Тёмный

Is Retouching Cheating?? 

Serge Ramelli Photography
Подписаться 642 тыс.
Просмотров 12 тыс.
50% 1

Here is my thought on whether or not retouching is cheating or is it really a photography?
Let me know what your thought are? in the comments below
TUTORIELS FRANÇAIS :
===================
/ tutoriels
www.photoserge.com/tutorials/f...
SUBSCRIBE TO MY PODCAST ON ITUNES:
==================================
apple.co/2xYaWrm
Follow me ! :
==========
INSTAGRAM ► / photoserge
FACEBOOK ► / photoserge
TWITTER ► / photoserge

Опубликовано:

 

11 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 294   
@ilovethismightyfineplace
@ilovethismightyfineplace 4 года назад
I think it starts to become cheating at the point where you start adding/replacing things that wasn’t there. But, honestly, as long as someone doesn’t try represent it as “in camera” when it wasn’t, then it doesn’t matter. Do what makes you happy-just be honest about it. And Serge, you’ve always been honest about it.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! Yes any artist can create as much as they want :-)
@sbl2051
@sbl2051 4 года назад
This reminds me of the 1980's discussions over cropping. At that time there were a lot of articles about cropping in the studio versus cropping in the camera. It was an unimportant issue and so is the concept of cheating when it comes to making art. Intent and result are what matters.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Absolutely that’s makes total sense
@georgeeharrison4293
@georgeeharrison4293 4 года назад
You did a very good job of making your point, keep the videos coming. I do not use Lightroom or Photoshop, but your videos are a great learning tool.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thank you so much! Really appreciate it! :-)
@hdb14154
@hdb14154 4 года назад
I love your work and the way you are not afraid to use color and light to express what you see in your soul.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Oh that’s really nice thanks!
@The2soaringhearts
@The2soaringhearts 4 года назад
Serge, your video is spot on. Thank you! I am now a subscriber. I have always made adjustments to my work since my days working with film in a wet room and I continue make adjustments to my photos using software on my computer. I make adjustments in camera as well. I consider myself an artist and I subscribe to the thoughts of Ansel Adams when he said; "You don't take a photograph, you make it." Those who go about spouting their uninformed opinion about an image being 'photoshopped' only wish they knew how to do what they so ignorantly declaim.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Well thank you for subscribing and the kind words! I do agree with you!
@ginomuscat7585
@ginomuscat7585 4 года назад
Cheating or not, the most important is that you have pictures that sell, you express your vision like an painting artist, keep it up Serge and thank you for all your tutorial....... thanks
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Oh thanks a lot! That’s very nice :-)
@ClipCaptain
@ClipCaptain 4 года назад
Thanks for sparking the conversation. To make a more informed decision of your own work, we would need to see the original images, pre editing. I was thinking of the James Dean dodged image during your video so was happy to see that included.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Nice! :-)
@JeffSibelius
@JeffSibelius 4 года назад
Ansel Adams used the dark room to do what we do with computers today. He compared photography to music - he said that shooting the picture was like writing the score, but printing the photo was the performance." If it's good enough for Ansel Adams, it's good enough for me.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha i love that!
@Noealz
@Noealz 4 года назад
yes indeed : )
@emokiriemiabednegoabed2844
@emokiriemiabednegoabed2844 4 года назад
Smartness is important in a relationship and cyberhackinggenius helped cloned my husband’s phone and I got access to all his dealings both on phone and social media without touching his phone. All I did was share my husband’s phone number with cyberhackinggenius and I was able to read both his new and deleted messages from my phone without having to touch his phone. My husband was a cheating Narcissist and I’m glad to find out all his secrets and infidelity with the help of cyberhackinggenius. I’m here in UK and able to access my husband’s phone messages with a link on my phone even while he was away in Canada cheating on me. I got to discover that my husband who is legally married to me here in UK is also recently married to another woman in Canada and I’m finally going through a divorce with lots of evidence against him. I read all his Whatsapp, Facebook,Skype,Instagram and Snapchat messages Including the deleted text and recent messages. You can contact this great Hacker Gavin via Gmail (cyberhackinggenius) or text and speak to him directly on his phone and WhatsApp : +19256795146 and don’t forget to thank me later.
@hectorlaffarge5019
@hectorlaffarge5019 4 года назад
Many unknown or worldwide wellknown photographers before the digital tools did some retouching works, yes it's true, BUT the tools were a less powerfull than nowadays computers, the possibilities were limited compare to Lr or Ps or any other modern software. THIS IS NO LONGER "PHOTOGRAPHY"
@fortierjacques3566
@fortierjacques3566 4 года назад
Simple question; simple answer. If you change what is captured by the camera, after the shooting then you cheat.
@ynkeehater
@ynkeehater 4 года назад
I think context is very important when talking about this. If you are shooting for pleasure/enjoyment, maybe you’re getting pictures together for a portfolio or an art show or something, then yeah, pull out all of your tricks and create the best picture you possibly can. There aren’t many rules when you are doing things for yourself. But say you are entering a photo contest and the assignment is “Wildlife”. I think it’s completely cheating if I just take an empty picture of my backyard and superimpose the wildlife on top of it in photoshop or other photo editing software. I didn’t actually photograph the wildlife, I fabricated the image using pre-existing images. I manipulated everything to make it fit the assignment, but I didn’t actually DO the assignment.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Yes that makes sens, I get that!
