Japan's Peach Air - What are they like? 

its nice watch again a handsome aviation geek 💖💖💖💖

Hi, Josh. I really like your videos. As I am Japanese, I will give you a tip. By the Japanese privacy Law, you can't take or videotape other people's face without their consent. You must blurr their face. I'm sure you want to avoid any troubles. By the way, some airlines don't dim the lights for the cabin crews to see what's going on the cabin. That is also the safety procedure from another perspective.

When you gonna review Air Belavia ?

Josh Cahill COME TO OMAN 🇴🇲 and review Salam air .

@@user-ec7xw6yo7q you are right about the taking pictures. For the safety you are wrong though. Lights need to be turned off for take off and landing. Cabin crew need to ensure that they are ready incase of anything. It is unlikely but just in case.

Turning on lights doesn't cost any money on a plane. It's not like our homes.

@@anubhavmitra8928 While this is true, it isn't the same as our homes at all and it isn't charged the same, you do realise that the electricity still comes from somewhere. In the case of a plane, I'd imagine it comes from onboard batteries, like a car. If this is the case, the OP's comment is still valid, as it would save money over time, using less of the battery and having it last longer.

@@ElusiveTy electricity comes from generators that are fitted on the engines' accessory gearboxes. Long story short, more electricy needed = more fuel burnt = more cost.

@@ElusiveTy the battery on a car is only used to start it and power auxiliary systems with the ignition on but engine off. During operation all electrical power comes from the alternator. A jet powered airliner uses batteries even less, as it has its own onboard generator for use when main engines aren’t running and uses compressed air to start.

hahahaha

good information tho...!

it seems that the law isn't safe at all

It might not be a law but it would make a lot of sense, so that is not a valid defense IMO. It is not a law to not smoke, still it is much safer not to do so.

If it's not a law it should be a company policy. I was a cabin safety instructor for 14 years and it would bother me. We had a lot of additional safety policies that were above and beyond the law.

It’s not a regulation, it’s a standard safety measure everywhere else.

Lol "scare" the passenger 😂😂😂😂

No Strobe lights too?

So imagine being on that plane that Josh was on… and there was an accident on the runway where cabin lights would be off completely. You and 179 other passengers would be blinded and it would take valuable seconds for your eyes to adjust to find an exit, lessening your chances of survival. Telling me that’s a good policy?

How often did that cause the actual issue in Japan? Zero in the last 30yrs as I understand it. Perhaps people who are nervous should start wearing sunglasses upon landing just in case?

I agree, Not over dramatic

You're both dumb, it is over dramatic. There is no such procedure in Japan.

During the flights especially for night - flight or red eye flight, while take off and landing the cabin lights should be dimmed. Due to make anticipation of those passangers in the emergency situation.

Peter have you ever gone into a room with the lights on then try to see with them off immediately after? You have glare and can’t see much, certainly not clearly. This is procedure drawn up based upon science by people much smarter than you and I. I fully support this procedure also as I very much know how long it can take for your eyes to adjust

Chatta290 Good Thinker. I do prefer to dim the lights when I wanna see what's happened Outside. It make me more comfortable and see clearly than the lights is turn on thou.

LOL I never see Cebu Pacific in the Philippines dimming their lights during landing at night, so, there you go. :)

Band-Maid Sheep Well maybe there are several reason why the cabin crew to do so. :) once again those situation depend on the circumstances. Anyone had their own choice to choose which one is more safe :)

But how he could know? They didn't, so he assumed this is Peach procedure. Any review doesn't make sense if you cannot generalize... But it does, because every Peach flight should have the same standards.

It doesn’t matter if they did it for your flight or a million of their other flights, they didn’t do it on his flight and that’s 1 too many that they didn’t follow safety protocol.

@@Kimchi_-nw8vg yeah. The only way to judge is by flying the airline multiple times. When someone flying the airline for the first time they'll assume the airline is like that

@@aslamnurfikri7640 no not by flying multiple times. Like kimchi said it only takes 1 accident. Then boom. There are no more “multiple times”. First impression counts.

