When I was going through my reversion and I received the Holy Eucharist for the first time in years and knelt and closed my eyes after communion, I saw the Shroud and was Mesmerized!
For Christians with a strong and true faith, it does not change anything. Jesus was in the past, is in the present and will be in the future till the end of the age. Praise be to Jesus Christ, son of the living God.
@@JJ-cw3nf you need evidence to believe? Perhaps you need to be reminded with scripture, “Then Jesus told him, Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” - John 20:29.
@@zendude123 if God left such a beautiful miracle (a holographic, X-ray, 3 dimensional photographic negative-impossible to replicate even using modern technology) you should care about it, but good for you for having more faith than most. If God left physical proof of Jesus’s resurrection from the dead, isn’t that something to be thankful for and to give Him praise for?
"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except by me." Thank you for your sacrifice so that we may have life eternal. Praise you, Jesus!
Lord Jesus Christ you are showing yourself to the world for unbelievers that you are the Christ suffered servere torture and crucifixion and that you did this all for us because you loved us so much ❤️♥️❤️❤️ that you died under the pressure of my Sins and those of world. Hallelujah hallelujah hallelujah praise Jesus Christ our Lord and savior ♥️✝️
Well, Jesus wasn't white, and he also had his beard ripped out according to scripture, both old and new testaments advise that his beard would be removed and thus cause his appearance to be marred, just as Isaiah 52:14 prophesied. Also, scripture advises in John 20:5-7 that a separate piece of cloth was used on the head/face. John 19:39-42 also tells us that strips of cloth were used, not a giant 14 foot piece. So, the Word of God seems to strongly indicate that this shroud is, in fact, not real. Plus there's been documents showing that the person that created this admitted to it, discovered in the 1900's that was written in 1389.
@@GoodShepherdFilms3333 the situation with the shroud seems like the same with the bones of Moses, people want a sign and choose it over scripture and faith. Faith only comes by hearing and reading the Word of God. Even with what you've shared, I truly believe it goes against scripture and is not real. Just like the churches that claim to have the spear of destiny.
@@dyerseve07 true people do want signs. the shroud is the sign of Jonah Jesus promised. the shroud has been verified by 21st century forensic science to be authentic. the word of God and the Shroud line up perfectly together. the evidence on the Shroud and the word of God are meant to be presented together not separately. here are 17 verses from scripture going all the way from Genesis to revelation doing exactly what I said should be done. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DAiUMEripQ4.html
Well, Jesus wasn't white, and he also had his beard ripped out according to scripture, both old and new testaments advise that his beard would be removed and thus cause his appearance to be marred, just as Isaiah 52:14 prophesied. Also, scripture advises in John 20:5-7 that a separate piece of cloth was used on the head/face. John 19:39-42 also tells us that strips of cloth were used, not a giant 14 foot piece. So, the Word of God seems to strongly indicate that this shroud is, in fact, not real. Plus there's been documents showing that the person that created this admitted to it, discovered in the 1900's that was written in 1389.
That is absolutely the face of our Lord Jesus Christ. I seen him in a dream . He lives. Please believe me . I was new coming back to my faith and going through terrible times and I was praying and doing bible study fervently, when I had a dream . He was sitting there in a white tunic robe. I asked if he was going to keep letting them hurt me, note I was talking of fellow humans, and he said yes. I felt terrible heartache at that moment and I tell you true, he also looked pained and said I'm sorry. Now to this day I have trial's but I know the sorry , was this has to be the way for my growth and elevation. Lord Jesus does not want us in pain however for our greatest good we must have trial's and tribulation. He loves us so very much that when you hurt , he hurts . Please, please believe he lives. he's working in our lives always doing his very best to elevate us as painless as possible but you have to be cleansed. I love him so much and I know he loves me with the greatest purest love you will ever know. There is nothing on this earth now I will not go through, to be in his arms forever.🙏🕊️❤️
My reaction to the realistic figure of the body is similar to my reaction at viewing The Passion of The Christ - heartbreaking. In Sunday School and church services, we never saw such realism, and only minimal depictions of the violence done to his body. IF the shroud is not a true relic of Jesus, and IF the figure is not an accurate depiction of what He really looked like, at the VERY least it reminds us of how much He suffered for all of us.