@HarryVitebski
@HarryVitebski 4 года назад
Totally agree with you Serge! People constantly confusing the concept of art photography with documentary photography. Over the past 50 years, I have heard these disputes countless times. I always have a simple argument: documentary photos can be fundamentally changed by simple cropping. And this can lead to complete falsification of the image, without the use of Photoshop, without any editing at all.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Absolutely I agree! Glad it makes sense ;-)
@bethanypisani8706
@bethanypisani8706 4 года назад
I think you explained and argued the point very well and made excellent use of examples to disprove that it is cheating. Retouching is just another tool to help us to arrive at our vision, or the cool effects that have an impact on us. Thank you for taking the time to make such a comprehensive presentation about it with your photos and explanations. It was also really helpful to see the old black and white photos and all of the retouching and dodging/burning instructions for the celebrities. Fascinating. I had no idea. :)
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Oh nice! So glad you like it! ;-) yeah I think it is part of the creative process ;-)
@matlynwood6225
@matlynwood6225 4 года назад
Great video sir and thanks for putting up a video of all the differences of how we retouch our work and not just talking about it. I believe there is a big difference between an explanation of a subject and a visual representation of the subject and easier understanding.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
No problem! I am glad you like it! :-)
@pallabmajumdar3026
@pallabmajumdar3026 4 года назад
Very good topic. The Ansel Adams segment on film retouching was a new learning. Thank You!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Nice! Thanks a lot!! :-) happy you like it!
@TonyaGreenwood
@TonyaGreenwood 4 года назад
Very well said! Thank you for the video! It's always been hard for me to explain this to anyone who doesn't understand. For me personally its creative expression and art. By the way I purchased some of your presets and I have been using them on some of my honeymoon photos from Alaska and people have been mesmerized by them and even asking to purchase prints. Thank you for providing the ONLY presets I have ever been able to actually use!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
That’s so awesome! Thanks a lot for the kind words :-)
@oldfilmguy9413
@oldfilmguy9413 4 года назад
Well argued and I appreciated the honesty toward your own work and growth as a photographer. As a former photojournalist it has been a somewhat difficult transformation to go from not manipulating images (or at least only in a minimal way, cropping, exposure etc.) to having the freedom to interpret a photo for its artistic and emotional impact, but I am really enjoying the artistic side now.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
I bet! That must have been interesting to go from an extreme to the other! Well have fun creating! :-)
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
I bet! That must have been interesting to go from an extreme to the other! Well have fun creating! :-)
@SergentTartiflette
@SergentTartiflette 4 года назад
A very interesting video Serge, like always. I have been doing photography for about two years and it has been some journey as well to figure out what I liked to do in terms of retouching on my own pictures (mostly landscape, wildlife and astro). Now keep in mind that I am a very new photographer, but I'd like to give my two cents on the issue. I think the issue is double. The first more obvious part is simple: many people do not know anything about photography, and will quickly assume you photoshopped something because they could never get the same result with a simple snap taken on the go on their smartphone. The second part is trickier, but also the one that annoys me the most. Instagram is, needless to say, prevalent to hundreds of thousands of photographer trying to share their work. The problem is that many do photography for the sole purpose of gathering followers, and ego flatting is one hell of a drug. Anything that works to bring the masses will definitely become trendy and influence their work, and oftentimes it will be composites, saturated or greatly retouched photographs. While I agree with most of the points you raise here, I'd still like to point the only instance where I consider retouching cheating, and it's also the most common in my experience. People that greatly alter a picture but do not disclose it or, even worse, make it sound like it is a "one click straight out of the camera" and will market it as skill. As an amateur photographer that do it by passion, it really angers me when these people get away with it and get a lot of exposure, but will quickly bury you into dirt if you ask because "you are obviously not as talented nor famous than me so stfu". TL;DR: do what you want and retouch as you may, but please at least have the decency to not be an ass when someone points an obvious manipulation that you've been lying about
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Well thank makes sense I agree :-)
@esanford
@esanford 4 года назад
Serge you absolutely nailed it.... Photography and retouching have been together from the beginning of photographic technology.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Absolutely Thanks! Glad you enjoy it! :-)
@hectorlaffarge5019
@hectorlaffarge5019 4 года назад
Not as far and deep than with modern nowadays softwares. (see my separate comment).
@ZiggyAir
@ZiggyAir 4 года назад
Totally agree. I see lightroom/photoshop as tools of your artistic expressions, as is the camera or lenses that you use. Keep at it; you have great work.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! I appreciate it! :-)
@nubscrub
@nubscrub 4 года назад
Awesome video. That was refreshing and motivating. There’s no good reason to hold back in producing and sharing a vision in our art, whichever form it may take. Thanks for sharing
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thank you! Really appreciate it! :-)
@BretBihler
@BretBihler 4 года назад
Like your thoughts! Always good information from you Serge. Keep it up!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thank you so very much! Really appreciate it!
@davidwilson4953
@davidwilson4953 4 года назад
Always motivational in what you talk about. I think people we not aware of the "processing" process by really good film strip photographers. Thank you for your constant addressing of art photography issues/components.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! I appreciate it! :-)
@DavidStella
@DavidStella 4 года назад
I really enjoy your videos, and the insight you provide.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Awesome! Thanks for the nice comment!
@timothymoore1987
@timothymoore1987 4 года назад
Great thoughts! Thank you.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! Happy you like it!
