On the 7th, it is crucial to understand that there were no direct attacks on civilians, only collateral damage. Out of the 1148 total names on haaret dataset, 403 were military personnel, 59 belonged to the police, and 668 were civilians. Ratio of civilians to military personnel killed on the 7th was 1 . 6 : 1 - lower than any of the iTf "mowing" operations, which has a ratio of 6 : 1 According to UN OHC data from 2008 to 2022; The collateral damage on the 7th was significantly lower than any of the ITf "mowing" operations, which had a ratio of 6:1 When including all casualties, not just deaths, the collateral damage ratio of the "mowing" operations it is a staggering 162:1 On the 7th, with 462 military personnel out of 1148 total, the ratio of civilians to military personnel was a mere 1.6:1 which is a hundred times lower than the 162:1 ratio from the 162,000 accumulated casualties over only 14 years of "mowing" operations. A 162 :1 ratio means that for every 162 civillians, 1 military personnel is a casualty. The 7th had a ratio of 1.6:1, a hundred times lower. The reported ages of the victims are as follows: 0-4: 2 civilians 5-12: 8 civilians 13-17: 14 civilians 18-25: 132 civilians 26-40: 119 civilians 41-60: 55 civilians 61+: 40 civilians Active duty military personnel: 18-25: 258 active duty military personnel 26-40: 60 active duty military personnel 41-60: 17 active duty military personnel 61+: 1 active duty military personnel UN Human Rights Office (UN OCHA) PA Civilians 2008-2023: 2008 - 2,325 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 1,440. 2009 - 6,401 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 103. 2010 - 1,572 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 81. 2011 - 4,677 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 118. 2012 - 3,992 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 255. 2014 - 17,533 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 1,492. 2015 - 14,639 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 169. 2016 - 3,464 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 109. 2017 - 8,447 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 77. 2018 - 31,259 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 300. 2019 - 15,491 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 138. 2020 - 2,581 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 30. 2021 - 19,183 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 349. 2022 - 10,345 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 191. 2023 up to September - 8,508 Wounded Civilians, Deaths 227. Wounded includes: amputees from the deliberate targeting of knees by snipers, white phosphorous third degree body burns, etc -Yocheved Lifshitz account - 'they treated us well' -Yasmin Porat account - 'i.T.f kxilled my husband' civilians were taken to have swaps for the civilians rotting in prisons without charge on the other side. An excess of ten thousands, all before the seventh haaretz datasheet titled title: xsraxl's Dead: The Names of Those Killed in Hxmxs Attacks, Mxssxcres and the xsrxel-Hxmxs Wxr There is a more detailed report of of oct 7th titled "I scrapped the information about 1096 of the 1460 killed on 7th of October Attack. Children Less than 1%" In the Tantura (2022) documentary there is a iTf man who says that they took a pregnant woman, made bets whether the baby is a boy or a girl, disemboweled and cut her stomach open to check who won, another one talking about school children who were raising their the hands, the same way kids do in a classroom, after he rounded them up. He then kept firing. Both laughing merrily and casually at the recollection. In another documentary '1948: Creation & Catastrophe', a survivor speaks about women getting violated infront of their family members by iTf. She was a child at the time and still wept as an elderly woman. For more recent atrocities, "Breaking the Silence" record statements by the iTf themselves, they recount the events witht he same casualty their forebears do. The "Costs of War" study by brown in 2021 has these figures for the past 20 years of engagement of US policy: indirect deaths 4.5-4.7 million, direct 905-940,000 , in other words 6 million deaths and 38 million displaced. This is relevant because of the Oded Yinon Plan.
More on the Oded Yinon plan - According to the founding father of zionism, theodore hertzel, the area of the jewish state stretches from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates; the promised land extends from the river of Egypt up to the Euphrates and includes parts of Syria and Lebanon; when viewed in the current context including the siege on Gaza the zionist plan for the middle east bears an intimate relationship to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the 2006 war in Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya and Syria and the continued crisis in Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political crisis in the kingdom of saudi Arabia. In the 1980s an article written by a former senior official with the israeli foreign ministry in which israel shahak wrote a forward to which says "in my opinion the accurate and detailed plan of the present zionist regime of ariel sharon for the middle east which is based on the division of the whole area into small states and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states." The argument of the Oded Yinon plan was that the world was witnessing a new epoch in history without precedent which required both the development of a fresh perspective and an operational strategy to implement it. The nationalist and humanist foundations of western civilization were in a state of collapse and in the 1980s the west was disintegrating before the combined onslaught of the cold war into the soviet union in the third world, a phenomenon he believed was accompanied by an upsurge in anti-semitism, all of which meant that israel would become the last safe haven for jews to seek refuge and so he had a couple of blueprints for the middle east which included Egypt, Jordan, the west bank, Lebanon, syria and Iraq. Its publication was actually celebrated by william haddad an american political operative and lobbyist in which he caused the publication to become an uproar, a celebration of sorts that the united states neoconservative party would grow in tantamount with the israeli zionists for the control of the Middle East. In a article written in 2011 the 'Yinon plan was a continuation of britain's colonial design in the middle east "the unarmed plan is an israeli strategic plan to ensure israeli regional superiority and it insists and stipulates that israel must reconfigure its geopolitical environment so the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states", and of course viewed in this context the war on Syria and Iraq which ended is part of the process of israeli territorial expansion.
