interests : computer graphics hardware, software, applications, production & broadcast; map-making; archaeology; paleo-, ancient, social, 20th-century & alternative history; alternative energy systems; ancient & modern technologies; eco-technologies; ancient, esoteric & quantum sciences; unexplained mysteries, ufo, psychic & paranormal phenomena; mythology; german mechanical engineering; animal intelligence, consciousness & communication; the natural world
i like people who are positive, free-thinking, empathetic, ethical & non-racist; people who take time to learn new things, expand their world view, study the past, teach, encourage & inspire others, improve our collective future, or who push the bounds of what it is to be human
Sooooo. What does all of this mean?? Treat me like a 5 year old bc I may as well be given that I don’t understand all of this techno talk!! Does your work lead this item not possibly being a UPA??
it means you are able to watch this video in 3D if you have a VR head mounted display, or a 3Dtv, or if you have coloured glasses that have a different colour for each eye
These comments relate to the actions and observations of ten-year-old Rosemary Willis who is seen wearing a white, hooded coat and a red skirt. She is clearly seen in the Zapruder Film Frames Z-135 through Z-225 just after the Presidential Limousine has made the 130-degree turn from Houston Street onto Elm Street. Rosemary trotted parallel to the left-hand side of the Limousine on the south side of Elm Street. She was looking at the Limousine as it traveled west on Elm. In Zapruder Frames Z-164 to Z-171, Rosemary starts to slow down and she comes to a complete stop while turning her head to look northwest toward the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) and the Dal-Tex Building. The discerning researcher will notice that, during this time, not a single Secret Service Agent turns his head and looks in that direction; not one. At no time does Rosemary raise her head to look at a higher elevation such as the Sixth Floor Window; her gaze, throughout this time, was always at street level. At Zapruder Frame Z-207, President Kennedy is hidden behind the Stemmons Freeway sign and is not seen again until he emerged at Z-225. In Zapruder Frame Z-217, Rosemary is seen as she suddenly snaps her head very rapidly and at least 90-degrees to look toward the Grassy Knoll. Approximately 0.44 seconds after starting her westward head snap towards the Grassy Knoll, President Kennedy's head then emerged back into view in Zapruder Frame Z-225. At this time, Kennedy was sitting upright but his facial expression and his arms were showing clear evidence that he had been struck by at least one bullet sometime prior to Z-225. On November 8, 1978, Rosemary Willis was interviewed, at her home, by Investigators for the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). Rosemary told the Investigators that she was running beside the Presidential Limousine trying to keep up. She stopped running because she heard a loud noise that attracted her attention. Most defenders of the Warren Commission Report claim that Rosemary heard a gunshot that missed both President Kennedy and his Limousine. But, here again, serious researchers will note that not a single Secret Service Agent turned his head and looked in the direction of the TSBD at this time; every Agent was looking straight ahead. Rosemary told the HSCA Investigators that she was aware of at least three shots being fired but she could not tell from what direction they were fired. She told the Investigators that, as the shots were being fired, she noticed a man near the north Elm Street curb holding an umbrella and that he appeared to be more interested in opening and closing the umbrella than in dropping to the ground, like everyone else, to protect himself from the shots. This confirms that Rosemary was looking toward the Grassy Knoll as the gunshots were being fired. Rosemary also told the HSCA Investigators that, while she was facing the Grassy Knoll, she noticed the movement of a person who quickly dropped down behind a white concrete wall to “disappear the next instant” from her sight. The reader is referred to the Phil Willis Slide #7 in which Zapruder is seen standing on the pedestal to the right of the Stemmons Freeway Sign, the Concrete Stairway is to the left in the photo, and the White Concrete Wall is in between. Rosemary further described the location of this person, as seen from her position, as the corner section of the white concrete wall to the left of filmmaker Abraham Zapruder and to the right of the concrete stairway leading up to the center of the Grassy Knoll. The HSCA Report also documented that Rosemary told them that her father, Phillip Willis, became very upset when the Dallas Police abandoned their search of the Grassy Knoll area because he believed a gunshot may have come from that area. Even though Rosemary was a Ground Zero Assassination Witness, she was never interviewed by Warren Commission investigators because they were not interested in hearing that a gunman may have fired at least one shot at President Kennedy from the area of the Grassy Knoll.
