I love how the rest of the table is completely silent here. Even the rail is keeping quiet. A lot of professionalism in this room, and very different from other games.
nothing profesional about it phil ivey thinks he is the king and there is no one else at the table so he takes his sweet ass time to make one move i would called clock on him 1 minute in im not gonna wait 10 minutes for one hand
Fair play to Patrick. Took his time. Made a decision. Lost and calmly handed over the money. No dummy spit about getting unlucky. Took full responsibility for his decision.
@@twown Yeah i agree! But i really think Ivey knew Dwan was bluffing too. He saved Tom with that 1 lol. God bless you in Jesus name Amen! I love poker man! Be safe!
The issue was caused by the prop bets they were having. Based on Ivey's opening raise size he was not allowed to have an ace in his hand. As a result of this Antonius knew it was jacks or nothing.
I know it's easy to criticize any poker play after seeing the hand and the result, but I think it's obvious Patrick should have folded on the river. Unless he puts Phil on a stone bluff (a flush draw that missed?) there's really no legit hand he can beat. Phil's flop bet and re-raise looks like it has to be AK, AQ, AJ or JJ. It's pretty hard to put Phil on a flush draw or a weak Ace with that re-raise.
Feel like it wasn't the best call (Obviously I know the cards). Phil did a great job i think of sending some false tells. Given the betting pattern he Obviously knew at the end he could only beat a bluff. It's hard as some players have taken pots down with bluffs of that size.
@@dmtc6913 of course it would. original commenter is right raise goes out the window once patrik’s body language says what it says in the clip. Ivey mustve been somewhat relieved because even though im pretty sure he wasnt afraid of AQ/A5, theres always a chance.
@@mrx7181 i mean doing this act with AQ. Would only make it look stronger to me. Still a snap call as he didn't have much behind. Anyway silly hand. Massive overplay on the flop by Antonius gets action almost only from hands that beat him, unless he expects Ivey to open all kinds of trash offsuit aces.
@@dmtc6913 antonious can get a reasonable amount of action from worse with flop raise given the history between these two. thats the only reason i dont hate the play even though im on your side; in any other situation AT with the ten of clubs should be a call. entire hand is essentially a leveling war and you have to take that into account.
The good ole days where shows didn’t pay players boatloads of money just to be present. Room was completely silent. Now players act like they’re on free rolls and pro players yap during big hands
Ivey clearly didn't know where he was after that Queen hit the river. Tell he was contemplating checking but he just couldn't do it, then once Antonius did his act he knew he had him. I don't really see how he bet the river and I don't see how Antonius called, I think these days that hand would have played completely different.
What’s baffling to me is how Antonius in the face of a pair in the community cards continues to call Phil Ivey‘s bets. Even for Ivy this is too much of a bluff. Antonius should’ve known that he’s dealing with a full house.
It's 110 years ago. Even Patrick had a 10c 😏 He blocked all Ivey's FD and called to catch a bluff ? Oh man, after seeing this vid I just realised how far we've gone In modern days someone could've shoved on river just to turn his hand into a bluff especially if holds a 10c
How is the 10c even relevant if Ivey has a full house? He's not semi-bluffing with any flush draw here when he makes it 50K on the flop. That would be stupid when you could be drawing absolutely dead or some of your outs are dead as well. He also has to figure when Antonius calls, he has an ace and basically nothing else. I know people like to think poker has evolved a ton but it really hasn't. The 10C is irrelevant here.
@@ijustwannaleaveacommentony6511 Ivey wasn't allowed to have an Ace in his hand given the opening raise size he used. So Antonius knew it was jacks or nothing.
Can someone tell me what I'm missing please? Antonius has 1 ace + 2 aces on the table = 3 total aces, Ivey has 2 jacks + 1 jack on the table = 3 total jacks. Why doesn't Antonius win? Don't 3 Aces beat 3 jacks?
