@chris jones Nah, the little Englanders that thought Brexit was more important than the NHS, education, policing, housing, etc. should take the credit for that snafu.
Better the Tories than the labour scum who were opposed to him and the idiots who listened to the media against him. The irony is he had more commonality and got on more with Boris than he did most of the MPs in his own party who are scum
@@nathanh5448 The Labour party has officially adopted the IHRA definition of anti Semitism, and accepts their guidelines on what constitutes anti Semitic behaviour. There is no doubt whatsoever that Corbyn has been in breach of these guidelines, on numerous occasions. So by the Labour parties own standards, the man is an anti Semite. And I don't buy that schtick about him "having fought racism his whole life therefore he can't be an anti Semite." I don't care what else he may have said or done in terms of fighting racism. I've got a list as long as your arm of instances in which Corbyn has either enabled anti Semitism, said anti Semitic things, or perpetuated anti Semitic stereotypes.
@@Thucydides1990 Great, so how has he breached those standards? Its all fine and great for you to tell me the party has adopted the IHRA definition, but you havent properly replied, so what has he done to breach these standards.
@@nathanh5448 Sure, no problem. Have a read through this list. There are plenty of examples in there of Corbyn breaching the IHRA standards.... Corbyn has spent time with high-ranking figures from Hamas and Hezbollah (two, Jihadist terrorist organisations committed to the destruction of Israel, and the broader annihilation of the Jewish people). In a 2010 visit to the Palestinian territories, he met with Hamas officials in Gaza. In 2009, he described Hamas as "an organisation dedicated towards the good of the Palestinian people." "They bring about long-term peace & social justice and political justice". He claimed that "labelling them terrorists is a big, big historical mistake." When questioned about why he was meeting with the leaders of a terrorist organisation, he responded, “'Our function is to support those people who are supporting & defending & representing the Palestinian people.' In 2014 he was photographed, alongside the exiled PFLP chief Maher Taher, laying a wreath at a memorial ceremony for the Black September operatives who carried out the murder of eleven Israelis at the 1972 Munich Olympics. When asked during a 2019 interview with Andrew Neil whether the comment, “Rothchild Jews control the world” is anti-Semtic, Corbyn refused to give an affirmative answer. When asked in the same interview whether or not he would personally apologise for past instances of anti Semitism, Corbyn refused (4 times). On numerous occasions he has shared a platform with Leila Khaled, the convicted plane-hijacker and former mastermind of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). In 2015, to mark Holocaust Memorial Day, Jeremy Corbyn went on Iranian state broadcaster Press TV to ask: "Has the Holocaust been exploited to oppress others?" (Iran is a country which regularly threatens the nuclear annihilation of Israel and which propagates anti-Semitism - e.g., holocaust denial is an official state policy). In the same year, Corbyn hosted a radio phone in show for the Hezbollah news service. When a caller advocated for Israel’s destruction (‘Israeli Jews should be thrown into the sea’) Corbyn failed to challenge his point of view and concluded the exchange with, “ok, thanks for your call”. In a 2004 interview with Iranian state tv, Corbyn accused the BBC of bias towards Israel in saying that ‘Israel has a right to exist, Israel faces security concerns, and Israel is a democracy. These things are not true.’ In 2012, Corbyn publically defended a piece of anti-Semitic artwork. The artwork depicted what the artist described as an "elite banker cartel" of the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Morgans and others sitting around a Monopoly-style board game on the backs of men with dark complexions. The temporary mural was later removed prematurely by Tower Hamlets council following complaints by residents. Lutfur Rahman, then Mayor of Tower Hamlets, said "the images of the bankers perpetuate antisemitic propaganda about conspiratorial Jewish domination of financial and political institutions". According to historian Deborah E. Lipstadt, as well as contemporary local media, the Jewish caricatures resembled the imagery used by Der Stürmer in Nazi Germany. Corbyn, who responded to a Facebook post from the artist (which contained an image of the mural), lamented its removal and referenced freedom of expression, asking "Why would this image be criticised? Don’t let the criticism worry you. You are in good company.’ In March 2018, Labour MP Luciana Berger asked Corbyn why he had questioned the mural's removal. Corbyn's spokesman issued a statement later in the day: "Jeremy was responding to concerns about the removal of public art on grounds of freedom of speech.” Corbyn has held membership of the Facebook ‘Palestine Live’ and ‘History of Palestine’ groups. Palestine Live was exposed by blogger David Collier in a thorough 280 page report detailing anti-semitism that ran through the group. The History of Palestine contained articles about the 'Rothschild Empire', the 'Zionist Agenda and New World Order', and 'Jewish Organ Trafficking'. This is the kind of content Corbyn seemed able to tolerate without objection. Between 2011 - 2015, Corbyn attended various ‘Quds Day’ rallies, in his position as ‘Stop the War Coalition’ national chair. On these occasions, he failed repeatedly to object to what the Jewish Chronicle describe as ‘antisemitic banners and posters, which "dominate" these rallies. In 2013, Corbyn attended at least 3 events hosted by Holocaust denier Paul Eisen (author of the 2008 book entitled "My life as a Holocaust denier"). In January 2011, a motion was submitted to rename Holocaust Memorial Day as "Genocide Memorial Day", supported by 23 MPs, mainly from the Labour Party and including Jeremy Corbyn. In 2011, Corbyn wrote the foreword for a republication of the anti-Semitic 1902 book Imperialism: A Study, by John A. Hobson, which contains the assertion that finance was controlled "by men of a single and peculiar race, who have behind them many centuries of financial experience" who "are in a unique position to control the policy of nations". In his foreword, Corbyn called the book a "great tome" and "brilliant, and very controversial at the time". In 2013, defending comments made by Manuel Hassassian, Corbyn described “thankfully silent Zionists” as “failing to understand English irony, despite having lived here their whole lives.” These comments were derided as being anti semitic by Labour MPs Luciana Berger, Wes Streeting, Mike Gapes, Catherine McKinnell, and political strategist John McTernan. (Zionist is often used as code for “Jew”). At the beginning of April 2018, The Sunday Times reported that it had uncovered over 2,000 examples of antisemitic, racist, violent threats and abusive posts in a Corbyn-supporting private Facebook groups, including frequent attacks on Jews and Holocaust denying material. It was reported to have as members 12 senior staff who work for Corbyn and shadow chancellor John McDonnell. Many of the posts criticised Labour MP Luciana Berger and Jonathan Arkush, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Corbyn has repeatedly compared Israel to Nazi Germany. In 2013, Corbyn compared Israel’s actions in the West Bank to Nazi occupations in Europe. In 2009, he marched behind a banner stating “Gaza-21st Century Concentration Camp.” One placard on display at the Birmingham march read “Fascist State” - next to an Israel flag with the Star of David turned into a swastika, while another had a star and the Nazi symbol, with “Holocost” written beside it. Corbyn gave a speech to people waving these banners. In 2010 Corbyn shared a stage with a speaker who repeatedly compared Israeli action in Gaza to the mass killing of Jewish people in the Holocaust. Years later, Corbyn apologised for this and said he now “rejected” the speaker’s views. And, in 2010 he claimed that the Israeli “siege” of Gaza was reminiscent of the Nazi sieges of Leningrad and Stalingrad.
@Edward Moran I.... don't think you know what a virus is... You actually get it for not washing your hands. So no it doesn't. It goes for dirty non handwashers... Thats why it's ALL conservatives that have it.
The NHS would of certainly of been in a better condition to cope with coronavirus with corbyn views...and where would the money of come from people will say.... the same place we magically produced it from when the financial system broke...and the financial system wouldn't of broke if we hadn't gone quite so far down the neoliberal trail.
Well he was the most honest and wonderful politician at the helm of a major party in the last few decades. He wanted to fund our NHS and now the deaths from corona will show the reality of the defunding that you voted for. Enjoy.
Corbyn promoted the causes and agenda's of murderous terrorists and genocidal regimes in public. As for 'funding the NHS'... impossible to do if you've deliberately plunged the UK into a politically motivated recession with your high taxes, impossible business burdens, increased migration and pointless nationalisations.
@@theodorefweitzenbaumsr.4061 *"Have you got an actual rebuttal or are you going to continue being the brainless little pawn the Conservatives want you to be?"* Says the same person who blamed "the media" in another thread for Corbyn getting trounced in the election......
Good man. He just wanted equality, more support for the poor, disabled, homeless and working class, and to solve poverty and the NHS crisis. Nobody can fault him for that.
We can if his fantasy borrowing plans wrecks the economy and just leaves us all equally poor. I liked the guy at first, but good intentions aren't enough, you only need to look at the road to hell to see that.
