Wow wow! Your playing is absolutely beautiful! So lovely. I acquired this pedal some time ago and think it is wonderful. I have mostly been using it with a Moog Model D. I plugged my wife's acoustic guitar into it and plucked some notes and it is indeed amazing with the guitar. Makes me want to learn to play the guitar just so I could make these sounds all day long.
I sold an old 24v DMM maybe 15 years ago for a third what i could buy it back for now. So i ordered one of these to restore balance to the universe. and 15% off thanks Walrus and for this nice sounding and well edited demo.
I think chase bliss has this one. I am in love with stereo like everyone. But the tonal Recall and specifically the Thermae are the best analog nastiness I’ve ever heard.
yeah I think if you're going for "nastiness" this probably isn't your bag. ha. The CBA stuff definitely brings its own unique quality. Thermae has some magic up its sleeve. But both are mono.
@@AmbientEndeavors my opinion, and I own several stereo delays honestly mono delays seem to sound better for ambient purposes cutting through stereo reverbs which is just allowing the reverb to breathe instead of absolutely everything being in stereo
Chase bliss pedals always disappoint me, and the tonal recall is not stereo. The suhr discovery is a great monk analog delay. The strymon Brig is a great option for a more affordable stereo ‘analog’ voiced style delay, but it’s dsp based. For me, the meraki takes it. I wish it had midi presets is my only gripe.
I always preferred two separate mono delays for stereo setups. At this moment I use two rubbernecks which are extremely pleasant to play with. I also used two thermaes, always synced and subdiv'ed with external gear. You won't get ping-pong this way and you also won't get series mode, but you'll get much more tweakability for each side. And don't get me started about synced thermaes' sequencer in a parallel loop.
@@AmbientEndeavorsa piece of cake with devices like Disaster Area Smartclock Gen3 + two regular mono cables to send tap-tempo. Also a good investment to sync everything midi-capable up. I'm pretty sure you don't think it's that complicated as a gear channel owner :)
YES - this IS the best analog delay money can buy. I am lucky enough to have one! I bought it for my synthesizers, and the sound of my Kiwitechnics "Matrix"-modded JX3P through the Meraki delay is, quite simply, the stuff of legend. Nothing can stand as a serious competitor here, the Meraki wins.
Wonderful presentation, very well done, thank you. Not that it would have been my first choice, but wouldn’t have minded just 60 or 90 seconds of some gain traveling through it. Just to see if the repeats start to fizzle, etc. Man this thing sounds good, and I can see where the control layout would quickly become quite intuitive.
Hi, see this pedal more and more, suppose the Meris Lvx at the same price is the one to buy, suppose to be the best delay on the market. What is your impression of the LVX VS MERAKI
man , they're completely different animals. Meraki is classic analog delay , in stereo , with some lovely modulation. Simple and approachable with a WYSIWYG interface. LVX it a rabbit hole of digital reverb sounds and a "create your own adventure" of tones with a pretty intimidating interface IMO. Kinda depends on what you're looking for!
@@AmbientEndeavors looking for the best versatile and sounding delay . I am pretty sure i found it for reverb with my new Mercury X. Now looking for the best Delay. I presently own Timeline and Eventide h90
The DM101 is great especially in Dual Mod stereo. The Walrus has some interesting differences. The DM101 can do multi head style though, if you want mojo and Binsonesque sounds in an analog delay that is hard to beat. In any case, too bad, the Joshua came out I’m not really interested in my analog delays at the moment
Haha totally - I have a Joshua coming and am quite excited for that one, although admittedly not really an avid digital user. Gonna need to deep dive the compare/contrast with my DM101 & Meraki sometime soon.
The price is fair. However, is there anything that sounds close to the fidelity level but with less features? I want the sound but I don’t need all the studio tech.
if you need stereo, there really aren't *many* to choose from. If you can deal with mono, check out (or hang tight for) the Bondi Art Van - it'll be out..soon? ...and sounds fantastic as a longer-delay time analog delay with modulation.
This is such a cool video. Once it goes to your Ruby in stereo, how are you listening to it after that? Does that go to your mixer, panned left and right? Or headphones somehow? I'm trying to figure out how to be abel to listen in stereo. Thanks
Thanks ! So , it is going out of the Ruby in stereo to my interface (now a UA Apollo Twin) and being captured in my DAW Reaper. From there I monitor it with L and R hard panned on studio monitors. For listening you'd just need headphones or stereo speakers attached to your computer.
@@AmbientEndeavors Thanks for the response. Makes sense. I am hoping to simply listen to L and R in my studio monitors without going through the computer - trying to away from the computer as much as possible. Thanks
@@oneandonlyarajivp ahh I see, yeah air pods / headphones or somehow connecting your phone to speakers would work. Usually you need at least an interface or mixer to get you from pedals to speakers.
Fair enough. Can I ask you about the Ruby in stereo. Is it true stereo? Is it not just the same amp and reverb ran on each side? So why run that in stereo?
