Honestly, Nadir comes across as being friendly enough and a normal person. That's far ahead of many other Muslims I come across on social media. They all tend to be rather extreme and eccentric.
Every time Nadir criticises Jesus and the Bible he is criticising the Quran. Alcohol usage, the size of a mustard seed and hand washing are pathetic examples of science in the Quran. He hasn’t had the courage to address the big ones which everyone knows have been thoroughly debunked. Time to retire to the muddy pool where the sun sets.
The big issues you are talking about were never mentioned in the debate. Anthony was too scared. That’s how good I am because he have watched past debate and knows all those error claims will be destroyed
The worst that can happen is if someone who hates the true, good and beautiful is a believer in the facts. That is a demon. It is better to be condemned as an unbeliever, than be a demon. 2 Thessalonians, says that delusion is sent on those who hates the truth, not on those who are simply wrong. If you are wrong, but seeking the truth, you will be sent clarity. But if you hate the truth, you'll be worse of with the facts than living in delusion that you are right. Therefore god sends you such a delusion, so you can at least have that, because there is no hope unless you start loving truth.
The way Nadir ranted about the one who condemns people to hell through alcohol needs to be very careful. He’s walking on thin ice since Allah supposedly sent down the Gospel and Torah. Therefore he is ranting against his own false god. The way he insults Jesus is disgraceful and if he is honest must surely recognise that he is insulting his own religion.
@Lavender-blue80 He lacks self reflection, I think. I got a feeling that self reflection is less important in Islam than posturing and claiming victory in a micro battle that consists of strawman and other fallacies. I still get Muslims who forward the Hijab-Wood debate "Allah prayed fooooor Muhammad" but don't see that the posturing of Hijab doesn't mean he won.
@@SaintOtter blustering, deflection and other tactics are the only way these dawahghandists can attempt to get their false message across. In their eyes the best form of defence is attack which is why they go for the Bible. It never enters their egotistical heads that their own sources affirm the inspiration, preservation and authority of the Bible. They shoot themselves in their feet every time they open their mouths.
Turns out Jesus was fond of children look it up septuagint 14-51/52 Arrested in a parking get some at 4 am in the morning saying I’m not a child trafficker while caught with a naked child with a medical bandage on his penis, which fell off when he ran away! It would appear that Jesus is milking the child for an antidote or theriac to counteract the snake venom that he had taken earlier in the evening while partying with 12 underage boys he left two of them guarding the entrance to the garden one of which was Peter……… I have to admit I’m pretty shocked didn’t realise Jesus was an admitted pedogog
This guy showed us the true Islam, the worst scientific endeavour in history. Whereas true faith is about the state of the inner human, the heavenly human, the heart, or what you want to call it, and how it is doing, how it connects in love to others, etc. something which can only be given by God's grace.
Nadir is off topic at the outset. He’s already attacking the Bible and has yet to address the actual topic. In fact by attacking the Bible he’s attacking his own sources.
@@nadirahmed4224 really? You are doing your best to attack Anthony and the Bible. Why are you focussing on alcohol and running from the moon splitting, sun setting in a muddy pool, the whole issue of embryology and so on. Where are the scientific facts affirming those statements. Talking about alcohol and the size of a mustard seed is totally irrelevant in the light of these big topics. Why are you talking about the Bible when the topic is the scientific accuracy of the Quran. You’ll have to try harder. You can’t win and you know it. The Quran is anything but fact based. Why are you criticising the Bible when the Quran affirms the inspiration, preservation and authority of the Gospel and Torah. It’s all or nothing.
@@Lavender-blue80 I was ready for those topics, but Anthony did not raise these issues because he has washed past debates and knows not to attack the text of the Quran. That’s a big win for me.
@@nadirahmed4224 no it isn’t. Why should he raise them? You should have in order to substantiate your case. Anthony doesn’t have to prove anything, you do. The truth is that you have nothing other than “Allah knows best “ to provide some sort of answer. You failed miserably. When you can produce journals to verify moon splitting, the Islamic version of embryology and where the sun sets, then you might have a case. Hand washing and alcohol don’t cut it. You’re arguing against your better judgment. Heck, you couldn’t even provide assurance of your destiny after you die.
I don't know where my comment went. Easiest answer to Nadirs question: child marriage including sex, is accepted in the Qur'an. Muhammad's marriage to Aisha and its consummation at 9 is given as an example in Sahih Al-Bukhari in aspecial chapter about CHILD MARRIAGE. It is known that sex with CHILDREN is bad. It is known that teen pregnancies are bad.
I was ready to refute those arguments but Anthony never raised them with me, because he has seen my past debates in which those arguments got demolished. so he was scared to directly challenge the Quran in my presence. Please accept he lost.
that is because I am still dealing with last night's debate. but if you understood my point, you would have less confidence in your arguments. Because Anthony did research those arguments against my refutations, and he decided not to use them against me. this is a huge evidence for Islam.
@@Lavender-blue80 well I stated that I would end Anthony’s career by pointing out that he cannot find a single scientific journal which contradicts the text as a QURAN and that’s exactly what happened
@@nadirahmed4224 if you think you can ruin Anthony’s career you are giving yourself more credit than you are due. You have done nothing to prove the scientific accuracy of the Quran. If you are so sure of your case you should be providing scientific evidence for the splitting of the moon, embryology, the setting of the sun and so on. Why on earth are you waffling about hand washing and refusing to address the big issues. You have done nothing but waffle, deflect and avoid the big issues. You won’t defeat Anthony if you live to be a hundred.
@@Lavender-blue80 you are trying to win the debate after the debate none of the issues you are mentioning, were raised in the debate, but I was ready to address them, but you should accept. Anthony was not able to provide documented scientific references to support his case.
@@nadirahmed4224 why didn’t you bring them up to substantiate your case? The truth is that you can’t make a case for any of the so-called scientific miracles in the Quran. Anthony responded to your case which was conspicuously lacking in anything solid. Quoting scientific journals does not prove the Quran’s statements about the setting sun, embryology and moon splitting etc. Why didn’t you raise those issues. The burden was on you to prove the accuracy of your book. You failed miserably. You kept saying Anthony should get back to science. Why didn’t you use science to prove the Quran? You didn’t get close. Show us a journal that affirms the splitting of the moon. The only thing you’re good at is deflection and sleight of hand.
