Jay Smith 6 - Authority of the Bible 

Beyond fabulous!! The Lion of Judah is truly within you Dr. Smith. May God's favour and strength be magnified within you. May his protection and blessings be upon you and may He grant you abundant, long life upon this earth. Thank you, bright star!!

Thank you Dr Jay Smith for shading the light in the darkness. Thank you for all you doing🙏 God bless you abundantly ✊❤️

Beautiful. Thank you Dr. Jay Smith

Your enthusiasm is showing. Biblical archeology tells us even the stones will cry out with the truth no matter what. We must keep digging. Good job.

I been enjoying all your videos Mr. Smith. Very informative and top-notch! Thank you so much.

The first shall be last, and the last shall be first

So grateful for your hard work for the Kingdom of God-God bless you!

very informative!!!.. thank you so much Bro. Jay for your love to muslims ...

Praise the Lord.Amen😊

Thank you sir. Very enlightenment

Awesome work Jay!

Great Study

46:48 No wonder! I felt like the Kurds were a very proud and noble people, and I can only see why! When they fight ISIS, they really fight like lions! Hittite-Kurds. It's quite shocking.

Love it!

Thank you Jay. God works through you...

I'm collecting all evidence for the authority of the bible so I can present it to my muslim brother. I hope he is as rationl as he claims to be.

Your work is beyond praise. There really isn't much needed to throw Islam out the window. The Muslims know that Jesus was crucified but they have been brainwashed to believe that he wasn't. And if he was crucified, then their faith is baseless. They are asked to read the psalms, and some other books of the Bible in their Quran. What part of Psalms are they reading that they don't see the crucifixion of Jesus? Even the prophets of the ot have prophecied about christ and his crucifixion

35:09 hahaha chines whippers!!!! In france we call this game " the arabe phone" and that match very well with your theory brother jay

Exodus 21:20-21 New International Version 20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property

Yes indeed thank God we don't have to apologise for anything in out Christianity.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Just check in Google

2:16 “…the early church always knew”..classic proddy circular reasoning..the diocletian martyrs died for the faith of jesus..jesus founded a church on peter..not a book by paul

Mohammed and Khadija bint Khuwaylid (his first wife's) stole Warqah ibn Nawfal ibn Asad ibn Abd-al-Uzza ibn Qusayy Al-Qurashi's interpetation of the Arabic bible which was based on Nabatean belief and presented it as a revelation of god. Has any one ever questioned the whereabouts of Warqah ibn Nawfal work?, Aisha tell the following about Warqah narrated in Sahih Bukhari volume 1, Book 1, Number 3 'Khadija then accompanied him (Mohammed) to her cousin Warqah bin Nawfal bin Asad bin 'Abdul 'Uzza, who, during the pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the writing with Hebrew letters. He would write from the Gospel in Hebrew as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to Warqah, "Listen to the story of your nephew, O my cousin!" Warqah asked, "O my nephew! What have you seen?" Allah's Apostle described whatever he had seen. Warqah said, "This is the same one who keeps the secrets (angel Gabriel) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out." Allah's Apostle asked, "Will they drive me out?" Warqah replied in the affirmative and said, "Anyone (man) who came with something similar to what you have brought was treated with hostility; and if I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly." But after a few days Warqah died. WHERE ARE THE WRITINGS OF WARQAH IBN NAWFAL?, DID MOHAMMED STEAL THEM AND CALLED IT "QURAN" WHILE HE RE-INVENTED ARABIC IDOL MOON GOD "ALLAH"?. #whereiswarqahbook

It is a time to every muslim should return to their origin religion. Let us form a happy global village.

Web site information no wonder He loses all his debates

Can u please say which Bible u are an authority of ? Is it the KJV NLT, NIV, NKJV, RSV, NASB, TB, NRSV GB or the Catholic Bible with 73 Books, the Christian Bible with 66 Books, the Orthodox Bible with 77 Books or the Ethiopian Bible with 81 Books ??? Why do u try to deceive people into thinking their is one Bible ? Authority of THE Bible ??

