Тёмный

J.S. Bach - Suite in E minor (for Lautenclavier), BWV 996 (c. 1710) 

Bartje Bartmans
Подписаться 110 тыс.
Просмотров 26 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

15 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 27   
@canalnomas
@canalnomas 8 месяцев назад
Me encantó esta versión para clavecín! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
@RodericSpode
@RodericSpode 2 года назад
This is my favorite suite of Bach's. I've never heard it on anything but a guitar or lute before though. Sounds great on harpsichord. Thanks for uploading it. From what I've read about the lautenklavier, tonally it is almost indistinguishable from a lute. But I'd still like to hear it played on one, and actually see it played too.
@AlexH4774
@AlexH4774 Год назад
There's a video of a lute suite (BWV 997) being played on one here on RU-vid.
@thomasneuber2740
@thomasneuber2740 2 года назад
... the music was already perfect in his head. That is why Bach could write it down almost as printed. His music is universal and unsurpassed.
@zeldathomas3498
@zeldathomas3498 2 года назад
I played sections of this in high school on vibraphone of all instruments, following the chain of Lautenklavier - lute - guitar - keyboard percussion. Fond memories.
@notaire2
@notaire2 2 года назад
Wunderschöne und detaillierte Interpretation dieser perfekt komponierten Suite für Lautenklavier in verschiedenen Tempi mit schimmerndem doch warmherzigem Klang des technisch fehlerlosen Cembalos und mit sorgfältig kontrollierter Dynamik. Wahrhaft intelligenter und unvergleichlicher Musiker!
@Sherlock_Violin
@Sherlock_Violin 2 года назад
Amazing, Thanks for the upload as always! I always wanted to arrange these for violin and I think I will after I have finished my current project...
@dsm2240
@dsm2240 2 года назад
Here is a really obscure question. How much of an expense for Bach was manuscript paper? He used a huge quantity of it.
@lauterunvollkommenheit4344
@lauterunvollkommenheit4344 2 года назад
From Yo Tomita's PhD thesis: "In Bach's Weimar period, the price of 480 thick sheets (1 Ries Doppel-Papier) was 2 fl. 6 gr. This figure may be compared to Bach's basic salary 250 fl. per annum at the time".
@dsm2240
@dsm2240 2 года назад
@@lauterunvollkommenheit4344 Thank you!
@fellow7091
@fellow7091 7 месяцев назад
​@@lauterunvollkommenheit4344Maybe his rich employeers paid the papiers off?
@lordchameleon2650
@lordchameleon2650 2 года назад
Omg this audio quality is amazing
@fredericchopin7538
@fredericchopin7538 2 года назад
Delightful!
@lewisjones2666
@lewisjones2666 2 года назад
If, as is widely accepted, the manuscript was copied by the elder Krebs, Johann Tobias (1690 - 1762), relatively early in the eighteenth century, it seems likely that the rubric "aufs lauten werck" was added rather later, as the vogue for the lautenwerck in Germany seems to have been in the middle years of the century. Might it have been added by J. T.'s son, Johann Ludwig Krebs (1713 - 1780), who was taught and esteemed by Bach in his later years, when he would have had the lautenwercken left when he died. It seems unlikely that Bach had a lautenwerck in 1710-1717, posited by Wolf as the period in which J. T. Krebs copied the "Praeludio con la Suite", or that he would have composed the work with that instrument in particular in mind.
@peterwatchorn411
@peterwatchorn411 2 года назад
Lewis: do you know the date of Bach's reported interaction with Zacharias Hildebrandt concerning the Lautenwerck? Like BWV 997 and BWV 998, this work seems to remain low in tessitura (although BWV 997 is written out with the upper voice an octave higher than I think it should be performed (I play the upper parts down an octave, where I think it sounds correct)). And how many of these survive in tablature? Regards, PW
@lewisjones2666
@lewisjones2666 2 года назад
@@peterwatchorn411 Thank you for this Peter. The reference in Adlung to Bach's lautenwerk made by Zacharias Hildebrandt is to its having been heard in Leipzig in about 1740. I don't know of a recorded interaction between the two specifically in connection with that instrument. They were acquainted from the 1720s; we might reasonably conjecture that the earliest likely date might be 1727, when Hildebrandt went to Leipzig to restore part of the organ of the Thomaskirche at Bach's instigation. Of course, we can't be certain that Bach didn't have a lautenwerk earlier than that, but I'm skeptical that he would have had one in his late twenties or early thirties, the apparent time of copying of this suite by the elder Krebs. (In 1985 I tried to make a partly conjectural reconstruction of Hildebrandt's instrument, with two gut-strung registers and a brass-strung 4ft.) I will add a note about the works surviving in lute tablature shortly, but I'll need to check some details. Most of the tablatures are relatively late; they don't attest either to Bach having been interested in the lute in 1710-17, or to lutenists having been interested in his music at that time.
@peterwatchorn411
@peterwatchorn411 2 года назад
@@lewisjones2666 Yes, that's the window I thought: c. 1727-1740. Original Lautenwercks are like pedal harpsichords: descriptions exist but no original instruments. The pedal harpsichord I use is based on the scaling of the 1734 16' Hass. Unlike most of these, the instrument has a normal string spacing, fitting under the main instrument, raised off the floor and connected to the pedalboard by a transfer box (a bit like a Vorsetzer player piano). My dating of BWV 996 would be based on its extreme French-ness (the courante especially). Whenever they were composed, BWV 996-8 are gems, highly effective when played on a good harpsichord. P
@christopherfreud5894
@christopherfreud5894 2 года назад
Avec la "bourrée" reprise par Jethro Tull :-)
@BaroqueBach.
@BaroqueBach. 7 месяцев назад
11:45 start of the famous Bourree
@wonkim5166
@wonkim5166 Месяц назад
Does anybody play this on the organ?
@tarikeld11
@tarikeld11 2 года назад
Is there a difference between Lautenklavier/Harpsichord/Clavichord?
@bartjebartmans
@bartjebartmans 2 года назад
Here is an explanation: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lautenwerck
@lewisjones2666
@lewisjones2666 2 года назад
@@bartjebartmans The 20th-century instrument depicted there is exceptional in having a huge lute-like body. We might note here that most of the 18th-century descriptions of the lautenwerck indicate that it was essentially harpsichord-shaped, albeit shorter, rather than lute-shaped.
@johnhudelson2652
@johnhudelson2652 2 года назад
@@lewisjones2666 As I understand, a Lautenwerk also had gut strings.
@lewisjones2666
@lewisjones2666 2 года назад
@@johnhudelson2652 Yes indeed. Some, like that by Hildebrandt described by Adlung, additionally had a register with brass strings at 4ft pitch.
@mugisinja
@mugisinja Год назад
2:47
@АлексейМартышкин-э8с
По-моему, звучит обычный клавесин, а не лаутенверк.
Далее
J.S.Bach-English Suite No.2 a minor BWV 807
19:26
Просмотров 7 тыс.
J. S. Bach: Lute Suite in E Major
19:39
Просмотров 120 тыс.
J.S. Bach - Twenty Little Preludes, BWV 924-943 (1720)
30:12
J.S.Bach Suite e-moll BWV 996
17:22
Просмотров 312 тыс.