Jeffrey Rosen discusses the unanimous Trump v. Anderson decision with Chris Jansing 

Who was charged with inserection?

To clarify-the Supreme Court determined in Trump v. Anderson that States cannot enforce the Insurrection Clause against federal officeholders to strip candidates from the ballot. The per curiam decision also set forth a standard in dealing with such cases (i.e., only Congress can create and enforce such means) by analogzing to Section 5. Justice Barrett concurred as to Sections I and II-B, asserting the court didn’t need to reach the hypothetical standards. She nevertheless argued the public should focus on how the court unanimously agrees States cannot enforce the Insurrection Clause on federal officeholders/candidates; rather than angrily highlighting the standard chosen to classify who can handle insurrection disputes. Justices Kagan, Jackson, and Sotomayor concurred in the judgment , criticizing the Court for expounding on the hypothetical standard when the issue wasn’t before the court. The Court did not rule on Trump’s immunity (appealed seperately) or whether an insurrection did in fact occur.

Trump maga usa thank 🇺🇲God n praise him always 🙏

Let’s give All the Praise to our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ for this victory with many more following.