I refer to Christian Primce who grew up learn Arabic and he memories Quran no Iman has won he would debunked all Islam till today morning

Oh dear...😂 Hubby is Kurdish and 98% DNA from Iraq.... I don't think he'd survive, if I told him he's more Christian than I am! 😆

Be careful your information could be False

23.Your Lord has decreed that you shall not worship anyone except Him, and [He has enjoined] kindness to parents. Should they reach old age at your side -one of them or both- do not say to them, ‘Fie!’1 And do not chide them, but speak to them noble words. 24.Lower the wing of humility to them, out of mercy, and say, ‘My Lord! Have mercy on them, just as they reared me when I was [a] small [child]!’ 25. Your Lord knows best what is in your hearts. Should you be righteous, He is indeed most forgiving toward penitents. 26. Give the relatives their [due] right, and the needy and the traveller [as well], but do not squander wastefully.

Brother, as a Muslim I ❤️ Jesus and follow Jesus commands and between Jesus and Paul I follow Jesus commands. This probably makes me a Christian in some peoples eyes but I am a Muslim ! Paul’s teachings happens to be blessed by Roman king Constantine around 320 AD, but I follow Jesus teachings. And Jesus teachings are inline with Islam! God bless you!

Many version of the bible but not one According to Yesus (Isa As) according to,according to according to,According to ???LOL

BIBLICAL AUTHORITY RELIES HEAVILY ON CIRCULAR REASONING! The term "Biblical Authority" gets tossed around a lot! Let's recall where this idea came from--when Catholics in some parts of Europe were fed up with "Papal Authority" in Rome, and had become quite certain the leadership of the Church had been teaching ideas that, people like Martin Luther, were convinced were foreign to Early Christianity, like paying indulgences to get people out of Purgatory. How, then, to counter Papal Authority in Rome? Well, they could have just appointed a different Authority, like the Eastern (Orthodox) Church did centuries earlier, by making a Patriarchal Authority or something similar. Had Luther wanted to, he might have made himself a sort of Protestant "Pope." But he and other Protestant leaders decided to counter Papal Authority with "Biblical Authority." Thing was, WHAT was the Bible? The idea most have is that the "Bible" was a book that had been around since Jesus' day...which is true, as long as one understands the Bible Jesus used was the Tanakh, the Jewish Bible, or what Christians call the "Old Testament"! But the Christian Bible has a "New Testament" that came from...where exactly??? Well, as it turns out, the Early Church never said which books and letters should be considered equal to the Jewish Bible! There were some favorites, popular in some parts of the Church, and others popular elsewhere! But as the bishopric of Rome became increasingly more powerful, especially after the conversion of the Roman Emperor, the bishops of Rome began rejecting books favored by many other Christians. In summary, it was Papal Christianity that ultimately settled on which books would be considered the Christian Bible, or we should say CATHOLIC Bible! Now, Martin Luther knew this, so when the time came for him to translate "The" Bible into German, guess what he did, or tried to do? Toss out a bunch of books favored by the Catholic Church!!! For example, he got rid of I and II Maccabees (largely because they contain passages that support the belief in a Purgatory). He also tossed out others, like Bel and the Dragon (No! That's not a Disney movie! It's a book that was in "The" Bible for 100s of years!)! Luther also wanted to get rid of Revelation, but he was talked into including it in printed editions toward the back, along with other apocryphal books, like the Shephard of Hermas. He wrote a preface, though, that made it clear Revelation was NOT to be regarded as an inspired text...which the American Bible Society REMOVED in 1807 in their printed editions (Yeah, THAT is how Revelation got in the Protestant New Testament)! In other words, when we use the term "Biblical Authority," there's some major CIRCULAR REASONING going on! To counter the Catholic Church's Papal Authority, Protestants asserted "Biblical Authority" was superior...even though it was the Catholic Church which had selected which books should be in the Bible!!! So, what's a Protestant Christian to do? Well, we can blindly believe that, somehow, the same Church we say had begun swaying from the teachings of Jesus as early as the Second Century was divinely guided into making the perfect choices as to what would later be regarded equal to the original Jewish Bible (though they added books to the Tanakh as well)... or, we can use the brains God gave us to realize what we call the Bible is a MAN-MADE collection of writings in which many a frail, sinful, human being tried to understand what God was trying to tell us! We can, in other words, find God's words and the authority they convey CONTAINED in the Bible, but it's foolish to blindly believe men with many an ulterior motive at several, religious power centers, from Rome to Philadelphia (HQ of the American Bible Society) received a singular book from the hands of angels, perfectly dictated, word for word, by God Himself! Rick Lannoye, author of www.amazon.com/Rightly-Dividing.../dp/B091LSMD9N Are you a victim of Bible Abuse? Get help at ricklannoye.com/contact