@Jaxemus
@Jaxemus 4 года назад
Thanks Serge. Completely agree
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! :-)
@arthurrmcphee4885
@arthurrmcphee4885 4 года назад
Brilliant video, you nailed it! I'm in total agreement with you about photography and the people who seem to believe that only maybe a Polaroid is real! For every other photographer please feel free to make the choices you want to create the image you have in your minds eye. Bravo Serge! Back in the day when I was making photo's for magazines and ad agencies, there was a whole industry supporting each photographer, from wardrobe stylist, makeup, hair stylists, different kinds of lighting daylight and flash and even location scouts, black and white specialist printers for professional photographers as well as colour labs. Does that mean the images are fake?
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Absolutely I agree! ;-)
@aylinam1
@aylinam1 4 года назад
Thank you very much Serge. I love your point of view and I am going to use it a lot. It represent exactly what I think
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Oh awesome! Well now you have a video that can help you with your argument ;-)
@grmrtnz
@grmrtnz 4 года назад
Serge we are artists. So people buy our interpretation of a landscape or a scene. My problem with Peter is his insistence in claiming that his pictures are "straight from camera"... which everyone that knows anything about photography know that is BS!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure!! :-)
@iannisanarys6887
@iannisanarys6887 4 года назад
Today everybody is able to press a camera button, with "Auto" or "P" modes and use Lightroom or Photoshop to produce an IMAGE, even a beautifull IMAGE. Are they "photographers" ? Is it still "Photography" ? To me IT'S NOT. I'm tired to see many and many over saturated colors, gradiant or radial filters and so on basicly and badly used for post production. The public is no longer able to say what a PHOTOGRAPHY is !
@voyaging4
@voyaging4 2 года назад
@@iannisanarys6887 What makes someone a photographer ? I am curious to know.
@sevenbridgesoneriver4838
@sevenbridgesoneriver4838 4 года назад
Do people enjoy your work.....................I don't enjoy ur work Serge.................I L❤️VE IT! You teach us all so much and instil us with confidence! Thank you Serge! 🙏🏼
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Hahah thank you so much! That’s really nice! :-)
@billb4894
@billb4894 4 года назад
Very interesting video, as right now I'm struggling with the idea that Luminar is moving towards manipulating photos with sky replacement etc. Currently I look at this as making a fake photo. When I look at a photo I would like it to be a representation of what the human eye saw. But I realize as I was watching your video, the little tweaks I do to photos to make them look sharper etc. which I looked at as just cleaning up a photo, really could be considered by some to be manipulating the photo. So now it becomes an issue of what is your level of comfort of altering a photo. I guess since my photos are just for me and to show my friends that places I have visited, I am looking for as realistic as possible. For a pro, who wants to sell his photos, I guess a more dramatic photo is what he wants. Thanks for the video, really did make me think !!!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Great viewpoint im more about creating an effect then represeting a truth, i like to communicate a feeling
@voyaging4
@voyaging4 2 года назад
Same thoughts here Retouching to make it appear like what the eyes saw . ✨✨
@rj934
@rj934 4 года назад
Serge, I agree completely. In general, there are two types of photography, journalism or reporting and artistic. In the journalism style of photography you try and reproduce the visual scene as accurately as possible. In the artistic style, as you stated, you are looking to generate an emotion. Thank you for your input and contributions to the art form.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Oh wow that’s really sweet! Thank you very much!
@jimcurrie7320
@jimcurrie7320 4 года назад
Appreciate that you have used the term "Fine Art" multiple times. Specifically that you do not claim you are a Photojournalist. Fine art is "art." Many books can be found on the subject of the "Art of Photography." You are "making art" and your "tools" are the camera, lens, intuition, and post-processing techniques. The world has an overabundance of "rock throwers" - also called critics. No matter what you create, some will like it and others will not. IMO you are not cheating, you are an artist who justifiably exercises creative - artistic - license. Keep it up. Love the vids.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
I agree thank you so very Much! That means a lot ;-)
@DottyFalbo
@DottyFalbo 4 года назад
I do both photojournalism, portraits, landscapes and mostly event and music photography. I agree with your opinion completely Mr. Ramelli. Well stated, represented and expressed. We are artists period. Learning photoshop and retouching successfully is not an easy task, it is a skill on its own. In todays world of digital effects, we are not involved with film any longer. Shooting in Raw means we must process our shots. Fact. What we create with those Raws is our art. Thank you for this video, I appreciate you, your work, your art and your creativity. Your work is phenomenally beautiful.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
That’s so very nice! Thank you so much! I really appreciate it ;-)
@k4piii
@k4piii 4 года назад
Great video man, awesome content. Thx for this sharing.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
You are very welcome :-) happy you enjoy ;-)
@gianlucacaputo821
@gianlucacaputo821 4 года назад
Totally agreed Serge. 👍🏻👍🏻
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Awesome! Thanks!!