Never understood Patrick’s call here. You beat absolutely no value. Had to be a pure bluff but Phil showed strength pre thru the river. They played so much together I believe Patrick just overthought the whole hand. I could almost get behind a all in if he had a lot back since he blocks AQ and AJ. But. Phil was down so much I don’t think he is folding. Patrick could easily rep AJ, AQ or A5 suited. I don’t think either had enough left to make that move though
Such a scary board for both players really.. I know Phil has the winner, but it’s one of the worst feelings to have an under pair to aces and flop a full house with your set over Aces because you’re always thinking, “another face hits the board, now what? 😂 their trips could’ve just boated up easily making JJ 💩
AJ never raises flop (wouldve probably 3 bet pre anyways), AQ almost always 3 bets pre so its very unlikely Patrik has that when Q hits the river, and QQ KK and AK wouldve always 3 bet pre so we dont have to worry about any cards coming off. only bad river is a five. if patrik hits his side card so be it.
That's why he is betting a relatively high amount . He wants to force Antonius to define his hand. If Phil hears all-in , i am sure he will not be thrilled about that.
@@chessbrilliance8783 you’re absolutely right an all in from patrik on the river would be terrifying for JJ. shrinks up from a sick value betting hand to a bad bluff catcher in that moment. most likely way for patrik to have JJ beat is A5s which could still move in on the river because its unlikely Ivey bet 3 bets flop with AQ and almost impossible for him to do that with AJ (locking up board so heavily). Ivey’s value bets by the river are mostly jacks full and maybe a bit of AK.
I dunno why are they thinking for so long especially when it's about call or flop. They should learn some math so they could crunch the numbers faster ...
I watch but have never played. Interesting game and want to learn strategy. Just was perplexed why Ivy didn’t go all in. Antonius may have called, thinking Ivey was bluffing.
Very Bad raise on the flop for Antonius, very bad bet on the river for Ivey, and very very bad call on the river for antonius, he was blocking all bluffs with that 10
Just because he doesn't play big events anymore, does not mean he went broke. He lives in Monte Carlo and has over £12M in winnings that people know of. This does not include cash games.
i would have never made that call. what can you beat? cant beat ak nor aq nor jj nor aj. terrible call. i dont see ivy putting in 350 k on missed clubs.
@@martinworld7214 I'm not sure what you mean exactly. All I was saying is while Ivey was in the tank for 5 minutes I tried to figure what was the most he could bet and get called, which is what he was thinking I assume, and I came up with the same number he did. Not saying that makes me a pro or anything. I just got this one right lol I don't think Patrick would have called a penny more and that's why Ivey has been the top dog for 20+ years.
If you think about it a little bit, you only beat a bluff, what are the odds of that? very very low, you lose against JJ, AK, AJ, AQ, QQ, A5, TK....there were some side bets, as Patrick explained later, that maybe made the call reasonable
Mainly he's worried about AK and JJ. AJ is very unlikely, AQ and QQ also very unlikely. Phil probably never plays QQ that way. He also blocks AK there's only one single combo in the deck. Same for AQ and AJ. He's only worried about a few combos. He's also explained there were some props that may have swayed him to call. There's many more combos he beats. Any weaker ace besides A5. Any big flush or straight draw. He could have KQc. Maybe Phil bluffed him an hour earlier mayeb hes got the other A10. The way the action played it totally could have made sense for him to have the big club draw, barreled the turn missed the river then bombed. Doesn't want to check fold all that money when he's already down. It's not a horrible call in my opinion
@@11pupona Obviously not the same exact line and spot lol but similar ones sure he has sure, Patrick knows he's capable of it. I'm sure that played a part in him calling. Against Doyle he's gonna fold.
Poker is not worth the frustration anymore since this actors take so long all the youn players do the same texesholdem ruined poker .can't find a draw game when cards were real!!!! Put a 30 sec clock or the game isn't worth the theatrics Phil hellmouth is the proof........
