Jason Cundy RIPS INTO West Ham's Performance Vs Chelsea Claiming 'THEY WERE TERRIBLE!' 😤❌ 

You lot are ruthless😂😂😂😂

Although you can bank on a football fan to come up with a spark of genius comment like this, but it never ceases to amaze me, wonderful mate 👍

There was a petition to not get him in that got a fair few signatures, but Sullivan has never really cared what the fans want. It’s why, under his stewardship we have been subjected to BFS, Moyes twice and now JLo. Pragmatic managers. I don’t even know what to say, but you watch Sullivan, these pundits and everyone else put the boots into us for wanting Moyes out now. We just wanted to enjoy our football, something we have been absolutely robbed of for a long time. Remember Sullivan blamed the fans for Pellegrini as well, then that tosspot Simon Jordan started blaming us for it as well.

What's a fat role up?

Moyes will be back again to rescue them.

@@Daniyal731hand rolled cigarette

@@imoutofyourleague4299 ahh thank you

@@burnaardnufc3173saying “a fat” roll up would imply it may have had something added to it and not rolled with a filter tip either

Dirty shame is more fitting

Get on with it. Why do you need to be famous to talk about football . Haven’t you had enough of the likes of Michael Owen

@@edscorner2827 I'm sick of you tubers only on now because it has to be 1 white 1 woman and 1 black person who haven't a clue

Grow some balls mate

diversify

Cundy famous??? Havent a clue who he is

Revenge ? We have no beef with Caicedo

he was definitely worth more than 30m, that kind of money is what West Ham payed for Fulkrug and less than Brighton paid for Rutter. He was probably a 70m player from what he had shown, arguably 80-85m based on what he could do in future. Still a drastic overpay but if he plays for Chelsea for 9 years, thats an insane investment. He had a rough probably 5 games to start after a drawn out transfer saga and no pre season, since then he has been nothing short of incredible but his price tag will always overpower whatever he does. Maybe they could have gotten him for 85/90m had they made that offer early and tied up the transfer but they tried playing the waiting game and it back fired. I highly doubt the owners regret their investment, cos 80m or 110m, regardless, those price are never about making profit on him for Chelsea.

@@granth1238Caicedo had only been playing in the Prem for a couple of years, that’s why I put a £30 million price tag on him. Also, he’s not a striker or winger. Yves Bissouma is as good a player and I think we sold him for £25 mil, but Caicedo’s price was drastically inflated because of the length of his contract he had left, the competition to sign him, and the drastic inflation in the amount clubs would pay for players after the Grealish transfer. I agree that he was looking like a £50 million player that last season at Brighton, but a couple of years prior and what most people call a £50 million player now, would objectively have been a £30 million player. A lot of factors came together to make Caicedo the biggest transfer fee in Premier League history, and I personally think only Tony Bloom could have pulled that off at that price, from a club the size of Brighton. Caicedo is beginning to really find his feet at Chelsea, but only Messi or Ronaldo are ever going to live up to a what people expect of a £100 million price tag. But the reality of these price tags is that they don’t just reflect what the player is worth. They reflect many factors. Even the timing of the transfer. I guess £50 would be a fair price for Caicedo. For me, Bissouma was almost a carbon copy of Caicedo, regarding the role he did at Brighton, and he was even better at dictating the play. Caicedo is slightly better on the ball though.

John shut up you idiot 😊

You ain’t got a clue

@@CharlieKerr11 To much truth for you old Rue Paul.