@Ruscombephotos
@Ruscombephotos 4 года назад
Thanks Serge for opening up the debate. I don’t believe retouching is cheating, and I think you got it right when observing the reactions to your earlier work. I don’t think I would want to hear: “You must be really good at Photoshop.” That response means the viewer doesn’t altogether trust the image. Landscape photographer Charlie Waite said: “The moment the viewer feels unsettled or distrustful of the image the relationship between viewer and photograph is completely broken.” I like what I’ve photographed to have been something real that happened in front of my eyes, so personally, I’m not a fan of sky replacements, even if I took the photograph of the sky I might use as a replacement. If the light is not right, I prefer to go back another time and try again. But you are also right about being artists, and we should not lose sight of that. Everything from composition, long exposure, selective focus, narrow depth of field, shooting black and white etc. are all artistic choices. People either like them, or they don’t. If I didn’t retouch my images, they would be lifeless. Printing is important too. Likewise, what an artist does or does not do in retouching is an artistic choice. But if an image has had something like a sky replacement, or something major added, etc., I believe the viewer should be told how the image was created, especially if they are buying a print.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure I agree that makes sense!
@neklamp2431
@neklamp2431 4 года назад
I completely agree with you!!!!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thankss!!! ;-)
@gabyisphoto2379
@gabyisphoto2379 4 года назад
VERY well said!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! I am glad you like it!
@jeffmiller8950
@jeffmiller8950 4 года назад
Enjoyed your video and agree 100% about the difference between photo art and photo journalism!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
thanks
@TLK029
@TLK029 4 года назад
Excellent tutorial from a master! Did you get a new laptop and what kind is it?
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! No I didn’t yet but I am planning on doing that ;-)
@AnVoPhotography
@AnVoPhotography 4 года назад
Totally agree with everything you said.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! :-) I do too haha
@sergeantcrow
@sergeantcrow 4 года назад
It is good to hone your skills at taking pics with no intent to retouch.. I try my best with that.. It is totally acceptable or even necessary to retouch and 'paint' some images to something visually artistic and appealing to people so they want to buy the print and hang it on their wall.. I realise that now and I know I will have to learn.. What you do to your images is absolutely fantastic.. That image through the arch with the lights... Amazing !
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
thanks a lot
@ccruz0591
@ccruz0591 3 года назад
You make a great argument. Makes me more comfortable using Lightroom
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 3 года назад
Okay awesome happy to hear :-)
@danielgentili1320
@danielgentili1320 4 года назад
Genius, mate you are a genius. I learned a lot just listening.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Oh nice! Thanks! :-)
@Call_Me_Mom
@Call_Me_Mom 4 года назад
I think it depends on why you took the photo and what you want to use it for. If you are trying to lie to people in a way that affects them or others negatively, of course that's wrong, but making the photo look how the scene looked - or correcting for the differences between how people see and how the camera sees - or creating an image for a specific reason - say advertising or an album cover or to be fine art or just for fun, that's perfectly fine.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure I agree! :-)
@nicholasalcock1366
@nicholasalcock1366 4 года назад
Spot on Serge.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! Glad you like that!
@pixelasm
@pixelasm 4 года назад
The difference is the intent I think: If you want to create art every tool is ok. If you want to document not so much. In the end who cares? If you do like what you have created no one should play it down unless you ask for honest criticism to which everyone should be open though ;-)
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
That makes sense sure! ;-)
@Bringisen
@Bringisen 4 года назад
Amen! I love this video 👍
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! :-) happy you liked it!
@jaceksliwczynski6387
@jaceksliwczynski6387 4 года назад
Thanks Serge. Totally agree :)
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks!!! :-)
@AzfarRahman
@AzfarRahman 4 года назад
loved your explanation...
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Awesome thanks!
@thanosbistolas6903
@thanosbistolas6903 4 года назад
Totally agree. Get it right in the camera and perfect it with whatever means you see fit. At the end of the day, if people enjoy the outcome of their work, this is absolutely fine. The only thing that is cheating is stealing the work of others and present it as your own. Thanks for sharing.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
For sure!! :-)
@trout3212001
@trout3212001 4 года назад
Great video. I agree 100%
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thank you! :-)
@flymeedrone6350
@flymeedrone6350 4 года назад
Completely agree with you on all the line! We must distinct between artistic photography and reportage photography. There is the convinction, expecially in the amateur drone community, that the shots must be published as they come out of the camera. They say that they like to use the jpg produced by the drone. But they don't understand what they miss, and that they are letting the drone to postproduce for them.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Yeah! Glad you agree! :-)
@flymeedrone6350
@flymeedrone6350 4 года назад
@@SergeRamelliPhotography on the other hand, it is more pleasing for the photographer to achieve the perfect shot without retouching. If I can catch the perfect sunset with the perfect clouds, becouse I was good at predicting the timing and the day, and waited for the right situation, I may get frustrated if someone else achieve the same result without effort by compositing tihngs in photoshop. Probably it is what thought photographers that used to shot on film. Today it may seems to easy to get great photos, if you are not afraid to cheat a lot in photoshop.
@sprocket_holes
@sprocket_holes 4 года назад
I have a problem here. I 100% agree that retouching in photoshop is not "cheating" and it's the same thing as working in the darkroom. BUT - I think when you replace something in your photo - adding different sky, or a moon or whatever- this is where I think it stops being a photograph and is now a digital artwork. If you present a digital artwork as a photograph - you are cheating.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Cool i can understand that!
@ianmeechan2040
@ianmeechan2040 4 года назад
I agree with your comments about the viewer liking the work at the end of the day. Isn't that what fine art is all about? I think the only difference being as I'm from a darkroom background, is the effort it used to take in the past to produce what a LUT produces in today's Instagram age. I'd have to dodge, burn or use my special mix of coffee, tea or whatever to tone a print so there was a great amount of effort in the work. I'm sure a lot of my ex-colleagues if they had the tech in those days to produce the same result without all the effort would have jumped at the chance. The only thing I would say is I'm not so keen on over manipulated images which can sometimes be the case.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
I agree! We have the easy solution now a days but I did that process too it is quite something! But I agree some people can go overboard!
