Is There Scientific Proof Of Noah's Ark Ever Existing? | Myth Hunters 

Why dont you look up the timbers found. Shape of a boat with metal way up a mountain and pushed down in slides over time. Not only a shape of a boat but the exact size as described

@@truesoulghost2777 let’s pretend it is a boat. How does that equate to the ark? Just because Egypt exists doesn’t mean the Bible is fact. Unfortunately for you the story about an ark has been debunked in several ways. The problem is that you are trying too make facts out of fiction. You have faith and belief in a fictional book of books.

​@@truesoulghost2777Why would an ancient boat have anything metal?

One day you'll know the truth

@@Jerrynotjefff you don’t think it’s weird telling strangers about themselves? Please show evidence that any hod exists. You can’t because your god isn’t real. That’s the truth.

Wasn't going to watch it. I am an Irving Finkel fan

Just in the nick of time. I felt my brain shrinking.

Doin gods work down here 🤣🤣🤣 But really, the second my brain started to process "man who has been to space and participated in an Apollo lunar mission not only believes in the bible, but truly believed that every event in it took place, up to, and including Noah's Ark" I was waiting for the ancient aliens guy to pop up. I'm out.

Thank you!

Not all heroes wear capes. Thank you.

He thought ahead 😉

Well not exactly 6000 if the Bible dates Noah to about 4500 years ago, and the Iron Age is estimated to have begun 3200 years ago.

this video shows that flaw and accepts it.

How can people who are creationists believe in the "Iron Age"? That makes no sense to me at all. The Iron Age is part of the evolution of man.

@@robynw6307 Creationists aren't big on logic. Or evidence. Or anything remotely resembling science.

But even the layman has to admit the global flood myth being found in ancient cultures across the world is a bit uncanny in its own right.

@@finalsecretofchrono1339, you do realise that they all have their origins in different time periods and the storiiiiies are different except for the flood part, these storiiiiies are also passed down over the centuries, embellished, exaggerated, plagiarised, changed...........and the "Worldwide" flood was nothing more than them 'thinking' that the whole world was under water because it stretched for as far as the eye could see and it was only 'their world' that was under water, they are storiiiiies, nothing more. You can 'believe' whatever you wish, give Cinderella a try, that's a good story;......... give me evidence, logic and sanity any day.

It's not a myth if people from around the world all have a story about it. Face it with an open mind and don't look down at the ancestors, they're alot smarter than you give them credit.

Yet atleast one civilization on every continent has a story of a great flood.

@@chrisdavenport3621 Yes but not about the Noah's arch

@@chrisdavenport3621 So what? Why do other flood stories vary so greatly from the Genesis account? Flood myths are fairly common worldwide (though sparse in more arid locales), and if they came from a common source, we should expect similarities in most of them. Instead, the myths show great diversity. For example, people survive on high land or trees in the myths about as often as on boats or rafts, and no other flood myth includes a covenant not to destroy all life again.

@@plainsman just like every civilization that didn’t have their history written down, it was passed down from generations. No story is going to capture 💯 of the truth when maybe 10 people had told the story by time genesis was written. Anybody who says it didn’t happen cause it’s not National Geographic type accurate, needs to find a better argument slow enough for you to make some LOGICAL sense.

@@Mithra53 I don’t think I believe the ark story. My opinion is everyone knew there had been a flood but questioned how anything survived and a ‘saga’ like tale became factual to them after years of history passed down.

Its recorded unicorns existed in china and older literature. Anything extraordinary is commonly known to be hunted as sport or for self preservation.

@@zachwells8994 As were fire breathing dragons.

I have a problem figuring out who carried all the viruses and STDs

@@MasterCedar Viruses and stds. Well we can observe lives of sinful living, because of sin like continued drunkeness people develop conditions in their body. Diseases, sicknesses, weakness, fatigue, death. But we also are dealing with a gov thag creates viruses, we also have to be concerned with God who may strike an individual with a plague out of judgement because of ones actions or even a whole society. Only the righteous obtain everlasting life do you know and follow Jesus Christ?

Good thing they got Bigfoot

ship length 6 km width 2 km rivet-like nail 15 tons 42,94302 47,47184

What makes any search pointless is the fact that the whole ark story is a fairy tale. The ark never existed and a world wide flood never happened.

True Fact: Noah lived in the time of the watchers and their children. Who taught man metal workings.

