I’ve seen fights, where, a fighter will get credited for shots landed and you have to ask yourself “when did he land those?”. Something needs to be done there. Not sure what but there are better minds than me for that kind of thing
@@tristhekidthat happens a lot Jose Luis Castillo landed 68 shots more vs mayweather first fight never got the decision it was mayweather controlled the pace or showed ring generalship how? When you were literally getting out boxed and Brandon vs Stephan Fulton Brandon outlanded Fulton by 40+ and had him hurt and they say Fulton landed the more meaningful or showed ring generalship I think these rules only apply to some fighters
well for one, your getting your info of the punches landed or not landed from compubox. Despite the name it is not a computer scoring punches. It is 2 people sitting ringside with 4 buttons. Jab landed, jab missed, power landed, power missed. Like Chris Algeri said, boxing punches are incredibly fast and these 2 guys have to watch every punch while pressing buttons. They may have a bad angle for parts of rounds. Also, compubox is notoriously biased. Especially back in the hbo days. So in your example of Castillo vs Mayweather, Castillo threw a lot that fight and missed a lot. Even if he landed more that doesn't mean they were clean. So the percentages probably favored Mayweather. Then you gotta think about the 4 factors of scoring. EFFECTIVE aggression, ring generalship, clean punches and defense. As for the Figueroa vs Fulton fight from what I remember, Brandon fought in spurts. The rounds he did win, he won big but having the best round doesn't mean you win the whole fight.
I got an idea. Let them fight until the fight is stopped or someone gets knocked out. The doctor, the ref, and the corner have to be extra attentive though so no one gets killed.
The way hustlers on RU-vid are using AI is just to make really bad boxing channels, narrated by almost-human voices. They're pretty gross, actually. I prefer channels like this because I'm not a machine. But if AI can help the fighters get fair calls, I'm all for that.
Thank God you guys are finally talking about this! The AI fight tracking had Usyk winning 10 rounds of that fight with Fury! They had 30 cameras tracking the action and while the fight was competitive, Usyk was clearly winning those rounds. Yet, with the crooked/incompetent judging, he needed that knockdown to not lose/draw the fight. Get these awful judges out of the sport. The AI sees it all. Takes the subjectivity nonsense out of the sport which allows promoters to rob fights for A-side fighters. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FcF2NvkhtJ8.html
Honestly I feel like it's neccesary to have instant replay. Like all other sports should be able to review ut and proceed with the decision afterwards.
Fan man probably saved Bowe from a KO. Let’s get real. Let’s stop the Fury revisionism. Most thought Holyfield edged Lewis in the rematch and beat Valuev when he was 90 years old. The myth that big heavyweights usually beat normal sized heavyweights needs to be disavowed by all.
I’d rather AI judge a fight honestly. It’ll be fair and accurate. I also believe like most sports there should be play review process to make sure certain things are called accurately
If any of you watch football (soccer) in Europe, there's been big problems with using video replay technology. They get decisions wrong constantly and take forever to make them
Boxing in general has been slow to change, and this is just an example of it. There are other tech changes that can improve all aspects of the game, from the medical to the logistics and to the very judging of bouts. Problem is everyone is comforatble in their jobs, and are resistant to change.
@@LeoHighpurpose true, but my point is that the corrupted judge would be exposed in the moment, that would be good for the fans and fighters, and the broadcasters would have to speak on it as well