Saying you a believer but you trying to disproof the Word of God makes no sense at all. Stop concentrating on the differences and embrace the common Word of God.

Who is god? .... Jesus Is Jesus the son of Mary? .....Yes Who Created Mary?....... God Who is God?......Jesus Is Jesus the begotten son? .......Yes Who is his father? ......God Who is God ?......Jesus Is Jesus a Servant of God? .....Yes Who is God? ......Jesus Did Jesus died on the cross? .......Yes Who ressurected him? ...God Who is God ? .......Jesus Is Jesus a messenger? ......yes Who sent him? ....God

The Holy Bible... but what Authority does it give when the Old Testament is not (even; Sura 5:14 has it that the Gospel, not wholly, was corrupted) the Tanakh? For example, Hebrews 10:5 gets Psalms 40:6 wrong as well as other verses of corruption. There is also the issue of Books' arrangement- between the Old Testament and the Tanakh. Also, Justin Martyr, in his Dialogue with Trypho, did accuse the Jews of (textual) corruption. Islam IS the Truth!

Funny, he mentions a number of "early church fathers" of which NONE OF THEM are Hebrews whereas history teaches us that the Scriptures from start to finish, under the inspiration of Yahuwah GOD, were written by Hebrews, to Hebrews, set in a Hebraic cultural setting, with a Hebrew mindset and this includes Yehushua Ha Mashiach himself. In fact, he was NOT SENT but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel. Matthew 15:24. So to even think that we can dismiss the 4 thousands years plus of Hebrew history in favor of the early church fathers belief that the " church" has replaced the Nation of Israel is a damnable heresy. These same " church fathers" changed the Gospel of the soon coming Kingdom of GOD for the go to heaven when you die gospel that the professing church believes and teaches today but is unknown to Hebrew Scriptures. These same " fathers" especially Augustine, was the one who changed the gospel of the coming Kingdom of God on this terrestrial plane for a kingdom of God within the human heart which is a false doctrine. These same fathers taught the heaven and hell destinations of man whereas the Hebrew Scriptures teach a life or death destination of man. These same "fathers" believed in the Gnostic belief of the immortality of the soul whereas Genesis 2:7 teaches that man is the combination of the soil of the earth and the breath of God that became or becomes a living soul and cannot be separated even at death. At death the body returns to the earth and the ruach breath of life returns to GOD. Man will either be resurrected unto life eternal at the first resurrection or at the second resurrection to hear of their final judgement of annihilation. Through Augustine, the Gnostic belief in a trinity was forced upon the church and later declared to be the doctrine of the church by a vote through Constantine's interference and meddling at Nicea under the encouragement of Athanasius and avowed Gnostic trinitarian. It was this same Athanasius who set the canon of Scripture in order of his own accord. So before you continue to be a good little Jay Smith sheeple, try doing some of your own research from the Hebrew perspective because you'll find out the truth that Yahuwah GOD is indeed ONE being Deuteronomy6:4 and NOT a triune god. That Yehushua Ha Mashiach is NOT GOD in the flesh but the uniquely created son of GOD as promised in Genesis 3:15, Deuteronomy 18:15-30 and 2 Samuel 7:12:15. Genesis 1 introduces the Spirit of GOD NOT the holy spirit as a separate being. This holy ghost being wasn't even given credence until 381 AD under Theodore the Great edicts and he was the pagan emperor of Rome then. Daniel saw a vison and understood what GOD was saying in Daniel 7:13-14 and that Mr. Smith quoted referring to the title son of man, which every Hebrew understood was a reference to the human Messiah of Genesis 3:15, Deuteronomy 18 and 2 Samuel 7. Mr. Smith even quotes the verse correctly as; "I SAW in the night VISION and behold one "like" the son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before Him. And there WAS GIVEN to him, dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages should serve him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that shall not pass away and his kingdom shall not be destroyed." First, it is a vision however prophetic and is future in it's fulfillment. Secondly Yehushua is GIVEN a dominion, and glory and a kingdom ALL OF WHICH HE NEVER HAD BEFORE. It was part of his exaltation for his willingness to stand in GOD's stead and shed his blood and give his life to accomplish what GOD could not do as He is a Spirit who cannot shed blood or die. That this kingdom shall last forever and never be destroyed is because it is the Kingdom of GOD and GOD shall preserve it through His anointed King of kings and Lord of lords, Yehushua Ha Mashiach for 1,000years before Yehushua lays all these kingdoms back at his GOD and Fathers feet, subject himself to his GOD and Father, that Yahuwah GOD shall be all in all. 1 Corinthian's 15:24-28. That Yehushua is from everlasting to everlasting is centered on the fact that everything GOD planned and did from the beginning was focussed on His beloved son and all things were created for him and in the coming 1,000 years reign , all things shall consist through him as GOD's anointed principle agent representative. So either the Hebrew Scriptures are correct or Jay Smith is correct and it's ultimately your choice but I know in whom and what I believe in.