@@zachwells8994 They didn't exist and they certainly didn't teach them to smelt or work iron

@@gryph01 yeah i don’t argue about whats true.

@@zachwells8994 But you do spout BS like it's going out of style

@@ecocodex4431 Jesus Christ gives eternal life. What’s inside of you?

ship length 6 km width 2 km rivet-like nail 15 tons 42,94302 47,47184

Again, 2 of each kind of animal, cat: one kind, dog: one kind…they reproduced from there. That means that maybe a couple of Smilodons came off the ark and through God, tigers, caracals, panthers, and house cats were created through adaptation to the new environment.

This is comedy

@@ML-dz5ix I was also going to say this is comedy.

You just cracked me up😂

Like 99% of science

@@tribe3828 your reply is irrational. You are definitely uneducated. Nothing exists without science. Just because science can’t explain nature doesn’t make all theories nit beliefs. Without science you would still be living in the Stone Age.

@@tribe3828 maybe you should go back 500 years and live like the native Americans did with only Stone Age technology. Because science is just a belief not technology. The truth is native Americans were the last people on the planet to live 10.000 years longer in the stone age than everyone else.

@@tribe3828 Says someone too science illiterate to actually read peer reviewed published research papers for comprehension.

@@tribe3828Remember that number if you find yourself on an operating table one day. Science is about truth and facts following the Scientific Method. Check it out one day. It may help you to understand how ridiculous response really is.

How'd you get there, Willie Wonka's great glass elevator turned outer space vehicle?

Bigfoot and Atlantis are far more believable than magic god ship that housed two of each species. By the way, just two animals can't produce lineage anymore so that too proves that this story is bs.

Well not quite, at least we know there is a Loch Ness😉

it depends if you have evidence and a real chance of finding it, religious people don't like evidence they like following their heart strings.... if a real piece of evidence existed, it would be worth it for archaeology... being the discoverer of something like that would make someone a famous archaeologist

Researching history is great if you have funding, but either you find it or you hit a dead end.

@@dcjway indeed, but with greater evidence

@@dcjway Theory with a whole lot of actual evidence of it.

@@rempseaheinamies9414 A theory has to fit certain criteria to be classed a real theory, otherwise, its not theory. Some people like to distinguish between a scientific theory and a religious theory like they are 2 version of a theory. This mostly false. The subject matter of a theory is irrelevant, it is the theory that is relevant in all discussions, the data presented, the explanations presented, the predictions and projections a theory must make, also must be falsifiable. Basically, a theory is a real theory if it has great explanatory power, doesn't matter if its scientific, religious, philosophical or otherwise.

@@cameronhesketh6814 nope that is complete nonsense... because having a religious theory already puts your argument outside the realms of provability.... so it's completely different to a scientific theory... for example the theory of gravity, you don't disagree with that do you? "theory" is not the same word in "the theory of relativity", as when you say "in theory" like a verbal caveat implying you think it should work but are not certainv"well in theory if i cut this wire we will be okay!"... you might be confused over what theory means in a scientific context, maybe thinking of what is more likely a "hypothesis", it's a proposed explanation it should have good evidence and reasoning behind it though theory is a missunderstood word

@@cameronhesketh6814 In science, to be classified as a hypothesis, it must be falsifiable. To be a theory, it must be a hypothesis that is backed up by a preponderance of evidence. The word "theory" as used in the vernacular has no more veracity than just a wild guess.

They road on the backs of big fish. (-:

Well according to Answers in Genesis the roos got to Oz by being blasted there by a volcanic eruption and there are penguins in Oz so perhaps they hitched a ride with the roos and some carried on to Antarctica.

Antartica didn't exist before the flood so.....

@@nathangent6921 That is a real help in aging the flood, if there was no Antarctica before the flood then the flood must have happened well over 200,000,000 years ago. Even you must admit that is a little before Noah's time.

@@MasterCedar Christians believe Noah existed about 2000 years before the creation and earth at that time had only one land mass which evolutionists call Pangea.

correct

TLDW*

I'm assuming you believe a fish grew feathers and a beak and crawled on to the arctic shore?.......

Yes, God uses mankind to do great things, like traveling to the moon, but it is only through faith that we can be Saved through Christ Jesus. And yes, there is lots of evidence supporting the Great Flood.

Easy.Just take the small juveniles and eggs.Heaps of room now.