Well, Jesus wasn't white, and he also had his beard ripped out according to scripture, both old and new testaments advise that his beard would be removed and thus cause his appearance to be marred, just as Isaiah 52:14 prophesied. Also, scripture advises in John 20:5-7 that a separate piece of cloth was used on the head/face. John 19:39-42 also tells us that strips of cloth were used, not a giant 14 foot piece. So, the Word of God seems to strongly indicate that this shroud is, in fact, not real. Plus there's been documents showing that the person that created this admitted to it, discovered in the 1900's that was written in 1389. And yes Jesus did condemn, that's wnt he has Paul write it. Jesus is the Word, as John 1:1 says, so if it's in the Word then it's of Jesus.
@@dyerseve07 1 John 5 through 9 is in reference to the shroud. the shroud is God's witness. God's witness is better than the testimony of men . the Shroud is God's witness concerning his son. word of God and the Shroud should be presented together. the shroud is a witness telling us the word of God is true ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DAiUMEripQ4.html
I had an overwhelming sense of just loving Jesus today, for everything He did for me and how many chances Ive been given over and over while still falling into sin. I so much desire to embrace Jesus in His humanity because he did not have to leave heaven and experience everything humans did, to take on our collective sin and to die in our place. I feel the weight of my imperfection. God knows we cannot overcome it on our own,
Jesus didn’t (and doesn’t) have to show us He existed (and still does) but He did, and I’m thankful to know Him personally, thank you for all that you do Jesus, love you o holy Lord, King of all kings! 💖
what you said is categorically false. There are multiple peer reviewed studies proving that the sample tested was from a medieval repair, i.e, not part of the original shroud. Also, the raw data that the British Museum refused to divulge for 30 years, shows that the “scientists” not only abandoned every single agreed upon testing protocol, but they deliberately fudged the data to get the date that they wanted. They also received a million British pounds from an anonymous group for saying that it was fake-look it up. I strongly suggest that you do more research
That was one carbon dating data point, and it was later found to be flawed. I'd recommend a research deep dive on this. There's been pollen from Palestinian plants found on it, the image on it is a photo negative, the image is imprinted extremely lightly into the actual fabric via a certain type of radiation (not a method that we can reproduce now, let alone several hundred or a thousand years ago)...there's other important pieces of evidence.
@@redeemedchannel5580 and yet, there hasn't been any tests of any other portions of the shroud to date it earlier or to verify that the fibers tested were actually from a medieval repair job. And if you're going to claim scientists intentionally fabricated the evidence, you have to prove that. What I said is verifiably accurate. What you're saying is what's false, or at the very least, unverified claims. Like I said, I want to believe. But coming at me with unverified claims and conspiracy theories isn't going to do that. The hard EVIDENCE says it's from the medieval period. You need equally hard evidence to refute that, and that evidence doesn't exist. If the shroud is genuine, why not test a different portion that hasn't been repaired? The shroud owner's reluctance to do that doesn't bode well for the artifact's authenticity
@@redeemedchannel5580 and putting "scientists" in quotes makes intelligent people want to dismiss you outright, so unless you can come back with hard evidence, consider yourself so dismissed
I did not have to see this to know that he suffered and died for me. However, I do believe he received everyone of those marks and bruises for me! By his stripes we are healed!But what did he tell doubting Thomas? Blessed are they who have not seen but yet believe! Thank you my Lord and my God!🙏
When I first saw those wounds my stomach turned. It makes you wander why anyone would go through that in place of another. Only someone motivated by immeasurable love.
This is amazing, and is in alignment with my witness. I am reminded this is just like when Jesus said to Peter, who do you say I am? Peter tried to shift the responsibility on to others, and Jesus said, No, who do you say I am, and Peter's witness and answer was amazing. This is good that it is being shown because many witnesses will come, and its one witness, even when they differ, will lead to agreement, and people will stop arguing with each other. Look forward to that day and am content now.
1 John 5 through 9 is in reference to the shroud. the Shroud is God's witness. God's witness is better than the testimony of men. the Shroud is God's witness concerning his son.
@@GoodShepherdFilms3333 You are not being clear in your communication with your reply to me and how it relates to the comment I posted, thanks. I am not familiar at all with research papers on the shroud, or differing beliefs of what scripture but just read a quick summary about 1John 5 witness that different people are believing, the shroud is not really my thing but it's what I ended up looking at, more to do with confirmation. What I am referring to is more to do with vision and the artist, and being reminded about the experience, relating to the video and Christ's witness to me that I had a while ago in 2005, of which I value and treasure and can never forget, ever.
