*ObJeCtiOn!* The continents would be rather part of the container in which the soup is, it is a container with a strange shape, but a container after all
*HoLd It!* This soup technically shouldn’t even exist! Technically, it is *on* the container, not *in*. And because it’s surrounded by empty space it should technically be falling apart right now!
*tAKe ThAt* The 30-ish percent of land is above the water. If Monkey Cat is right and the continents are part of the container, the water is below and thus *in* the container.
I love how it went from not being a soup for understandable arguments to suddenly not being a soup due to the lack of a sizeable spoon. They're visibly losing their sanity. Comedic GOLD
But not as a whole. Only the parts near the underwater volcanoes. This would be more like sticking a soup into a pitcher of water. The pitcher does not become full of soup just because some of the soup was mixed into the drinking water.
@@naajih11 Being over seasoned doesn't disqualify it from being soup. Simple salt broths of that salinity is very common in Asia. Also, you can drink ocean water and live if you just have a normal amount of the soup. It only becomes a problem if you're overloading your system with salt.
Marine ecologist here! If we define vegetables as a true plantae, then seaweed doesnt count since they are macro-algae However, seagrass is a true plant that can live in the ocean. A new discovery that some of its seeds can be processed as rice substitute. So yes, it can act as a broth seasoning or even the eatery main components. Dives away with mask on
@@EmmanuelNgwalaWatshela*Hold it!!* Although lawyers can choose to take cases, that doesn’t mean that they are exempt from unfortunate circumstances which may force them to take cases they dislike! An example could be if a lawyer is in a desperate need of money!
@@EmmanuelNgwalaWatshela*Hold it!!* Although lawyers can choose to take cases, that doesn’t mean that they are exempt from unfortunate circumstances which may force them to take cases they dislike! An example could be if a lawyer is in a desperate need of money!
I have an autistic best friend she repeats just about the same three sentences and this is one of them but you’re actually say the whole thing where are you I’m at soup what do you mean you’re at soup I’m at soup you think it would be funny but it gets annoying after a while
They are looking at this from the entirety wrong angle, the oceans don't need to be currently boiling for it to be soup they just need to have been boiling in the past, ergo the ocean is actually leftover soup that has been left out. "Primordial Soup" may infact be literal
There's a Japanese dish called Shirouo which is a "soup" that has live fish, also technically eggs are alive so fish roe soup counts. In conclusion the ocean is 100% a soup
Objection, the world is not ending. Webster's dictionary defines "world" as being the earthly existence of humans, or, the earth with all it's inhabitants. Anyone who has read any history ever can tell you that civilizations rise and fall countless times, and have endured hardships which would make today's look like a tea party. Not only is our current civilization intact and simply progressing as they do, but in the worst case scenario, it falls apart and comes back together again in a few hundred years. By the scale of history, this little moment is nothing
Look buddy, I'm an engineer. That means I solve problems, but not problems like, "What is beauty?," because that would fall under the purview of your conundrums of philosophy.
The ocean used to be very hot, and now it's cooled down. The ocean is just soup that's cooled down by now, and we're all awaiting for the greater power to finish his meal.
I love how you can almost see their chaotic childhood friendship from these grueling 3 minutes. Like when they agreed that cold soup sucked while still yelling at each other
Honestly I would really like that. A court to finally end debates like if water is wet or not, (it’s not) if a hotdog is a sandwich or not (it’s not) and if the ocean is soup (it should be)
Objections!!! The Size of the Spoon doesn't matter. Neither does Wether or Not you can consume the entire serving. However you have to serve it within the Off Shore. Otherwise it is no longer the Ocean.
Adressing contested points: Broth - Ocean water is technically a broth, thermal volcanic vents at the sea floor cook dead bacteria and fish which have sunk as scattered "sea snow" to broil, which means the water is considered a diluted, but valid broth by definition as this cooked tissue is scattered via currents. Live animals - Asian delicacies in South Korea include live Octopus or Squid in soups. Spoon size - Just get a comically large spoon, duh :P Ergo, The Ocean is the nastiest type of technically valid soup. I'd intend on reboiling it thoroughly before consumption however...
@@_pitako you can not slam the gavel with a hammer. That is like the Judge's main job in every incarnation ever. The judge decides on who has the last word and the judge decides when the trial's discussion ends. Allowing a lawyer to unlawfully silence both the judge and the jury without consent is absolutely unconstitutional .
