---- previous/next frame HOT keys are "lessThan/comma" "greaterThan/fullstop" ---- left and right cursor arrow keys go back/forward 5 seconds ---- [SHIFT]+[.] changes speed ---- [0][1]]...[8][9] go to 0%,10% .. 80%,90% of video ---- [SHIFT]+[?] onscreen help ---- [F] toggle full screen for more Keyboard Shortcuts for RU-vid, see support.google.com/youtube/answer/7631406?hl=en
it's the first time I've ever seen a video like this great panoramic with visualization of the actual footage thank you I will subscribe please make more videos like this
How did you do this so it paints the background of the whole frame while the stabilised footage moves through it? I’d like to do this with some Bob Dylan footage I have
each frame is a photoshop smart layer, aligned against its neighbours, i dont have a tutorial, but some clues at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EyyC0iTmfYs.html
lots of photoshop "smart-object" layers (1 layer per frame) on a big canvas, photo-merge not used - too many moving elements.. set all layers to 1% to create average, then keep duplicating the average until opaque, each layer moved/rotated until in positon using "difference" as guide... so when aligned, the commonly located elements will turn black .... no quick way)) work in 16bit colour depth . if u have lots of frames, start with doing say every 10th frame to get overall panorama size, then go back and fill in the other 90%, export aligned laters as alpha masked single images having the panorama's dimension .... i used After Effects to pan across the exported aligned frames with the average composite as a background element
I respectfully disagree. Remember, that was 1963, back when people ran towards danger. Today... yes, they would run from it. Also, regardless of where you believe the shots came from, they shots were fired right at the area they are running to. Back then, people weren't afraid to get involved.
Alex, you are correct. Seeing this and other videos it seems clear to me they ran towards the knoll because the road the limo took to the hospital curves to the right behind the knoll and people were running up the hill to catch a glimpse of the car as it sped off. Not because they suspected a shooter there. Plus the shooter would have been just 20-30 feet from Zapruder and 3 other people standing there and it would have left a shooter totally exposed.
Kill-shot (and sound) came from inside the car, hence why people closest to the car jump a little, or fall back, or move away from the car. Some witnesses said it sounded like a firecracker went off inside the car. Given that Jacqueline Bouvier joined the CIA in 1951 and was controlled by other men, as is now known, before marrying JFK in 1953, it is pretty safe to assume everyone in the car was in on it except JFK. Her mother Janet Bouvier arranged it (Jackie joining CIA) with family friend Allen Dulles. Look up pictures of them at events. She fawns over him.
Great Work NO View of zapruder or his Secretary at all, they must be faster then anyone else, also Dave wiegman jumped off the blue press car which was only 2nd car after the secret service car behind LBJS Lincon & was filming down elm st & has a view of jfk's car before hit get's to the bridge & even in those frames you cant see Zapruder standing up there ? Also the Railway cart behind the pergola area to the left of where Zapruder was standing which is seen in the mark bell film, which shows zapruder up there is missing in this film ?
+7071t6 is that Zapruder closest to the pergola, and who "disappears" when the camera pan returns to that general area; I thought he was meant to be standing on the concrete seat base, he's there in the previous Nix clip . This sequence must have been filmed reasonably close after the tragic event, as the 'falling man' (left of frame, next to orange skirt woman) is still sitting on the ground, but then the orange skirt woman isn't in the previous Nix clip
+antdavisonNZ You cant see Zapruder or his Security at all in this footage, if it was just after the cars left the area, then where are they what they ran off, yet the Mark bell film shows Zapruder & the Secretary moving away from the area, its like the top part of the film is there to prove that Zapruder was there, but the bottom 1/2 is part of a different time of that area. cheers you do such great work keep it up & i am pleased that you returned to my comment. :). PS: you also cant see the people like the NEWMANS on the ground as well which were there on the north end of elm st & to the left of where Zapruder was filming from, more or less in front of Zapruder, where are they they fell to the ground with thier kids ? Also Mary Ann Mooreman / Jean Hill Charles Brehm also all fell to the ground straight after it happened, meaning in the Mark Bell film you can see them, yet in this footage you cant see them on the ground, so the film was edited after they must have got up, its a different time line like i have said the top is part of way after the fact, but the bottom 1/2 again is part of what happened after the fact, but does not match up with what the above people did it only takes seconds to drop & then maybe a minute of 2 before you get back up, you can see Beverly Oliver or Bubuska lady next to Charles Brehm. I believe its real footage, but altered to hide what was going on next to where Zapruder was standing, you cant see altgens over the street with someone, which i believe was Dave Wiegman or 1 of the other official press camera crew that left the car which you see in this footage talking standing there next to the light pole. Also right over on the other side of where Zapruder was standing east along elm st there were other people that went to the ground & in front of the pergola as well, near the Chair that was fixed to the ground, where are they as well, also the lady that went to the ground with glasses, which Dave Weigman filmed as he ran towards the Newmans & the other couple that went to the ground in the middle of the pergola area as well they are missing from this footage. Cheers :) Maybe to can try to match up the Bell film & time it to what was happening on the side of where Zapruder stood & the witness on the southern end of the grass on elm st. cheers :)
