Тёмный

Is US military strong enough to take on China? (2016) 

Binkov's Battlegrounds
Подписаться 858 тыс.
Просмотров 4 млн
50% 1

How would a war between these two superpowers go? Whose navy and air force has the upper hand? Would it turn into a ground war? Watch to find out!
Music by Matija Malatestinic
www.malatestinic.com
If you really like Binkov's videos, you can support him via Patreon.
www.patreon.com/user?u=3606614
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos!
ru-vid.com...
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook!
binkovsbattl...

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

 

16 ноя 2016

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 22 тыс.   
@someguy8223
@someguy8223 7 лет назад
Vatican city Vs NATO
@someguy8223
@someguy8223 7 лет назад
GG NATO
@atlasflame5815
@atlasflame5815 7 лет назад
Pope Francis will summon a great thunderstorm wiping out the entirety of Europe and North America, gg easy.
@ktkatte6791
@ktkatte6791 7 лет назад
I don't think NATO can withstand the heavenly legions
@ascendedsleeper6144
@ascendedsleeper6144 7 лет назад
The Vatican would obviously win because they have GOD on their side. He should do this next
@Spacehamster1OO
@Spacehamster1OO 7 лет назад
lol 1 airstrike by British fighter jets, done ^_^
@enclavesoldier769
@enclavesoldier769 7 лет назад
Well done, and I think Russia vs. China would be a great video too
@Whitepandemic
@Whitepandemic 7 лет назад
that sounds awesome!
@daihuantran9928
@daihuantran9928 7 лет назад
Enclave Soldier the country is Russia allies
@nw1520
@nw1520 7 лет назад
bro its just for a cool scenario
@gerry7man555
@gerry7man555 7 лет назад
+Dai huan Tran That will most likely change with Trump presidency.
@berkehan4808
@berkehan4808 7 лет назад
China and russia arent allies.trump plans to team up with russia against china
@keithcollard2217
@keithcollard2217 3 года назад
whatever happens, the true winners will be rock fish and crows.
@ushopelife7538
@ushopelife7538 2 года назад
Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defectors Invasion of China Operation Final Countdown:0:16,0:20,0:24,0:27,0:33,0:40,0:47,0:51,0:59,1:06,1:11,1:17,1:19,1:25,1:30,1:36,1:41,1:51,2:07,2:14,2:21,2:29,2:35,2:44,2:51,2:57,3:07,3:15,3:22,3:35,3:41,3:46,3:52,3:57,4:05,4:10,4:19,4:23,4:29,4:37,4:40,4:46,4:52,5:01,5:05,5:14,5:19,5:27,5:36,5:40,5:44,5:50,5:54,6:01,6:05,6:10,6:16,6:24,6:29,6:32,6:37,6:43,6:54,7:05,7:10,7:17,7:25,7:34,7:38,7:43,7:50,7:58,8:04,8:11,8:17,8:21,8:29,8:33,8:38,8:42,8:45,8:48,8:56,9:01,9:03,9:06,9:16,9:22,9:25,9:32,9:34,(9:42)
@peterprovenzano9039
@peterprovenzano9039 4 года назад
It’s been four years. Need an update. Or an expansion. China, North Korea, and Pakistan vs USA , Japan, Australia, and India
@tanmoymitra1952
@tanmoymitra1952 3 года назад
south korea?
@peterprovenzano9039
@peterprovenzano9039 3 года назад
All In One thanks, how could I forget
@tanmoymitra1952
@tanmoymitra1952 3 года назад
@@peterprovenzano9039 what?
@peterprovenzano9039
@peterprovenzano9039 3 года назад
All In One I forgot to include South Korea in the needed update of the video. Thanks for correcting me
@tanmoymitra1952
@tanmoymitra1952 3 года назад
@@peterprovenzano9039 u missed israel, if israel support usa then whole arab union will support china pakistan
@fabio6170
@fabio6170 7 лет назад
North Korea vs SOUTH KOREA PLEASEE
@thomasczyzyk852
@thomasczyzyk852 7 лет назад
Fabio Ganassini South Korea wins within 5 months
@fabio6170
@fabio6170 7 лет назад
North korea use guerriglia mode
@twitchypaper1391
@twitchypaper1391 7 лет назад
Fabio Ganassini not with a starving population
@madsnorlax223
@madsnorlax223 7 лет назад
Their population wouldn't be /willing/ to go guerrilla.
@EvilDuckOfDoom3
@EvilDuckOfDoom3 7 лет назад
A betting man, would put his money on the DPRK. "North" Korea - Only Korea
@lukerooney2024
@lukerooney2024 7 лет назад
You forgot about South Korea they would help the US with airbases etc.
@naturalDisplay21
@naturalDisplay21 7 лет назад
But russia could help china as well. I don't think helping us attacking china is in the best interest for south korea, they might use the time to deal with north korea
@zombielinkinpark
@zombielinkinpark 7 лет назад
Don't forgot about Taiwan as well, they have bases ready for US deployment within 18 hours for fulfilling mutual defense treaty.
@garysanders5326
@garysanders5326 7 лет назад
yeah for about 8 minutes, then they'd get nuked
@jacoblie4260
@jacoblie4260 7 лет назад
there are also ballistic missles and moab they could strike chinese hq and important areas there is also cruise missle wich could stike air defence and other thing
@thangcohon
@thangcohon 7 лет назад
Yes, South Korea has excellent nuclear defense system which is provided by USA. And Vietnam eventually will join USA as well to fight against China. And millions of Vietnamese people in Vietnam and in America really hate the fuck out of China and want China to get destroyed by America in anyway possible. And India hates the fuck out of China for several reasons too. India WILL join America to attack China from India border. So for that matter, China does NOT stand a chance at all. So BRING IT ON !!!
@user-vo9zo4kg7m
@user-vo9zo4kg7m 3 года назад
This is going to be very useful, given the current circumstances
@nonamethegamer762
@nonamethegamer762 3 года назад
Im here on 2020
@twinsen1949
@twinsen1949 3 года назад
Although might require some equipment update. I believe in the meantime China has produced a couple of carriers as well? Although that alone probably wouldn't change the outcome. Will need to include allies too. Also might have to take into account the use of small nukes for strategic targets, since that seems to be a growing tendency... sadly.
@finnegansx4423
@finnegansx4423 3 года назад
@A proud Indian China deosn't even have 4th gen jet fighter, they have only 3rd gen
@finnegansx4423
@finnegansx4423 3 года назад
@A proud Indian fake news, they pretend they have it, its just model
@finnegansx4423
@finnegansx4423 3 года назад
@A proud Indian which is why i said its a 3rd gen model
@Scylon1
@Scylon1 4 года назад
wouldn't mind seeing this with allies involved.
@davidparker9676
@davidparker9676 4 года назад
China's recent actions may start this war. I believe that due to COVID and China's deception, the USA would have even more (unlikely) allies to crush the CCP. The USA needs to seriously prepare for such an event, making itself more independent from China's manufacturing.
@jamesondee1216
@jamesondee1216 4 года назад
It’s China who needs allies not USA 😂
@markk9446
@markk9446 4 года назад
Yeah let's include NATO
@nightmarekhazix4419
@nightmarekhazix4419 3 года назад
@@jamesondee1216 China has a lot of allies LMAOOO
@RS-xx8gz
@RS-xx8gz 3 года назад
David Parker lol
@shanghainoon7829
@shanghainoon7829 7 лет назад
*China was at war with the US in Korea & Vietnam. We won both.*
@romanu1076
@romanu1076 7 лет назад
Shanghai Noon In Korea was a draw.But not only China wins in Vietman , USSR does to.
@theethicalpirate1849
@theethicalpirate1849 7 лет назад
China didn't win in Korea, because of The UN imposing the ceasefire USA had already crossed the border and nearing Pyongyang when the ceasefire was imposed so technically The US won For Vietnam The US withdrew their troops due to unpoplar support at home
@shanghainoon7829
@shanghainoon7829 7 лет назад
Tonii nope, Korea was not a draw. The ceasefire was America's idea because they were bankrupt.
@romanu1076
@romanu1076 7 лет назад
Shanghai Noon America finish the war because casualties were to much
@shanghainoon7829
@shanghainoon7829 7 лет назад
Tonii the south gave the north the city of Kaesong to sign the ceasefire lol.
@LutherusPXCs
@LutherusPXCs 7 лет назад
Iran vs Saudi Arabia would be nice, great video btw
@salsaniggas8544
@salsaniggas8544 7 лет назад
Yemen vs Saudi
@brianl569
@brianl569 7 лет назад
Saudi Arabia would fucking kick Yemen's ass are you kidding me
@salsaniggas8544
@salsaniggas8544 7 лет назад
King Stannis Baratheon www.activistpost.com/2016/07/houthi-rebels-invade-saudi-arabia-launch-ballistic-missile-in-counter-offensive.html
@salsaniggas8544
@salsaniggas8544 7 лет назад
King Stannis Baratheon spanish.almanar.com.lb/cat/news/noticias-regionales/yemen
@g.t6702
@g.t6702 7 лет назад
According to military sources the E.A.U air force will wipe out Iranian air force in matter of hours!!! If Iran was so power full why Russia needed to go aid them in Syria???
@benque7491
@benque7491 3 года назад
Taiwan: Am I joke to you?
