Тёмный
No video :(

Is this lens WORTH $2,700 - Nikon 80-400 AFS VR Review 

Jared Polin
Подписаться 1,5 млн
Просмотров 118 тыс.
50% 1

froknowsphoto.c... Click Here to download the FULL RES images as well as sample RAW Files.
Is this lens worth $2,700, that is the question. First off in my sniff test I said it smelled "overpriced" and I meant it. Regardless of the quality of this lens there are other options for less money or slightly more that I personally would go with.
For example you could purchase a 70-200 2.8 VRII for $450 less. On top of that if you wanted a 300 2.8 you could probably find one used for a few more bucks. But it wouldn't be fair for me to sit here and tell you about other options when this is a review of the NEW Nikon 80-400 VR.
Let me explain how I like to do reviews of lenses. My goal is to take sample images and give you the files and full res images to make your own mind up about quality. On top of allowing you the images to analyze I have to chime in with my own opinions.
You would think that an 80-400 would be a large and very heavy lens. Well it is on the larger size but its not that heavy for what it gives you. The zoom range is huge, to be able to go from 80 to 400 without loosing to much light is pretty exciting.
With all variable aperature lenses you have to worry about zooming and loosing light. What this means is at 80mm your f-stop is F4.5. But as you zoom out your f-stop is going to change until it goes to F5.6 at 400mm. See the sample images to see where the f-stops change on the zoom scale.
In my opinion the image quality is very good for such a mega zoom lens. I have expressed in the past that I am not a fan of mega zoom lenses and I still stand by that after reviewing this lens. But that is for me as a professional photographer, I wouldn't personally use it on jobs.
What I am looking at with the sharpness is how the lens handles low light situations with VR on. The images of Brandon look fine at a distance but as you zoom in you can see that the eyes are not totally sharp. You will notice a sharpness difference between this lens at a F2.8 lens.
The VR is beyond fantastic, it is the new four stop VR that allows you to hand hold not just for sharp still images but very stable video as well. Could you imagine needing to do hand held video work while having such a large zoom range? That is where VR shines in these lenses, for video use.
When shooting video you tend not to shoot super wide open because its very hard to focus. A general starting point is around F4.5 to F5.6 so this lens has the ability to do that without an issue.
The ultimate question though is who is this lens for. In my opinion its for someone who can afford the huge price tag. Lets put price aside for the time being and say its for anyone who is looking for a large zoom range in a light portable package. If you are a biker, hiker or backpacker and you don't have a lot of space for camera gear than this lens would be a great edition to your travels.
The portability mixed with the image quality makes this a very nice lens. I almost said a very nice lens for the money but at this price, I wish it were an F4 or 2.8.
If you are someone who loves nature and wildlife and wants a lens that gives you huge reach than this lens is for you. If you are not looking for a lens that will allow you to capture low light images inside than this lens is also for you. If you have the money to drop on this lens than of course this lens is for you.
Be sure to check out all the full res edited images as well as RAWfiles listed above. The Jpegs are edited as I feel thats the only way to get a realistic look at how the image quality is.
To connect with FroKnowsPhoto please follow below
froknowsphoto.c... FroKnowsPhoto Beginner Guide
store.froknowsp...
Facebook: / froknowsphoto
Twitter : / froknowsphoto
Google + : plus.google.co...
Please Subscribe www.youtube.com...

Опубликовано:

 

4 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 93   
@cliftonwhittaker260
@cliftonwhittaker260 3 года назад
I've been using this lens for at least 4 years. I have it on a D850 now. It is such a versatile lens that it stays on my camera most of the time. I use it for everything except the warbler migration. I have a 500mm F 4 G lens that I use for those itty bitty birds at distance. I paid about $2300 new for my 80-400 from B&H. Didn't realize they had gone up to $2700. Still worth it, but I would look for a used one first. Versatility and quality make this a must-have lens for me.
@AlmightyUniden
@AlmightyUniden 11 лет назад
That's if you shoot without any VR. So he should take photos at 1/400th but since the lens is rated to 3-4 stops of shake reduction you can take it well below that shutter speed.
