Is This Lucien Freud's First Painting? Art Experts Try To Prove It | Fake Or Fortune | Perspective 

Gee, it was so good to see Bendor back in the series. His calm professionalism is a definite asset to the show.

"Fake or Fortune" is one of my all time favorite tv shows. Thank you for posting it in 1080P HD quality!

A cliffhanger of a show. Absolutely wonderful, and so underrated! Thank you for this wonderful journey in a lost British art world in the quaint British countryside. ❤

Lucien Freud loved hating people and it shows in his work. He made everybody ugly just like he was inside. Having said that, this show Fake or Fortune is great! One can’t expect to be a fan of all the artists they feature. The fact that I watched a whole episode based around and artist’s work that I’m not a fan of, is s testament to how good of a program this team puts together. Thank you for posting them online!

What stands out for me and not discussed, is how on earth Lucian Freud arrived at this portrait using the young handsome colleague as the model? He painted what he would perhaps look like at 60yrs old! It's very possible Lucian was searching for a personal style with contrasting ideas that didn't crystallize at the time of this "Unfinished", portrait. I had never heard of him, but the fact that he "Liked hating people", assures me I would have loved knowing him specially in a British Pub. I like this channel tremendously, it's a world- class production experience with British wit and elegance. BRAVO 👏!!!

You can't take Freud's word for it that he didn't do it, it just means he doesn't remember. I did a lot in the late 80s I don't remember either.

So much talent and honesty in the young Freud. This episode is rich, a fine re-run.

*Imagine this painting actually fetching the highest price of all his paintings due to the controversy, the landscape, and the fact he actually did the Painting. I bet this happens.* "He denied the Painting because he didn't want the College Foe to profit from his work." That's is so obvious.

Each and every program you offer is a joy to watch. This one, however, was extraordinary, compelling and completely engrossing.

He was quite the contrarian. His grandfather would have had a field day if he had had Lucien on his couch.

A delicious hour, as usual, with this program. I always learn so much while being charmed and delighted by the experts.

At the end, it’s odd that the current owner actually looks like the subject of the painting.

An enthralling mystery I couldn't wait to get to the bottom of! Well done!

Why is nobody picking up on another obvious reason why Freud disowned the painting - his feelings for/relationship with the subject - Jameson? The focus is on Dickie & Dennis, nowhere is Jameson brought up.

Such a great series! Thanks for posting.

I binged watched this whole series and thoroughly enjoyed it.

This is my first time watching and it was very intense to see. Thanks for all the hard work.

Ah yes, that old nugget of works the artist does not think should be credited because it was before they developed as an artists. Seen it many times.

I'm going to guess that the part of the portrait not by Freud was the original landscape which was by someone else. Freud decided to experiment by doing a portrait on top of the original work, which is why you can see some of it on its side in the present work. Freud may have considered the work not good enough to be a part of his official body of works intended for the world to see and/or he simply considered the painting not to be a work by him because it contained the work of another artist in it.

According to the introduction to the program, the painting was auctioned for a large sum as a Lucian Freud work in spite of the artist’s statement that he hadn’t painted it. I have watched 3 episodes of this series where the negative opinions of the “experts” destroyed the possible values of the works in question. How strange that the opinions of the “experts” and “authorities” have such power to affect value when the opinion of the artist is ignored.

Fantastic show. Each episode is captivating.

What a great show. They dont make shows like this. Its amazing.

Art and a sweet Airedale under the table what a great way to spend a snowy Sunday!

The feeling, from the immediate beginning; was of an original hand but unsatisfied, vaine artist..such an delicate, intelligent portrait! Very well done, throughout - both program, presentation as well as painting! Thankyou

such a fascinating piece! Thank you

Wow! Immensely captivating! Thanks for sharing!

You guys are great , bravo such amazing programming thank you for being fantastic

Exceptionally interesting investigation... Goodness I watched it on a single breath. 👏👏👏

Fascinating research! So interesting! Absolutely admire your thinking process and perseverance 💐✨💐✨💐

Loved the show I was glued to the set. Well done indeed.

My guess is that he said he only painted part of it because there were aspects of the painting that he wasn't satisfied with.

JF was such a contrarian and despised those two men so fiercely that he just might have denied authorship out of spite, thus preventing them or their heirs profiting from ownership. Yep, I can see that after the description of JF's personality.

Spectacular level of research.

What an amazing episode.

This is such an interesting story with twists and turns

10:45 "Constant razz" -- Oh! Constant ROWS! The "w" is barely there!

Lucian needed some therapy from his grandfather.