It sounds good, looks great, and seems well featured. I just don't know that you're getting anything of substance here that makes it worth $100 more than the Boss DM-101, which is also stereo with 8 BB chips and has a really well done WYSIWYG UI for a great variety of sounds without tons of tinkering... while it still gives folks who are into MIDI and presets all the options they want.
totally. I think that's the ONE (correct me if I'm wrong) comparable in the market. I have that one too, both were comp'd by the companies (full disclosure) ...the DM101 is MONO in, which is a knock IMO. Both sound really good, although I'd give the edge to the Meraki in true analog warmth and character. I also think the stereo dimension and what you can do with unique modulation control of both sides is a cool perk of the Walrus. I do not believe the Boss unit runs MN3005 chips, fwiw. Both fantastic options, and as you note, there's a price trade-off as well.
I think being able to go stereo in might be worth the $100 difference in certain signal chains. The other comparable unit is the upcoming Flower Pedals Dahlia. Analog delay, stereo in and out, fully MIDI controlled (unlike Meraki's partial MIDI), normal pedal footprint, but probably only 4 BBD chips (they haven't released specs, but delay time is ~half that of Meraki).
@@SoulGook Demo forthcoming for the Flower too - I have that in. I'll try and delineate it eloquently in the video, but yes there are some noticeable contrasts between the Flower and the Meraki (including max delay time) ; the Meraki IMO warrants the uncharge. I think there are perhaps contextual advantages for the Dahlia, but there's a good bit that Meraki excels in that I think makes Meraki an "if money is no object, go with this one" pick.
I asked Walrus Audio if both delays sum to mono and here was their answer: "No, they are true stereo so they are totally independent. For mono, you’d just run into the left channel."
thanks for chiming in! Yeah it would seem overkill to *me* to spring for this if you're not using stereo; there are a few more mono analog delay options out there that are great and some with unique feature sets too that might get a look along with or instead of Meraki.
If you have a box like the Goodwood Audio Output, you can sum to mono for one amp and still get both delay lines, albeit slightly diminished in impact. I use this as a ‘Plan B’ for gigs where I can’t use stereo, or when I want to run wet/dry.
never played the Halo - looks cool! I think it's quite a different beast in terms of circuitry and design. Almost certain it's not analog. Might have to track one down !
Halo amazing but more pristine / digital sounding (not a criticism), has presets (Meraki doesn’t); Halo a bit fiddly for tap tempo unless you use remote tap…..which unfortunately means you can’t use the remote jack for EXP wet mix is a v useful feature of the Halo that the Meraki can’t do. Meraki sounds sensational in stereo, quite nice mono. Halo happy either way.
Good shout! Especially as one of that delay’s selling points, with the Amazeo, was tap tempo for analog delay. I never bonded with the ARD but the Meraki has been on the board since it arrived
The only catch is that after 30 seconds of bypassing (with trails enabled), the oscillation cuts off because the pedal engages a relayed bypass. You'd have to put this in its own loop that allows for trails. 😢
I got rich day trading bitcoin a few years back. 📈 No but for real, it’s been slowly amassed over the last 15 years, and much of it comes in in exchange for video content work these days.
Hey man you do some the best stereo mixing ive heard from content creators. Mark johnston next. I don’t want to ask for all your secrets but i have a similar rig to yours but dream instead of ruby. Do you mind if i ask what kind of post processing your doing for your mixes or these videos? I assume uad plugins if your using an apollo. Any plugins in general that help you get that really wide stereo field by chance lol?
If outputs do not have their own independent dry/wet pots going from KILL DRY to FULL DRY gradually, than this is NOT a Stereo pedal. And these outputs do not have that very important option. This pedal is going to put the DRY signal always on BOTH outputs, Left and Right, meaning that DRY sound is going to be in the CENTER. For example, guitar amplifier is going to always be infront of a kick drum, center. This is done by designers who are not musicians who actually play on live stages with a band, so they do not know how STEREO FIELD is created.
Nothing about this makes sense. First, to say that the recorded guitar would come through center assumes 2 important things. 1, that the guitar is hard panned, and 2. that both channels are set perfectly equal in both dynamics and volume. Rarely, if ever, does guitar remain hard panned and even volume in live or studio environments. Demos and gear videos are an interesting microcosm for this, but rare in the broader world. Second, if you need to place your stereo guitar in a psychoacoustic space, there are many, many methods for preventing that 'down the center' perception you're describing. Bring the pan in a bit, lower one side or the other, EQ one side differently to the other to create differences in perceived dynamics, compress differently to create real differences in dynamics. Just because you, the musician, can't control the end result of how your performance will be captured, interpreted and reproduced, does not mean that the features you're describing are necessary or even relevant to the idea of something existing as a "stereo" device. If the first place you're going is to your pedalboard to manipulate the sense of space in your mix, it's probably worth spending time understanding the art and science of mixing deeper