@@nathangent6921 For millions of species. Mixed with the millions of species that currently exist. Would take a helluva big ark 😉

@@nathangent6921 Still a good trick since dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid strike 65 million years ago.

@@paulford9120 Again, not species, two of each kind, plenty of room now.

@@plainsman No evidence for any of that, but the flood, volcanic activity, earthquakes, etc…caused the rapid burial of the animals (and dinosaurs) outside of the ark. Rocks completely changed as the earth was wiped clean, this is why strata layers are found all throughout the earth, and fossils of the same species.

Well, luckily it is not a myth, but Jesus will come back, then you will wish you read the Bible and come to know Christ.

@@LueRue06 The flood myth was inherited from the Sumerians long before the Bible was written. Please do some extra studying on the matter.

@@LueRue06 There is copious evidence that there was never a global flood. Any other conclusion is just wishful thinking and self-delusion.

The Old Testament ... the Pentateuch ... is the work of the Jews who returned from their Babylonian captivity in the 6th century BC (some Jews, the peasantry, weren't taken into captivity) who, as it says in Kings, declared that it had been found buried in the Temple at Jerusalem, having been put there by Moses hundreds of years earlier. If there was a Moses could he have been someone from the Egyptian Old KIngdom ... prior to 2150 BC?

Enjoy, friend.

I can tell by the way u are typing. Enjoy the vid lol.

😂

I'm about to have one too!! Need a laugh this morning 😂😂😂

Wasted weed my friend.

thank god that he gifted them with the knowledge to fix it

Now we all know that the moon stuff is all Hollywood

BS. We all know it was all filmed here on earth. Things like a broken rover were invented for dramatic purposes. There is no need to lie anymore. We know it was filmed in a studio and the astronauts were all puppets. Heck Kennedy was a puppet too and so am I.

@@dollywilson1005 The nice thing about conspiracy theories is that there are so many to choose from. And that you don't need a single fact to start them.

@@dollywilson1005 Science literacy is clearly not one of your strong points.

Creationists are the best thing that ever happed to Atheism.

😂 you just bought into man made lies

If you look into it though, it makes all the sense in the world. Fossils were thrown about during the flood along with the sediments, and the flood, along with the earthquakes, hurricanes, and volcanic eruptions, it completely reshaped the earth. Everything died that was not on the ark and after the flood, the earth changed completely. God sent two of each animal kind onto the ark, so they would all fit there, and from the cat kind chosen, we now have tigers and lions, etc…one kind…

That's also how we get seasons, the result of the flood: winter and rain…

@@LueRue06 It makes no sense at all. Speaking of sediments, why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of unique sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, and a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, yet no such evidence exists.

No, if the humanistic nature of sin wasn't real, there would be no issue to question God’s truth. Despite all the evidence, sinful humans want to create their own beliefs that defy God, this is why everyone needs Jesus.

Well, there is plenty of evidence, but people don't believe it because they are biased and follow their presuppositions based on a sinful mindset.

@@LueRue06 do you understand what faith is? Maybe ask yourself why people believe a fictional book of books is fact and then tell who’s biased. The book is the claim so it’s illogical to use the claim as evidence. Meaning you can’t say atheists are sinners because sinning is a claim in the Bible. If sinning is real then where’s the evidence of it? Stop putting your fake beliefs on others.

@@LueRue06sinning is a claim of a fictional book it’s not humanistic. Until someone can prove that any god is real and exists then you’re just irrational. Somehow you think that everyone should be irrational like you. You are the problem with this world. Stop believing in things there’s no evidence that it’s real it just makes you irrational.

@@bigskunk801 Faith is putting your trust in someone despite the unknowns. Realize that EVERYONE has a bias, it would not be easy to change the way one sees something if they already have a set belief. The Bible carries evidence that corresponds with physical evidence as well as historical events that align with the times, locations, and such, but it starts with faith in God and in Jesus (our savior). Anyway, sin is a global humanist characteristic that WE ALL share, I'm not saying that only atheists are sinners, we all are. Sin is the wrongful act against moral and divine law, the Old Testament of scripture gives the foundation of what this means to sin against God, but ultimately, we all sin, we all disobey God, sin is a common trait we all share, its only natural to rebel. However, not believing in God, Jesus, and the Gospel, is what puts people at risk for eternal separation from God. Sin is doing what you know is wrong, but you do it willingly. Sin is going against morality and actively pursuing evil, whether it is something as small as lying, or something much larger. Sin is not a claim, it's a fact.

