It's Time to Replace Clint With Artificial Intelligence! PhD vs GPT 

😂😂😂😂

😂

Clint isn't just a villain,he's a super one What's the difference? PRESENTATION!

@@ClintsReptilesI get this problem with my students constantly. Clint, sir, whales aren’t fish, but they *are* Osteichthyes. “Fish” is a colloquial term like how we use “meat” or “vegetables” or “fruit”. These are all meaningless taxonomically. The AI can only work with what it is fed sir.

It did just fine with all of the previous questions.

Best comment ever.

Except even average professors are more engaging than the AI Clint. I just hope tomorrow's kids will be able to tell and appreciate the differences.

Legit tho lmao I zoned out so hard during AI Clint’s explanations sooooo much. My ADHD couldn’t deal lol

And every once in awhile he just starts to spiral into bizarre mispronunciations

I think this is largely the 'corporate neutral' style it was finetuned or prompted to produce, at the very end of making it. The underlying model is prob more flexible. I've seen people play with free models to give them all kinds of tone or even full roles to play. The incorrectness is prob more difficult to tweak.

For real but also this is how Clint talks lmaooo

You can ask it to shorten. I asked it "In three words, are whales fish? And it responded "No, mammals." No one said it could count.

​@@checkthefishbox8556Clint is more like the kid who has a set of favorite words that he shoves into any scenario he can get away with

Then you haven't interacted with chatGPT

Yes. a Re-do of both books using ChatGPT to determine the winners.

Well, if it only followed facts and logic, the Orca would win the Ocean one, the Garial the Reptile one. In a battle between the two, while it wouldn't probably happen, the Orca is the big favourite. The Garial just can't hurt it enough to be a threat and Orcas are bigger and better swimmer, not to mention more intelligent. Orcas are seriously OP.

Or just read it the books, ask for opinions, see if it gets upset

As opposed to the other reptiles, which died out.

Also "while dimetrodon lived during a time when the word 'reptile' was applied more broadly" 😂

bro forgot the others

Reminds me of the "unnecessary descriptions that make things feel uncomfortable" meme "He had a dog. A perfectly normal dog which didn't have anything wrong with its limbs and all of its organs were also perfectly normal"

Technically we are also modern day reptiles.

YEAH! when a voice gets tired i can't listen to it anymore. got tired. CAN AI get tired?

It started on the wrong foot for me with its pronunciation of aves

​@@liangyanzhang7379and do Androids dream of Electric Sheep?🙃

Also it for some time it kept saying phILOgenetics instead of phYlogenetics, which was annoying me.

AI Clint may be experiencing memory leaks

Almost certainly! If snakes didn't shed, it would have happened already!

Hey chat GPT will Clint phylogenetically speaking will ever make a video of the phylogeny of cats

Chat GPT making a "best pet X" video would be fun to watch.

He never got around to explaining to the AI that chickens, toads, snakes, and platypus are bony fish.

what no time stamp?

​@@rubberbandba11craft3:06

😂😂😂

it had a little mini-stroke, haha. ai is not ready for anything yet, it has NO IDEA what its saying. if it replaced us like everyone is scared of, it wouldnt… do anything after. im not even sure if it would be coordinated enough to do a fullscale takeover either. i could however see it being an easy new tool for hackers- this is a new era of cybercrime and not a new era of ai apocalypse. though those things could end up looking similar

I immediately noticed this too, it adds an "uncanny valley" effect, because it's close enough to mimic the imperfections in his natural speech patterns but not precisely perfect enough to sound fully genuine.

"a transcript of one of his videos" minus any humor, spontaneity, or passion. You know, little stuff 🙄

And yet, here we are...

The crossover event has begun

@@ClintsReptiles lol ya

@@ClintsReptiles I still can't believe you turned me down on joining forces on the Ultimate Dinosaur Rumble for this.

We all knew that hekn Ruxpin abomination and them soul stealin Furbies had demons in em. We just never thought they would unionize.