@catrush6642
@catrush6642 3 года назад
Ahahaha
@RonnieMcNutt_Mindblowing
@RonnieMcNutt_Mindblowing 3 года назад
L
@RonnieMcNutt_Mindblowing
@RonnieMcNutt_Mindblowing 3 года назад
Nnjkk
@Zer0thehero117
@Zer0thehero117 3 года назад
allies were not included in scenario till end
@damienblock6998
@damienblock6998 3 года назад
No. but since You asked to participate, could You provide an Insurgency?
@grzegorzwojszko1618
@grzegorzwojszko1618 3 года назад
Binkov! It`s 2021! Isnt it time for a small up-to-date? :) Best regards!
@Dom-kk4sl
@Dom-kk4sl 2 года назад
China will overpower
@Henry-xu5jg
@Henry-xu5jg 2 года назад
@@Dom-kk4sl well no
@campinasvendas298
@campinasvendas298 2 года назад
Se ele fizer uma atualização em 2022, a situação será completamente diferente. O poder chinês em todos os campos aumenta de forma brutal a cada dez anos. Em 2021 a China superou os EUA no campo da inteligência artificial. Até 2030 terá quatro porta aviões modernos e com aviões de combate de quinta geração no último que está sendo construído que terá perto de cem mil toneladas de deslocamento. Algo que não existia em 2016. Em 2021 a China superou os EUA na tecnologia de mísseis hipersônicos. Algo que também não existia em 2016. Em 2028 a economia chinesa se tornará oficialmente a maior do planeta. Poderia ficar horas enumerando cada aspecto do poder chinês e sua superioridade frente aos EUA.
@mehmed13
@mehmed13 Месяц назад
​@@campinasvendas298 every nation reaches its peak and start falling after that, the good days for usa is passing quickly
@XiyuYang
@XiyuYang 4 года назад
USA vs China: Japan lost
@mikasaber972
@mikasaber972 4 года назад
X Y nope,japan will be very happy,Korean war is a good example。
@jinmingzhang7923
@jinmingzhang7923 4 года назад
@@mikasaber972 You are happily playing star war at your neighbor's house does not mean you will be happy about neighbors playing it at your bed room
@ennoiaz.c7268
@ennoiaz.c7268 4 года назад
​@@mikasaber972 If the U.S use Japan as their staging base, I believe they will receive the first missile attack, Japan will become the victim of the war.
@user-zl7ji8ju6o
@user-zl7ji8ju6o 4 года назад
USA win because he is USA people
@waihai6167
@waihai6167 4 года назад
That's right. Japan won't be hit by a nuclear attack in wartime, which is strategically important to start with, and it won't cost much to occupy.
@informationyes
@informationyes 7 лет назад
Finally a guy whole discusses what would logically happen from a strategic standpoint rather than that country attacks and wins
@informationyes
@informationyes 7 лет назад
TheAbsoluteBest But this video explains why and the way generals from both sides would make decisions that would effect outcomes. you have to remember that human error can get involved and could disastrous for either side, generals can be either bad or good at their jobs and last thing you want is arrogant ignorant stupid generals who refuse to think or listen. I in reality think both nations have a lot of technology that is not public knowledge that may effect the outcome. These scenario are from what we know about a nations technology.
@informationyes
@informationyes 7 лет назад
TheAbsoluteBest what do you imply with your comment?
@informationyes
@informationyes 7 лет назад
TheAbsoluteBest With the military budget america has I would expect no less, The state of america as a civilized nation is another issue
@Sckeza
@Sckeza 7 лет назад
it would screw up the Chinese economy
@blkspade23
@blkspade23 7 лет назад
Going off of public knowledge alone, I do think he's grossly underestimating the US Airforce. If China can't counter stealth tech, F-22s will do a lot to diminish its airforce, in combination with the (undefeated) F-15C. Assuming the US waits to claim air superiority before starting stealth airstrikes. Raptors will likely escort B2s and F-117s (type-1000 storage), right to the target areas of Chinese air defense systems. The US probably doesn't lose any stealth craft in this scenario, deeper strikes can be made by non-stealth aircraft (F-15E), and they open the door for Naval Air. Speaking of which, he neglects the fact that Pearl harbor is still active along with an AFB. So at least one carrier group will be there in half the time. The B2 has a range of over 11,000km, so even launching from mainland US they'd only "need" to tank up once diverting to a closer airfield post strike.
@Hawkgaming-pv5wb
@Hawkgaming-pv5wb 3 года назад
Long story short: We win, but will cost us a big portion of our defense.
@Dark-sx3bd
@Dark-sx3bd 3 года назад
With our budget we can make china pay reparations, build it back up may take a long time
@trentonconner8454
@trentonconner8454 3 года назад
I’m getting more of a second great famine vibe as soon as the US cuts of china’s trade route
@christianlegoff1434
@christianlegoff1434 3 года назад
ridiculus. you put australia , japons and other with usa and none with china. tawain will be the first target of cina and russia xill attacked very fast northzrn usa.. philipine will not go in this mess. india of course not. that means it will be a drawn, and both will be weakers.and china tech'ologie improve very fast. each island they put in china sea received already weapons.both countries xill come back in midle adge
@Justicar2503
@Justicar2503 3 года назад
@@christianlegoff1434 You do understand that this video is about no allies and nukes right? Also if it was real US and its allies would been better prepared(Taiwan included) to launch a attack. India, Taiwan, Australia and Japan is set as "USA allies" since all those countries have problems with chinese sphere of influence and would have much to gain from its demise.
@SoftDrinksOfChoice
@SoftDrinksOfChoice 3 года назад
Wooo
@bigmike9128
@bigmike9128 3 года назад
We'll need an update of this video in a few years.
@billybill1272
@billybill1272 5 лет назад
Make a 2019 ww3 scenario with all allies involved
@AnaklnUn
@AnaklnUn 4 года назад
They are make now china vs US.PH.RUSSIA.JAPAN.BRITISH.TAIWAN THIS TRUTH SAY THEY ARE MAKE NOW WORLD WAR 3
@AnaklnUn
@AnaklnUn 4 года назад
China he want philippines sea lol now ph he will attack as soon so far so good
@AnaklnUn
@AnaklnUn 4 года назад
Sorry im. Bad english
@TheGrannyBangerz
@TheGrannyBangerz 4 года назад
China owns everything since ancient times..
@ctrlaltdefeatx2898
@ctrlaltdefeatx2898 4 года назад
billy bill It will be US, UK, Japan, South Korea, and Australia vs China, Russia, North Korea, and Pakistan.
@skyeyes9723
@skyeyes9723 7 лет назад
As a Chinese who lived in America for a long time I allege peace for every country in the world. No one on the earth would like to see war happens.
@isunlloaoll
@isunlloaoll 7 лет назад
Of course, it's just fan boys and little kids on both sides screaming at each other. If the countries on earth was governed by then, Earth would have been gone a long ago.
@mofanguo5195
@mofanguo5195 7 лет назад
Thor Sebastion you are so naive dude,you know what.Just one thing .by going through wall between our Chinese internet.i know things that bad in my country in your view.we admit it.but generrally things are good here. You can not see a thing clearly by judging from the information in your country.my friend i can understand your language while you can not understand ours . How could you say this things without knowing even a bit firsthand rawChinese information 😃
@skyeyes9723
@skyeyes9723 7 лет назад
Mofan Guo amen man, be united
@tonymoore01
@tonymoore01 7 лет назад
Yeah I can't see a war between America and China happening. There's no benefit for either side. We're better off as trading partners. Hopefully Trump sees that.
@thorsebastion1768
@thorsebastion1768 7 лет назад
We are not better off as trading partners. China's trading "relationship" with the US has been exploitative on the part of China. They have stolen US technology, manipulated their currency to put us in debt, and used the wealth they acquired from trading with us to bolster their own strength against us. Their foreign policy is completely hostile to us, China only cares for the Han people and no-one else (and even then it's still an oligarchy with the heads of the CCP heading over 90% percent of the major industry). China hates the west because of the opium wars/our trading outposts during the colonial era and because they envied our success for the past few centuries. The more power China has, the more they will use against us. If not for those reasons than certainly because we are competition to their goal of global supremacy. It is the way of the world, life is a shark tank. Peace is impossible because no matter how hard you try survival of the fittest will always come back into the equation. The strong eat the weak, so let's not allow ourselves to become weak? Continuing this lopsided trading relationship certainly is a sign of weakness. As is not challenging the Chinese militarily.
@thecutieandpandafam1650
@thecutieandpandafam1650 3 года назад
USA and China fighting China: haha I won USA: haha I won Meanwhile Japan Japan: you want me to turn into the empire of Japan
@selfiefox3561
@selfiefox3561 3 года назад
pray world never have war again❤️
@redsauce5778
@redsauce5778 3 года назад
Peace only causes war sadly
@Grim_Yeeter
@Grim_Yeeter 3 года назад
Yeah mate tired af of dying and getting reborn for like 3 tines
@redsauce5778
@redsauce5778 3 года назад
@@Grim_Yeeter hahahaha
@kimhae-jung4966
@kimhae-jung4966 7 лет назад
"The greatest US enemy would be geography." Ah, our old nemesis.
@basedman1443
@basedman1443 7 лет назад
Indeed, friend...indeed...
