@febrikriss1781 2 года назад
They're actually hardcore 💪
@scottkirby5016
@scottkirby5016 7 месяцев назад
So I grew up near the old Patagonia HQ and Flag store. And one of things about them I found odd at the time was that there was a tiny shack of an outlet about a block away with a ton of Patagonia gear for comparatively cheap-called Cheap Sports funny enough. Not K-Mart prices but Sears level and had tons of camp equipment vs what clothes you'd see today. It was an outlet for the mistakes, the bad colour batches, wrong buttons whatever and was sent there as clearance. Not shocking when you look at the company but the reaction was how the people at the main store treated the cheap sports store/customer. People actively would send us to the mistakes outlet if they knew it had what we asked for, even if they had it on the shelves too, they actively seemed to look up to them as almost a more pure thing rather than something to be looked down on. If you were tolerant of them not being "perfect" they seemed to actively like you more. It was however a horrible place to norm my ideas of a clothing brand worked, misconceptions for life.
@nothinleader
@nothinleader Год назад
I used to buy into Patagonia's marketing but then I noticed- why does Patagonia make so much stuff with polyester which is a forever material that won't decompose though. If they keep making forever materials that stay in landfills forever, they are just virtue signaling like the rest of the outdoor industry.
@robertcurcio4927
@robertcurcio4927 2 года назад
Great video. I have the book you mention. Have rad it a number of times. Yvon says that there is no such thing as complete sustainability. He says to do as little harm to the environment as possible.
@JordanFayter
@JordanFayter 8 месяцев назад
Levi we already have a sustainable way to stitch to a fossil fuel planet and better humanity. We can use hemp for basically everything we use fossil fuels for and more. A great book is The Emperor Wears No Clothes by Jack Herer.
@jamesmoss739
@jamesmoss739 4 месяца назад
Ah. The answer is simple. Just federalize the fabrics industry as a whole. Then we can change the whole supply chain and increase quality. Easy peasy
@odiggler
@odiggler 5 месяцев назад
Sad irony is Patagonia sells "sustainable" goods to one of the most wasteful customer type. Educated, entitled "the world is mine for me to take all I want and dominate!" type
@theslightlyhillyrider969
@theslightlyhillyrider969 11 месяцев назад
"forever chemicals in goretex".... Little did they know, the ePE jackets were just round the corner lol
@olewetdog6254
@olewetdog6254 Год назад
We will always need fossil fuel fired energy sources. The renewables just are not "always on." Natural gas is also many times more clean than coal and should not be lumped into the same box.
@Satorisails77
@Satorisails77 Год назад
No entity for the purpose of financial profit will ever be sustainable. It's impossible. Patagonia is a responsible company.
@friedrichwohler3819
@friedrichwohler3819 Год назад
please oopen that can of worms PLEASE!!!! I wanna know, no, I MUST KNOW!!!
@ruinedsoup9337
@ruinedsoup9337 2 года назад
they are unfortunately the only brand in America. That you can get hemp pants. Which i love. Except low style and color selection. But long lasting.
@Dkayed00
@Dkayed00 2 года назад
You are my lucky⬆️⬆️winner today ....
@BestYears2BestPlaces
@BestYears2BestPlaces Год назад
This is a smart biz strategy... if not for their philosophy. There is not much difference between well made clothes (how could that be so different?). But with this mission behind, it will stand out and differentiate. Thanks for the nice sharing. I would buy more Patagonia from now on....
@kidcaldwell
@kidcaldwell 2 года назад
they literally have black people picking cotton in their advertisement
@evano8312
@evano8312 2 года назад
I am a huge worn wear fan for these reasons
@oliroy92
@oliroy92 2 года назад
Would love to see a video dissecting the tentree apparel company!