My Heart sank and I was moved to tears the instant they showed the statue, and I was convicted in my soul "this is Jesus" And how can it be that it would be any other person when they can't figure out how the shroud was made, and when the description of His death is just as we see it here but even though crucifixion was typical in those times, crowning people with thorns was not - this was particular to Jesus because they claimed him king of the Jews. This is Jesus. Look what we did to Him, through someone else's hands but the spirits of evil and sin are the same generation to generation so our sins our evil did this to him. For the sake of His sorrowful passion have mercy on us Father God and on the whole World.
The shroud is not only evidence of God the Father's great sacrifice of love, but also the resurrection of His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. The image on the shroud was not created by the hand of man, but by the act of bodily resurrection. "Jesus answered and said to them, 'Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.'” John 3:19
This gives me righteous anger towards those who killed JESUS. He was the best. Lord, we are all sinners , humans, we are basically horrible with few glimmers of hope that you want us to be like at all times. Please Lord have mercy on all of us. AMEN 🇻🇦✝️
Faith is a higher form of knowledge even over "science". However, for those who will be moved by seeing this I am grateful. How he actually looked is not important to me. The evidence of suffering is heartbreaking and humbling.
A new study overseen by Dr. Liberato de Caro of Italy’s Institute of Crystallography of the National Research Council, in Bari has concluded that the Shroud of Turin dates to the first century. In a report published on the website of Italy’s Department of Chemical Sciences and Materials Technologies, de Caro outlined the “Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering” or WAXS method they used, which measures the structural degradation due to natural aging of the cellulose that makes up the fibers of the linen threads. This process, which is non-destructive, was used on a variety of historical textiles which have well-documented ages, and then compared to the Shroud of Turin; the best match was with a piece of fabric from ca. AD 55-74 known to have come from the siege of Masada in Israel. The new dating contradicts the 1988 carbon-14 test of fabric threads from the shroud, which dated the relic to the Middle Ages. Critics have long pointed out that that test was flawed, as it came from an area of the fabric that was repaired in the Middle Ages. The new study also notes that ancient textiles can become contaminated with substances over time that could distort carbon-14 results. The new findings show that the fabric of the Shroud of Turin originated at the time of Christ.
Right you are. So much easier for an idiot atheist to call it a fake that to prove that it is one. And that will be incredibly hard to do since it for sure is not a fake.
His mind is beyond our comprehension. He is God. All powerful, All knowing. Everywhere and every when ! He is ALIVE . HE sees us , knows us , and... Loves us ! Very AWESOME to know this. Absolutely . Amen
It seems to be worse than you think, as scripture tells us and, Well, Jesus wasn't white, and he also had his beard ripped out according to scripture, both old and new testaments advise that his beard would be removed and thus cause his appearance to be marred, just as Isaiah 52:14 prophesied. Also, scripture advises in John 20:5-7 that a separate piece of cloth was used on the head/face. John 19:39-42 also tells us that strips of cloth were used, not a giant 14 foot piece. So, the Word of God seems to strongly indicate that this shroud is, in fact, not real. Plus there's been documents showing that the person that created this admitted to it, discovered in the 1900's that was written in 1389.
here is a 1 minute video we made that shows a similar model showing the extremely brutal sacrifice of Jesus ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uO4_LV-hqKo.html
True believers dont look for his face because we know His voice and if he was supposed to be seen we would have know immediately many many years ago. Idc what He looked like i love Him and He is my Lord forever and ever 🎉❤
I journeyed to heaven in June 2020 to stand before the 12 stone blocks and the light above them. I passed into another realm and was asked to sit on the steps of a throne. God had created a portal for me with his massive hand in the sky because once before he had rescued me from the pit of hell to have me deliver a message for mankind. A simple message, in fact. I didn't see the face and body of Jesus at first, just his light as he lit each of the 12 stone blocks from within to indicate it was a passage. The inscribed text was different bit I welcomed there as if I never left. You must lose your guilt. You must have faith, believe in what you know is true in your heart. Your heart is your power, it is your brain your mind, your life here and beyond. I didnt see Jesus Christ until 2024, he called me to see his face, his garb and adornments and radiant hair and eyes. To be in his presence is a special feeling indeed. More recently he parted the skies and came to me upon a white horse. He had an angel with him but it was a quick reminder of the challenges that await us all. Again, we must just keep our faith.