@@yamabushi170 Fantasy borrowing plans? Lol, Corbyn was pledging to spend around six times LESS than the Tories. At the moment the Tories are relying on a number of Corbyn's policies to get us through this crisis.
@@yamabushi170 Yes and it has proven that everything Corbyn stood for and pledged was doable and the NHS should have been properly funded years ago so they could have been ready for something like this. The lack of equipment and ventilators available has been a total nightmare.
@@smokeylee1986 If you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you. All it's proved is that to provide everything the NHS needs in a crisis requires massive amounts of borrowing with a detrimental impact on the economy. And no it wouldn't have made any diffrence because the NHS wouldn't have spent its money stockpiling tens of thousands of ventillators so that argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny for a second. Thank God Red Steptoe didn't get power, he'd have the whole country starving to death in mud huts in the pursuit of his hallowed equality.
MrKunt the unfunniest part was when boris became the prime minister so another 5 million poor children could die, unemployment rates crashed, nurses still had to use food banks, our key workers still don't have suitable housing, and the rich have profited BILLIONS, while homeless people are still lying on the ground with no where to live even though we can afford to give them all houses.
@@ericahill3027 I really think you should use other sources for your 'information' than the Socialist Worker. Like oh, I don't know, real life for instance. By the way, socialists are particularly adept at killing children. They've made it an art form, they are so good at it. Anyway, I'd love to see your evidence that 5 million children have died. The things is, I know you don't have any.
Still only hope for justice for every type victim only and only Uncle Jeremy corbyn❤️. My dream and wish to meet uncle Jeremy corbyn in my life. Inshallah this dream will be successed one day. 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@@Thucydides1990 This is what the establishment who were terrified of him taking power against their interests want you to believe. There is literally no evidence behind it, they threw everything at him in a smear campaign from day one, including lies about him selling state secrets to the USSR. This was the only thing that managed to gain traction, as the conflation between antisemitism and criticism of the government of Israel was normalised by the right wing press.
@@Uio3eva I’m afraid that this sort of denialism is precisely the reason that Labour lost the election. Here are the facts: 1. Labour has officially adopted the IHRA guidelines on what constitutes anti-Semitism. 2. There is absolutely no question that Jeremy Corby has been in breach of many of the IHRA guidelines, on numerous occasions. Conclusion: By the Labour party’s own standards, Jeremy Corbyn has been anti-Semitic. That is no right wing conspiracy, it’s a statement of fact. And to dismiss what he’s said and done as “criticism of Israel which has been conflated with anti-Semitism”, is flat out wrong. The IHRA guidelines explicitly states that criticism of Israel is legitimate. No. JC went far beyond simply criticising Israel. If you need examples, I've got a list as long as your arm.
@@Thucydides1990 Go on then give me the evidence. Because in all reporting on the issue, including the BBC they have not included one shred of evidence or examples as part of their reports. The ECHR report on the issue which people assumed was damning exonerated figures such as Chris Williamson who were accused of antisemitism as having done nothing wrong, and the only evidence of ‘leadership intervention’ in antisemitism accusation investigations was that the leadership expedited these investigations - meaning they intervened to make sure these accusations were looked at sooner. It is a narrative that has been established which needs no facts. The narrative has been constructed by the Tory supporting right wing press, and the Tories - like the ‘saviour’ narrative created and embellished around Margaret Thatcher during the late 70s (even though it is a little known fact that she engineered the ‘Winter of Discontent’ by sabotaging the Callaghan government’s wage agreements with public sector workers) - only this time the right wing of the Labour Party participated in it, seeing it as a means to wrestle back control of the party. Frankly they shot themselves in the foot as they easily could have won the election in 2017 had they not been sabotaging the leadership at every opportunity, and they would have done better in 2019 if Starmer and the right of the party hadn’t insisted on changing their Brexit policy. Labour’s policies under Corbyn were very popular; the establishment in this country were very scared of Corbyn gaining power, this is why we saw a smear campaign more vicious than we have ever seen before. Of course such treatment of left wing Labour figures is normal - remember how Tony Benn was characterised as ‘The most dangerous man in Britain’, and Ed Miliband’s dad the Labour thinker Ralph Miliband was characterised as having ‘hated Britain’? This is how these smear campaigns work, and because literally around 90% of the UK’s print media is owned by a handful of Tory donating billionaires, and the BBC is historically subservient to the government of the day (not to