+7071t6 what do you think the duration of the interval, between the beginning of this clip, and the end of the previous Nix (assassination) clip, would be, given that you seem knowledgable of the position of the light blue car in the presidential cavalcade
antdavisonNZ 1 minute no more, as in the Dave Wiegman clip or frames, he jumps of the same car, the blue car & runs towards the knoll area & you can see that the secret service car thats behind LBJS car is in those frames as well stopped just where Melcome Sommers the man thats on the ground is & also you will notice that he filmed all the people out the front of the TSBD entrance as well & not 1 person is looking up from where they say the shots came from, theres a Green 1959 Chev in front of the blue Press car which is seen in the Dave Weigman film, which you dont see in this film, as the blue car starts to come into frame & also the secret Service car that stopped just where melcome was approx. if you can do a frame by frame study of the Dave Wiegman film you will see it shows no Zapruder standing up there with his secretary & especially the people that you can see on the south end of elm st where the secret service car stopped. Also the people that dropped to the ground on the same side of the north end in front of the pergola as well. cheers :) PS: sure cars can move faster than people, but you would still have the same people from film to film especially when its more or less the same time period. :)
+7071t6 interesting, i will have a look at the films you suggested ... the cars in this clip, the light blue one, and the white one, are they the same as the, possibly, 3rd and 4th cars of the cavalcade visible in zapruder frame 149 -- maybe there is one (or two) car(s) ahead of them
I was trying to see if I could see Gordon Arnold I couldn't but he always claimed to have been their and one of the shots almost took his ear off, he had to have been their because they found a photo of a man standing exactly where Gordon Arnold said that he was standing with a video camera in his hand, I couldn't see it on this footage though, but I still believe him.
Zapruder was on the way to sell the video that he had just made of the assassination he didn't waste no time getting out of there because the FBI would have confiscated the film before he ever got away with it
I've visited Dealey Plaza in Dallas twice. One of the first things I noticed is how very, very small Dealey Plaza is as compared to how big it looks in historical photos and videos. Really nothing mysterious about it. Zapruder could have hit tennis balls at JFK's car as it made the left turn onto Elm Street. It's that close. Makes the whole conspiracy theme seem so much more uncredible. Oswald had an incredibly easy shot, while a shot from the grassy knoll would have been difficult, and virtually impossible to not have been detected by the multitudes of spectators, photographers, and railroad workers and cops standing on the overpass. Just my three cents as a longtme student of the event.
@@PANCHOVILLAMATO He wasn't eating his lunch. He was assassinating the President of the United States with a cheap mail-order rifle, merely because LHO was batshit crazy and JFK's motorcade just happened to be passing by because Elm Street was the only access to Stemmons Freeway north to the Trade Mart. Please tell me your information is not coming from Oliver Stone's movie "JFK" which is about as factually accurate as "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang." I do respect your interest and engagement.
@@dcwinebuff My info comes ONLY from evidence and sworn testimony before the HSCA & the ARRB.... No books, no documentaries, No speakers, and certainly no movies.... Cold hard facts, in evidence at the National Archives. Read with particular interest the sworn testimony taken by the HSCA, that they withheld (*)from the public, and is now available... Read the ARRB testimony of witnesses present at the autopsy... witnesses that were not interviewed by the WC or the HSCA.... Read with interest the "list" of interviews conducted by the HSCA of CIA officials. Interviews that are still classified today. It's a long list... Wonder what they're still hiding.. Surely all those people are gone by now.. So it can't be a question of WHO are they protecting but WHAT are they protecting... (*) Not ONLY withheld, but actually twisted the testimony to serve their interest that LHO acted alone.
Did you ever see the Prayer Man documentary? An argument that Oswald was on the entrance steps of the TSBD a few minutes before the assassination. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eAhFP0gnItM.html
This but especially the Muchmore film prove a second shooter. Watch Emmett Hudson and the 2 men other men with him ( one below him and one above him) they both jump out of their skin at the instant JFK is hit in the head. The man above Hudson runs like he was in a track meet. Why does this prove a second shooter? Because they jump out of their skin on the headshot which is the 3rd shot. They remain calm during shots 1 and 2 (the WC narrative). The headshot was so close it startled the 3 men.