We all know now that Kennedys killer was his driver. From this videos perspective, its harder to see but the video shot from the other side, you can clear see the driver turn around and blow his brains out.
This but especially the Muchmore film prove a second shooter. Watch Emmett Hudson and the 2 men other men with him ( one below him and one above him) they both jump out of their skin at the instant JFK is hit in the head. The man above Hudson runs like he was in a track meet. Why does this prove a second shooter? Because they jump out of their skin on the headshot which is the 3rd shot. They remain calm during shots 1 and 2 (the WC narrative). The headshot was so close it startled the 3 men.
The "Umbrella Man" is a nickname given to a mysterious figure seen in the Zapruder film of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas. This man, identified as Louie Steven Witt, was standing on the side of Elm Street, holding an open black umbrella, despite the fact that it was not raining. The Umbrella Man's unusual behavior and presence at the scene of the assassination sparked numerous conspiracy theories. Some speculated that the umbrella was used as a signal to the shooters, while others thought it might have concealed a weapon. In 1978, Witt came forward and testified before the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). He explained that he brought the umbrella as a form of political protest. The open umbrella was intended to reference British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was known for carrying an umbrella and was criticized for his policy of appeasement towards Nazi Germany. Witt's protest was directed at JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy, who had supported Chamberlain's policies in the 1930s. Witt's explanation was accepted by the HSCA, and he was deemed to have no connection to the assassination plot. SORRY FOR THE LONG REPLY hope this helps :D
If you freeze the video between 313 and 314 frames you can see clearly that the fatal shot came from below. You can also see the trajectory of the bullet as it goes up along with JFK blood. The bullet got into JFK's upper right side cheekbone from below and got out from the top right part of his head opening his skull. The thing that shines after the shot is probably the inner part of his skull bone ( bliah) or the bullet was one of those that they explode ( did they had such kind of bullets back then?). After the shot he falls on the left while Jackie freaks out because his head exploded 30 cm away from her face. As it seems the shooter was hidden in the street drain system something that makes sense as if someone was in the drain he could easily shot him without being detected from very close distance. It would have been impossible to shot him from the front without killing Jackie because she was bending in front of him after the neck shot.
Bon après les Américains qui ont menti. En fantasmant la vie des gens qui se font enterré. C'est souvent ce que font les gens quand ont voit que c'est des loosers. Apparement ont devrait écouté des gens qui reussise leurs vies. Les Américains serait sauvé par ce type de gens. Qui ont pas besoin d'en soulever une😊
@@tincan3080 it seems counterintuitive but yes. Slowing down to understand a confusing event is actually the more common response. I know you, with 60 years of hindsight, would speed off, go to a phone booth and put your Superman tights and cape on, being the hero you are. But regrettably they didn’t have you there.
Missiles can bounce in fact more modern missiles are designed with a trigger to detonate the charge on inpact kr electronically. Modern bombs and warheads can't even be detonated by hitting them with a hammer. It is very common for scuds yo fail to detonate when impact different types of sediment and the entire thing just ends up laying on the ground intact unexploded ordinance.
CLEARLY shown are the TWO independent thrust vectors, one trailing the object as expected, the second ALWAYS perpendicular to the ground despite the objects attitude. Missiles dont have that 2nd characteristic
@0:11 The assassin was wearing red :)watch other videos and follow the 3 'tramps'. BTW why is one of the tramps running up the stairs to where 'badgeman' was and then proceeded to take badgeman's camera ????
The assassin wore pink and was inside the car. The pink outfit is sealed until 2103, 140 years from the assassination. It has never been tested for GSR (gun shot residue). The lady in red is running up the stairs (away from the car) while facing the car, because the kill-shot came from inside the car.
C'est Jakie Kennedy qui la buter, ça se voir très bien. Ehhh chéri, vient voir mon bouquet de fleurs et bommm, elle le but, ensuite elle prend l'arme et va sur le coffre derrière et donne l'arme du crime a l'agent qui vient lui aussi la récupérer et ensuite de remet en place pour faire la veuve éplorée.... Agent de la CIA la Jackie ?