Yep sir

Mei, ein Herzerl von der authentischsten Airline-Nemesis auf YT. Jo gibt's des? Danke Dir und mach weiter mit Deinem guten Content. Cheers, Daniel :-)

None of that is true. The cabin lights are dimmed at night so that passenger’s eyes acclimate to the dark in case of an accident where the cabin will likely lose power so that they can evacuate quickly.

@@lumpheadthump that's what they said... learn to read.

@@lumpheadthump what they said is literally true. You said it in short words they explained the full psychological reason behind it.

caca nustinarani nope, it looks like they had flaps 1

Yeah it was the standard low cost carrier experience, no frills.

@@JoshCahill awesome thanks Josh! keen for the next vid mate

Just so u know the companies who build these planes Boeing n Airbus have it in their manuals that the light are to be dimmed before takeoff so I trust the plane developers over a pilot anyday.

XD

福岡 / ふくおか　/ fu-ku-o-ka

You're totally correct...Peach is all about price and short domestic flights. If you have a lot of time to travel or prefer more affordable choice than Shinkansen, I would choose Peach or Jetstar Japan.

It is a common mis-conception to think that every jurisdiction adhere to the lightout on take off / landing principle at night. That is simply not true, a good example is Japan and Thailand, both country does not follow that rules. (Note: this is a very common mis-conception for aviation blogger or RU-vidr or even people who works in the industry who only fly domestically and not internationally). There are two side of the argument of which is "better", but in reality there are no definite answer. As it has been pointed out by a lot of people, the common understanding for dimming the lights are for eye adjustment, but it is important to note that the eye adjustment are not for you to get off the airplane, rather it is for you once you are outside of the airplane. During evcuation, all the exit and slides are very brightly lit and this is by design by the airplane manufacturer (in fact there is a flood light that illuminate the whole slide once it is deployed). The dimming of the light is really for once you have gotten on the ground. Or in situation where there is a complete power outage on the plane (which is rare). On the other hand, keeping the light on has their own advantage. By keeping the light on, you are forcing the passenger to be more alert and less passenger is likely to be asleep. And therefore during an emergency evacuation, there is a higher chance that your passenger will have a faster responds time. Rather then someone who just got woken up by the cabin crew shouting at them for evcuation.

because it's cheaper lol?

Cheapest and fastest way. Worth on money

@@MohdYusuf-sm3tv does that fully include the environmental cost of carbon pollution and global heating?

@@michaelpillingnow I'm not sure.

Peter for me it’s more of an inconvenience having the lights on early in the morning/late evening. It’s bothersome :)

YES! It's international regulations for all civil aviation.

@@ElusiveTy I want to see the law and see how its written. A lot of people interpret it differently which is an issue in this society.

@@ElusiveTy The FAA doesn’t have any relevance for flights in Asia lol. That’s up to their authorities and as far as Japan goes it’s not mandatory to dim the lights during night landings/takeoffs.

Boria Travels its a domestic flight that’s why but I think all airlines should at least know English to an extend

@@yungsavage289 : Agreed.

Watch from 8:50

Barely! I was on a 737-800 from Singapore to Perth and it fucking sucked!

the global peasant it’s an FAA regulation, that means it’s mandatory as long as you are on planet earth

@@PersonalQuotez FAA is American. If this was the case, there wouldn't be airlines banned from European airspace, if they all had to follow FAA (which they don't). Japan Civil Aviation Authority is responsible for regulations here.

It boggles the mind that some people still think that an American regulatory body has jurisdiction over another sovereign nation's domestic flight regulations.

Well, here we also call it FAA

Keith what boggles my mind is fools that think they know better (like you) but fly on a plane MADE IN AMERICA 😂😂😂 u idiot u do know boeing is an American plane right?!🤦🏽‍♂️ and yes in the Boeing manual it says lights must be turned off before takeoff. But u clearly think Japan is full of the smartest people. How are those Japanese planes working out? Oh wait u fools haven't built any.

It's not the pilots dimming the lights it's the cabin chief...

Hahaha can’t wait :)

Peach aviation is one of the ANA’s subsidiary.

Peach is a safe airline. This reviewer is just bitching because he wants to.

Jose Olivares He had a good reason to be concerned so shut the fuck up.

I gots the flu

@@davidrichardson8247 I just hope Peach outright ignored these entitled RU-vidrs. There is only 2-3 good ones out there, he's not one of them.