Trust me, with some people, it wouldn't solve anything. I've posted a comment on this video more than a year ago about gazpacho, and I've got into an argument with someone for weeks and maybe even a month over gazpacho qualifying to be a soup or not. In the end, all their replies were erased and some time later I had some fun with some other replies, but still, I got into an argument when trying to use that example.
Technically once the conditions are met, anything added in afterwards doesn’t matter. This means the land is part of the soup too. This makes the Code Ment “I’m at soup” an even better scene lmao
*OBJECTION* They forgot about the hydrothermal vents under the water which are pretty much mini volcanos but like a lot of them therefore the ocean actually is getting cooked
@@NateLeonhart yeah but so does the rotation of the earth do you cook your soup by heating up one half of the pot for long enough for the other half to cool down, and then doing the same for the other half?
@@pikadragon2783 your stove doesn't heat all the water/broth at once, it heats up the bottom water first because its closest to the stove, just like the ocean and the core/hydrothermal vents
this kinda thing once happened with me in one of ace attorney online's servers. A guy said the room is a library, I disagreed. I tired my best, but the guy won, by having almost every member in the room testify. He gave stupid reasons for everything, I said where are the book, he said the books are ordered and being delivered. I said where are the shelves, he said Library needs no shelves. just like Edgy in this video. LOL
Haha the answer was right in front of your face then...If the books were being ordered it means they weren't there yet...Which means that wasn't a library it was the site of a remodel or a construction site. Until the building is completed it can not be classified as it's proper purpose. If I built half a Dairy Queen but stopped before I put the ice cream equipment in, you couldn't call it a Dairy Queen
@@theflyinga8575 Yea. It's a fanmade community/game/ online chat place etc. You can play fan made cases with other members casing with u taking different roles like defense, prosecution judge etc. here's the link to their official site to join it either on web or download the client. aceattorneyonline.com/ Although it's not filled with a bombarding population, but still there are quiet a lot people Also beware of Newbie Hole if you can't take the insane spamming there (NH in short) but you can join, there are good people like me there too.
The ocean is not a soup. If you pointed to the ocean and said, "wow look at that soup" the person you were talking to would hire you a psychiatrist. Just because it has the contents of another item, doesn't mean that specific item is the same as the other item. If you put all of the ingredients of a soft taco on top of a loaf of bread, that's not a taco. It's the same same the ocean. And soups usually are prepared ingredients that are mixed together for a presentable meal that is edible. You don't put alive fish in soups, soups have cooked ingredients. And let's just say everything I said is void, the ocean can still have things like icebergs, stone, dirt, sand, gravel, clay, etc in it. Soup does not have those things in it, and all possibilities are to be considered when defining something. For example, if you say >3 = >100,000 then you would be wrong. >3 CAN be >100,000 but it also CANNOT be >100,000 by being
@@kelsey6197 Who said the soup has to be on a good quality. And about the ingredients its because never was said it needs be on a bowl and about sand a gravel..if you find a small rock on your soup you will call that soup or not? And about alive animals..there literally some foods whats gives alive animals as food. And about cooked ingredient probably there cooked ingredients on ocean but just we cant see it because its deep.
Right ! when they mention cold soups I instantly thought of some of the Asian dishes that are called cold soup some countries even have cold soup as a delicacy or national dish
So, you now have a spoon the size of a table. Now what? Once you fill it with ocean/soup, it‘ll probably get too heavy to lift. But even if you could still lift it, how will you get it inside your mouth?
@@FVN-Addict you dont get it inside your mouth, you lay it down similar to a bowl and get a smaller spoon to drink from it, or you could just lick directly from the large spoon
Ah, yes. Miles: *uses the definition of soup as evidence that the ocean is soup* Phoenix: *uses the same definition to prove Miles wrong* Miles: tHeRe ArE nO sEt rUlEs
@@Tankirb - First off, love your name and pfp. That said, I disagree that it negates the soupness of the rest of the ocean. The ocean as a singular entity is still being cooked, just extremely inefficiently.
@@crxkirby it may be in the process of being cooked but the ocean hasn't finished cooking yet. It would need to finish cooking first in order to be considered soup. Interestingly enough if we go by the definition of cooking being required for something to be soup then this would also disqualify gazpacho from being soup since that is made of raw uncooked vegetables that are simply blended into a soupy consistency. So gazpacho "soup" would technically be using the second definition of soup "a substance or mixture perceived to resemble soup in appearance"
There are many cold soups meant to be cold. Tomato soup doesn't have meat. Chicken noodle soup doesn't need vegetables (I know it usually does but it's not necessary). Really soup is just liquid with some other stuff in it. Salt water itself is soup. Also sea cucumber.