The CIA was easy to deal with because they were perfectly willing to lay out the never-ending, ever-expanding red herrings, meant to confuse and muddy the waters. The Secret Service acted completely opposite because they held real, condemning evidence
Je sais. Celui qui me touche. Il mourra. Alors arrêté d'ouvrir vos gueules pour rien. De faire vos caïd avec moi. Je vais vous niqué vos mères. C'est compris guignols ? À mon avis ils ont rien compris😊
ia904707.us.archive.org/5/items/aerogel-craft/AerogelCraftUpdate1.txt **Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence - The Aerogel Patents** (first update 2023-11-18 - added more details, examples and videos for clarification) This information is provided for free. Please take your time to analyse, challenge the facts, math or physics [ @korea_ufo on twitter/x ]. If you believe, distribute as widely as possible, every human deserves to know. Further investigative journalism or research is still clearly required. ( archives at archive.org/details/aerogel-craft diagrams at archive.org/details/aerogel-craft-images ) *The 5 observables* 1) Anti-gravity lift > Unlike any known aircraft, these objects have been sighted overcoming the earth’s gravity with no visible means of propulsion. The air-buoyant structures (described in patent [ 1) Aerogel Craft ] below), when evacuated (emptied to have an interior vacuum), are configured to lift the air-buoyant platform into the air. 2) Sudden and instantaneous acceleration > The objects may accelerate or change direction so quickly that no human pilot could survive the g-forces-they would be crushed Depending on the rate of change of the pressure, which can be varied by controllers, this can result in near instantaneous rapid acceleration. The objects are remotely controlled drones. They have no human pilot aboard. 3) Hypersonic velocities without signatures > If an aircraft travels faster than the speed of sound, it typically leaves "signatures," like vapour trails and sonic booms. All aerogel-composite drones have an interior vacuum chamber, which can have its vacuum pressure modified via pumping (described in patent [ 1) Aerogel Craft ] below). As you can see in the Leslie Kean 2014 Chile UAP video (in Examples below), it shows a UAP pumping gasses from the interior vacuum chamber. The mining-variant drone has small propellers at it's "top", housed in cowlings coated in a photon-absorbing coating (described in patent [ 4) Photon (Light) Absorbing Coating ] below). 4) Low observability, or cloaking > Even when objects are observed, getting a clear and detailed view of them-either through pilot sightings, radar or other means-remains difficult. The entire drone fleet is coated in a photon-absorbing coating of black silicon (described in patent [ 4) Photon (Light) Absorbing Coating ] below) which renders all of the drones indistinct to visual observation and somewhat "jittery" with relative changes in viewing angle, as well interfering with IR & Radar. 5) Trans-medium travel > Some UAP have been seen moving easily in and between different environments, such as space, the earth’s atmosphere and even water. The aerogel-composite craft are vacuum-sealed in both directions, allowing travel in water, air and outer space. The aerogel-composite craft can withstand heat up to 1200 degrees celcius. *Why are these patents important?* These patents describe a mass-producible craft... 1) Capable of maintaining pressure against a vacuum. 2) Capable of travel in air, water and outer space. 3) Capable of dramatic and rapid acceleration. 4) Which, upon destruction, leaves minimal and mostly non-magnetic debris. 5) Which is Human-built. 6) Which requires minimal-to-no power or fuel to operate. 7) Representing a trillion dollar multinational fraud. 8) Which uses current human materials science. 9) Which uses current human-understood physics. 10) Which represents the treasonous sequestration of reverse-engineered technology outside the purview of elected officials. *Patents & Methods* 1) Aerogel Craft: patents.google.com/patent/US11027816B1/ 2) Mass-production of Aerogel Composites: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008622323008175?via%3Dihub 3) Light/Temperature control of Aerogel Levitation: (used in conjunction with interior-vacuum-pressure change described in [ 1) Aerogel Craft ] as a levitation/propulsion method) www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-91918-5 4) Photon (Light) Absorbing Coating: patents.google.com/patent/US10276740B1/ 5) Superconducting surface between aerogel-composite hull and photon-absorbing coating: patents.google.com/patent/US20090036313A1/ 6) Rechargeable cathode system embedded within superconducting surface: (used to recharge interior batteries which power the device) onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.202002292 7) Interior cargo: patents.google.com/patent/US20150048203A1 8) Docking port / method of cargo transfer: patents.google.com/patent/US10589969B2 *Aerogels and vacuum / gas permeability* A craft can maintain pressure to the vacuum chamber in its interior cavity in both directions, due to Airloy's rigidity and a