I just LOVE, LOVE this tv program!!❤😀👍

I adore this series! 🍸

It's his first painting of John Turturro.

I really want to know what “the egg-cup episode” entailed.

Masterpiece Presentation

Freud was all IN DENIAL about the painting's authorship, even violently disgusted at the mere accusation. Later on, however, he did admit that it is one of his earlier painting studies.

Absolutely fascinating to see the depth of research that went into this case leading to an incomplete answer. However, Lucian Freud had his reasons for disowning this painting. They were private reasons and that should have been respected, especially as he is no longer able to explain or defend his decision, even if he wanted to.

This painting is more interesting to me than the Mona Lisa

A "portrait by Lucian Freud on repurposed canvas with landscape by unknown artist" in other words he clearly knew he painted most if not all of the portrait but would not allow the painting to be added to his body of works because the rotated landscape painting was by someone else at the school. He was very accomplished in his own right so he would only want his work that he did completely to be in his portfolio. I would venture to suspect one of the fellow art students he had a strong rivalry with had done the landscape but discarded the canvas unfinished for other students to repurpose. Lucian simply did not want his talent associated or shared with that artist, whomever it may be. Imagine sharing a painting with another artist that you disliked & how much that would or could change the value of this painting in particular. I honestly feel that is why the daughter said she feared he would destroy the painting if he had seen it in person because the dislike for the other artist would have brought anger out & he would have wanted to destroy the connection or idea of sharing a work with them. It would be very interesting to identify the other artist especially if it was Dennis Miller because would really be a collaboration of hatred. It might explain how Dennis came to have possession of it. He possibly could have done it out of spite or by some admiration for Freud that he refused to originally acknowledge. I hope they continue researching it rather than selling it. I really enjoyed this episode!

I'm left wondering whether the background landscape of the painting was indeed a backdrop ...and whether a painting exists from that place/time which looks like that? ...intriguing

Wonderful ❤

Such a portrait, made by a very young man shows his genius.

Talent, small or great, intelligence, all these aspects of being human so valued in modern western culture, have very little bearing on whether or not an individual is a decent human being. My mother was a member of “the great artists can get away with atrocious behavior” club. We once had a huge fallout over Gaugin and his abominable treatment of Polynesian women. I did not say he was not a great artist, I said he was a poor excuse for a human being. Lucien Freud seems to have enjoyed playing the miserable, mean spirited snob. His work is astonishing (if also mean spirited at times) but that genius does not make his behavior something to overlook. On the other hand many of his fellow travelers weren’t much better. They drank deeply from the vast lake of human jealousy, competitiveness and greed for recognition. I sometimes wonder how folks so incapable of self reflection can produce such extraordinary art. Wonderful presentation, as always.

That was a good result. I tend to agree with the experts and the evidence given that it is partly by Freud and therefore it does have some merit and value attributed to him

Lucien sounds really quirky, a true candidate for his father's couch!!

So interesting 🤔 exiting story

Such an interesting episode! However, the solicitor's notes just say that he mused about what he may have painted 65 years later. Considering the amounts of paintings he produced in this time span this is not facts. But, him admitting it before his solicitor under confidentiality - which he clearly valued - is a giant clue. Especially because he denied it to everyone else, that is very much his personality.

I don't like his later work, but do like this piece.

Without watching the whole thing I’d say that it was stolen and the artist didn’t want the thief profiting off it so he denied it.

I’VE BEEN PAINTING & DRAWING ETC. SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME - ONE NEVER FORGETS - ESPECIALLY A PIECE OF WORK THAT COMPLEX AND LARGE - NOW THAT BEING SAID, YES HE COULD/MIGHT OF NOT CARED FOR THE WORK AND DENIED HE PAINTED IT - NOW I WILL WATCH THE DOCUMENTARY

That landscape behind and face itself gives me an idea, that person is actually laying down on a field. I didn't watch till the end yet but in the middle it seems so. Face shape start make sense much more, whoever did pain it.

very interesting.

They have no right to go against the painter even if if it was one of his paintings if he denied the picture they should of stopped any investigations

I don't know why people buy the rubbish and hang in the house. In a garage sale it would be difficult to sell for $5. Just ridiculous!

Aha.. I pointed correctly at jamersons pic too @ 45:21 before the owner did.. I did wonder that, the portrait didn't look like Lucien at all.. But definitely the guy in the picture.. Wow.. Truly talented young lucien was..

Lately I found some first painting of Picasso, Dali and other in my grandmas closet LOL

It is worth a lot, extraordinary.

How about, if he denies creating the work, then no one can sell it for his. To spite someone?