mention Murdoch’s Sky etc) their work in shifting the Overton Window (the acceptability of policy and persons in public life) is rather easy. (Btw I studied political and media history as part of my history degree so I can go into a lot of detail on these points if you wish, but this is already going to be a long post). Not only have they alienated the left wing of the party, they have also contributed to the conflation of antisemitism with any criticism of Israel. This is an undeniable truth nowadays - it has spread to the US where people like Ilhan Omar are accused of antisemitism every time they criticise the Israeli governments treatment of Palestinians for instance. The fact is Jeremy Corbyn spent his whole life fighting for racial justice, whether that’s campaigning against Apartheid or campaigning to stop Margaret Hodge’s council (ironically) in the 80s from selling a Jewish cemetery to a land developer to build over. The media which pushed the antisemitism line do not have any special concern with racism or antisemitism: The Sun, Daily Mail and Daily Express for instance have all been censured by the UN as sources of hate speech. They do not report on the massive issues of racism and discrimination - Islamophobia, antisemitism, homophobia and other forms - which are ALL much more pervasive and insidious within the Conservative Party. However it is not in the interests of these publications to report on these issues, because it is their primary objective to propagandise their readership into voting for right wing parties, not to pursue the cause of racial justice. Sorry for such a long post lol 👍
You know what isn't hilarious, letting 5 million poor children die, leaving millions unemployed, forcing nurses and NHS workers to use food banks, leaving key workers with unsuitable housing, and letting homeless people die on the streets while we can afford to give them all houses. an absolute blatant lack of human and a complete DISGRACE! The rich have profited billions while poverty rates have soared, just tax the rich a bit more and you'll be able to afford to improve EVERYONES lives dramatically. But if you want to support an incompetent, ignorant dirty racist and a party who couldn't even tie its own shoe laces and kills poor people then fine
He was a good man. The media completely villified him. Yet he dug his own grave when he tried to cancel the referendum. It didn't make sense because he has been against the European Union for a very long time. The fantasy poltics of Labour under him are the fault of the entire Labour Party not just him.
You know what kind of party is a basket case one that, lets 5 million poor children die, leaves millions unemployed, forces nurses and NHS workers to use food banks, leaves key workers with unsuitable housing, and lets homeless people die on the streets while we can afford to give them all a place to live. The conservatives have isn't an absolute blatant lack of human decency and are a complete DISGRACE! Their a party that couldn't haven tie its own shoe laces and have a leader who is completely incompetent
@@theodorefweitzenbaumsr.4061 The media were biased towards both parties depending on which media feed you listened to or watched, but Corbyn's non personality and "on the fence" attitude to Brexit whilst ignoring warnings from hardline Labour constituencies didn't help, and that's before we get to the anti semitism and terrorism sympathies both with him as Labour Leader, and within the party as a whole,, so yes, I'm afraid he needs to take much of the responsibility.
Broomehall you want to know something, your wrong, the media tried to destroy Jeremy because he wanted to change things, he wanted to tax the rich, and you know who own the media, the rich, you know who pays the media, the rich, you want to know who friends with the people who own the media, the rich. But if you want to let poor people die and let rich people profit of them for billions then fine
@@ericahill3027 If you believe the labour party do not entertain the rich when it suits them you are very much mistaken, some of the largest direct and indirect donations come from very wealthy individuals indeed, take a look at Corbyn's illegal dinner party of eight, if you look up the guests under the freedom of information act you will discover they are anything but poor ! .....open your eyes, there are good and bad in both parties, but at least Boris is not a Marxist idealist.
When I'm feeling blue, lying in bed at night unable to sleep, I often think back to that night and it gives me a lovely warm feeling. Better than a mug of Ovaltine.
@@sbaeneg4738 no...Corbyn only came down from the back benches due to a dearth of talent in Labour , he spent decades in Parliament and achieved absolutely nothing . We are Rid of the lunatic Corbyn :-)
@@sbaeneg4738 Why waste your time, he had his 15 mins of fame and the electorate didnt like what he stood for , you need to move on , you are backing a lame horse if you still think he has any political credibility.
@@sbaeneg4738 Your juvenile attempt at attributing my political position to that of the BNP is very juvenile and a bit silly. In most traditional Labour heartlands, knock on doors on council estates and ask them what they think about Yemen or even if they know what Antisemetism means and you will see why Crorbyn and Labour lost . Leave the London political scene and people have real concerns that affect their lives that nobody is addressing .