@TheGamingIndian
@TheGamingIndian 7 лет назад
Nah the greatest nemesis would be a man who suggests building huge walls, says global warming is not real and tries to sexually assault beautiful women being the president leading the nation into a war. *wink**wink*
@XFHU
@XFHU 7 лет назад
TheGamingIndian brainwashed idiot
@deannomad7160
@deannomad7160 7 лет назад
No, it is our greatest friend. Kept the Germans at bay.
@BingeWithLee
@BingeWithLee 7 лет назад
no not brainwashed he is simply speaking truthfully
@TheOtakuPrince
@TheOtakuPrince 7 лет назад
However in realistic terms I dont think China will be fighting alone in this war either.
@vision6955
@vision6955 7 лет назад
The Deaf Mute China only has Russia and the U.S has nato. Plus Trump and Putin seem to get along well, so I wouldn't be surprised if Russia stayed neutral
@davidli7539
@davidli7539 7 лет назад
stay neutal? for russian? hell no, russian will attack china from the north if this happens
7 лет назад
The Deaf Mute Russia and China have several border disputes, quite a bit of tension due to China breaking multiple trade deals with Russia and illegally copying Russian technology. They're not strong allies and haven't been since the 60s. Instead of allying with China, Russia would probably use the opportunity to take over large areas of China from the north while Chinese forces were deployed along the coast.
@hwasiaqhan8923
@hwasiaqhan8923 7 лет назад
Vision then nukes would be thrown around and no one wins , china is not Afghan or Iraq
@hunterkiller232134
@hunterkiller232134 7 лет назад
In all likelihood they will only have North Korea willing to support them. Russia and China don't have close enough relations to go to war together and Russia would have little to gain from getting into World War III.
@FantacistI
@FantacistI 3 года назад
Excellent video, thank you
@tttzzz8453
@tttzzz8453 4 года назад
The Soviet Union sat up from the grave: finally my turn.
@smokeybrown8752
@smokeybrown8752 3 года назад
It turned out Stalin actually gained immortality and launched his nukes.
@c.i.a.932
@c.i.a.932 2 года назад
I mean America, NATO, India, Japan, and South Korea could probably beat China, Russia, Pakistan, and North Korea…
@muhammedafou2693
@muhammedafou2693 2 года назад
@@c.i.a.932 not when turkey wont help nato
@quqbalam5089
@quqbalam5089 7 лет назад
World War II and the Korean and Vietnam Wars completely disprove this video. Geography proved no obstacle for the US to destroy Japan, North Korea and Indochina. The US would quickly deploy troops to deal with China and, while perhaps not easily beat it, still quickly take them out of Japan and into mainland China where most of the war would occur. The video is also laughable by suggesting China could sink US warships so easily. No, it can't. US warships stationed in the South China Sea in fact have a higher chance of sinking Chinese warships and even destroy much of the Chinese navy. China can win a war of attrition, at the cost of devastating itself, but that's about it.
@PrinceSilvermane
@PrinceSilvermane 7 лет назад
This is a military analysis. Losses are usually generated as pretty generous and typically 'worst case scenario.' It's arrogant to think that the US would not lose any ships during a full on war with China. I also think that the video assumes losses = not combat capable. If a ship is damaged enough that it's not operating at combat efficiency it'll pull out and be considered a loss since it's no longer contributing to the war effort and will require time to repair. At this time the Navy will cycle out any ships that aren't fighting at their peak for new ships because remember they can only maintain a certain number of ships. Might as well make sure all the ships you have are at their best.
@ScipiPurr
@ScipiPurr 7 лет назад
"Geography proved no obstacle for the US to destroy Japan, North Korea and Indochina." Do you know anything about those wars? With the exception of perhaps Korea, terrain was the bane of the US military. And there's a reason the quote goes, "Do not go fighting with your land armies in China."
@bozo8603
@bozo8603 7 лет назад
The US couldn't land more than a couple, maybe two hundred thousand troops at once, and that's a VERY generous estimate. The Chinese would likely be able to push them back into the sea by the time more US troops could be deployed. Though if an ally were to be added, like India, for example, China would likely have to focus it's land forces along that border, and so a full naval invasion MIGHT be an option, though the US wouldn't see it as worth it. Allies or not, the US would know they're winning the war in the long run, and wouldn't want to lose the tens if not hundreds of thousands of troops that it would take to do a land invasion. Plus, there's no real reason in the video's scenario to perform a land invasion. The US wouldn't be able to annex or even occupy much Chinese land, as an occupation of somewhere like Afghanistan is obviously incredibly difficult, let alone China. There's no reason the US would want to land more than token troops to raid specific targets. They wouldn't need to do that to beat the Chinese. Though obviously no war between these two would be a good thing. The world economy would just kill itself and the death toll would be unthinkably massive, seeing as allies do actually exist, and land war would likely be an option. (Though not necessarily a necessity. India wouldn't want to lose the kind of troops it would fighting a land war against the Chinese.)
@StreetSWAT
@StreetSWAT 7 лет назад
he said nothing about the us assuming no losses...... but considering how many other assets the US has i highly doubt this to be a problem. we have already demonstrated our lack of care for other nations lives... we did nuclear bomb 2 cities during ww2 i don't think the nation would have any remorse of bombing the entire country if it came down to it...
@bozo8603
@bozo8603 7 лет назад
The US repeatedly offered Japan surrender before the bombings, and even offered them surrender between the two bombings. The Japanese Emperor forced the Americans' hand. Also, the US has treated it's war enemies with a lot more respect than a hell of a lot of countries on Earth. I know they aren't perfect, but the US is a pretty good country. I shudder to think what other nations like China would have done with the sort of monopoly on power the US has seen over the past eighty or more years.
@Kebobbin
@Kebobbin 7 лет назад
Feels like everytime I watch one of these "USA vs ___" Usa would always win and people would argue about it. I personally think that both America and China are great countries, but most people think China is a place of dead dogs.... :3
@dgfpat
@dgfpat 7 лет назад
WTF are you talking about. America is not that bad yet, beside next year we have Mr. Trump as our President. He will make America great again.
@johnnyfewhairs1862
@johnnyfewhairs1862 7 лет назад
Chubby Gorilla America would win chinas military is week there ground force are pathetic US infantry price is about 3.5 grand chinas is 1.5 half of it is the gun alone there armor is just a sad excuse but there's so many of them that's why there powerful
@Kebobbin
@Kebobbin 7 лет назад
JPSxQualms you clearly have never went to china
@Kebobbin
@Kebobbin 7 лет назад
The Maestro it's all about war for you isn't it :/
@Kebobbin
@Kebobbin 7 лет назад
dgfpat just my opinion bro hehe
@Binkov
@Binkov 3 года назад
Hey everyone! We are making a series of history of warfare kind of videos on the Graphy app. We call it War Transformed: share.graphyapp.co/MHNG So if that's your thing, if you like us talking about history in general, how tech influenced development in general, how certain new weapons influenced warfare - feel free to check it out!
@mechanicalfruit9659
@mechanicalfruit9659 3 года назад
Yes daddy, err I mean ya man
@Dylan-bc2po
@Dylan-bc2po 3 года назад
Binkov! Love the content, could you do an update with US allies? Also it would be cool if you did a video of a possible WW3, Like, Russia, china, North Korea, extc vs USA & Allies.
@NeGoPoS
@NeGoPoS 3 года назад
The Armenia-Azeirbajan war is already happening, I bet this one is the next.
@HNW00
@HNW00 7 лет назад
However, the economic damage would most likely be the most serious part.
@HNW00
@HNW00 7 лет назад
Badger0fDeath Both. China loses money from not being able to sell its manufacturing goods while the US loses by not having any products to consume.
@Enchie
@Enchie 7 лет назад
Badger0fDeath Both, but I would say more on China. But it would suck for both sides.
@HNW00
@HNW00 7 лет назад
jthedog The US lacks the industrial base to build consumer products.
@theethicalpirate1849
@theethicalpirate1849 7 лет назад
+RM Nimitz Actually China can marginally produce more aircraft and other stuff than USA, but the quality of Chinese products is the question They have good manpower but how effective they are? Chinese Navy will be destroyed as USA can destroy its coast Most of The Chinese Airforce in the East will be wiped out and they would have to go to Western China to train Also Chinese production will be hampered by air attacks so USA will eventually win
@HNW00
@HNW00 7 лет назад
DragonDroid Yes, but the US has practically no commercial or civilian manufacturing base because the vast majority of it has been outsourced. The Chinese Anti-Ship ballistic missiles prevent US ships from coming too close (lesson learned from the Taiwan Strait). The US airforce will also be at a significant numerical disadvantage. Again, the US military also needs to be at standby in Europe protecting against Russia while also being in the middle east protecting the Arab states against Iran. The issue about Chinese production being hampered is that in the space of this war (1-2 years), not many planes are going to be built. The US can only produce single to double-digits in plane manufacturing per year. The difference of 50-100 planes (at max production) over the entire course of the war is unlikely to significantly change things. When you question their quality, it is pretty stupid to associate civilian manufacturing with the quality of their military manufacturing. Looking at their excellent rocket production record, it doesn't mean that their military manufacturing is bad.
@marktwain4372
@marktwain4372 7 лет назад
I love this channel. It actually does its research unlike other war simulation channels. Keep it up, Binkov!
@aorusaki
@aorusaki 2 года назад
Sweet video!!
@mtango9985
@mtango9985 3 года назад
Awsome videos im a new fan of your page.