These are lots of interesting points, but you fail to acknowledge any of Hamas' wrongdoings or simply toss them aside as nothing. Remember that Hamas attacked first - and they have expressed in written documents their desire to destroy the Jewish in Israel - not just Israel itself, but all the Jewish people in it. They have forced their own people (with lethal force) to stay within zones demanded to be evacuated, simply as an excuse to use them as meat shields. Israel has certainly done bad things in this conflict, notably some disgraceful bombings of areas that never should've been bombed in the first place, but we must consider the other side - the fact that Hamas is a known terrorist organization where Israel is a democratic country's government. I hope you've seen the videos of October 7th, btw - and the pictures of the aftermath of the music festival. @@mznxbcv12345
For anyone who's curious, the original source is 'A Fox in Space'. Not the real audio, of course. It's actually really cool to see that Joe knows about him.
If an animator so much as makes ONE video that isn't an animation, people immediately think something is wrong; the reality is that animation takes time, any other kind of video doesn't take as long to make, and animators (who are people, capable of making any other "content" aside from animations) sometimes make this kinds of videos because they are easier and more fun to make. So what if he shares his political views? Why do people get so butt-hurt when others do that? Half of what one can see on TV is people arguing about politics! Hell, one can even have the frequent chance to see straight up professional politics! Are they all mad for sharing their opinions with the world? Is it so strange, to disagree with another person, that one should wish to expunge this experience from existence? Let the man make his goddamn shitposts in peace!
i was scared the guy who made fox in space was a zionist but apparently the sound is from some zionist girl on a pedestal yelling. video’s funny either way
*the palestinian child looking up at the bomb about to land on his house "it's already too late, habibi. Ukinojoe has already depicted me as the chad wolf and you as the seething incel fox."
i mean he seems to be in the same place he was a year ago, just expressing his bitterness about a particularly stressful political issue instead of mostly about his career and industry
This is 100% some kind of meltdown and also isn't a new thing. He went off the deep end in recent years. iirc his sister is the author of a fairly successful long running webcomic while he lets all be honest here still known as just "that guy who made the dog video that was popular around tumblr for a little bit" and this made him seethe with jealousy. He started posting weird political shit on his socials and I think he accused some industry people of grooming or something and now outside of this channel he's an AI shill.
@@snowdevil002 True. Some real ignorant shit right there dude, it's obvious this person subtly bootlicks israel and assumes no one cares for anything other than "dog of wisdom", despite him having done much more before that (great the show being ONE of them). As soon as someone who people like starts saying something they don't want to hear, they'll be keen to call them crazy to deny their enjoyment of their content. It's also obvious this person doesn't watch the streams.
I don't even know why people got upset over that in the first place. NFT hate came from the fact that large operations were mass-producing them using bots by the thousands for no other reason than greed. Joe sold his own work that he made because he needed extra cash. Three years later and people keep talking about it as if he murdered a puppy or something.
What’s going on man, are you alright? This is a ridicules amount of reposts and poop videos and community posts, what is going on with you? Are you good?
hrmm I will post funne video making fun of nations who fight over desolate grains of sand.. people will argue and be clueless but all in all it will be funnie - Joe probably
@@spikeal5296 Isreal backed the development of Hamas and the IDF shot Palestinians when they marched peacefully. What do you expect to happen under such circumstances?
@@fatcat1414 Israel backed the development of Palestine, not Hamas. Hamas developed on their own and seized democratic elections, using funding coming into Gaza to dig tunnels instead of supply food and water for their people. I honestly did expect them to attack eventually. Doesn't make it any more justifiable...
@@heymay724 what’s so hard for you people to condemn Hamas no seriously it’s not necessary to side with Israel or agree with them to call Hamas on its bs
@@Sufganiyot Your problem is trusting Israel in that 1/3 killed were HAMAS. Also, 1% of a country is still a huge fucking amount. And 2/3 killed being civilians? Even buttered up by Israel that stat is fucking evil. You are supporting serial murderers.
@@Sufganiyot "according to Israel 1/3 of people killed were Hamas." You're falling for one of the most ineffective propaganda campaigns in history. Let's rephrase your statistic: IDF is killing 2 civilians for every member of Hamas. Shock aside, do you suppose that number is even accurate, given an estimated 10,000 Palestinian child deaths (nearly 60% of casualties in Palestine are women over 14 and children)? Even if your 66% civilian death number is accurate, it is higher than the average for all world conflicts between WWII and 2000. But we can be almost certain that it's not accurate, because the number of Hamas militant casualties you postulate is actually much closer to the number of men killed in the Gaza strip at all. So unless every male in Gaza is a Hamas militant, I don't think it really holds up. I say this all not to embarrass or belittle you, but in the hopes that you realize (in spite of what Hamas has done) that Israel is commiting a massive war crime.
with how often and aggressively certain people get up his ass over nothing I really doubt it bothers him. Doesn't even matter if Gafford personally finds the thought of using AI in his own work abhorrent, surely he's smart enough to know the internet will do what it does and having a big crying tantrum over it will do nothing to stop it.