Jason Bourne Special! | MythBusters | Season 8 Episode 1 | Full Episode 

same, loved this show back in the day

Under a rock, you live? There have always been full episodes

@@waynematthews5693 Read you can not do? Where did i say it was recent? Think before you speak next.

@ecofishes "Start posting full episodes" Knobhead Read your own shit before posting

in 2024? got better ideas than YT? btw I watched show like a lot years back on TV and it was kind of good sht with fun.

It's creepy.

glad it wasn't just me

Fr he's standing with me in my kitchen 😂

I used an extension to turn the audio to mono which fixes it

was about to comment "boy, my left ear feels really appreciated by the narrator. my right ear? not so much."

It's strange for me bc I'll watch other host/actors that have passed, acknowledge their passing then continue on with the show or film but when I see grant I immediately get that same sadness I felt when I first heard what had happened to him. I've lost loved ones in my 52 years and obviously miss their presence but I am surprised how much his passing has affected me.

@@hdoglesby and the time bomb that killed him is in his head while we watch each episode....

Ri.L Ms. Jessi Combs also

Yes, Requiescat in pace, Grant Imihara.

serio,, Thats What I Was Thinking, No Mention Of that Litte ______

And my phone

​@@hyhena-gaming9986no way phone have that on speaker, what phone you have?

@@w_ldan I phone and I know to sounds weird but it does only sound like tos coming from the left

@@w_ldan maybe it just sounds word I. General but yeah

@@hyhena-gaming9986 Well, stereo recordings have existed since before you were born. And spacial algorithms to modify stereo sound have existed since the 80s. And phones with multiple speakers have been around for several years, now. So, this is certainly normal today. My cheap phone comes with Dolby Atmos built in. Atmos can work with up to 64 channels, obv not using that many in a phone. IDK what an iphone does. Also, they have the narrator completely in the left, so they must think they are the Beatles and are already playing with it before it gets to YT.

Sound perfect to me

@@nicholas4839 Try listening from a stereo setup, not mono

Speaking loudly down a hallway.

@@uss_liberty_incidentno since its Split audio (narrator voice is separated from main track) it is best to listen it through MONO since it combines the two audio tracks into one instead of listening them separately in Stereo

@@nicholas4839 sounds like you're aren't listening through anything of quality

Adam did a pretty in-depth video on the red bag on Tested a few years ago.

I was about to comment on that, I'm glad I'm not the only one to spot that

True, but at cruising altitude, the air speed is higher and the temperature is colder. It's not a perfect test for sure. Still cool/fun.

yeah not only was it more dense but the smooth shape of the formed ice like an ice cube would also make it more aerodynamic, which would generate more heat, but make it harder for the wind resistance to break the ice up. Im sure its possible for this to happen in real life, but i bet its highly unlikely.

@@jackfranks7160 Yes, but in the wind tunnel, they had to increase temperature to get it fall off, simulating lower altitudes (not sure if they changed airspeed at all). I wish they would've stayed a little more consistent on this one (what temp did the ice fall off? What approximate altitude does that correspond to? What is the density of the ice formed in this way? How would it have reacted?) My gut feeling is that it's still plausible, but I would've liked to have seen it done more accurately.

Are you trying to say it wouldn't kill you if it landed on your head?

Also in America the toasters work on half the power than europe

Absolutely, and usually half the house is destroyed too with significant collateral damage to the rest of the block.

@@TVD1984 Uhm, hasn't happened like that here yet, only the windows have suffered.

not to mention the windows were installed on the wrong side of the wall. They're mounted to the exterior of the wall not the interior

They said it took 4 minutes to get the reaction they got. 12 would have DEFINITELY worked.

Yep they really missed the mark on this one.

The gas line in the movie was also a bigger diameter than what they used, possibly with a different pressure. Natural gas is lower pressure than propane systems I’m pretty sure. Still, I thought the effect they got was interesting

They also didn't test a variety of toasters. Toasters get hot at different speeds. I also would have soaked the Bourne mag in some fuel, just for fun, to see how that would have sped up the flameination.

Also, that part of the movie was in Europe, they use 240V electricity in their outlets

Yeah. A gas explosion will demolish a brick building if the conditions are right, but this was myth-busting and I think it was truly busted.

Right. Or they could have used the long burn magazine and/or timed it with how long it took to get to right ratio. But they had a massive hole in the ceiling for the fans so this was a bad test.

or just leave the door open

you can tell that tory and carrie like eachother by her pregnancy

​@@alecnolastname4362 he was about to kiss her after her landing 😂 I mean, good for him, but it kinda seems like a open secret, noone is willing to acknowledge it 🤔

It's also on Discovery+.

It's the official channel. They' re not going to remove it. Also see " Banijay Science". It''s a French media company. " ( Banijay Entertainment ) In Europe they were mostly known as "Endemol" - the company behind the first French reality show ' Loft Story ' - until they were bought by a larger media company They are the right holders, they have decided to monetize it on RU-vid from now on...

That or the entire plane falls on top of you... Certainly one of the two things

Yes stuff falling off an airbus is believable built like shit, like unregulated soviet shit.

​@@pilsplease7561 I don't know if you've noticed, but between Airbus and Boeing, only the latter is making headlines for making single-point-of-failure control systems that nosedive their passenger jets into the ground, forgetting to install the correct number of bolts, and liquidating whistleblowers.