@ciarancosgrave
@ciarancosgrave 4 года назад
Touché Serge. I think you may have been inspired to make this video by a comment which I recently left on one of your other videos. Maybe not. Either way, you have persuaded me that I was wrong. I need to embrace retouching!!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Wow haha! I did receive a lot of those comments, and I can understand but I really appreciate you mentioning that you changed your mind, that is just my viewpoint and I am glad that I can open others to see it as well!
@ricardomuller2092
@ricardomuller2092 4 года назад
Serge, please tell us about the flambient technique for interior design photography. Comment prós and cons, make some photos with this technique and compare the results using your basic workflow of HDR look and dodge and burning retouching. This is my sugestion for another video.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
I will have to check it out and let you know!
@pedroalves8739
@pedroalves8739 4 года назад
I agree with your point of view..
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! Appreciate it! ;-)
@tikawasi
@tikawasi 4 года назад
Great video - thanks.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Welcome
@sroy9023
@sroy9023 4 года назад
Your point is well taken.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! Glad you like it!
@yorgosr
@yorgosr 4 года назад
SPOT ON !!! It´s funny how people are prepared to accept anything to do with electronic music and sound manipulation in general from the simplest echo to the most complicated electronic sound and the don´t want to accept that photography is exactly the same thing. No singer or musician in this world sounds the same with and without the studio equipment. In music you are working with sound and in photography with light . Full stop! Photography like music is an art and through art you are trying to create emotions. There is no limit to what tools an artist will use to create these emotions. Hardware and software are there to assist you express your artistic views. The only one time that sound or picture cannot be manipulated in any way is when it has to do with reporting an incident that needs to be represented as it is either it is sound or picture. Great video Serge!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
That’s a great comparaison you are right! I like it :-)
@yorgosr
@yorgosr 4 года назад
@@SergeRamelliPhotography Hi Serge thank you for taking the time to reply to my comment and I am glad you like my comparison. I have been a professional musician for many years and a photography enthusiast even longer (My very first camera was a Lubitel 2). Both music and photography (when I am talking about photography I mean photography as an art through which you express your emotions and not photo-journalism) have a common main point: Composition! As with every composition some will love it and some will disapprove it. The 99% of modern musical compositions include electronic sounds (midi). Have you ever heard anybody saying : " I don´t like this piece of music because the composer is cheating on the instruments that he is using because they are synthesizers and not real? No ! Nobody ever said that! The same happens with singers. No singer sounds the same in real life as they sound on recordings. Yet nobody is accusing them for cheating because they use studio equipment to improve the sound of their voice. What matters is the final sound or to put it better the final composition! I consider photography to be exactly the same thing. Everything has got to do with composition. As a photographer you are the composer. There are plenty of tools in your disposal to express you feelings and your emotions. Some will love your composition and some will disapprove it. As long as the understanding is that you are dealing with art and not journalism to my opinion there are NO LIMITS! Nobody has to like my composition! Everybody is free to like it or to disapprove it. At the end of the day it is My art, My time My composition! I am not cheating to nobody! I am just expressing my views and my feelings using light and all the equipment that are available to me to do so. THERE IS NO CHEATING IN ART! Thank you again for your video Serge and for taking the time to read my comment ! You have done an excellent job!
@prabirchatterjee3198
@prabirchatterjee3198 4 года назад
I fully agree with your view on retouching. I shoot in RAW and I think all serious photographers do the same. Working in photoshop /lightroom is only working in digital darkroom and darkroom job in photography - could any photographer avoid it!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
I am glad! Yeah that makes sense to me ;-)
@cristianogiani702
@cristianogiani702 4 года назад
I have noticed that often, those who criticize fine art photographers are those who do not know how to use post-production software. You know, the story of the fox and the grapes ..... Thank you, Serge, and see you soon....
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha yes! That can happen for sure :-)
@fortierjacques3566
@fortierjacques3566 4 года назад
I have noticed that often, those who criticize fine art photographers are those who do not know the historical and meanings of the words "Photography" and "Cheating" we use. A cheat is a cheat ! even though about changing an image captured before with a camera with post production softwares. LANGUAGE is the key to understand things we're talking about.
@goldspike1
@goldspike1 4 года назад
The painter uses the brush and paint, photographers use the camera and computer.Does every painter depict the scene as it is in reality ,light, shadows,color and detail ? Does a painter eliminate unflattering objects...yes of course they do.Manipulation has been going on for hundreds of years ! It's art and it's what the artist wants it to be and if the viewer likes it or not it's up to them. " If you ain't cheatin ya ain't tryin" Good topic Serge.Thanks
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha thanks! I do agree it is an artistic decision! :-)
@thomast5163
@thomast5163 4 года назад
Totally agreed, Artist has their own tools to do their work so I don't think that is cheating. Similar to automatic use computer machine to read the engine codes, or constructions uses jackhammer instead of shovels, etc... good Point Serge.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure! Exactly:-)
@matthewroddy1
@matthewroddy1 4 года назад
Good show, sir. SO glad you show that heavy retouching and enhancing is nothing new. There's definitely a difference between journalism and art (not that journalism can't BE art, of course). There's nothing magical or more real about an image direct from the camera, as you point out. Even the crop factor can be modified in camera (3:2, 4:3, 16:9, etc, etc), so I never understood "purists" espousing that cropping is bad.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
True! It is an artistic decision ;-)
@darrellosullivan9901
@darrellosullivan9901 4 года назад
Thanks Serge for an excellent video. I am very tired of non-photographer "cheating" comments. For some reason they can't separate fine art from journalism. Their loss
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
yes
@fortierjacques3566
@fortierjacques3566 4 года назад
it depends on what cheating means and what is "photography", since 1826 ! It all depends what is the meaning and definition of the words we use.