That blue is clearly your color, Fiona! Gorgeous!

So who painted the rest? That's what I want to know!

It is a painting from an art school. Maybe the landscape on its side was sitting there in the live scene background when it was sketched out and included to reflect the art school environment.

I don't comprehend the value of art -- expect maybe it is one-up-manship for the rich or rising rich. Van Gough couldn't sell even one painting even though his brother owned an art gallery/studio. In his time his works were less than worthless. I don't understand the astronomical prices for art works.

What a great show.

so...who did the landscape underneath? and who left a hair in it?

is this a new episode?? is this series back on BBC?

I love this show.

I used to excell in art as a kid, but my mother would hit my hand as she didn't want me to focus on art as she so no future in art. My dad quietly bought some paints in a tiny tin box and my dad entered my painting in a competition and i won. The school i went to was so poor just like my parents, we had no art supplies. Our teacher was impressed with my pencil drawing and she bought paints out of her own funds. i paint a few paintings and friends of parents saw them and asked for them, and my mother never asked me, and gave them away. She was determined i was not going to waste my "life as an artist". When i wanted to study architecture she refused and insisted i study the sciences only so i gave up doing any more art. i think i could have produced some good art. i now have arthritis in my hands and am partially paralyzed but i am going to try to creat art and hopefully get rich....yeah sure! 😅😅😅😅😅

Lucky man to have a painting by a famous artist who painted it in his youth before his fame

If I was Freud, I would denied the printing, because it was finished by someone else. Unfortunately, the art market needs Freud painting to make profit.

I picked him immediately out of the lineup of students, on a small laptop screen.

But who's to say that it wasn't someone else's - like someone standing close to it before it was dry???

" At The Saint Johns Fete we learned that they even had something called a PIG ROLLING COMPETITION which was one by a LADY called MRS. DEATH, and FRANKLY the MIND BOGGLES!" LMAO!!!!!!

Watching this made me watch more about Lucien Freud ,documentaries etc reading about his life etc ,half way through I recognised he was on the spectrum ,his personality etc the way he painted ,I knew this portrait was real ,paint colours etc lol did art history ,great fun to watch

02:30: 'I never think about technique.' Erm...yup.

I think the DNA theory was rather flawed. Even assuming that the hair would have been from Freud or someone in his maternal line, there are many ways in which a hair of his could have ended up on someone else's picture in the general mess in that school. Conversely, the fact that the hair isn't his doesn't prove the issue one way or the other, again because the hair could have got there in any number of ways.

WE MISS BENDOR GROVNER!

He should have been sent to the tower for that disgusting "portrait" of her Majesty!!!

I would love to be in the art trade in my next incarnation so I am trying hard to live a good life now to enable me to have that choice when the time comes. Auctioneer, dealer, expert, writer/programme maker, artist even, all would be a great life for me. I'm not mad, just an atheist with my own individual set of beliefs carefully formed over time and as valid as anybody else's beliefs.

Is it possible LF just decided that he didn't want those two artists to profit from his work, and just decided to deny them profit?

It’s so ugly, I wouldn’t take credit for that either 😂

When this episode first started I was like....if he said it's not his then why would that not be true? But as I am watching I remember that I was looking through an album not too long ago from work that I did in college and I do not remember a few of the drawings and paintings at all. Yet there I am sitting there holding them posing for a picture. I know I did them but I have no recollection of doing them at all. Could be the weed. Lol. I have no idea. But excited to see the rest of this episode.

What a great channel. Im about to launch a new internet radio station here in Peeth, Western Australia and would love to promote this channel and restream the audios, with your permission. Regards Michael

The portrait looks like the present owner than any other persons dead or alive😆. The landscape on the background could just be a sideways laid painting at the back of the model while painting it.

He Freud had something in common with Francis Bacon in that practice of having someone go in and destroy paintings he wasn't pleased.... they were apart of this group of the times.....

Great program, but ads every five minutes?

If he chose to paint over someone else's work, perhaps that was why he couldn't claim it as his own.

No, that’s my son Timmy’s first painting.

why is it that throughout the theme is that .. we hope the painting by LF ,, so they can auction it off for big dollars even though the artist himself has said its not mine . Pretty pathetic

Yes, early evidence showing his lifelong love of greenish greys!

I’m 45 min in and I already know what happens in the end. It’s actually a portrait of the cohost but the vermillion turned dark brown. Boom! End.

Jon Turner when his eyes are closed just a little he looks a lot like the painting you are investigating.

I can do that.

It would have helped to go to a Freudian Psychologist to better unfold his grandson's denial complex.