unique property of all Aerogels best described by Mary Ann Meador, a research chemical engineer and team lead for aerogels at NASA’s Glenn Research Center in Cleveland (yes, "near" wright-patt). www.nasa.gov/aeronautics/aerogels-thinner-lighter-stronger/ > The pores are so small, and gas phase heat conduction is very poor. Molecules of air cannot travel through the aerogel. *Advanced Vacuum Balloon Drones* The craft are essentially advanced vacuum balloons. Aerogel-composite Lighter-Than-Air drones. Atmospheric submarines. Built for various purposes (described in more detail below [ Purpose-built craft ]). They are (water + air + vacuum + space) safe. They are safe up to about 400 degrees celcius, but perhaps not some exterior mountings like cameras and pump intakes. *Going up, going down* Since the craft weigh less than atmospheric air, and have an interior vacuum chamber with modifiable pressure, you can go up and down via pumping gas or water into/out-of the craft's interior vacuum chamber to change the pressure difference versus "outside conditions". The craft also benefits from a significant reduction in the mass component in f=ma That's how they travel up and down in water and atmosphere columns with such rapid acceleration. You can see in the Leslie Kean 2014 Chile UAP video (in Examples below), it shows a UAP pumping gasses from the interior vacuum chamber. *Off the beaten path* Movement in directions other than up / down requires taking advantage of the reduction of mass in f=ma. One of the two nozzles on the bottom of the tictac diagram [ see tictac.png ] acts as the air intake, the other nozzle acts as the exhaust. I suspect the intake and exhaust are just small holes on the exterior of the silver-orb type craft. The drones pump air into the intake and on to the vacuum chamber, then immediately out a thrust-vectored (like harrier jump jet) exhaust. This causes rapid acceleration. The craft also benefits from a significant reduction in the mass component in f=ma As you can see in the Leslie Kean 2014 Chile UAP video (in Examples below), it shows a UAP pumping gasses from the interior vacuum chamber. *To the moon* The drones could potentially go "to the moon" *literally* with a properly calculated vector exiting Earth's atmosphere and the force from pressure-differential of an interior vacuum chamber purge (via both nozzles) initiated low in Earth's atmosphere. Imagine holding a sealed bottle of air under a pool, when you release the bottle (leaving it sealed) it shoots up out of the water due to pressure differential. Scale that pressure diff up. Faster than any other known technologies.
*Purpose-built craft* Silver-orbs are mass-produced for recon with 6 axially mounted cameras and minimal-to-no propulsion from a small pump. They occasionally will get blown by wind (sometimes drastically off their desired position) due to their relatively small pumping capabilities. They attempt to build a recon network fully covering a given area with multiple orbs. This is why they are seen in US Aircraft Training areas and why they are currently filtered from radar returns. The Photon Absorbing coating makes the craft appear visually like a "Reflection Probe" (silvery sphere), a spherically projected view of its surroundings which is jittered and distorted. Tictacs are for relatively-small cargo loads. Potentially formed in a large gas-station propane storage tank. I believe this encounter was a test of the relatively new "modern MIC UAP phenomenon". Staged in 2004 by the MIC, against the best conventional pilot at the time (CDR Fravor, unknowingly) to see if Fravor would detect it. See diagram attached tictac.png. Two tictac paint options: a) With Photon Absorbing coating, it may have appeared silvery "white" to CDR Fravor, as he was on a clear day, with a dark ocean background, at a vantage point above the craft. The Photon Absorbing coating alone would explain why the tictac appeared "jittery" to CDR Fravor. The "jittering" could have been enhanced a vacuum-pumping movement artifact/pattern/effect of the prototype AI. b) The craft was simply an early enough prototype to have simply been painted white or even remained it's aerogel-variant's natural hues. The "jittering" could have been a vacuum-pumping movement artifact/pattern/effect of the prototype AI. The TR3B is for larger cargo loads, and potentially has other unknown technologies (3 corner lights purpose unknown-to-me other than lighting the ground underneath and air-traffic-control purposes due to its larger size). See diagram attached tr3b.png. Mostly moves at night, mostly. Sometimes quite slowly considering its top-speed. Almost always slowly moving when approaching bases/cities to disguise the 3 large lights as "artillery launched flares" or "conventional aircraft dropped flares". Has a centrally mounted interior cargo rack for containers, described in [ 8) Docking port / method of cargo transfer ]. The cargo rack is visible partially on the bottom of the craft as a series of several straight ridges that run down the middle of the bottom of the craft. But as with all other craft coated in Photon Absorbing material it