@jc32750
@jc32750 7 лет назад
Picked up the 80-400 lens refurb for 1795.00. Works great with my D500. Going to try it with my wife's A6000. Should be a fun experiment.
@granitecarver
@granitecarver 3 года назад
Nice video! Just picked up that lens in excellent condition for $500! You confirmed it was the right lens for me! Thanks!
@ki6eki
@ki6eki 11 лет назад
WOW! I just moved to Levittown from California! I didn't know this place was here!!! Definitely checking out the camera shop(:
@markwalker652
@markwalker652 11 лет назад
Great to see you back at Allens Camera :-)
@Chiefmyosine
@Chiefmyosine 11 лет назад
that's true - versatility is a big issue I also had in mind. I bought the 70-200/TC combination just today and tested the combination. good choice - from portraits to wildlife pictures - that's versatility. Thx bowhunterxxx
@berto1999
@berto1999 10 лет назад
I will buy this lens. It is not a lens for beginners, Nikon recommended the Nikkor 80-400mm AF-S VR even for the Nikon D800: this means that the lens is EXCELLENT and capture a lot of details. Also: this lens gives the best at 400mm. GREAT LENS!
@jacobgaysawyer337
@jacobgaysawyer337 6 лет назад
berto1999 i imagine your face when viewing the first images.. did you really enjoy that lens? many say its really soft at 400mm.. canons 100-400 ii is much better than the nikon and its only 2000$..
@ove6285
@ove6285 Год назад
This lens is extremely soft at 400mm. I bought it and I’m really disappointed and planing to switch to an 70-200 instead
@bxfisherking
@bxfisherking 11 лет назад
For that focal range to me a better buy would be the Tamron 70-300mm DI VC f4-5.6 for about $550. On a DX body that would be 105-450mm, with great VC and very sharp.
@jonbilson1641
@jonbilson1641 11 лет назад
I am very tempted to sell my 70-200 and TC to buy this lens. It is very sharp and fast AF. The VR is a bonus. CA is very low, but vignetting is a bit high for my liking. It is about $700 overpriced IMO. In my tests it beats the 70-200 with the TC and the 70-300 in overall quality.
@VasquezZ95
@VasquezZ95 11 лет назад
It's half magnesium and half plastic, but the plastic part is really well made! got my hands on this lens today, go to a shop and see for your self it's not that bad
@chrisah1
@chrisah1 11 лет назад
Yes, I personally got a cheap 70-300 from Tamron with VC and saved the money to spend on primes/24-70
@jjhaston
@jjhaston 11 лет назад
Nice! I like when you do the videos at Allen's
@BluefanNL
@BluefanNL 11 лет назад
That would leave you with 140-400 f5.6 with the sharpness degrading by the teleconverter. Compare that to a sharp 80-400 f4.5-5.6 which has a much larger zoom range and a somewhat larger aperture. This lens has it's place, sports photography for example where a large zoom range at long focal length can be needed in one lens.
@juuonse
@juuonse 11 лет назад
I'm actually looking at a offer on this lens. It's going for 999,00 EUR. Would be a nice lens...but I doubt I actually have any need for it.
@b233332
@b233332 11 лет назад
Would be nice if you can compare this new 80-400 to the sigma 50-500 OS in the future.
@cliftonwhittaker260
@cliftonwhittaker260 3 года назад
I had a 50-500 OS for a while. Got rid it!! Got the 80-400 and have been really thankful I didn't wait to do it.
@Arkasai
@Arkasai 11 лет назад
Not sure if this is any indicator but the price of the lens has dropped in the UK by about £400. That could just be a move to bring it closer to the price of the US version, which is still $300 cheaper even after the UK price cut.
@bowhunterxxx
@bowhunterxxx 11 лет назад
No it gives you a range of 70-400 the first 200 at 2.8 and very little softening from 200-400 but sharper under it.and the 80-400 is at 5.6 from 200mm anyway.
@bowhunterxxx
@bowhunterxxx 11 лет назад
Yes but only in the 200-400 range and it would be small but the range you would use more you have a 2.8 lens that would be better quality .