@feuerderveranderung6056
@feuerderveranderung6056 7 лет назад
EU vs US Arena Battle ;)
@arealbigboss
@arealbigboss 7 лет назад
Feuer der Veränderung EU does not have a military
@asterax101
@asterax101 7 лет назад
No, but the nations in the EU do.
@Enchie
@Enchie 7 лет назад
arealbigboss They are planning to get one soon.
@cluelessPhilosophic
@cluelessPhilosophic 7 лет назад
If its the entire EU, then make it North America vs Western Europe.
@WhatDuhDogDoin
@WhatDuhDogDoin 7 лет назад
Until the EU gets their act together, that would be a pretty one sided battle.
@EmperorTigerstar
@EmperorTigerstar 7 лет назад
Fantastic video Binkov. I'd be interested to see one with North vs South Korea but without anyone else intervening.
@coledavis5212
@coledavis5212 7 лет назад
EmperorTigerstar it's already North Korea. NK has a big army compared to SK.
@EmperorTigerstar
@EmperorTigerstar 7 лет назад
ExplodingHam I'd still enjoy the video.
@t10god
@t10god 7 лет назад
+ExplodingHam North Korea is receiving oil from nobody and produces 0 barrels a day. The inefficiency of their Soviet era arsenal of armored vehicles would reduce their fuel time to 2 weeks -- that is, after 2 weeks, they wont have any oil left. They would resort to their nuclear weapons.
@kokopelli2012
@kokopelli2012 7 лет назад
wouldn't ever happen. Don't you think US watching for DPRK invasion? As soon as that leaked out or was seen on satellite, US would turn Pyonyang into a shattered glass bowl.
@EmperorTigerstar
@EmperorTigerstar 7 лет назад
Erik Charles I said *without* foreign interference. That's always the premise of Binkov's videos.
@Steel_Scholar
@Steel_Scholar 3 года назад
I'd be interested to see an indepth current year analysis with a USA/Australia/India/Japanese Coalition
@mattb4649
@mattb4649 3 года назад
And Taiwan 🇹🇼 and likely South Korea 🇰🇷
@ushopelife7538
@ushopelife7538 2 года назад
Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defectors Invasion of China Operation Final Countdown:0:16,0:20,0:24,0:27,0:33,0:40,0:47,0:51,0:59,1:06,1:11,1:17,1:19,1:25,1:30,1:36,1:41,1:51,2:07,2:14,2:21,2:29,2:35,2:44,2:51,2:57,3:07,3:15,3:22,3:35,3:41,3:46,3:52,3:57,4:05,4:10,4:19,4:23,4:29,4:37,4:40,4:46,4:52,5:01,5:05,5:14,5:19,5:27,5:36,5:40,5:44,5:50,5:54,6:01,6:05,6:10,6:16,6:24,6:29,6:32,6:37,6:43,6:54,7:05,7:10,7:17,7:25,7:34,7:38,7:43,7:50,7:58,8:04,8:11,8:17,8:21,8:29,8:33,8:38,8:42,8:45,8:48,8:56,9:01,9:03,9:06,9:16,9:22,9:25,9:32,9:34,(9:42)
@daniellevy4104
@daniellevy4104 3 года назад
I love the hand puppet , he makes learning war fun!
@dislikebutton4981
@dislikebutton4981 3 года назад
daniel LEVY lmfao 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 underrated funny
@daniellevy4104
@daniellevy4104 3 года назад
Airplay lol
@gg-sr6ju
@gg-sr6ju 3 года назад
The racist dude delete his comment
@reclusiarchgrimaldus1269
@reclusiarchgrimaldus1269 3 года назад
@@gg-sr6ju What did they say?
@MurderRich626
@MurderRich626 7 лет назад
" I don't know what World War 3 will be fought with. But I know World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." ~ Albert Einstein
@peterisawesomeplease
@peterisawesomeplease 7 лет назад
Yea this video completely misses this basic point. Any US china war would either be a carefully contained affair or would result in all out nuclear warfare.
@aniksamiurrahman6365
@aniksamiurrahman6365 7 лет назад
also, this video misses how US economy will get messed up by invading China.
@allohobo
@allohobo 7 лет назад
The U.S economy has stagnated due to the cost/benefit of importing (since they are extremely capitalistic), whether the industry is being used or not, most of it is still in place and can be activated in a short period of time, the U.S economy wouldn't be that crippled, it would simply revert to a 60s-70s economy based on self reliance and exporting. Short term the loss of income and goods from china would hurt, but not extremely severe, in addition a breakdown in relations in the superpowers would be relatively known before hand and both would be in a war-time economy by the time it would begin
@strangerintown3676
@strangerintown3676 7 лет назад
I don't think you are right.
@thetimberwolf9904
@thetimberwolf9904 7 лет назад
Big_Ricardo21 no fidget spinners
@brothermohdhanif375
@brothermohdhanif375 7 лет назад
I bet. there will be no war.
@manonmoon12
@manonmoon12 7 лет назад
Between the "Super Powers" it will be mostly a pen and paper war, both sides have too much to lose going all out war. Thats why they stick to invading the smaller country's who cant do shit about it.
@SmokeyCRO
@SmokeyCRO 7 лет назад
I will take that bet! Give me your bank account and I wll give you mine. Just say how much$$$?
@brothermohdhanif375
@brothermohdhanif375 7 лет назад
SmokeyCRO are you serious?
@bailey2198
@bailey2198 7 лет назад
Right now you're very wrong
@user-hp3bp7zh7h
@user-hp3bp7zh7h 7 лет назад
这个视频表达的什么意思,有明白的帮我解释一下。
@pankajyaduvanshi2837
@pankajyaduvanshi2837 3 года назад
i'am waiting for USA to do this , it is the only ultimate way of Tibet's independence
@mikehe3646
@mikehe3646 3 года назад
做梦
@pankajyaduvanshi2837
@pankajyaduvanshi2837 3 года назад
@Leonhard Euler fook you
@mikehe3646
@mikehe3646 3 года назад
@Markmarkus0911 user Lol everything could happen in your sweet dreams
@DanFromMerdo
@DanFromMerdo 3 года назад
@@mikehe3646 you gonna sign up for the PLA if this happens? Or you you going to be like the rest of your country men and hide behind a computer
@ronniezhuang2222
@ronniezhuang2222 3 года назад
fuck u
@erictroxell715
@erictroxell715 3 года назад
Considering what's happened in past 3 months...japan, Australia and India would gladly help us.but it would still be horrific over all
@erictroxell715
@erictroxell715 3 года назад
@@zabuspler6285 my apologies sir I have to find out how to translate this. But thank you for replying. My apologies
@Lem0nsquid
@Lem0nsquid 7 лет назад
i fail to see what either party would gain from a war.
@dylang2255
@dylang2255 7 лет назад
Lem0nsquid In reality nothing. This is just a hypothetical scenario examining military capability.
@NertoFurity
@NertoFurity 7 лет назад
That´s why they don´t actually do it
@WM-eg4gh
@WM-eg4gh 7 лет назад
that's why both countries are engaged in empty threats. each country will portray that opposite country attacked and if they knew they were in the wrong, it won't be covered in the media and will be dealt secretly by authority and ministers. if it was true, the whole world will suffer from their silly behaviors.
@patrickhenry6695
@patrickhenry6695 7 лет назад
The USA would have its debt wiped out with China, thats kinda huge. Also, its not about gaining, sometimes its about STOPPING someone from becoming the new super power.
@Lem0nsquid
@Lem0nsquid 7 лет назад
Patrick Henry yea i understand that. but i wonder if we would be willing to do that. the only way i see china not becoming a super power is if we decimate at least half their population
@clashofhaxrealhax2888
@clashofhaxrealhax2888 6 лет назад
If we have war we will end up looking like Mars lmao
@jacobdot456
@jacobdot456 6 лет назад
Eastern China would. At least in this scenario.
@helmetguy6495
@helmetguy6495 6 лет назад
No, the Pacific might, but not the world
@jacobdot456
@jacobdot456 6 лет назад
Go watch a series on RU-vid called Shattered Citadel, it's about WW3 that starts in 2055. Super good stuff.
@helmetguy6495
@helmetguy6495 6 лет назад
Jacob Martin why
@jacobdot456
@jacobdot456 6 лет назад
Cause there's some heavy nuke action that happens early in the war.
@kuolevijyrkinen4675
@kuolevijyrkinen4675 Год назад
Would love to see an updated version of this video
@guillaumel9977
@guillaumel9977 Год назад
It has already been done
@kuolevijyrkinen4675
@kuolevijyrkinen4675 Год назад
@@guillaumel9977 Whats the name of the vid?
@guillaumel9977
@guillaumel9977 Год назад
@@kuolevijyrkinen4675 here the link brother : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FxYwD_n21wI.html
@kuolevijyrkinen4675
@kuolevijyrkinen4675 Год назад
@@guillaumel9977 Thank you
@guillaumel9977
@guillaumel9977 Год назад
@@kuolevijyrkinen4675 You re welcome !
@Casperski1312
@Casperski1312 3 года назад
This is a fun video, but it has less filling than a poptart. To assume that allies on both sides would sit idly by while two superpowers duked it out for months is a little naïve. It would be difficult to really factor in each nation and what they could accomplish for their respective allies, but it would make for a nice mini-series to explore the subject. I'm sure you'd be up to the task, though.