@iannisanarys6887
@iannisanarys6887 4 года назад
Maybe U're tired , but the question is from serge and about cheating, then people come to talk about, It's logical Captain Kirk.
@wanneske1969
@wanneske1969 4 года назад
You are right
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
I couldn’t agree more ;-) haha
@noobodyXX
@noobodyXX 4 года назад
great video!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thank you very much! :-)
@V00ify
@V00ify 4 года назад
I have replicated a couple of peter lik's images and was amazed I could actually do it with just lightroom. one thing is obvious tho, he used a much better medium format camera vs my d700. the things I couldnt replicate was detail...he knows how to capture what he needs and especially printing techniques. ever watch his tv documentaries? ofc, I dont know his entire portfolio but its nice to know 1st hand its possible at least for some of his images. many images I see nowadays I know its just not going to happen with my aptitude.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Well that’s a great accomplishment! :-)
@henrybarnett
@henrybarnett 4 года назад
Perfectly argued and explained.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thank you very much!
@tonymurphy9112
@tonymurphy9112 4 года назад
Fully agree 👌
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! :-)
@rejeannantel1185
@rejeannantel1185 4 года назад
I agree Serge! When people argue that photos are software edited, they seem to compare digital images to film - some assuming that they were no artifices while others accepting only in-camera artifices. Many people praise the work that is done in-camera because that’s were most past great photographers come from. Still many of them were great photo retouchers - and when they were not, they hired specialists to do it for them. Robert Mapplethorpe was one who hired great film developers. People also forgot that “composite images” were done as early as the 1860’s. William Notman made many such composites because of the technical limitations of the times. They are also a group of purist that will debate that what the camera sees is the only true reality. Sure enough you’ve proved them wrong with what one can do just using a camera. But everybody seems to forget is that a photographer manipulates reality just by choosing his frame. What he chooses to include or exclude in his images will guide the viewer to his message or his mood. Although I like to retrieve some elements that distracts the viewer in my photographs, I’m not a fan of composite images and I do not replace elements. I think that replacing a sky or adding an element to make a composite is beyond the limitations accepted as being truthful. That’s why I would like to see some indication that an image is a composite. Many fine art photographers who have denied using such techniques were proven wrong afterwards. At the price consumers pay for limited editions prints - they have the right to know the truth. Photographers who refuse to acknowledge this type of manipulation impair the reputation of those who don’t.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure! I get that! I agree with you ;-)
@NeoViny
@NeoViny 4 года назад
There are two different things about it.... a pro photographer creating art.... and on the other side travel magazins/commercials with totally other intentions because the scenes that they create has nothing to do with the real world... one is true art, one is cheating.... I took a great photo on my wedding holiday... I made some arrangements in post and it looks awesome to me... I made a big print for my wall and I love it... for me it’s art because it creates emotions without commercial thoughts... when company’s trying to sell a lot of their products it is cheating. And even when most of the people know that it’s fake, does this makes it less cheating? No...
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha yes Right! :-)
@voyaging4
@voyaging4 2 года назад
This has always been troubling me . Whenever i say the photo is edited , people react like they think my photos are artificial and this lets me down . But its not , all i want is the image should be exactly like what i have seen with my eyes . Phone camera doesn't see like my eyes do , everytime. The colour of Twilight sky may not get captured as it is in nature . All i wanted to convey is " hey i got to see this really beautiful scenery" and when people realise its edited they think the entire image is edited to core and the picture , the nature and the sky loses the credit and recognition it deserves. What triggered this thought was seeing jaw dropping sunset sunrise images in social media . I was sad how i never came across such moments in my life till i realised those were heavily edited. What i do now is that , i take a photo , retouch it till it looks like what i have seen with my eyes ( its time consuming to get that exact balance to make it look like what i have seen ) .And if someone asks if edited , i give them choice to decide if its edited or not . And if i share it in social media , i add that the photo is retouched to look like what i have seen . I want viewers to see the nature's beauty and not my skills (if i had ) while seeing such photos .I don't want anybody to get sad for not getting to see such beautiful sceneries , when they see my work. Such events are rare to come by at least where i stay . There are good , average and stunning sunsets. Editing all kind of nature photos to make it look stunning and jaw dropping might give unrealistic expectations of Nature to viewers and even make them slightly depressed.
@BartRos1980
@BartRos1980 4 года назад
Well said. I think its a good point as always to realize all photographers in the past used a type of post-processing. Lots more is possible today, but that does not mean they would have used all the tools we have now also. I get it from lots of photogs also. Not as savy with Photoshop. Its just a spot of jealousy...