@MichaelFoleyPhotography
@MichaelFoleyPhotography 11 лет назад
Great review, Jared, thanks! I will definitely be getting one of these used at some point!
@WillInWestPalm
@WillInWestPalm 11 лет назад
@bowhunterxxx No, the 2x converter would make it really soft.
@andrewt248
@andrewt248 11 лет назад
The 70-200 f/4 is a great lighter tele lens too. And, though it doesn't have the same reach, at $1400 new, looks like the steal of the century compared to this.
@Chiefmyosine
@Chiefmyosine 11 лет назад
but why better? ok its a good alternative, but nevertheless you would have to carry 2 instead of 1 equipment with you and after attaching the converter to the 70-200 objective and the body,... it is no longer safe from dust and water due to missing rubber stuff on the TC. Today, I am exactly confronted with that problem: either the new 80-400 (2500€) or the 70-200 2.8 + converter TC-20E III (2320€) - 7% savings. What's YOUR recommendations folks???
@hemming57
@hemming57 8 лет назад
I'm noticing lot's of Nikon 200-400 lenses selling very cheaply on E-Bay. Could this lens be the reason?
@bowhunterxxx
@bowhunterxxx 11 лет назад
Its better because you have a 2.8 lens till 200mm the 2 together still smaller how often do you shoot in a dust storm? or rain storm. much more versatility.
@jopemo95
@jopemo95 11 лет назад
I think that is not a general rule nowadays with superb VR and IS -systems.
@MHanded
@MHanded 11 лет назад
I've tested it for myself last week. Of course I would not give that money for it, but I must admit, this is a great and powerful glass.
@PieroVera
@PieroVera 11 лет назад
I'd really like to see a Canon lens similar to this, me being a Canon user obviously.
@SKgeostrat
@SKgeostrat 8 лет назад
Jared, nice video. Could you recommend this lens for pro wildlife and bird flight photography? I need a lens for a Nikon D500 and it needs to be fast focusing and plenty sharp. How does it compare to the new 300 f4 Vr lens, the 150-500, the 200-400? Thanks in advance for your answer.
@mattpacker4372
@mattpacker4372 8 лет назад
Hey mate I have recently purchased a d500 can't wait for it to come ! What lens did you end up purchasing I am having the same debate. ? 200-500 gives more reach and cheaper! Or this 80-400 or new 300f4
@SKgeostrat
@SKgeostrat 8 лет назад
I have not bought yet, but I don't think it will be the 80-400.
@mattpacker4372
@mattpacker4372 7 лет назад
Steinar Knai
@XwaD666
@XwaD666 6 лет назад
How does it compare to the older non AF-S version (besides the obvious slower/louder focusing)?
@f80dan
@f80dan 11 лет назад
I thought your focal length should always match your shutter speed or close to it. Why was that photo shoot at 1/160 sec at 400mm?
@CarlosArruda77
@CarlosArruda77 10 лет назад
Hi Jared. What would be an all rounder lens for a D610 please? I like to shoot landscapes and sports mainly. I was thinking something F4. Really like the 70-200 F2.8 nikon but to expensive. What are your thoughts on the 70-200 F4? Your input is truly appreciated. Budget in hand is $1,700 US. Thanks.
@bkushner2
@bkushner2 11 лет назад
Don't think it's better. Most that have tried say no. A workable solution though for sure.
@bowhunterxxx
@bowhunterxxx 11 лет назад
Get 70-200 2.8 and a 2x converter would be better and about the same price.
@SahilNanda
@SahilNanda 9 лет назад
Jared Polin Would getting a 70-200 2.8 and using it with the D750s in-camera crop mode or a teleconverter be a better option?
@neatophotography
@neatophotography 11 лет назад
Well put. Reason I love your videos.
@Dundrodkeith
@Dundrodkeith 6 лет назад
I just bought one Used but mint in UK for £399 good price I think
@trevorpinnocky
@trevorpinnocky 11 лет назад
i have zero use for this lens, especially with 5.6 at 200mm. Backpackers, maybe press photogs, I could even see wedding photogs liking it. $2700 is pretty rich, though.