@frankboyer1490
@frankboyer1490 2 года назад
I don't think it makes sense to use the comparison of Patagonia with other brands as an argument. It should be looked at from the perspective of the planet, not "well, at least they're better than these other brands". I know a lot of people love Patagonia but it really is no different than any other large company that contributes to climate change in a significant way. B Corps are flawed because they still rely on growth and like mentioned in the video, any statement from the company talking about not buying a jacket or whatever else is just marketing that leads to even more growth. I wish people were not only more informed about things like this but also more willing to reduce their consumption because companies like Patagonia are absolutely contributing to the consequences of rampant capitalism, regardless of what they tell you.
@yoshigreen821
@yoshigreen821 2 года назад
I completly agree. I'm a huge patagonia fan but I see their obvious flaws, one of which being where their clothes are made. They still make all of their goods in third world countries and while I'm sure they pay those workers enough, the fossil fuel emissions from transporting the goods around the globe from their factories put a huge strain on the environment. I can't believe they haven't move their factories to the United States yet to cut down on those emissions.
@kevinsbacon932
@kevinsbacon932 2 года назад
@@yoshigreen821 I thought their sales were global
@kevinsbacon932
@kevinsbacon932 2 года назад
Companies grow because of growing demand. Demand grows because more people exist. Growing population isn’t a unique feature of capitalism. Commoditization and replacing and adding items to your wardrobe is though, which Patagonia tries to insist people instead by a product once and repair it. Pretty cool and something no one else does. To get around taking resources from the earth you’d have to be an anarcho-primitivist. That has little to do with specific types of economic systems, market-based or otherwise
@yoshigreen821
@yoshigreen821 2 года назад
@@kevinsbacon932 Their sales are global but I'd put my entire bank account on most of their revenue coming from North America. Nobody said anything about taking resources from the earth, that's obviously pretty stupid. The point I'm making is that if most of their revenue come from the US, they need to be making and distributing those goods from there to cut back on the co2 commissions from shipping the tens of thousands of tonnes of fabric from country to country just to be brought to the US and shipped again to customers around the globe. The US is fully capable of manufacturing clothing and cotton, that's why I'm confused why they choose to outsource it all and ship it back to them.
@perknsmerch4824
@perknsmerch4824 Месяц назад
Currently at 7:28 and I don't think you've truly dived into the topic yet. Is this whole video an intro?
@kikakooo
@kikakooo 5 месяцев назад
My Patagonia clothes need 0 mantainance, looks brand new after 100 washes.
@frantisekpetruv1904
@frantisekpetruv1904 2 года назад
Could yoy please be in nebula?
@jameszambito4176
@jameszambito4176 Год назад
Why don’t they have anything to say about the recent chemical spills across the country
@williamrobinson4265
@williamrobinson4265 2 года назад
patagonia is a cheerleader not a material leader unfortunately elon musk > yvon chnard
@MeMe-lx2jw
@MeMe-lx2jw Год назад
NO, no it is not. Their marketing makes people believe they are, though.
@showmemojo4784
@showmemojo4784 2 года назад
This might be a odd question but intelligent people tend to read a lot but what if someone substitutes books for documentaries documentaries sports and stand up comedy are about the only things I watch big Hollywood products I just don't get into
@Dkayed00
@Dkayed00 2 года назад
You are my lucky⬆️⬆️winner today ....
@harrisonsearle7442
@harrisonsearle7442 2 года назад
Definitely trying to hear about their MARS line
@uptownkittydc
@uptownkittydc 2 года назад
Hell yeah I wanna hear about military shenanigans 😂
@wiledman2430
@wiledman2430 4 месяца назад
I have to much clothes to buy Patagonias stuff but i love there efforts.
@jerryvincent8402
@jerryvincent8402 2 года назад
I there not my time watching this video would be a waste.🇺🇸🐻
@michaelnorth8602
@michaelnorth8602 Год назад
Is it right patagonia produce uniforms for the US military?
@markwells8798
@markwells8798 2 года назад
Also show me a photo of earth that isn't CGI, good luck with that 👍
@jorgerangel2390
@jorgerangel2390 Год назад
The only purchase that is good for the environment is the one that is not made
@cauliflowerhead2735
@cauliflowerhead2735 Год назад
Patagonia may not be perfect but at least they are doing something about their convictions.