will be visually somewhat blurry and indistinct, scattering the "reflecting photons" of its surroundings and slightly jittering with change of perspective due to movement. The RAF Syria shootdown, Gimbal and the "Jellyfish" are laser-equipped mining robots (sharks with fricking laser beams). See diagram attached corbelluap.png and next section "Mining laser information". Visually appears like an indistinct hollow "jellyfish" due to the relatively complex shape of this drone variant. It also jitters (like other craft with Photon Absorbing coating, but slightly different due to the more complex shape of this drone variant). I believe these were the type of drone spotted and shot down in North America Jan 2023 as well. A literal army of 9 or more CCP (vacuum) balloon drones. Why they are being filtered from US conventional force radar is unclear to me and has implications of complicity. The large balloon that passed over the continent and made no attempts to hide was gathering recon for the rest of the smaller drone fleet. *Jan 2023 CCP balloon incident* See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Chinese_balloon_incident for the coverup story. There were 9 or more smaller mining drone variants near Alaska / Northern Canada (one shot down over prudhoe bay, another shot down over northern british columbia) and even a potential shootdown over the great lakes (i need better info to clarify the great lakes incident, a US conventional aircraft shot an air-to-air missile at something). *Mining laser information* UK government confirmation that a shootdown occurred Dec 14 2021 (article 2 days later, Dec 16) www.gov.uk/government/news/raf-typhoon-destroys-terrorist-drone-in-syria Corbell states that shootdown was a UAP, not terrorist drone and provides grainy photo ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-U6LyHl559qo.html UAPMAX claims a "Direct Air LSM" mining laser was recovered uapmax.com/ufo-reverse-engineered-chinese-lasers/
__Examples__ *Leslie Kean example vacuum pump exhausting* Correct time index -> ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NkUTGpegZN0.html Believe this depicts the same type of craft as the "tictac" encountered by CDR David Fravor. An aerogel-composite blimp with a coating of photon absorbing black-silicon and two exhaust nozzles on the bottom of the vessel. It appeared like a "white tictac" to CDR Fravor on a bright clear day from his position above with the dark ocean as a background lit from above. At the given time index in the youtube video of Leslie Kean's reported incident, you can see the vacuum pumps used to expel pressurized gas from the interior vacuum chamber via pumped exhaust. *RAF Syria Shootdown drone / "Jellyfish" drone sightings / "Gimbal" video* Correct time index -> ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LOftlgbG6Ho.html Believe that the craft in this video is the same type as the drone shot down Dec 14 2021 by RAF over Syria. It is also the same type of craft filmed in the "Gimbal" video in IR. An aerogel-composite drone with a coating of photon absorbing black-silicon. Several "cat ear" shaped propulsion cowlings (fan/jet/forced air) are located atop the drone, a mining laser at the bottom. It is "indistinct" when observed visually because of the black-silicon coating. It jets "upward" out of the frame by altering its internal vacuum pressure via pumping and shoots upward at dramatic speed in reaction to the pressure difference. *DC Long describes a monolith that hovered, movable by one person* Correct time index -> ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8ebGlEFac6k.html Potentially this exact device: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0008622316306339 *Aerogel the Movie* ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-w1TMgvp7SfU.html&ab_channel=AerogelTheOfficial *Nanocompositing breakthrough* ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-s2PiK5vPIhk.html&ab_channel=aerogeltech *Graphene Aerogel* www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0008622315005096 *Creating aerogel* ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Y0HfmYBlF8g.html *Creating graphene ---DANGER OF DEATH--- DO NOT TRY AT HOME * ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3hHoL77QDkg.html&ab_channel=TechIngredients *Supercriticality and aerogels* ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AeJ9q45PfD0.html *Hydrophobicity in aerogels* ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-12QJKET1Dq8.html&ab_channel=aerogeltech *Aerogel pumps* See diagram attached aerogel_pump.png *Sean Kirkpatrick "explains" the lie* Correct time index -> ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1dcVi_3NTF0.html *Why not just use a helium balloon?