Phoenix picked a losing battle on this one. Even his best chance with 'live animals' was a failure, because there are cultures that eat live animals.....
@@Siocpa Well, I've always got an Italian vibe when hearing about gazpacho, and there was even an add one time for carton bottles of gazpacho in which it said smthin like "The best gazpacho in all of Italy" And no, I'm not Italian (I mean, if I'm not 100% sure about gazpacho being Italian) so the possibility of a comeback like "of course it would say that in the country the add is displayed" is null. So like, why would a company be boasting about the best version of a product in a country in an add showed in another country if the company and the product aren't from the country mentionned in the add?
@@Siocpa OK, fine, but that possibility of selling a product and trying to convince it's from another country is kinda dumb with Italy and Spain, don't you think? I mean, both have that South vibe and Spain also has that vine like the company could have had the ad saying "it may be cold, but you can still feel the heat coming from Spain in it" (sounds dumb, but that just to illustrate my point so it's fine). Also, I've checked a decent amount of websites for definitions of soup and I've also checked descriptions of gazpacho, and it fits: a liquid in which there are bits of meat, fish or vegetables, the liquid being made by cooking the same meat/fish/vegetables from earlier with water. Gazpacho just has extra ingredients but the base is still here. And on the topic of hot/cold, the definition of soup says it's *usually* or *often* served hot, but it also says on some websites that it can be served cold, so gazpacho also fits there. So basically, it is a soup and you're just being delusional, perhaps because you may be proud of that dish and don't want it to be minimized to something simple. Or another subjective reason, whatever it can be. But gazpacho is a cold soup
@@Siocpa Though Spain and Mexico are kinda related to one another because of Portugal and all the Hispanic vibe, aren't they? While Spain and Italy don't have many things in common, or at least that's what I'm feeling when thinking about it. And, Well, see, the definition changes depending on websites, and some websites even have more than one definition, some including heat, some not, and even one of them implying heat or cold, so it's really a grey area. And for milkshakes, don't make me laugh. Soup requires water as part of the liquid, milkshake don't include water. Also, I'm wondering. Does gazpacho usually have bread crumb in it, like, is it tradition? Because I went back to check that part about bits and a bunch of websites mentionned those in the base definition so that would mean there are bits of something solid in the liquid, thus making it soup.
@@Siocpa OK, I won't try to go on the Italy/Spain/Mexico thing further, that was kind of a moot point anyway And milkshakes are made by using milk, so sure there's water, but the initial liquid isn't water itself, while soups are based on water, and for gazpacho, there are two different liquids, water and oil. So it's based partially on water itself, while milkshake isn't based, liquid-wise, on water itself, be it partially or entirely And no, I didn't mean croutons and the likes, what I've read on some websites is that "mie de pain" (yeah I'm French, moving on) is a part of gazpacho, and when translating, I got the simple word "crumb" so I assumed it should be called "breadcrumbs". And seeing how and why bread is used in the recipe, I guess it's mainly used for the part I was talking about so I really didn't mean croutons and the likes of it. But that's not important since you admitted that some solid is used in the recipe, with parts in the final product (I mean, when blended, it will turn into crumbs that are still in the gazpacho, right ? Unless you filter them out but you didn't specify that part and honestly I would be judging so hard because the crumbs would eventually be really small so you would need something that filters really tiny things and that would be so absurd but whatever). Also, that problem about drinking? Please, people also can drink soup. I mean, if the bits are small enough, they can be chewed and swallowed while drinking. Besides, soup usually are served in bowls, so after eating the bits, you can just, gulp the broth down. So no problem in the eat/drink department.
According to this same discussion I had with some others, we determined that the ocean is leftover soup that’s slowly being reheated because of the underwater volcanoes
Edgeworth literally could win instantly if he had just added the argument that the ocean is full of salt, which is a seasoning that most soups come with.