@Clint_the_Audio-Photo_Guy
@Clint_the_Audio-Photo_Guy 11 лет назад
Overpriced definitely. Only Nikon can make a lens go from $1400 to $2700 in one generation.
@nlondon70711
@nlondon70711 11 лет назад
good video...thanks
@KieranLigginsPhoto
@KieranLigginsPhoto 11 лет назад
WOW haven't been here for a while (Allen's Camera).
@matt46vale
@matt46vale 11 лет назад
I have a nikon d90 and I'm using a 70-300 afs. I mainly take pictures to do with Motorsport I'd like abut more zoom is this the lens for me ?
@AldyVG
@AldyVG 11 лет назад
I will go to 70-200mm 2.8
@Axelsypkenssmit
@Axelsypkenssmit 11 лет назад
jared I don't understand you, you do an unboxing of the 55-300 and you hate it because it's f4.5 to 5.6 it even has vr. And now you do this unboxing and a non consisted aperture is completely fine wile this lens is $2200,- more expensive!
@alexking0909
@alexking0909 11 лет назад
400*1.5 = 560 >>> jared math hahahahaha , thanx man
@sautsitumorangkpk
@sautsitumorangkpk 4 года назад
Thanks mate, nicely how much right now ?
@bowhunterxxx
@bowhunterxxx 11 лет назад
What loss of fstop? 2.8 till 200 then put on 2x tc and then its 5.6 so then same it will be sharper till 200 and maybe a tiny bit softer once the 2x tc on not so absurd for any one actually understands.
@rondhole
@rondhole 11 лет назад
I think at 400mm its VR only about 2.2 f-stop effectively, just like what it advertised. UP TO 4 stops which is only at 80mm not at 400mm. Anyway, It still toe to toe with CANON 100-400mm L IS in terms of image quality and image stabilization at 400mm in most of copies. It is indeed $1300 overpriced and will need to be down to sane level below $2k to be popular enough.
@StevenPaulTassi
@StevenPaulTassi 11 лет назад
You're paying a hefty premium for the 300-400mm range....
@tjsnaps
@tjsnaps 11 лет назад
Just about anything with the word "NIKON" stamped on it is over priced. (especially accessories) You just have to decide what you want, what you need, what you can afford and what you are willing to pay.
@MikeLegris
@MikeLegris 11 лет назад
Really expensive compare to the 100-400L Canon ...
@uvafan940
@uvafan940 11 лет назад
Answer to the topic question emmmm no. Just another of the many many over priced lenses from Nikon. Sigma and Tamron are really upping their game lately. Good for us.
@larsemilegebergsimonsen3830
@larsemilegebergsimonsen3830 7 лет назад
anybody tried to use this lens on a dx?
@TheErikBallew
@TheErikBallew 11 лет назад
That seems like a Rental Lens, not one to be owned.
@vnitto
@vnitto 11 лет назад
Buy more beginner photo programs so Jared can afford this lens.
@rubenverbeek7108
@rubenverbeek7108 11 лет назад
I have to laugh everytime he says "FroKnowsPhoto(.)com"!
@GreatOne0815
@GreatOne0815 11 лет назад
I say it's not worth the money. For 2700, you can get a D7100 and a Nikon 70-300 and you still have 1000$ or so.
@VictorZubakin
@VictorZubakin 3 года назад
Seriously...what's the point of doing this lens review if you don't try shooting wildlife or sports with it!?
@TheHornet79
@TheHornet79 11 лет назад
I agree. Its a rental type of lens.
@husseinali2692
@husseinali2692 10 лет назад
Well review 👍
@Thinkingthings1
@Thinkingthings1 3 года назад
So I found a used one for just over 140$ Should I get it guys?
@mrwashur1991
@mrwashur1991 18 дней назад
No you didn’t. You found an as is quality D lens lol..
@mon010ms
@mon010ms 10 лет назад
I need a suggest plz.. I'm going to a safari in Africa and i have to buy a lens for this.. Do you suggest the 80-400 or the 70-200 f2.8 vrII with a converter 2x for my D800E?? Thanks
@mon010ms
@mon010ms 10 лет назад
thank you
@angelisone
@angelisone 10 лет назад
You want the 80-400, for the reaching power. Provided if you are shooting in bright light. Because the lenses was made for beginners. Very slow F5.6. Or get the Sigma 120-300/2.8. 70-200/2.8 is useless when you are in a jeep.