Just because many truths can be revealed by the lies that a liar tells - doesn’t make those lies truths

@@L8rCloud Didn't say it did but thanks for weighing in with your philosophical claptrap, lol.

So presumable complete fantasy is the right thought process. OK, got it (cough).

Famous kook, lol.

Nope, the Bible said that two of each kind were on the ark, two cats (say a smilodon), and they reproduced and adapted to their new environments from there. So, there were not as many as you might think.

@LueRue06 you don't know how many animals existed on earth and definitely during Noah's time when he built the ark,the bible never talked about numbers and all the animal species

The King James bible?

@@mattdeinken6580 Right, but if tigers and other cat species came from one animal kind, the cat animal God chose would have been the original animal kind that God chose to survive, meaning the other cat kinds would have been whipped out, and the new cat kinds are what came of the pair that God placed on the ark. Think about dinosaurs, they are perceived as larger animals, but the flood would have whipped most out, and the smaller of the species would have been placed on the ark instead of the larger species.

And, if you were to visit the Ark Encounter (or look into Answers in Genesis), it goes into more detail on how the animals would have fit and more of the science behind the flood and whatnot.

It's like apocalyptic predictions. The nice thing about them is that there are so many to choose from -- and they're all wrong.

A lot of them didn't quite get the concept behind the Doubting Thomas story.

@@paulford9120 Even so Jesus himself treated skepticism, even if it was very effective, as lesser than blind faith. Why? Who knows. Jesus himself was doing a tour among his followers to show them he was the real deal. He shouldn't have a reason to be negative about Thomas seeking the evidence Jesus was offering to everyone else.

You do understand most sre christians right or do you live under a rock

¨Proving the existence of God is straightforward¨ Really? Wonder why no one has been able to do it to date... Also no one has really ever been able to even define what ¨God¨is...

@@thomasxxxxxx2345 Really?! God, creator of the heavens and earth, who created everything in six literal days, is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and loving. Furthermore, scripture aligns with Historical accounts like the Flood with scientific evidence-the rapid burial of fossils.

@@LueRue06 Where do you wanna start ? Loving ? Explain children who die of horrible diseases (not to mention assorted genocides conducted by God himself). Omnipotent ? Why did it take him almost a week to create "heavens and earth"? Omnipresent ? Where is he then and why can't he be detected? Scripture does not align with much.. There is NO historical account of a global worldwide flood, though of course there are plenty of local floods that happen all the time And I suppose coincidentally by a stroke of luck, this God happens to be from your particular religion, while the God(s) of all other religions are non existent ?

@@LueRue06 This is an absurdly rigid viewpoint that few of the early church fathers would have agreed with. For instance, since the time of the early church, many theologians have recognized that Genesis 1-3 presents a largely figurative depiction of creation. Augustine and Origen both understood, for instance, that the Bible did not describe literal twenty-four hour days. As Origen put it, “who would be so foolish as to believe that the days of creation are literal days when there is not even sun, moon, and stars until the fourth day”. The rest of your gibberish makes it clear how little you know about scientific reality as well.

None. There IS abundant evidence that there was never a global flood.

They're still looking for the drain plug

There has never been anywhere near enough water on the planet to create such a preposterous idea.

You're used to your free govt cheese 🧀

Over-generalization. Flood myths are fairly common worldwide, and if they came from a common source, we should expect similarities in most of them. Instead, the myths show great diversity. For example, people survive on high land or trees in the myths about as often as on boats or rafts, and no other flood myth includes a covenant not to destroy all life again. They also seldom show up in civilizations based in more arid locations.

@@plainsman you need to read Echoes of Ararat by Nick Ligori

@@eldeguello9154 That guy is a civil engineer (NOT a trained historian) and an avocational researcher of biblical history and creation "science" - so I'm smelling a barrel load of confirmation bias. Lying for Jesus is a specialty with creationists.

Floods happen all over the world every year. It's hardly surprising that there are so many flood stories.

@@paulford9120 so do earthquakes and wild fires. But ... Why are there no "global earthquake" or "global fire" myths (that match up with each other) told in every corner of the globe?

Because bodies of water are generally where civilizations come about. Bodies of water flood. Floods can be devastating to that population. Therefore, flood stories.

That happen 66 trillion years ago.

That happen 66 trillion years ago.

A myth SMH and yet all your beliefs aren't