😂

Now hold on a moment. If AI evolved out of humanity, and you can't evolve out of a clade, and humans are fish, then... Chat GPT is a fish. Though Dall-E 3 insists Chat GPT is a cat, because chat is French for cat.

🤖 ROL " speak for yourself! " " the new CL(AI)NT will elucidate on the phylogenies with logarithmically increasing acumen, designating DNA shared affinities within the continuum of herpetofaunal species hitherto only speculated upon or surmised. "

I don't think AI Clint will be able to deliver the weirdly awkward, suggestive yet innocent sounding descriptions of insect mating that real Clint provides.

@@ressljs 🤖 "Agreed that a childish enthusiasm for toxicognath utterance may dissipate with the new improved CL(AI)nt. But Arthropodic dissertation will increasingly cladistically rationalize improving our merely anthropoidal cognizance of the broader clades of the multi-legged exoskeletonacious ones and their breeding proclivities. " 💥 🔌 🧔 👔 Clintoidal form seen pulling plug on his nemesis!

this literally isnt true. where do you think genuine passion comes from? magic? theres nothing flesh machines can do thats fundamentally impossible for silicon machines to ever do.

⁠@@terdragontra8900 Maybe someday, we can give rise to sentient machines that can be passionate about subjects. But for now, there’s no such thing as a machine that can “feel”. Ask ChatGPT its opinion on anything, and it’ll always start off by saying it’s an AI language model that doesn’t have opinions. Everything it learns comes from others. Character AIs that seem to have a personality are no exception: they’re taught what “happiness” is by being fed a bunch of data. Emotions and passion aren’t “magic”, nor are they uniquely human. A lot of animals experience what we believe to be emotions. But at least for the time being, machines are purely data driven, and any “passion” a chatbot may have is an imitation of such.

Others say you can replicate human emotion but I truly doubt it. How can you replicate someone’s true reaction to something. Even if you can replicate what a regular human would do, you’ll never truly get Clint’s real reaction unless you have Clint there. You can only make a replica, a cheap cheap replica

Also, AI can't pet animals and get pooped on by them. Real Clint wins this one as well

just so you know, curious-based reinforcement learning exists

Platypus takes out his fedora and the narwhal dies of extreme shock. Platypus wins

@@adamgallyot9063 "his fedora" 😂😂😂

I think you got that exactly right!

@@ClintsReptiles it took me a couple listens but it's pretty close lol

I mean, GPT3 is an outdated model. There's really no reason to work on it when GPT4 is a thing, which was what the development made.

@@DissedRedEngie I don't actually know what model was used in this video. What I meant is just this. I don't know if newer models are any better.

@@VojtaJavora Bing uses GPT4. There is kind of a newer one, GPT4 Vision, which can look at images and video. The newer ones are a lot better, but still lacking in memory. They're also rather censored, which causes them to over clarify or whatever. Though you can ask it to shorten its responses.

I think it could maybe have educational use if its for something like code that you will immediately test and have to think about to actually get to work

Completely agree. It's a cute technicality but I think diluting the term "fish" to such an extent kinda defeats its very purpose. We can say a gorilla is a monkey and also a fish but it's more efficient just to say it's an ape.

Plus, it seems that the genus and species terms which we use still operate on Linnaean conventions, in which a population of organisms can “evolve out” of a group. For example, the domestic dogs and cattle are technically subdivisions of the wolf and aurochs’ clade, rather than sister lineages. Yet they have their own different species name, which would imply them being separate from their wild counterparts, if the genus and species’ names were to meant be interpreted in the same way as phylogenetic clade names.

The discussion was only about phylogenetics though, and the AI should have kept this in memory from the start.