@berto1999
@berto1999 10 лет назад
@Stefano Montipò Nikon recommended the Nikkor 80-400mm AF-S VR even for the Nikon D800(36MP sensor): this means that the lens is EXCELLENT and capture a lot of details. You know, Nikon recommends only the BEST lens, for the Nikon D800. And if you don't have the Nikon D800, this lens remains one of the BEST lenses, also for your camera. Also: this lens gives the best at 400mm. For your Safari, the new Nikkor 80-400mm AF-S VR is perfect! The "70-200mm" is not enough for a safari.
@mon010ms
@mon010ms 10 лет назад
Thank You all!! btw i think i gonna take the 70-200 f2.8 vrii with the tc 20iii. maybe at 400 is worst than 80-400 but i think i'm gonna use more the 70-200 focal length.
@berto1999
@berto1999 10 лет назад
Stefano Montipò Of course if you are interested in portraits, the Nikon 70-200mm is better. Nikon 80-400mm ist for Safari. The Nikon "TC-20E III" perform GOOD with the 70-200mm f/2.8G VRII.
@IceBox3
@IceBox3 11 лет назад
nope
@Guinhulol
@Guinhulol 11 лет назад
Wow kinda pricey, huh
@fredjohn7572
@fredjohn7572 11 лет назад
The current price of this lens is 999EUR. Either it's cheaper in Europe or the price has been reduced a lot (probably thanks to this video :P )
@y35n00b5
@y35n00b5 11 лет назад
I just realized this is the full frame version of the 55-300mm lol.
@Bryan.Hernandez
@Bryan.Hernandez 11 лет назад
better off going with the 70-200 2.8 this lens, i feel, is not worth it
@y35n00b5
@y35n00b5 11 лет назад
Slightly overpriced*
@MRZjuan
@MRZjuan 11 лет назад
I am, sorry if I insulted your boyfriend
@NikonPhotoHawk
@NikonPhotoHawk 11 лет назад
Drastically overpriced !!!
@SuperGeorge2112
@SuperGeorge2112 5 лет назад
calm down and stop shouting
@invisiblelight007
@invisiblelight007 11 лет назад
edededed
@rgould77777
@rgould77777 11 лет назад
you're obviously new here
@MRZjuan
@MRZjuan 11 лет назад
your hair is too distracting, i cant concentrate in the lens
@rondhole
@rondhole 11 лет назад
For $2700, it is supposed to be build with ALUMINUM/Magnesium Alloy, to be same level of build quailty of 70-200mm F/2.8 VR II. Plastic build is so disappointing.
@angelisone
@angelisone 10 лет назад
Over $2,800.00 for a beginner lenses. That is not cheap for a F5.6 lenses. Why many reviewers are claiming it is sharp. Because the lenses is F5.6. No one will tell you that 50/1.4 is sharper than a 50/2.8 lenses. But many will buy the 50/1.4, just to get that lousy depth-of-look and speed. You can tell the beginner lenses, they all have the Viagra effects when zooming.
@kinjat561
@kinjat561 9 лет назад
its expensive cuz its nikon and its 400mm, now to your question if it is soft, no... at F5.6 it is sharp definitely sharp. you are comparing apples to oranges, you pay extra for a glass if it is fast aperture cuz you get the extra stops of light which is useful in low light situations and for extreme sport even in broad daylight to freeze the action. But don't be fooled that F5.6 lens is not sharper compare to F2.8 lens.
@JeffMiller-ci7mn
@JeffMiller-ci7mn 5 лет назад
Just my opinion, but, I would not call this a beginner lens. Beginners are using kit lenses on a DX frame or the 70-300 on a FX frame.
Далее
THESE LENSES SUCK!!! (On Purpose)
7:46
Просмотров 60 тыс.
Nikkor AF-S 80-400 VR vs Sony 70-400 II Shootout
9:22
Просмотров 192 тыс.
Nikon AF-S 70-300mm G ED VR lens review with samples
8:42