@@pilsplease7561 Airbus isn't Soviet, it's a multinatinal EU company, they had a research center in Russia but they don't work there anymore and like Boeing they no longer sell spare parts to Russia, that's why a lot of planes were falling all over Russia after months without proper mainteinance. And all those "Russian" Beoing and Airbus planes were stolen from companies from other countries, all planes that were in Russian territory when the sanctions were imposed were stolen by the state and given to their own airlines that never owned a Boeing or Airbus before, they were renting them at most. And all the Boeing failures where due to Donald Trump (best friend of Putin outside Russia) who allowed Boeing and other American manufacturers to bypass (give the middle finget to) the FAA and certify their own (poor) work and the (low) quality of the products they were making. The situation was so bad for the American market that it was one of the first things that Biden had to revert.

​@@pilsplease7561try again. Wrong manufacturer

that wasnt the myth though? they know it will explode/burn *eventually* since it does happen IRL alot. the myth was that you could have it happen as quickly and in the same fashion as in the movie, which you cant. you get the explosion from the spontaneous ignition of all the natural gas at the same time, where as the movies slow leak doesnt give enough time for the gas to reach a proper mixture ratio and causes it to act as a fire accelerant instead of a explosive ignition.

​@@derpmanaveragegamer7791a movie isn't going to show 12 min of a magazine smoldering before an explosion though. That should've been taken into account instead of trying to follow the exact movie timeline.

​@@theoriginalemim then that isnt a myth at that point, thats just asking "can a house blow up from a gas leak" the whole point of the show and the myths is asking "can it happen as shown in the piece of media it originates from"

@@derpmanaveragegamer7791 well a lot more gas comes out of a natural gas pipe than you think. They were just adding gas into the room. I think they revisited this one in a later episode anyway I might have to find that one

You witnessed it or you just heard it?

Nice word play.

He loves your left ear more than the right :'D

There is a trend of YT posted television shows having extremely poor audio quality. My theory is that the creator of the videos is not mixing down a surround signal to 2 channel stereo. Often, the announcers voice (which I theorize should be in the center channel) gets lost in the mixdown and is often very quiet or non-existent. I'm just spitballing here.

Turn on forced mono, but yeah I doubt they do it manually it's automated and the center channel idea of the poster befor makes sense, they got the license and they don't want to put much money in as people will still klick.

Depending on if your using iOS or android , you can go into settings and select mono audio

Why are you using headphones anyways? It’s not a horror game lol

Doesn't really matter for toasters. They aren't using the full potential of the 230v network as that would just turn your bread into charcoal. And the difference in time it takes for the element to heat up is miniscule as it so small.

It's not the voltage consumed, it's the amps to wattage, 230v toasters use ~5 amps, which is 1150w, 120v uses ~10a, which is 1200w. So pretty much same power output.

I think your laptop was dying. The audio was great for me.

@@Snugglez187ditto

@@Snugglez187 they're talking about the narrator

I have stereo sound on my phone

@@nicholas4839 oh really that’s great thanks for that information just fyi most if not all phones have stereo sound so cheers for letting me know even though it’s completely unrelated to my comment

@@nicholas4839 Same thing. You can set audio to mono in either the audio or accessibility section of your phone's settings

that's how they get away with all the explosions. The Fire dept/police get info on how explosions and fires work in weird scenarios.

The word "gets" is a verb, not a possessive statement. It is _never_ correct to insert apostrophes into "gets," or into any other verb.

@@__Obscure__ well you must be a handful of sunshine and fucken rainbows in a party 😂

@@ideges-smasszer Believe it or not I'm the president of a student-led theater and improv comedy organization at my university! 😃😆

Yeah, bet they were like "you know, it would be interesting to find out how a faulty liquid tank on an aircraft would behave". Heck that data would also be good to forward to the engineers making planes. Good to know that if all safeties fail and it's also a slow leak, that's what can cause an issue.

awesome idea! He's gonna BUST... some myths

some flashing tape would have helped tremendously I bet

Im not certain how gas explosions are in the UK (from the US), but my understanding is that gas explosions here are more often caused by a gas feeder line catching fire then the building itself filling with the gas. The massive Lawrence colomubia gas pipeline explosions that happened in Massachusetts a few years ago are a pretty good example of what im referencing

@@panzerfaus8459 oh, I see interesting! I’ll have a look :) Thank you! :)

@@hunyesmith03 my guess is that its mostly to do with the construction differences in the US vs UK and Europe. With stone and plaster being more common over there houses are far better sealed

@@panzerfaus8459 Yes, that’s a really good point. Our houses are usually made of brick, I’m actually not even sure I’ve ever seen a wood house over here actually, anyway a lot of newer properties ( 1950s onwards) especially suburban have brick houses with a stone cladding and the doors and windows used are very thick and insulated, and there’s like a switch (manual) to set how much air will pass through. I mean they’re obviously not airtight but it’s something we take seriously as it impacts a homes energy rating and thus utility costs. So I think you may be right. I’m a Londoner but I lived in Edinburgh for a while and my house was quite new, 1982 I believe, and it had bricks with mortar then was covered in concrete and a really ugly stone cladding, we then had the very thick windows and doors I mentioned and a super well insulated roof, etc. it never got cold really, so good in that respect. Compared to the place I live now which is Victorian, or the place I lived in Edinburgh before my house (An apartment in a literal castle, and was built in 1638 (renovated in the late 80s), and both here and especially there you could literally feel air rushing through, which I think would prevent or at least lessen an explosion if there was a leak. Usually when you see stories here about this I think it’s a newer suburban property which are often more energy efficient so have the cladding and thick doors, etc to retain heat and stuff. So I think you’re probably completely right! Sorry I’ve ranted on for a bit, I do that, thank you for taking the time to discuss this with me, it’s much appreciated! Enjoy the rest of your day!