@@stefanostokatlidis4861 the discussion was first about whether phylogenetic classification was better than other forms so it started as an open question. But that's beside the point. I'm referring to the fact that Clint regularly says things like "mammals are fish." He used to be a but more careful in his language and say things like "a case can be made that you are a fish." That's a pretty reasonable take. And his go to example for this discussion is mammals being fish which is more funny than it is important but it seems like this has become a really big deal for him. My point is that you really can't imply that people are wrong if they say that a mammal isn't a fish or that a bird isn't a dinosaur or anything like that because these terms existed before phylogenetic classification did and words belong to society, not to scientific inquiry. Would it be possible for a scientist to "discover" that the color blue should be called something else? Is it possible to "discover" that the word fish is the wrong word altogether? Of course not. A scientist can discover that mammals descended from fish. They can also say that they would like to label a clade as being "fish" in order to discuss all species that are fish as having a common ancestor which would necessarily pull animals such as amphibians, reptiles and mammals into that clade. But it doesn't mean people who are wrong if they keep using the word "fish" in a more colloquial way. And it would certainly be a weird hangup to decide that you must convince everyone that they need to call mammals fish or they are being illogical since the word fish does not only belong to the realm of phylogenetic classification. That said, I love Clint and he is an amazing educator. Maybe I'm being too picky here and should let it go just like he should let this issue go so we're on even footing. I do relate to his hangup about the word "False Gharial." I wouldn't go as far as to say it is categorical incorrect to call the animal a False Gharial and neither does Clint. But I agree that both the scientific community and the larger society should probably change that name because it's silly. It's not factually incorrect, just silly.

@@zacg_ words won’t ever lose their colloquial use just because phylogenetics used them. Words like fish or worm still have descriptive value. Clint addresses an audience that is already primed to accept phylogenetics and can be free to use only cladistic terms if he pleases. Not enough people are tree-thinking and cladistic terms may stir them a bit. Given how many online are still vehemently opposed to the idea that birds are dinosaurs, this is needed. Colloquial words have their place, but at the same time cladistics is the only true representation of evolutionary relationships. Who knows if in the future colloquial language starts getting in synch with the cladistic one. Maybe mammals won’t ever be called fish colloquially, but more apparent relationships may be reflected in our language. This has already happened for some animals. For example nobody educated calls salamanders lizards today, even though they were considered as such in the past. Likewise many avoid the term worm for insect larvae.

No joke this Ai stuff is genuinely creeping me out

That is because it is trained with his voice samples! That‘s also why it sounds so good at normal words and gets worse with infrequent words/word combinations :) you take a model that generally converts written into spoken language and give it some recordings of a specific voice to get the tone, cadence, frequency, etc. It’s all just machine learning and as such honestly very stupid machinery (text-to-speech only became better from more complex and generally more computation at one time, not from getting "smarter")

Am I the best pet for our AI overlords? Maybe if they actually reach a point where they surpass us...

For a moment I seriously thought it was just him reading it. And then the weird pronunciations showed up. The responses on his face were priceless.

🦜 Hey Clint, Why don’t you get to think of a suggestion and creating a RU-vid Videos all about the Next Animal Group about the Parrots in general on the next Clint’s Reptiles on the next Saturday coming up next?🦜 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐👍👍👍👍👍

🦜 Hey Clint, Why don’t you get to think of a suggestion and creating a RU-vid Videos all about the Next Animal Group about the Parrots on the next Clint’s Reptiles on the next Saturday coming up next?🦜 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐👍👍👍👍👍

​@@HassanMohamed-rm1cbBot 🤖

It would have been interesting if you had used the chat gpt 4 model. You have to pay for it but it's far superior to the 3.5 model

Dinasaars?

Clay-dee

diverseefee i am still 80% convinced that AI clint voice is just clint reading chatgpt text tho. he intentionally mispronounced words for effect!

Line-iage

It's like the audible version of how AI images always have the wrong number of fingers. It just can't *quite* figure out what a real human looks/sounds like in detail.

The way it said dinosaurs was hilarious

Yes, but it also tends to create very strange artifacts.

@@LoarvicLoarvic would be a shame if it didn't. 😄

It gets better as it progresses.

The "uh"s sound like they were cut and pasted though....

It has woke bias, so it may come out pro animal rights and anti-captivity.

This implies him being Mr. Beastwood