No, history will prove him to have been a complete nonentity. He will be one of those people of whom others say, 'Do you remember that crazy old man? You know, the one who thought he was always right. The one who was a perpetual student agitator. No, I can't remember his name either.'
@Jacque Elyaqim I am not Jewish, but I am also glad to see the back of him. His politics of envy and the way he allowed bullying and anti semitism have been a disgraceful blot on our already tarnished political history. We as a nation should be ashamed to have ever elected a vile creature like him to parliament, and apologise to the Jewish community for the pain and misery he has caused and tolerated.
You mean the recession we shall undoubtedly face after covid 19 I assume? If that's what you mean, please explain why us Brits and the people of America will suddenly realise we should be Socialist?
@@ralphdavidson9542 Hopefully it will make people realize that capitalism is long overdue to be replaced (the fact that it is in crisis every 10 years should tell you something).
Henry Discipline oh and letting 5 million poor children die, leaving millions unemployed, forcing nurses and NHS workers to use food banks, leaving key workers with unsuitable housing, and letting homeless people die on the streets while we can afford to give them all houses isn't an absolute violation of human decency and a complete DISGRACE??? The rich have profited billions while poverty rates have soared, just tax the rich a bit more and you'll be able to afford to improve EVERYONES lives dramatically. If you need stats and proof look at the detail in his manifesto and interviews and social media
Meester Writer the conservatives are more than a joke, they let 5 million poor children die, left millions unemployed, forced nurses and NHS workers to use food banks, left key workers with unsuitable housing, and let homeless people die on the streets while we can afford to give them all houses. The whole party has an absolute blatant lack of human decency and are a complete DISGRACE!
Please, a question about the people you accused of terrorism in direct and indirect ways, and they are innocent people. Are you looking forward to settling their situation and rehabilitating them? I am a person of twenty-one years in Britain and I do not have any right to life. What is the solution please?
If only he was good with maths, for the least, he could lie conveniently. I did vote his party, and him in the 2017, election. Just depends on where you stand on certain subjects. For wealthy people, labour isn't for them, and never will be. But I do accept, that there are many on the left who will always argue for certain policies that may seem far fetched. But ultimately, selfishness is everywhere. Perhaps the universal system may of been the best policy to introduce, not broad band for every home. May be the conservatives will introduce this system as a way of keeping Labour out of power.
@macdonald tramp That's true, but some are funnier than others. Now, of course, some of the real masters and mistresses of slapstick are gone. Welcome to the Westminster Palace of Varieties.
letting 5 million poor children die, leaving millions unemployed, forcing nurses and NHS workers to use food banks, leaving key workers with unsuitable housing, and letting homeless people die on the streets while we can afford to give them all houses is more than being a clown it's an absolute lack of human and a complete DISGRACE! The rich have profited billions while poverty rates have soared, just tax the rich a bit more and you'll be able to afford to improve EVERYONES lives dramatically. If you need stats and proof look at the detail in his manifesto and interviews and social media
@@ericahill3027The trouble is if you tax the rich too much you get tax exiles, and it’s middle and working class people who end up paying for everything. I believe in progressive income tax, but there has to be a balance. When Mrs. Thatcher cut the top rate of income tax, the percentage of tax revenue from rich people in Britain actually increased.
Yeah and if you look back in history the Nazi's spent billions before the war keeping their people onside,and then they killed 6 million jews. Similarities????
@@ericahill3027 curb your righteous indignation please...the left has drained all meaning from the word nazi, spraying it at whomever questions their childish utopian fantasies
I thought that his funniest moments were when he was cosying up to the IRA while they were murdering innocent civilians, and also to Hamas who he called his friends.
@@jimmysimms2399 Every war has innocent civilians killed. The British forces have killed many innocent civilians in the occupied stolen six counties of Ulster and Afghanistan and Iraq and Syria and Libya with American help.
@@pauldunneska I'm not going to debate about this with you. You're obviously a committed republican which is entirely your right. But when you stand with desolate families of innocent victims it's impossible to see the justification for killing. If you're happy to justify the slaughter that's your right. I wouldn't justify the killing of civilians by anyone, including the British army. That's the difference between you and me
@@jimmysimms2399 The innocent Protestants killed by the I.R.A were obviously mistaken identity attacks or indiscriminate car bombs as in wrong place, wrong time. But one thing is for sure they weren't deliberately targeted like the I.R.A would deliberately target the British security forces.