I would encourage any Christians listening to this, to wrote down every criticism of Islam this man presents, and bring the list of criticisms to your local mosque and ask any Muslim who has actually studied his religion to explain each and every item on the list. This man’s arguments can easily be countered by any knowledgeable Muslim. Muslims welcome dialogue and you will find Islam to be a very natural and logical faith, no mental gymnastics required. What this man is doing is quoting items from the Quran and Hadith out of context, and not giving you the full story, and contrasting this against the best of Christianity. By stating that God required human sacrifice (which is what the claim of Jesus Christ dying on the cross for humanities’ sins actually is) to forgive people is limiting the Omnipotence of God. God did not need anyone to be crucified, God will forgive your sins if you just ask him too. “And when (O Messenger) My servants ask you about Me, then surely I am near: I answer the prayer of the suppliant when he prays to Me. So let them respond to My call (without hesitation), and believe and trust in Me (in the way required of them), so that they may be guided to spiritual and intellectual excellence and right conduct.” (Al-Baqarah 2:186) Hadith Qudsi 17: (this type of Hadith is an oral tradition from the Prophet Muhammad, quoting directly from God): On the authority of Abu Dharr al-Ghifari (may Allah be pleased with him) from the Prophet (Peace be with him) has is that among the sayings he relates from his Lord (may He be glorified) is that He said: O My servants, I have forbidden oppression for Myself and have made it forbidden amongst you, so do not oppress one another. O My servants, all of you are astray except for those I have guided, so seek guidance of Me and I shall guide you, O My servants, all of you are hungry except for those I have fed, so seek food of Me and I shall feed you. O My servants, all of you are naked except for those I have clothed, so seek clothing of Me and I shall clothe you. O My servants, you sin by night and by day, and I forgive all sins, so seek forgiveness of Me and I shall forgive you. O My servants, you will not attain harming Me so as to harm Me, and will not attain benefitting Me so as to benefit Me. O My servants, were the first of you and the last of you, the human of you and the jinn of you to be as pious as the most pious heart of any one man of you, that would not increase My kingdom in anything. O My servants, were the first of you and the last of you, the human of you and the jinn of you to be as wicked as the most wicked heart of any one man of you, that would not decrease My kingdom in anything. O My servants, were the first of you and the last of you, the human of you and the jinn of you to rise up in one place and make a request of Me, and were I to give everyone what he requested, that would not decrease what I have, any more that a needle decreases the sea if put into it. O My servants, it is but your deeds that I reckon up for you and then recompense you for, so let him finds good praise Allah and let him who finds other that blame no one but himself. It was related by Muslim (also by at-Tirmidhi and Ibn Majah).