* Helium is relatively scarce, and supposedly running out. www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/helium-shortage-4-0-continues-and-it-s-not-just-bad-for-party-balloons-1.6090014 www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/helium-shortage-doctors-are-worried-running-element-threaten-mris-rcna52978 *Desired elements/isotopes* I believe this fleet to be strip mining the planet for desired resources using advanced reverse-engineered technologies, without elected oversight. The fleet will be "seen" more often around deposits of desired resources. Resource possibilities : Deuterium, Tritium, Helium-3, Helium-4, Lithium, Gold, Silver, Tungsten, Rare Earth series, Radioactive series About 1 in every 5,000 hydrogen atoms in seawater is deuterium, making it easy to acquire. Tritium, however, is a radioactive isotope, and difficult to source naturally. This can be circumvented by exposing the more readily available lithium to energetic neutrons, which produces tritium nuclei. *Unanswered questions worthy of further investigative journalism and research* > Can free lift be proven in-the-real-world, outside of the math in diagram aerogel-graphene-lift.png? > Can free lift translate to free energy? > Can these craft be scaled / modified to replace cars, trains, boats and conventional airplanes that burn fuel? > Does this solve "Climate Change" if built-out to replace the petro-grid? > Since no craft are officially acknowledged to exist, are the proposed craft feasible for us to build{yes}? > If (by some miracle) humans are not building these craft, are the described craft designs then acknowledged > as new inventions which rely on the patents below? > Were the craft reverse-engineered by humans? > If so, where did the reverse-engineered materials originally come from? > Were some of these craft designed by AI? > Why did Dr Stephen Steiner say "the math didn't work" for lighter-than-air aerogel craft in 2012? (see aerogel-ssteiner-denies.png) *8 diagrams attached* tldr: ||Finkle is Einhorn. The modern phenomenon is a rogue M.I.C. They have all the patents. They are lying to everyone. I will never kill myself.|| diagrams at archive.org/details/aerogel-craft-images ======== ia904707.us.archive.org/5/items/aerogel-craft/AerogelCraftUpdate1.txt
Each of the 10 chapters is 2m36s long, so you can use RU-vid's predefined (0% - 90%) hot keys to jump to the chapter or particular format you want to view, and press that hot key to repeat that chapter if desired. The 'chapter' hot keys are [0] to [9], both the NumPad and row-above-QWERTY number keys work equally well. I included a map ( 00:50 ) of additional RU-vid specific hot keys if you want to change the playback speed, scrub back or forward 5 seconds, go to previous or next frame, etc For the anaglyph versions you should adjust your display device's colour settings, so that the principal two colours are sufficiently saturated, colour settings such as sRGB are not recommended, go for gaming or standard settings instead You may need to increase your display device's colour saturation levels; try and get the starting reference (text over grid) looking as ghost free as possible, so that one eye sees only one coloured image with no or minimal ghosting and vice-versa for the other eye. Reducing brightness and contrast can also help. For the 3Dtv versions, I assume you already know the optimal settings for viewing 3D content, if not reduce brightness and contrast, if you see ghosting or cross-talk occurring between areas of bright whites and dark blacks For VR-HMD versions, none of this adjustment is required. Since I am right-eye dominant, the right eye sees the original video, the left eye sees a time delayed version of the right image, it is delayed by 1 or 2 frames in the fast moving sections, but where the apparent camera pan is very slow, the delay may be as much as 15 frames (1/2 second), or more if stopped. In addition to this time shift, the left and right images are also physically shifted horizontally with respect to each other, so that the background buildings and terrain are as close as possible to being identical. Obviously this is, technically, the worst method of creating a 3D video, no horizontally parallel dual cameras or split-lens single-camera system was used, but the substantially right-to-left pan does provide lots of perspectives than can be used to make stereo pairs. Where it fails is when the camera pans vertically / up-and-down, or changes its horizontal direction. For this reason original frames 0001..0719 (‘head’) and 4991..7028 (‘tail’) were not included in this 3D conversion. You can watch the entire untrimmed 3minute55second 2D video at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2ZZlOvDeKQY.html The 3D is set up so that the background buildings and terrain sit on the same plane or Z-axis-depth as the monitor, and the OSD target cross-hair and UAP pop out to float in the 3D space. Focus on the background buildings and terrain, as that is the place where you eyes should converge. The best viewing experience will on a large-as-possible 3Dtv or 3D computer monitor, but the anaglyphs work OK. I prefer GreenMagenta anaglyphs over RedCyan ones, as human eyes are most luma-sensitive to green, then red then blue, so Green & Magenta (Red+Blue) is a good compromise. In VR-HMD it works, but to me, the sense of depth doesn’t feel quite the same in such a boxed-in-exclusive-of-the-rest-of-the-world environment, but your mileage may be different, 30% of people will have some difficulty with 3D anyway.