That man is my Father! And the Father of millions 😢 we know who that is whether other people want to be hard-hearted or not. I pray that u see before it's too late.
When I've have live dreams of when I was in Heaven That Looks Like Jesus that I saw more than once Up in The sky over his children in heaven, THANK YOU JESUS FOR YOU GAVE EVERYTHING YOU HAD FOR THE LOVE OF YOUR CHILDREN FATHER ABBA AMEN✝️🙏❤️
I greatly enjoy the growing evidence of the shroud's authenticity. The one thing that bothers me is why are no two scourge marks superimposed? t would seem unlikely that a thorough helter-skelter flogging would so cleanly miss all other scourge marks. Is there any explanation for this? Otherwise from the pattern of scourge marks it does appear that the victim was hoisted by his hands during the flogging. This would explain the lack of scourge marks on the forearms. and the availability of the body for 360° scrouging.
Only we as his followers will know what he looks like once we get into Heaven. Praise to be The Glory of God, deliver us from this world. No amount of science can truly uncover what he looks like, despite all the artifacts we see now in modern history.
Revelation 1:14-15 offers a clue that Jesus's skin was a darker hue and that his hair was woolly in texture. The hairs of his head, it says, "were white as white wool, white as snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire, his feet were like burnished bronze, refined as in a furnace.”
Not correct. I recently watched a video that gave the description of Christ from the writings of a Roman who saw him. He wasn't a follower. He just saw him in passing a few times and he argued that Jesus wasn't an enemy of Rome and that if anything he was an enemy of the Jews. His main descriptions were of Jesus having blonde hair and a beard. So it would appear that Jesus was white and had a beard, but they got the hair color wrong.
Anyone that is so concerned about what Jesus looked like needs to reevaluate their relationship with Him. Regardless of His skin tone, facial features, height, hair color, eye color or any other features..... He took the sins of the world on his shoulders and went to the cross. He was the ultimate sacrifice to reconcile man with God. I couldn't care less if He was purple with pink polka dots, He's still my Savior and He ALWAYS will be!
Do people not understand that Jesus was born in the middle east 2000 years ago? He would have been middle eastern, in the region of Judea. As a 1st century Jew he would have had features of the Semitic peoples of that geographical region at the time and place of his birth i.e. Olive to darker skin. Not the white European featured depiction of Western influenced renaissance art.
This is indeed true ,please read revaltions 1:12-15 12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands, 13 and among the lampstands was someone like a son of man,[d] dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest. 14 The hair on his head was white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire. 15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters. 16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and coming out of his mouth was a sharp, double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
@@giangamesofficial7947 You seem to have a bit of Biblical ignorance. There is nowhere in the Bible where it describes how Jesus looked as a living breathing man. You are very confused obviously. You're talking about the description of his _glorified_ body. Not how he looked on Earth! Duh! The fact that Judas had to kiss him to identify him meant that Jesus looked like the typical Jew of those times, which is how many Middle Eastern people, especially Syrians and Lebanese look. They have light brown skin, not black and certainly not like brass in a furnace which glows red-white hot. The description in Revelation is the same as the Transfiguration. A glowing Jesus walking in Jerusalem would have frightened everyone.
My blessed Lord. The Lamb of God. My Savior. He was beaten, mocked tortured, and nailed to the Cross and took onto himself the sins of all the world. Especially the sins of the nonbelievers. Because He loved mankind so much. He then defeated death by raising Himself on the third day. Jesus still loves us and all you have to do is repent and accept Jesus Christ as the Lord our God, that through Him, we can have life eternal.
Im Zusammenhang mit dem Turiner Grabtuch sei vor allem auf folgende Titel hingewiesen: - Enrie, Giuseppe: Das heilige Grabtuch von Turin / Karlsruhe: Badenia, 1939. - Fried, Johannes: Kein Tod auf Golgatha: Auf der Suche nach dem überlebenden Jesus - 3. Aufl. / München: C. H. Beck, 2019.
Why is this so remarkable!!! Everyone knows who did this and no one says anything about it!!!! Believe what you will but that is not Jesus Christ cloth!!!!
Wrong. Everyone with a working brain that has spent even as little as 30 minutes on studying the Holy Shroud knows very well that it is not a fake. But if you really and truly think that it was someone _other_ than Jesus in it, would you care to explain why? I have a feeling that you will not.