@Pepsi69486
@Pepsi69486 7 лет назад
China will hopefully get buffed in the next update patch
@isunlloaoll
@isunlloaoll 6 лет назад
Bt 2045, China's defense budget will roughly match that of America's. Can you imagine that? Two superpowers both each spending ~$1.3 trillion annually on weapons and shit. God have mercy...
@retkuperkele
@retkuperkele 6 лет назад
That's assuming US is frozen in time. US is still growing, it still isn't close to reaching it's potential.
@rahulagrawal8110
@rahulagrawal8110 6 лет назад
Godlike Pikachu
@godswatching2863
@godswatching2863 6 лет назад
Trinity TM lol
@MrHoeBow
@MrHoeBow 6 лет назад
Trinity TM No, it's really just that America is broken. Cut its military funding in half to balance the game.
@hardyhuang1446
@hardyhuang1446 7 лет назад
dont start a war. everyone makes his own money and enjoy life
@worldtravel101
@worldtravel101 7 лет назад
+1
@annabuivis6965
@annabuivis6965 7 лет назад
how about a Nerf war
@groMMit1981
@groMMit1981 3 года назад
I feel this is coming, and allies will happily take part. Touch wood.
@beifeng7448
@beifeng7448 3 года назад
Trust me, their are 0.2% chance of this happening, it won’t be beneficial for both country’s and will not accomplish anything but damage the economy, both China and the US wants to avoid this scenario.
@looinrims
@looinrims 2 года назад
@@beifeng7448 .2% happening today, who knows what terror the future holds?
@jonathaslopes8038
@jonathaslopes8038 4 года назад
So THAT is how fallout's world was born
@jeffreyflynn5746
@jeffreyflynn5746 5 лет назад
I'm American and honestly I think China would be our hardest fight ever and nobody would really "win". Some of my best friends are Chinese and they are loyal..strong beautiful people. Hope this would never happen. Blessings and love from USA to China!! ✌️&💜
@zzyzxzee6374
@zzyzxzee6374 5 лет назад
Jeffrey Scott not the chinese people but the communist party that is the enemy. Gd nixon for ever opening up china in the first place
@kickbutoxy1218
@kickbutoxy1218 5 лет назад
The problem is geography But hey they can not even come near USA
@Andy-pp5ic
@Andy-pp5ic 5 лет назад
well if china government will continue behave like it does it will happen and us with allies will take them down. I have Chinese friends but their government is horrible.
@WillAnderson3rd
@WillAnderson3rd 5 лет назад
Shut up pussy
@Chicagoisbetter32
@Chicagoisbetter32 5 лет назад
They thought that about japan..We always figure out how to win.
@yoskole
@yoskole 7 лет назад
im sure everyone would like to see israel vs iran :)
@derekvigil9788
@derekvigil9788 7 лет назад
Yos Kolesnik iran would lose lol
@yoskole
@yoskole 7 лет назад
i know lol im from israel.i want to see how israel would wreck iran
@anthonyqcolosimo5374
@anthonyqcolosimo5374 7 лет назад
Yos Kolesnik I think Israel vs Saudi Arabia would be a fairer fight. I hope they do Pakistan vs India
@shooterdash
@shooterdash 7 лет назад
זה קצת לא הגיוני בגלל שכדי שאירן תגיע לישראל היא צריכה לעבור הרבה מדינות
@yoskole
@yoskole 7 лет назад
אפשר לעשות משהו
@RipperMaggoo
@RipperMaggoo 2 года назад
Overall, great video, obviously a lot of time and thought into it. My only piece of constructive criticism, if you decide to make a new updated video, is that this video was under the impression that war broke out suddenly with no time to prepare. But most major wars, especially this one, would start with a lot of buildup and posturing. Maybe do a scenario in which the US and China had months to strategically move around troops before the start.
@RipperMaggoo
@RipperMaggoo 2 года назад
Also, the US has many secret, small airfields throughout the south pacific.
@jamesbelcher896
@jamesbelcher896 2 года назад
It would just be over sooner in the usa favor not really worth a video
@nopenope8364
@nopenope8364 2 года назад
The only way to defeat china is forcing a surrender,invading china is impossible as it's just to big the same thing would happen as it happened when Germany invaded Soviets.But then again imperial Japan did it so maybe
@blainesitter9110
@blainesitter9110 2 года назад
that overflowing dam would be a big target , how much industry is down stream
@rannvijaysingh1
@rannvijaysingh1 6 лет назад
USA vs China ( Japan loose)
@tokugawaieyasu7837
@tokugawaieyasu7837 5 лет назад
Rannvijay Singh 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂
@petergriffinhentai4724
@petergriffinhentai4724 5 лет назад
Lol nice
@user-vf5ek6pw6s
@user-vf5ek6pw6s 5 лет назад
优秀
@digitalpirate2183
@digitalpirate2183 5 лет назад
Yeaah, suuure. More like it will be end for Chinese economics and chinese themselves in final and even bigger debt in USA budget. Japan will rebuild itself as always when chinese will kill each other just like they do now already and Americans will suffer from another wave of people with ptsd since they became weak and naive.
@petergriffinhentai4724
@petergriffinhentai4724 5 лет назад
Law Gun Srsly China and US are stromger than you think
@ryancrandall7644
@ryancrandall7644 7 лет назад
Geographically, the US is golden! They have a ocean on each side and no major Islands their enemies could station at like the situation with Japan and China. No wonder they haven't been invaded in a century.
@boldCactuslad
@boldCactuslad 7 лет назад
There's also that "them leading the world since just after the first world war" thing, what with their obscene military spending (85% of world spending) and founding NATO + UN
@alexandermercer5363
@alexandermercer5363 7 лет назад
Ryan Well, I don't really think it's possible to invade the superpower country that has the support of all of NATO, and has the most advanced military on Earth. I honestly feel sorry for the imbeciles who even think that it's possible nowadays (imbeciles being the likes of Kim Jong Un and ISIS).
@ryancrandall7644
@ryancrandall7644 7 лет назад
Alexander Mercer agreed
@egg-rollsmith6303
@egg-rollsmith6303 7 лет назад
Alexander Mercer so true America has a large advantage in defending. The attacking force would have D-Day. United States would also have a advantage with naval,air and ground force. It's almost impossible to invade the U.S. Unless you had many major powers attack Mexico for a southern attack, Canada for a northern attack and massive attacks in the east and west coasts. Which would have massive casualties.
@ipr3336
@ipr3336 7 лет назад
That's if you manage to destroy the strongest navy on earth, not counting navies allied to the U.S. The invasion force would likely be sunk quickly.
@playbassken
@playbassken 4 года назад
You should be promoted to General Biknov! Well done!
@someguythatlookslikeme8306
@someguythatlookslikeme8306 3 года назад
first one Ive seen. Great! love the muppet
@jamesdexneraquino6095
@jamesdexneraquino6095 7 лет назад
ALways Remember US the most powerful country in the world. And China is for business not on war..
@amog849
@amog849 7 лет назад
james dexner aquino if the US can't exert that power in an effective way, then the strength of their military means nothing
@user-cc2yy7fo7f
@user-cc2yy7fo7f 7 лет назад
To learn history,America has just failed two wars .
@premjianand3210
@premjianand3210 7 лет назад
you couldn't rely upon military strength alone. Asia will not be a favorable battlefield for the U.S. too many strong hostiles in the area. North Korea and Russia will not stand idly if a war broke out between the US and China.
@premjianand3210
@premjianand3210 7 лет назад
***** Please visit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Russian_relations_since_1991
@premjianand3210
@premjianand3210 7 лет назад
***** and this too en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93North_Korea_relations see the military relations part.
@cedricverner7380
@cedricverner7380 7 лет назад
Canadian snipers would 360 no scope the chinese from Canada eh.
@dreamtree1510
@dreamtree1510 7 лет назад
Lol, I love the "eh" at the end. I broke out laughing more than I should have xD.
@pennythewilly1774
@pennythewilly1774 7 лет назад
RUSH B
@zionmainframe5165
@zionmainframe5165 7 лет назад
Do you guys even have a military
@cedricverner7380
@cedricverner7380 7 лет назад
Zion Mainframe LOLLLLL
@jazzwayne3822
@jazzwayne3822 7 лет назад
scope us with what? tim horton or mapple sugar?
@theduke9264
@theduke9264 4 года назад
This video helps me sleep better
@infoscholar5221
@infoscholar5221 2 года назад
This video needs a 2021 update, including Space Forces of both countries. Great channel! Horrorshow!
@brandonhuynh4528
@brandonhuynh4528 7 лет назад
Make more please I love these!
@patrickthomas8101
@patrickthomas8101 7 лет назад
do Uk vs Argentina 2nd Falkland's war
@Flosky93
@Flosky93 7 лет назад
of course UK had won ^^
@TheIceman567
@TheIceman567 7 лет назад
are you british?
@dereboyusk3572
@dereboyusk3572 7 лет назад
argentina win
@ExpectoPatronum1997
@ExpectoPatronum1997 7 лет назад
they really would, theyre a world super power.
@patrickthomas8101
@patrickthomas8101 7 лет назад
***** exactly
@GoldLove21
@GoldLove21 2 года назад
Oh we'll find out this year
@gallasebiyo4427
@gallasebiyo4427 4 года назад
The most likely scenario would basically be another Korean War on Korean soil. China and the US would avoid direct confrontation.