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure it can be.. but I can understand :-) that’s just my viewpoint :-)
@johnchilver536
@johnchilver536 4 года назад
Exactly what I have been explaining to those who say you must have altered it as they prefer to stick with what the camera sees. Unless you have the RAW image you are not seeing what the camera sees because the camera produces the compressed version in jpg which is often a poor example of the RAW. You have to reprocess RAW images to enable sharing and printing. With negative and print the image quality depended on chemical and light exposures. It is impossible to be certain that any image captured at a specific time is a true copy of what the eye saw.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Absolutely and the eye knows the correct colors when the camera well is just a camera ;-)
@MultiDavidellis
@MultiDavidellis 4 года назад
I agree with everything you said. People forget or don't realize that photo studios in the past employed retouchers to clean up complexions or to slim subjects. If you are making art, Photoshop is a good tool. If you are documenting something then Photoshop obviously needs to be used judiciously .
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
For sure! That makes sense! :-)
@lupo19047
@lupo19047 4 года назад
Quite a rant Serge. I agree. Technical progress has moved a lot of skill to the tool from the user of the tool. In addition to photography, I also enjoy woodworking. Should I feel bad that I use a table saw instead of a hand saw? Would anyone criticize Picasso for painting with a palette knife? The truth is, almost anyone with an opposable thumb can use Photoshop, and do in 30 seconds what took Ansel Adams days to do in a wet darkroom. I have 2 types of photographs. Those that I don't do anything in Photoshop that couldn't be done in a wet darkroom, and those where anything goes. I don't try to pass the latter off as the former. But unless you're a crime scene photographer, who cares?
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha true!
@user-is2im7fh4b
@user-is2im7fh4b 4 года назад
Great work!! Ramel-li-ghtroom!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Hahaha thank you!!
@warrengh5647
@warrengh5647 4 года назад
All very true Serge but I have conflict as to who I should try to impress, other people looking at my work or me and to hell if 'they' don't like them.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha i guess it’s a little bit of both? I love doing photography because I bring emotions to others but I enjoy the process myself :-)
@catherinegodefroy6991
@catherinegodefroy6991 4 года назад
Most of the people are just ignorant and know nothing about retouching. So easy to critize. So I agree with you it's not cheating It's an art to know how to retouch a photo.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! Happy you like it :-)
@BonesTheCat
@BonesTheCat 4 года назад
"You" (anyone) can display their shots however the hell they like. Nearly everyone I've heard make that "cheating" argument had the most uninteresting bland photography ability.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure any artist can express themselves the way they want!
@rawanal-daneen7566
@rawanal-daneen7566 4 года назад
It’s not cheating, you are an artist ..please could you make a tutorial How make fine art? Whats the best setting as well?
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Here is a video on how to make fine art: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uxgOKPj9HQ8.html
@draatishshekhar
@draatishshekhar 4 года назад
I saw somebody who just looked just like you in st. petersburg Russia, but turns out he was not you... Great video, really gives me points to argue with others who don't understand the art.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha that’s very funny! You are welcome ;-)
@jasonlee6227
@jasonlee6227 3 года назад
A lot of photographers I've seen also do black/white or monochrome photography. Most of us see the world around us in color so I would consider black/white phtography as a form of photomanipulation. This type of photography isn't real either.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 3 года назад
Right that’s true :-)
@ericholthaus2316
@ericholthaus2316 4 года назад
If it’s done with camera, it’s photography. If it’s done with software, it’s editing. Two separate art forms.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Okay :-)
@Theosax1
@Theosax1 4 года назад
You're right Serge about this topic. Is the reason of making this video about negative reviews?
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Well I’ve had a lot of comments throughout the years and I wanted to explain my viewpoint and I also want to help people so that they can create the way they want :-)
@Groesch7777
@Groesch7777 4 года назад
If the top grammy winning artists of today can use autotune, and no one bats an eye, then we can use whatever tools we want to get the shot right too! We have artists who rip off the sound of another artist, people plagurizing google articles to write their own essays, comedians stealing jokes from each other, and people copying the same shot when the original became popular the day before on social media. True art is dangerous anymore because once it gets done and becomes succesful, 200,000 other people will try to rip it off. Thats just todays society anymore and it makes me sick! If youre true to your art and make it as original as possible, and have to retouch a few things to make it better for YOURSELF, and it all came from YOUR heart and mind, i dont feel like thats a crime at all. There are far more worse things happening out there.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure!
@pancaro77
@pancaro77 4 года назад
Bonjour Serge, Nice idea for a debate: you put really good arguments! My girlfriend always tells me that my photos are not reality... merci!
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha :-) well don’t fight with your girlfriend haha that’s just my viewpoint ;-)
@kallyone
@kallyone 4 года назад
Retouching versus adding objects to a photo that were never there is not the same thing. Some people do not even need a photo to make something in photoshop look like a photo taken by a camera. It is all art but there are photos and there are photoshops. So I do not think it is cheating if you call it a photoshop instead of a photo.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure it really depend from one person to another :-)
@somevideoguy99
@somevideoguy99 4 года назад
I know people will hate me for saying this and there's a whole debate about this but adjusting contrast and brightness with dodge tool on existing elements in a photo vs adding totally new clouds and removing unwanted objects, changing colors of the clouds/scene etc in a picture are totally different. Although I enjoy your work and your photoshop skills, I consider this kind of work "digital art" than real "photography" The reason why I admire old photographers is that they captured the moment as it was presented. Of course, they played with contrast and brightness in dark rooms but I know that what they captured is authentic. Their photos inspired people with composition, timing, hard motivation to capture the moment as it was there. These days when you look at a photo you don't know what's real and what's not real. Even in photo contests these days, it's about who's better at photoshop than photography. You don't have to wake up early in the morning to capture that beautiful sunrise. You don't have to wait for the right moment because you can add/remove(recreate) everything in photoshop. In my book that's not considered photography. That's just good photoshop skills.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure! Whatever works for you, at the end of the day that is all that matters ;-)
@pamelalucca2146
@pamelalucca2146 4 года назад
I think exactly the same!!! Because you can definitely make a "photomontage" and present it as ART, but you can't go around saying that you "took that photograph" because it's NOT like you CAPTURED that moment. Those are 2 different categories and it seems like some people are trying to mix them. Plus, just "retouching" is not the same as "making substantial changes".