Nigel S for a minute there I thought the conservatives didn't let 5 million poor children die, leave millions unemployed, force nurses and NHS workers to use food banks, leave key workers with unsuitable housing, and let homeless people die on the streets while we can afford to give them all houses isn't, for a second I thought that they didn't have absolute blatant lack of human decency and they weren't a complete DISGRACE of a party! For a second a thought that the leader wasn't an incompetent racist who leads a party that couldn't even tie its own shoe laces. For a second I though the that rich hadn't profited billions while poverty rates have soared, for a second I thought we couldn't just tax the rich a bit more to be able to afford to improve EVERYONES lives dramatically. Oh wait no I didn't
@@ivorbiggun710 Long reply here but unfortunately the truth is usually harder to tell than Tory propaganda lies... I'm not sure where she got 5 million kids from. It may be something to do with rejecting refugees. However, one thing is for certain and that is that the Tories have one hell of a death toll. The BMJ article linked below relates to a study done between 2010 and 2014 that showed the Cons' austerity policies had caused 120,000 unnecessary deaths over four years. This is a death toll of 30,000 per year. Assuming that the Cons haven't changed their policies (they've actually got worse, but let's assume they haven't for simplicity's sake) this means that by the end of 2020 300,000 innocent people had been *corporately murdered* (murder, not 'manslaughter' because they'd been made aware of the consequences) by successive Conservative 'governments'. That is well over four times the number of civilian casualties from WW2. On top of this, the policy adopted by the current government in early 2020 of sending home care home residents with covid to infect their neighbours, resulted in 20,000 unnecessary confirmed covid deaths, as stated by one of the chief scientific advisers, whom the Cons had ignored. And there were an additional 20,000 deaths from 'other diseases', which also probably arose from people being sent home to spread respiratory and gastrointestinal viruses in an uncontrolled situation, instead of being nursed back to health in hospital. This is why I usually refer to the PM as 'Boris the Granny Killer' and his cabinet as 'the granny-killer government. FullFacts, which is a government run website have tried to suggest that the change in death rates since 2010 could have been due to other causes but there is no evidence of any increase in the alternative causes they cite and the one glaring difference between these and previous years is the draconic Conservative austerity policy, which is still at work despite them lying that they've dropped it. You don't need to look further for evidence than their recent pathetic excuse for a pay rise for nurses. blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2017/11/15/health-and-social-care-spending-cuts-linked-to-120000-excess-deaths-in-england/
Yes mate it's also hilarious having a fuel crisis and having one of the worst death rates in the world during a global pandemic. I guess that's what you voted for eh? A big round of applause to you!🤣
@@rogerigez21 Stop? No, but there is no question that Labour would have managed the pandemic better. The UK had one of the highest death rates in the world considering relative to the population and at one stage the worst in Europe. The government knew about the pandemic months before and were even offered extra PPE equipment but turned it down. They were advised to have a lock down earlier but waited too late. They told people to stay at home and had numerous parties in downing street whilst ordering police to arrest and fine people who did the same. So many mistakes that cost literally thousands of lives and yet still people such as yourself defend and make excuses for them.
@@amanred9337 I mean, you think they would’ve handled it better, but you would’ve just ended up in a far longer lockdown. Everything else would’ve remained the same.
@@rogerigez21 I think pretty much any alternative party would have handled it better. Even the Monster Raving Looney Party and Lord Bucket head would have done a better job. The government handled it appallingly in every respect. This is not my opinion. The evidence is there in black and white. You can even acknowledge it or choose to ignore it as you are doing.
@@darrinpatterson2764 if you run a small company and you voted Conservative, which im guessing because of your comments, despite Labour having an amazing small business manifesto the joke really is on you, from beginning to end. You have good music taste though, I've seen your playlists
@@noodle1987able Corbyn sunk labour and I am aware that many of the diehard Corbyn supporters can't see this but it doesn't change this fact. His indecision and attempt to hold the country to ransom destroyed his trustworthiness along with his open willingness to lie ( he daft call may a stupid woman) and she was but he got all crippled by PC culture.
And you're telling me Nigel farage being a brave leader with good policies isn't propaganda when was the last time he supported something like free healthcare. case closed