@reedmorris6559
@reedmorris6559 3 года назад
If china attacks taiwan or our allies the game is on
@samthesamesam7711
@samthesamesam7711 3 года назад
China can economicaly bring down the USA
@spicymilk7311
@spicymilk7311 3 года назад
SamTheSameSam the US can economically bring down China. It’s a lose-lose situation. I think the US would be able to pull through though. China wouldn’t.
@samthesamesam7711
@samthesamesam7711 3 года назад
Atomizer yes that is true tho and the whole world will suffer too... but maybe China would still survive since they can have 1.4 billion people buying their own product if it goes down on a full scale economical warfare, and if that happens, product in america like Apple, Walmart , automotive industries. But still China will suffer too but still survive but idk about america doe
@JJ-fb2lp
@JJ-fb2lp 3 года назад
Man if US and China gonna fight, have a war in some place quiet in China and not Korean soil.
@Calbeck
@Calbeck 7 лет назад
Excellent analysis.
@Alpffine
@Alpffine 7 лет назад
Do Germany VS USA, UK, France, Poland, Russia, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Belarus, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia. It would definitely be a very close fight.
@Alpffine
@Alpffine 7 лет назад
just like last time
@TheCelticsAREboss
@TheCelticsAREboss 7 лет назад
The world today is different than the world in 1930s-1940s
@oneoftheonly911
@oneoftheonly911 7 лет назад
Lol, the US owns the German military today
@ryancrandall7644
@ryancrandall7644 7 лет назад
This wouldn't work with modern day Germany. It's army despite being strong could not handle such forces...
@brandowwww
@brandowwww 7 лет назад
Louis Cheuk Germany would get shit on if it was the same scenario, even if it was just the US alone.
@PingYJ7750
@PingYJ7750 4 года назад
This aged very well....
@Andy-ti2yy
@Andy-ti2yy 3 года назад
As a Hunan and Chinese, no war on this beautiful planet earth 🌏!
@ForgiveUsAll
@ForgiveUsAll 3 года назад
Also stop bullying your neighbor so that peace remains.
@summerrr1
@summerrr1 3 года назад
Er, tell your government to stop being hostile to the world then. I would willingly sign up to fight your country.
@toonewang1482
@toonewang1482 3 года назад
@@ForgiveUsAll If they don't build bases and oil platforms on Chinese territory, India can be less arrogant and think it can ask more from China on territorial issues. I don't think China will bully them.
@toonewang1482
@toonewang1482 3 года назад
@@summerrr1 I did not see you Shouting for Sikkim when free and democratic India killed Sikkim. What can we expect you to do for me?
@toonewang1482
@toonewang1482 3 года назад
@@summerrr1 The Americans on the Korean battlefield also thought China was evil, but when they were captured, they were educated, people of different colors got along better, many of them stayed to be Chinese, and those who returned to the United States began to support communism. Now, this is interesting, isn't it?
@Norwegian733
@Norwegian733 7 лет назад
The US would block any oil entering China by sea and also try to take out pipelines inland. In adition the reserve holdings of oil. This would have crippled the chinese production and after a while become a problem for the military.
@madsnorlax223
@madsnorlax223 7 лет назад
Yeah, they could likely just win the war through an naval blockade and UN embargoes.
@MuffHam
@MuffHam 7 лет назад
wouldn't work china gets there oil from Russia
@zulikun6
@zulikun6 7 лет назад
China on the other hand is the largest debt owner of the US, so figure it out.
@zulikun6
@zulikun6 7 лет назад
China is one of the 5 permanent members of the UN as well, just sayin
@zulikun6
@zulikun6 7 лет назад
just which one do you think is faster, china selling US debts or US trying to destroy china completely?
@ownurlove
@ownurlove 7 лет назад
I have to say, most parts of this video seems right, however, you forgot about peoples will for the war and how fast eproduction speed could happened during the war. China is well known as word manufacture,,and it has the largest ship produce capacity in the world, so, if there is a war to be happening, they can quickly pulse all surveillant production line and shifting them to military usage. which means, Chinese number of ship is not just like what you are looking at now, and not to mention, even nowadays, china is producing 1 war ship every month, they are building 1 aircraft carrier, 2 missile battle ships, and 2 smaller defense ship, and a few different subs, and this is just for peaceful time. at same time they are still have world most capacity ship production line. if you think it how much ship and how fast they can produce ships during the war time? don't forget this is one of the reason why USA, won the WW2. same to their other weapons, don't just look how many missile they have now, cause china is different with any other countries USA had attacked in last 60 years. china is the world manufacture, this title is not only give china advantage to produce consumer good, it also give china advantage during war time to replace damaged weapons. and not to mention, when the war started, the Chinese government can just call state emergency, so all the consumer resources will give the priority to military usage. in that case, the china will just turn into a giant weapon manufacture in a bout couple weeks. and how could American to compare to that? even you know you can win, but how much will USA willing to sacrifice? how much American people are willing to put up with? if they know they are going to lose their living standards , a lot of consumer products are going to rise up 100%or more, and a lot of their children are going to die during the war, and not to mention, this war is not about saving the USA ass, is only about to stop china to grow up or stop china to occupy the whole south china Sea to help other SEA countries like Vietnam,which was another communist country and fight with USA 40 years ago, Philippine who was against USA 20 years ago, die for protecting Taiwan? which is not even USA's business, or protecting Japan? which had war with USA in WW2, and some of jananese are still hate USA? I really doubt that all american are willing to sacrifice that much to do so. on the other side, majority of chinese are willing to fight for their nations survival, even it means to lose a lot of business or living standard, which communist are really good at how to organize this things during war time. dont forget china wasnt a free market 30 years ago, everything was controlled and distributed by peoples basic needs, and everyone was working for government for produce exactly what government needs, but, USA, has never got this style of life, and never had this kind of thought. the government has to pay for every weapon to use for the war, china is simply produce with all resources they have. so, who will last longer? china is communist party running state, for last 70 years, Chinese had been reunited thought by the government, that china need to stay strong together or fall together, just like WW2, so, no one in china wanna this happens again. but, how many American are willing to fight this war? not mention USA is democracy country, such a big scale attack need to go through bot parliament, that will take a lot of argument, especially those companies who have business in china. sum up, there is no need to worry about the war between china and USA, because either of these two countries can afford the consequences. unless there is really necessarily situation like China is attacking USA bases, or Australia, which has strong ally to usa,which I still doubt USA will joint the war straight away, just look at WW2, when the whole world was in the war, USA was just selling weapons to both sides to make money, the only reason USA attack is because they got hit by JAPAN....and before that, they were selling oil to Japan for long time.. money is what USA want, not losing life. and will china stupid enough to attact USA land or base for none necessarily reason? I dont thinks so, china is happy to do whatever they are doing now, dealing with everyone, and making money too. unless taiwan is trying to be independent or somthing happen in south china sea, however, none of them will became a full scale war... so relax, guys, this is not going to happen anytime soon, even trump couldnt do it, because, he is not the dictator of USA, there are still parliament members to stop him to do something to insane. so, a piece of advise, just try to work hard and enjoy your life. that is what really matters in the end.
@FrazerGoddon
@FrazerGoddon 7 лет назад
Harry zhang very true. :-)
@James-tv6ii
@James-tv6ii 7 лет назад
oh yes because China use to steal Russia's military secrets! hehehe! and China's manufactured goods are of poor standards it destroys and worn easily. Poor sub standards!
@Killernuma123
@Killernuma123 7 лет назад
Harry zhang Lol. China is only "the world's manufacturer" of cheap, simple shit. Chinese engines of all sorts, especially jets, are terrible. All the world's biggest plane manufacturers outside of Airbus are American. The U.S. has some of the world's biggest car companies, as does Japan. Virtually no Chinese cars are ever sold outside mainland China (because they're crap). The existing military-industrial complex in the U.S. is extensive, reliable, and can compel many private companies to produce necessary materials in wartime. The U.S.'s industrial and financial capacity to produce materiel for a war absolutely dwarfs China's, and it would all be mobilized if a war broke out. The weapons both countries have now, in peacetime, reflect a similar story. And while the U.S. lies thousands of miles away from mainland China, in complete safety, mobilizing it's vast arms production, China's industrial base gets blown to shit. China is boxed in by the U.S., Japan, and all other allies in the region. And nearly all of China's industrial capacity lies on the east coast, where it's incredibly vulnerable to the U.S.'s vast and superior fleet of aircraft and ships. China would be choked off from the rest of the world almost immediately if war broke out - the U.S. Navy is way too much for them. All of the international trade and money that normally come to China would dry up while the U.S. lies far away, relatively unaffected. You are incredibly foolish if you think China's peacetime capacity to manufacture simple goods for the rest of the world at low labor cost will translate into the ability to outproduce the U.S. in wartime. These facts may change significantly in the coming decades, but that's how it is now. I know the Chinese are in a hurry to "grow up" into a mature industrial power, but they're just not there yet. Taking on the U.S. (even totally ignoring the vast gap in nuclear weapons) is suicidal for China for, at the very least, a decade.
@James-tv6ii
@James-tv6ii 7 лет назад
Killernuma123 I agree with you! Chinese low , cheap and sub standards products are nothing but garbage! Most of their military gadgets and weapons are imitation from Russia. That's why the Russian government is getting irritated with China. And yet some people who are commenting on this video on the side of China does not know the whole truth. They just rely their biased views based on their own prospective and not on facts and statistics!