@iannisanarys6887
@iannisanarys6887 4 года назад
YES Every modification IS somewhere a cheat. After that there is small retouching, which is ok to me, and high end to much deep retouching which is not the truth. The real genuine photography is the image caught live withe the camera.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
And what do you thimk about the ‘reality’ created. by lens and filter?
@goldspike1
@goldspike1 4 года назад
@@SergeRamelliPhotography To me it's the same as the paint or maybe the canvas that the painter uses.Did Monet paint the same shade of green in his garden painting?
@iannisanarys6887
@iannisanarys6887 4 года назад
@@SergeRamelliPhotography Well I think because you sell packages of filters or plugins or scripts that obvsiouly your answer is ... your answer ;-) But I'm sure in your deep mind and your own knowledge you know what a cheat is and anything about this subject. But we could discuss hundreds of hours about this case.
@jean-michelcoin3674
@jean-michelcoin3674 4 года назад
Chuis d'accord avec Serge.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Merci! ;-)
@jnd2415
@jnd2415 4 года назад
Why does it even matter? Do what you think looks best as long as your honest.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Sure!
@gastonmessier2192
@gastonmessier2192 4 года назад
COMPLETELY AGREE PHOTOGRAPHY IS ART.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Absolutely yes!! :-)
@chrisrohwer5481
@chrisrohwer5481 4 года назад
I have some friends I will suggest watch your video, hope it sinks in with them. I have even used the Ansel Adam's examples. They don't get it.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Haha i know people can have their viewpoints, I don’t mind, I just wanted to share mine :-)
@gogovitch66
@gogovitch66 4 года назад
Since when is art cheating?! ;) I think it is legit to melt the picture in the head with the one produced by physical materials :)
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Thanks! I think so too ;-)
@johnfletcher1036
@johnfletcher1036 4 года назад
Do you know that Ilford produced a multi grade B&W paper in the 1980's. The contrast of the print was changeable by changing the colour of the light the paper was exposed to using different strength of a purpleish filters below the enlarger lens. Was this cheating?
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
Nope! I agree! :-)
@johnfletcher1036
@johnfletcher1036 4 года назад
Serge Ramelli Photography I still have the filters stashed away somewhere.I might even have some of the paper.
@randymelton6096
@randymelton6096 4 года назад
Here, here. Hat's off to you Serge, I totally agree with you and your views on retouching. Those that carry the banner for "getting it right in the camera and not retouching" have obviously forgotten that as good as DSLR's are these days, they still can't produce an image the way our eyes see the scene being photographed. The camera is either going to expose for the highlights or the shadows but it can't do both. That's where retouching comes in. Just as you mentioned, it can be overdone and that's when the comments of "oh you retouched that picture" or "you Photoshopped that picture to death" come in. So to the die hard "I want to get it right in the camera because I'm too lazy to post process" I say this...Get over yourself, your camera will never make a fine art quality image on it's own.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
very true
@didierperrusset
@didierperrusset 4 года назад
En Français Serge : Un juriste pointilleux pourrait dire que les retouches sont un "faux et usage de faux" puisque en droit pénal un faux est TOUTE altération de la vérité. Sans aller jusque là il y a développement d'une part et retouche d'autre part, et dans ces 2 notions des modifications légères et d'autres plus prononcées. Pour moi tant que c'est dans l'esprit de l’image captée, qui n'est que ce qui a été photographié in fine, les modifications légères sont acceptables et ne sont pas une triche. Si ces modifications vont trop loin, modifient de trop l'image alors il y a tricherie et plus encore si on ne l'annonce pas lors de la publication. A force de voir des images travaillées et retravaillées par des logiciels depuis 15 / 20 ans les gens ne savent plus ce qu'est une photographie, tel qu'on en a pris de 1827 à 1990 (environ) TROP DE RETOUCHE TUE LA RETOUCHE ET LA PHOTOGRAPHIE AVEC, la culture photographique du public aussi.
@SergeRamelliPhotography
@SergeRamelliPhotography 4 года назад
je comprends
@didierperrusset
@didierperrusset 4 года назад
@@SergeRamelliPhotography on a abordé ce point ensemble à Paris l'an dernier, brièvement ,vers le pont des arts ^^
Далее
Is Photo Editing CHEATING?
42:15
Просмотров 165 тыс.
Are these photographers CHEATING?
11:44
Просмотров 814 тыс.
My favorite Camera Settings for Landscapes
10:11
Просмотров 99 тыс.
We review YOUR photos!
45:26
Просмотров 33 тыс.
IS EDITING YOUR PHOTOS CHEATING?
6:17
Просмотров 369