Salt is not a necessary ingredient for any soup. Salt is also not part of any definition for soup. Furthermore the ocean has so much salt that it is not safe for consumption. That doesn't sound like soup - at best it's a soup rendered inedible due to high salinity.
i was really hoping for the : “But soup is served in a bowl, the ocean is not in a bowl !!” *OBJECTION* “Soup can also be in cans!” “The ocean is not in a can!!” “You can pour soup on the floor, doesn’t have to be in something” “…” argument
I love the fact that i have a final exam in one hour and haven't even started preping yet but i somehow got genuinely attracted to this very astonshing debate.
This topic of discussion actually had me curious, so I asked ChatGPT if it thinks the ocean is a soup, here’s what it replied: The question of whether the ocean can be considered a soup hinges on the definition of "soup." Generally, soup is a liquid food typically consisting of water, stock, or milk, combined with various ingredients such as meat, vegetables, and grains. ### Arguments for the Ocean as a Soup: 1. **Ingredients**: The ocean contains a mixture of water, salt, organic matter, and a vast array of marine life, from microscopic plankton to large fish, which could be likened to the ingredients in a soup. 2. **Nutrients**: Similar to soup, the ocean has a rich nutrient content that supports marine life. These nutrients can be seen as parallel to the vitamins and minerals found in a broth. 3. **Complexity**: Just as soups can be complex mixtures of various ingredients, the ocean is a complex ecosystem with numerous components interacting in a fluid medium. ### Arguments Against the Ocean as a Soup: 1. **Edibility**: Soups are typically prepared for human consumption. The ocean, with its salt concentration and potential contaminants, is not directly consumable as a food product. 2. **Purpose**: Soup is a food item intended to provide nourishment. The ocean, while it supports marine life, serves a broader ecological purpose and is not designed or intended as a food product. 3. **Preparation**: Soups are created through a process of combining and cooking ingredients. The ocean is a natural body of water formed by geological and environmental processes, not by intentional preparation. ### Conclusion: While the ocean shares some characteristics with soup in terms of being a liquid mixture containing various substances, it fundamentally differs in purpose, preparation, and suitability for consumption. Therefore, the ocean is not a soup in the traditional culinary sense, though the comparison can be a fun and illustrative way to think about the complexity and richness of marine environments.
these videos, are PERFECT! these videos talk about questions we want to search up but we don't. When we want to make videos of these, we don't, because we are lazy. So let's appreciate the maker of these videos that is actually not lazy to talk about these questions that life has given us.
Technically, nothing can stop you from drinking seawater. Will it taste good? Of course not. Will it kill you if you drank it in big quantities? Yes. However, nothing can physically stop someone from drinking seawater.
@@EaterOfGeese it’s not that the ocean is a bad-tasting or unhealthy thing to consume, although it is, it’s that it is literally extremely bad to drink any of it at all because of the obscene salt content, it dehydrates you to a serious extent. If you’re lost at sea you don’t want to drink the seawater. Pillows are technically possible to eat, but they’re inedible because… they’re just not food
1:46 ; Actually, eggplants are fruits. The definition of "fruit" is the sweet and fleshy product of a tree or other plant that contains seed and can be eaten as food, and eggplants are fleshy, with seed, and can be eaten as food. It also contains at least some sugars. Anyone object?
Actually, seaweed aren’t vegetables, they are algae. They’re different categories. That’s not to say that there *aren’t* any vegetables in the ocean though. Littering is most certainly a thing that contributes to that.
Seaweed can actually reffer to a kind of plant also known as seagrass, which belongs to the the angiosperm phylum of true plants. Many modern scientists also consider green and red algae (including things like nori and ulva) as true plants.
There's also a difference between biological and culinary categories. Biologically, tomatoes are fruit. But they're still treated like vegetables in the kitchen.
@@widmo206 The thing is, in regard to cooking, tomatoes are very much _not_ treated like both, but are instead treated as non-fruits. (Bonus: By treating tomatoes as fruits, salsa becomes a fruit salad.) And while the biological definition of "vegetable" is just "plant", cooks wouldn't use it like that - though there is no real rule what _exactly_ constitutes a vegetable in cooking, since there it's based on culinary culture, not on the biology of the ingredient. But formore examples, strawberries are biologically nuts, and the part we eat is an aggregate accessory fruit. Which, despite the name, isn't even considered a proper fruit in biology. (In biology, fruits have to be formed from the plant's ovary.) In any case, nothing about strawberries is a berry - however, tomatoes, bananas, and watermelons are berries. And peanuts, beans, and chilli peppers are fruit. In short, bringing biology into the kitchen is absolutely pointless.