@backwoodsbully9841
@backwoodsbully9841 7 лет назад
The US would destroy those ship yards so no more ships. It would take more than A month to train crew for each ship. The US would cut off ships delivering building material like steel. Yes the US could do it back in WWII because the enemy was NOT at our doorstep. Kind of hard to bomb if you are not in range. But all in all this is A stupid scenario.
@jeromebarry1741
@jeromebarry1741 3 года назад
Your videos are very entertaining. I suggest you update the USA-China conflict every five years. China and USA are evolving relative to each other that fast.
@stuartbega7097
@stuartbega7097 3 года назад
Awesome video tell everyone !👽
@user-yy2br1rn7e
@user-yy2br1rn7e 5 лет назад
YOU SHOULD MAKE 2019 CHINA VS USA
@dixiefish0173
@dixiefish0173 5 лет назад
Pretty much the video lol
@TimCrinion
@TimCrinion 5 лет назад
Skyhawk Lover yes let's do it! Share the love...
@itsfelbourne8254
@itsfelbourne8254 5 лет назад
It's not really much different. China has some more advanced tech being deployed but the numbers are far too small to make any sort of major difference. If anything, full scale deployment of F-35s would eventually outstrip them anyways and tip the coastal harassment phase further in the USA's favor
@Misel982001
@Misel982001 5 лет назад
They would lose even more easily
@TrionityIr
@TrionityIr 5 лет назад
One word. Subs. US enjoy a huge advantage over China in SSN and SSBN. China's SSK can't venture out to harass US Navy and they only have a dozen SSN and SSBN of low quality. Until this changes for China, they will never win against the US. So it won't matter if he did a video this year. Maybe in 5-10 years, this category will be different.
@tomislavlaskovski1287
@tomislavlaskovski1287 6 лет назад
AMERICA always Win In Movies and Videos
@vietle8157
@vietle8157 6 лет назад
Free Speech except vietnam😭😭😭
@jesseramseyz
@jesseramseyz 6 лет назад
U REPLY U LOSE *Thats so fucking incorrect, less then 1% of 2 Million is 58,000 (U.s Casualties)
@worldinformation9428
@worldinformation9428 6 лет назад
you are right.
@obsidianman50
@obsidianman50 6 лет назад
Free Speech lmao you obviously don’t understand politics, The fuck do liberals have to do with genocidal capitalists??? Your a fuckwit mate and everyone of those American soldiers who died deserved to.
@ArthaxtaDaVince777
@ArthaxtaDaVince777 6 лет назад
Free Speech No it was 1 mil Vietnamese plus 200k Chinese vs 600k Americans, and over 1 mil veitnamese. The other side Actually had less casualties. Vietnam was far from a win.
@freddyd1783
@freddyd1783 Год назад
Can you do a remake of this vid for 2023?
@TheAhernFamily1
@TheAhernFamily1 3 года назад
Nanking part 2 playing in theaters nation wide also available on Netflix.
@user-dc6zq5nd6d
@user-dc6zq5nd6d 3 года назад
中国大陆最起码有自知之明,知道和美国的差距还很多,还需要努力追赶,但台湾就不一样,宇宙第一,打遍天下无敌手,台湾南玻万!
@giupetr968
@giupetr968 3 года назад
@@user-dc6zq5nd6d Eh?
@colecummings2071
@colecummings2071 3 года назад
Oh no *flashback of Japanese brutality in nanking*
@looinrims
@looinrims 3 года назад
IJA: “Nice place, nigga”
@hellosirhowcaniscamyoutoda8105
@hellosirhowcaniscamyoutoda8105 2 года назад
I would love a Washington massacre
@fanfanjohn3207
@fanfanjohn3207 4 года назад
why we fight, can we just stay at home and play games till dead
@user-fn9me8qi8p
@user-fn9me8qi8p 4 года назад
卢本伟牛逼
@Linshuizizhao
@Linshuizizhao 4 года назад
卢本伟牛逼
@user-dk8re7ce4r
@user-dk8re7ce4r 4 года назад
卢本伟牛逼
@user-kl9lc4ww7j
@user-kl9lc4ww7j 4 года назад
卢本伟牛逼
@user-dc3sm1ti7g
@user-dc3sm1ti7g 4 года назад
卢本伟牛逼!!
@thestaggy
@thestaggy 7 лет назад
I think not enough value was placed in B2, B52 and drone strikes against mainland Chinsse targets. I believe China would have the upper hand in the earlier stages but eventually the US would secure air superiority and then proceed to implement a naval blockade the likes we have never seen. Naval blockades done a lot of damage to Germany's war efforts in both World Wars. The naval blockade would hurt the US just as much as they are reliant on trade with China, but cutting China off from the world would hurt it even more. China is the world's largest net exporter, so while it would hurt a lot of other countries, a blockade would likely cripple the Chinese economy. Ultimately it would be the naval blockade and not military losses that would force China to the negotiating table. A land invasion is out of the question. There is simply no way that the US would put boots on Chinese soil. They'd be overwhelmed.
@zsarimaxim692
@zsarimaxim692 7 лет назад
The Staggy It's a war of attrition. How many B2 can one afford to build in a year vs how many fighters the other side can build. Sending B52 into China would be possible pretty much a suicide mission.
@thestaggy
@thestaggy 7 лет назад
***** Three words: Made in China. The West, including the US, have made themselves dependent on Chinese labour. You take the largest next exporter out of global trade and you hurt a lot of economies.
@zsarimaxim692
@zsarimaxim692 7 лет назад
***** False assumption. Actually, all the western companies use Chinese sub-contractors for their order, including Apple. That means the companies that are actually making the products are Chines owned. Certainly these western brands can search for other contractors, but they are unlikely to find another of similar size and capacity. The fact is that these Chinese sub-contractors are the ones expanding oversea, into Vietnam and elsewhere, not the western corps.
@thestaggy
@thestaggy 7 лет назад
***** Did I not say both sides would be hurt by it? Actually read what I said. Yes, the West could just move its labour anywhere else in the world, but that would come at a cost. Labour and production is outsourced to China for a reason. Relocating your work force takes time, negatively affects production in the interim and costs a lot of money. China will feel it. The West will feel it. That is what would result in negotiations, not military losses.
@thestaggy
@thestaggy 7 лет назад
Akin Khoo China relies on trade, that is an indisputable fact. Largest exporter and second largest consumer. You shut those ports down, you hurt that economy. You hurt everyone else with it, but a naval blockade will do more harm than a bombing campaign. And I'll mention it again because people seem to lack basic comprehension skills; Economic factors, not military factors will bring an end to any war and it will hurt BOTH sides.
@aeroripper
@aeroripper 3 года назад
It seems in a fully conventional war between the US and China, the US may be able to retain control of the Pacific and defend her homeland but wouldn't be able to defeat China and it would likely end in a stalemate with severe economic impacts on both economies. It seems the only way the US could occupy China (why they would want to do this I don't know) is to have all of her allies and new ones including India taking part in the invasion, even then it's doubtful they could succeed for long. It's likely Russia would intervene at some point to maintain China's borders and the war could expand into Europe and elsewhere as the US and allies now face a two front war. This is basically a WW3 scenario that would dwarf WW2 in scope and we all know nukes are going to get involved pretty rapidly if the US starts losing aircraft carriers.
@ladymorwendaebrethil-feani4031
@ladymorwendaebrethil-feani4031 3 года назад
The scenario may also involve a massive economic blockade by several Western countries. And even if China manages to achieve a military victory in the Pacific, it would probably end up totally isolated in economic terms from the West, that would probably destroy its economic growth.
@shepherdlavellen3301
@shepherdlavellen3301 2 года назад
that is, if everyone can live without made in China products
@liammoy5911
@liammoy5911 2 года назад
@@lobbyskids2 Damn John, you've just solved an issue that master economic advisors haven't been able to solve in decades! Quick somebody get this man a nobel peace prize!!!
@Tawseef-ee1yj
@Tawseef-ee1yj 2 года назад
And what would Russia do, he was talking about Japan giving full military support to Us, but never said anything about Russia.
@binbows2258
@binbows2258 2 года назад
@@shepherdlavellen3301 Yeah we could. Sacrifices can be made for a war as large as a war with china. I'm sure the economy and happiness would take a hit in the U.S, but it'd be manageable.
@shepherdlavellen3301
@shepherdlavellen3301 2 года назад
@@binbows2258 that is if you don't put human factor in the consideration, it's gonna be a mess when people start complaining and protesting on the streets again, but then again, human are easy to manipulate if there's a common enemy out there
@mykochan2429
@mykochan2429 6 лет назад
omg, the airplane bigger than my country
@massineben7198
@massineben7198 6 лет назад
unidentified person yup, to thicc :D
@mikedn1970
@mikedn1970 6 лет назад
Lmao
@DeepakSharma-ej2js
@DeepakSharma-ej2js 6 лет назад
unidentified person hahahaha
@Canesnumber1stunner
@Canesnumber1stunner 6 лет назад
Hahahahaha
@moonowhles7640
@moonowhles7640 6 лет назад
My country is slightly bigger.
@wad5907
@wad5907 7 лет назад
What about the forces already stationed in South Korea? You said no allies but allowed for Japan since the USA already had forces, why not SK?
@AlqGo
@AlqGo 7 лет назад
If South Korea attacked, it would be nuked by N. Korea since China is the closest ally of N. Korea.