@colebrantmeier6821
@colebrantmeier6821 2 года назад
yes, please dive into their Military business!
@desidesigning
@desidesigning 9 месяцев назад
I'll never buy anything from Patagonia again for life.
@shaunaburton7136
@shaunaburton7136 2 года назад
I have a Patagonia long underwear that is almost 20 years old. It lasts!
@dillanperez8378
@dillanperez8378 2 года назад
Did you say ‘Cancerous Goretex material’ ?
@manuelpopp1687
@manuelpopp1687 Год назад
No company is sustainable. They can only be more sustainable than others. And this only helps if people buy Patagonia products instead of other brands (not if they buy Patagonia products because of an ad and if they otherwise had bought nothing at all). But that is a problem caused by consumer behaviour rather than the brand. On a free market, any brand has to offer reasons why to buy them. I.e., they have to do some advertisement to tell people the reason behind thy they charge 5 times the price you'd pay for a similar product at Walmart. Unfortunately, we live in this ultimate capitalist society where you not only buy products but you buy your identity and your public image, packaged within some brand logo on your shirt. Under these conditions, I'd argue it is not sustainable to buy Patagonia products but most alternatives are even less sustainable. So, I'd suggest you buy their products if you really need to buy something new but else, you keep wearing what you already own.
@samtortell3680
@samtortell3680 2 года назад
Def make a video abt patagonia and army
@craigmignone2863
@craigmignone2863 2 года назад
All apparel companies are rip-offs.....depending on debt slavery obscene profits[...]
@Dkayed00
@Dkayed00 2 года назад
You are my lucky⬆️⬆️winner today ....
@ConnorCanRead
@ConnorCanRead 2 года назад
This is what "no ethical consumption under capitalism" means. Do your best. It doesn't give you permission to work at Lockheed Martin guilt free. Patagonia's charitability is stolen wages, but at least they're not union busting.
@pmarty7339
@pmarty7339 Год назад
Naturally and logically, they do have an impact in the environment. And, even so, it's so beneficial they exsit because if they didn't, all those customers would have to buy from another company...and I'm sure other companies wouldn't do so much to try to help the environment and lessen their impact.
@omgtheweirdo
@omgtheweirdo Год назад
You should join Nebula! Great content!
@Von199X
@Von199X 2 года назад
It's just another clothing company
@byghostlight1
@byghostlight1 2 года назад
But is it possible for a company of that size to not use Fossil Fuels at all?!!! Complaining that they still do is like listening to people complain that Greta sometimes has to take a plane or use tech, while complaining about them. It is impossible for any one to not consume the very things they complain about it. For me, instead, (like you say in your video) it has to end up being about how someone offset the damage and things the things they do, while actively being vocal about how they are aware on the contradiction.
@nateb9768
@nateb9768 2 года назад
How do y’all like $5.00 gas now that we’re not energy independent? Without fossil fuels, we’re going back to the dark ages😂
@pioneer_1148
@pioneer_1148 Год назад
Aside from Gortex I'd say patagonia is a good company for the planet. I'm not sure though if that is simply because it makes people love them as a brand or because Chouinard actually means what he says.
Далее
The TRUTH about Reformation Clothing
14:23
Просмотров 298 тыс.
The TRUTH About Patagonia's New Material
10:37
Просмотров 284 тыс.
🛑самое главное в жизни!
00:11
Просмотров 132 тыс.
Как снимали мой клип POLI - Котик
00:37
Why Gym Memberships are a SCAM
15:12
Просмотров 613 тыс.
The secret economics of Google Street View
22:34
Просмотров 469 тыс.
The Difference Between North Face And Patagonia
9:52
Why Cars Today Suck
15:55
Просмотров 432 тыс.
The TRUTH About Chain Thrift Stores
11:26
Просмотров 983 тыс.
This hidden Swedish design is very mindful
13:32
Просмотров 192 тыс.