You have a legitimate wish and, at the same time, there's already plenty of evidence that true science has brought forward and that solidly points to the man in the Shroud to be Jesus Christ and no one else. Still, God respects the Free Will that he gave us and will not suppress it by overwhelming us into belief. Jesus showed his divine glory in the Transfiguration to Apostles that were ready to see it through the daily Faith in him. Even then, Jesus did not overwhelm them by transfigurating every other week or every month, etc. Pray for your Free Will and that of the whole of humanity to turn in Faith to the Real Jesus. We receive him through Faith, as even some of those who saw him in the flesh decided believing in him would make them highly responsible for their lives and they did not want to be. REAL Faith has deep, life changing consequences.
@@philalcoceli6328 the only actual scientific evidence I know of is chemical dating in the 70s, which placed the shroud as being created during the medieval period
The latest study I read of was about the Holy shroud was "printed" due to an immense amount of energy coming inside from the body. There is this amazing video that summarizes the findings of that study, of the Spacere Institute "For the first time projective geometry and photogrammetric survey, operating for many decades in the field of archeology, have been used to study the Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo. The Shroud reveals a new phenomenon, a shocking reality. The fabric features distinct and sequential images released from parts of the body and moving objects. " m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xAVZp9tW5FU.html
@@williamavitt8264 what you said is categorically false. There are multiple peer reviewed studies proving that the sample tested was from a medieval repair, i.e, not part of the original shroud. Also, the raw data that the British Museum refused to divulge for 30 years, shows that the “scientists” not only abandoned every single agreed upon testing protocol, but they deliberately fudged the data to get the date that they wanted. They also received a million British pounds from an anonymous group for saying that it was fake-look it up. I strongly suggest that you do more research.
@@williamavitt8264 it was discovered that the sample scientists used to date the shroud was from a patch that was added to the shroud that was victim of a fire. All evidences points to the credibility of the shroud.
It's not an idol Idol is an image of a false god that is worship Nobody is worshiping this statue You can make images of God Because He entered creation Jesus is the icon of the invisible God
This is a very good representation of Christ, but not many know that jesus was african-american. Not White. Respect the efforts tho! Looks Amazing Amen!
@@user-gi4su8lp4x No kidding. Is it not amazing how many really dumb people there are out there that actually believe that Jesus of Nazareth was not a Middle Eastern Jew but rather some black boy from sub-Saharan Africa?
@@beverlyhurd8556 just look it up. The shroud is proven to be a hoax. Even the bible proves that jesus wasn't wrapped how the shroud implies he was. There were strips of cloth wrapping jesus's head.
All of the renderings of his face based on the shroud are quite dissimilar from each other. You'd think they would be more alike than they are. So my answer would be: probably not.
So first, we need to see a valid, original picture of Jesus and not an artist's imagination. I got a chuckle about a yeast roll in Florida that was supposed to look like the virgin Mary. What did they compare it to?
I dont understand why people can be so easily decieved. The bible says He had hair like wool, (black people are the only people on the planet with wooly hair) and His feet the color of brass as if they burned in a oven. So how do you get this image from that?
Wrong. There is _nowhere_ in the Bible that describes how Jesus looked when he walked the Earth. But if you think that there is, then how about giving us the book, chapter and verse so we can look it up ourselves?
@@NerdIsMean No matter who, no intelligent people are going to think that Jesus of Nazareth was some black guy from sub-Saharan African. Hard to imagine just how dumb they would have to be to believe that.
@beverlyhurd8556 we don't need a description of how he looked when he walked the earth. First of all the book of revelation gives his description and second we already know how the people he come from looked.
@beverlyhurd8556 Acts 21:38-39 Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers? But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people. Revelation 1:14-14 Feet: "Like burnished bronze, refined as in a furnace Moses was mistaken for Egyptian by hy even his own people Joseph brothers didn't recognize him and mistook him for Egyptian, because the Egyptians and Hebrews were black, the only difference for telling them apart was clothing and beards. Original king james bible man (adam) created from the soil of the ground Mary and Joseph take Jesus to hide in Egypt. (White people can't hide amongst black people) Etc, etc
The Lord Jesus did not entrust us to deal with his image, but with the gospel that he left, everything else is Satan's deception and distracting attention to unimportant things