@wad5907
@wad5907 7 лет назад
Alq He said no nukes and no allies. I was just meaning that he didn't account for the USA forces already in SK.
@AlqGo
@AlqGo 7 лет назад
I'm Nubby It's a completely unrealistic analysis not considering allies.
@wad5907
@wad5907 7 лет назад
***** How so? Can you give me the time-stamp that he accounts for bases set up and operated by the USA in south korea just like japan?
@ShardojanChAngelCherubimVtuber
I'm Nubby there would be world war 3. think about it.. the South East Asia Treaty Organization says that if there was an attack on any country near the allies on either South Korea, Japan, Australia, Taiwan, Philippines or any there the allies would fight China and Russia would be involved too. even North Korea
@felix25ize
@felix25ize 3 года назад
As usual, no nukes and no allies are totally unrealistic; but it makes that amusing ...
@chrisdionela
@chrisdionela 3 года назад
What about the US bases in South Korea? It’s much more nearer to Beijing?
@nickolazcarters
@nickolazcarters 3 года назад
north korea
@SultanMapping
@SultanMapping 3 года назад
also India Taiwan Phillipines and others would probably help against China
@agent-j1451
@agent-j1451 7 лет назад
The US had only three opportunities, 1949,1989,2001.
@USCZongyang
@USCZongyang 7 лет назад
1996 is also a good timing.
@agent-j1451
@agent-j1451 7 лет назад
***** Hainan Island incident
@Marylandbrony
@Marylandbrony 7 лет назад
It's just speculation. Not anything real serious.
@boilpoil
@boilpoil 7 лет назад
+Crashandburn999 Nope, there were at least two main factors that led to the defeat of the Kuomintang. One is the support of CCP by Russia, as you said, but the other is the corruption within the Kuomintang then. While with US support the Republic of China could've won, the widespread corruption which originally led the people to become disillusioned and sided with the CCP would cause massive civil unrest and likely evolve into another fractured China like that of the earlier 20th century.
@DEMONX62
@DEMONX62 7 лет назад
1960s aswell with the sino-soviet conflict.
@StealthEagle9
@StealthEagle9 7 лет назад
Us would try not to hit nike apple and other americans factories in China ;p
@worwor1721
@worwor1721 7 лет назад
The Joker isn't that a good thing? If China are manufacturing everything and not the us then china are making money, and have the ability to lower prices to a level no other country like the us can compete with, that's why china are doing so well
@v2apache992
@v2apache992 3 года назад
A lot has changed in 4 years
@Nakameguro97
@Nakameguro97 2 года назад
In 2022, if you check the US Naval website, there are four large naval groups scattered around Guam, so they won’t be far from the front lines.
@Njr-ww1yh
@Njr-ww1yh 4 года назад
6:43 In my mind I was going "you know damn well that aircraft ain't going nowhere near NK."😂
@mikehunt9894
@mikehunt9894 4 года назад
Who else had this pop up in their recommendations during coid19?
@TY-fs2qf
@TY-fs2qf 4 года назад
Just release a new form of Sars I bet that would do some damage
@c3sxxzxxz726
@c3sxxzxxz726 4 года назад
Soon we will release a new form of atom in china *The Nuclear bomb* i dont see any civilians dying in that situation ;)
@stuartbega7097
@stuartbega7097 3 года назад
And their equipment is also a very important factor !👽
@reactor4
@reactor4 7 лет назад
The US has 10 Nimitz class aircraft carriers. I imagine at least half would be deployed to china in a war situation.
@matthewliuzhenjie
@matthewliuzhenjie 7 лет назад
The real problem lies in China's DF-21D anti-ship missiles. They can hit targets at mach 10 within a 1500 km radius (930 miles), and would mean that carrier groups will be unable to defend against it should they enter within range of the missiles. The carriers are a source of pride for Americans and to see them taken out one by one would do a great deal to weaken support for the war (or maybe result in a more fervent war effort?)
@kronkron3066
@kronkron3066 7 лет назад
70% of the US navy is already stationed there.
@TonyRios
@TonyRios 7 лет назад
Laser
@awesome4349
@awesome4349 7 лет назад
reactor4 Lol check again there are like a few new ones
@thomashom7514
@thomashom7514 7 лет назад
thetruegamingchannel
@dessiederatta8513
@dessiederatta8513 7 лет назад
And Russia would just sit back and watch this????
@stefandusan9629
@stefandusan9629 7 лет назад
Dessie Deratta No, they would go on the offensive against China.
@samhaiwei6829
@samhaiwei6829 7 лет назад
It's unlikely that this will happen, Because once China is destroyed, the next target for the western world would be Russia.
@presssecretaryalexjones969
@presssecretaryalexjones969 7 лет назад
Well China is the new big kid on the block, it'd actually surprise me if the US and Russia were smart enough to team up on China and suck all of the newfound wealth out.
@stefandusan9629
@stefandusan9629 7 лет назад
Can you name me a singlr nation besides North Korea that will support China?
@PedroBittencourt2036
@PedroBittencourt2036 7 лет назад
Dessie Deratta Russia doesnt like to take the side that will lose, they are like this since WWI, they join the side that will win, or just stay neutral
@MrKen-mc4bu
@MrKen-mc4bu 4 года назад
In the case of a possible 'not too distant future' conflict between the USA and China - there is one - very - key word, that I failed to hear in the presentation. What is the word? Experience. The Chinese Navy and Army have little or no experience in waging a modern war or even a limited Military campaign. The U.S. Navy - and Army/Marines have far more (recent) experience than the Chinese. I suggest that the amount of experience in combat situations would favor the U.S. in a conflict between the two Powers. The technology of the Chinese arms does not have the 'battle tested' factor going for it either. All the training and war games practice suddenly change when somebody is actually shooting at you.
@MrKen-mc4bu
@MrKen-mc4bu 4 года назад
@wut it is mate Never should have helped Great Britain not once in WW I but twice in WWII either.
@T2G-DJT
@T2G-DJT 4 года назад
wut it is mate Who the fuck was talking about COVID or Britain before you rolled in?
@jimmyan1976
@jimmyan1976 Год назад
reboot of this topic is totally needed
@tobilikebacon
@tobilikebacon Год назад
agreed, especially with the HUGE upgrades to the chinese military since then.
@icrushchildrensdreams4556
@icrushchildrensdreams4556 4 года назад
Xi Jinping: *takes notes furiously*
@Shane-Singleton
@Shane-Singleton 4 года назад
He can skip to 9:26 and catch the end.
@paracovo
@paracovo 4 года назад
>Nukes aren't being simulated Daddy Xi: HMMMMMMMMMMMMM
@icrushchildrensdreams4556
@icrushchildrensdreams4556 4 года назад
Matheus mnz *HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM*
@user-zl7ji8ju6o
@user-zl7ji8ju6o 4 года назад
@@Shane-Singleton I think russia will help china when china be close to lose
@Shane-Singleton
@Shane-Singleton 4 года назад
@@user-zl7ji8ju6o It's very possible.
@thelonestarpelican9343
@thelonestarpelican9343 4 года назад
Realistically, any US vs China wildfire would quickly spin out of control -- meaning WW3. I can't see how any major nation can avoid taking active military sides in that one, including the major African powers. Maybe Brazil can just manage to sit on the sidelines - *just* . Everywhere else outside Latin America, sucked into that whirlpool.
@Whatthesigma758
@Whatthesigma758 Год назад
He literally said in this *FICTIONAL* scenario *NO* allies will be involved
@fatnlazychinc
@fatnlazychinc 4 года назад
It’s been almost four years! China military got significantly stronger, more carrier, more destroyer, hypersonic missiles, man made islands in the South China Sea: time to refresh this discussion!
@Recoil816
@Recoil816 4 года назад
The United States' military has as well. It wouldn't be much different.
@thomasalvarez6456
@thomasalvarez6456 4 года назад
China doesn’t have many allies. Turkey, Russia and anything one else associated with these two would likely stay out of the conflict unless the conflict went to China’s favour. Which is very unlikely. A stalemate or intervention is more Likely
@kappsa5365
@kappsa5365 4 года назад
The US has built over 500 more gen 5 muli role planes and 200 gen 5 fighters and has 2 more super carriers and a new stealth destroyer
@kappsa5365
@kappsa5365 4 года назад
@Rich 91 not when the missiles can't find the plane
@renewoffles4369
@renewoffles4369 3 года назад
American vs Chinese dude the american man is gonna beat the Chinese dude 9 out of 10 times
@ravagesoyjoy
@ravagesoyjoy 4 года назад
Just have people walking around with balloons and take out the electric grid...
@T2G-DJT
@T2G-DJT 4 года назад
Fucking genius
Далее
Could US military might stop North Korea?
10:43
Просмотров 3,2 млн
Can China invade Japan? (If USA is neutral)
10:27
Просмотров 883 тыс.
The Taiwan Trap
14:23
Просмотров 783 тыс.
Can industrial output decide US v China war?
23:50
Просмотров 146 тыс.
1980: could NATO stop a Soviet tank rush in Europe?
21:13
The US Marines Bold Risky Plan to Defeat China
21:38
Просмотров 1,6 млн
Could US military successfully invade Iran?
16:22
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Could Russian army hold on against an united Europe?
12:53
Greece vs Turkey (feat. Cyprus)
11:03
Просмотров 3 млн
#saiho @EkaterinaKorea
0:13
Просмотров 1,4 млн