I first used this 3D method, way back in 1997, when I got a UFO crash video from Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan, who he visited New Zealand in March 1997 for a UFO Symposium over the Easter holiday period. He is the host of "Third Millenium [Tercer Milenio],” a long-running Spanish-language TV program, available to view at www.youtube.com/@MaussanTV This technique was possible, again, because the camera was panning substantially horizontally, meaning I could extract 100s of useful stereo pairs. Quality wasn’t great, as it came on a PAL VHS tape, that had been transcoded from NTSC, so there were both dimensional and frame-rate-timing changes. I captured the VHS onto hard disk, split the interlaced frames into their two fields to get 50 separate images per second, time shifted one set of images for one eye, re-interlaced the left and right eye video streams, viewed through LCD shutter glasses synchronised to field changes on an analog, ’glass bottle / phosphor tube’ monitor, and the result was surprisingly good. Even though source was noisy transcoded VHS, I could see a lot of hidden detail, such as the direction of impact dust cloud, and that the UFO was actually rotating like a spinning-top. I was interviewed at that time on that 3D version, by NZ investigative reporter Ian Wishart ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Wishart_(journalist) ), and that was broadcast on New Zealand national TV in 1998 on his show ‘RealTV’. I was out of the country that year, so I never saw the broadcast, I saw a copy on VHS later, but my friend, who had that copy, can’t find it again as he has 1000s of videos and books - I did look for hours and hours - so I guess that interview is forever lost in time. I don’t have that source data or 3D version any more, but you can see a dirty low resolution NTSC mpeg1 source 2D version of the UFO crash at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YwexZuCotJ4.html and a photoshopped panorama of the crash at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RVUvMG6AGGg.html That video has some interesting features, such as there are two apparent thrust vectors, one always trailing the UFO from its rear, but one coming from underneath the UFO which is always perpendicular to the ground. Make of it what you will.
in 2011 I did some object tracking analysis on "Mission to Mir" ((c) 1997) IMAX & Lockheed Martin Corporations ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OQeQR_Oz3xM.html ufo's visible on the film and dvd - IMAX - Mission to Mir - analysis - part 1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BesaR1Lor78.html ufo's visible on the film and dvd - IMAX - Mission to Mir - analysis - part 2 Interesting footage for a number of reasons -- the camera is fixed in relation to the Space Shuttle, not handheld -- no focus or zoom changes -- footage shot on IMAX 70mm format film, not (image intensified) video -- anomalous objects floating around and changing direction over time -- two objects do sharp U-turns (top left) -- one object does an abrupt right angle direction change (bottom right) -- some objects suddenly appearing and disappearing -- increasing contrast/brightness reveals more objects than originally visible part 2 secondary analysis most clearly detailing trajectories of moving objects
The capabilities of the particular camera model family used in this video is shown in ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eZcFUYMAWBY.html L3 Wescam - kamera MX 15HD ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XE4y3PArOmw.html L3 WESCAM's MX™ 15 Product Video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MOUuxITR4eA.html L3Harris | WESCAM MX™-15 Best of www.l3harris.com/sites/default/files/2021-05/WESCAM%20MX-15-0503AA-Sell.pdf en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wescam =============================== Wescam's primary product line is the MX-Series, which consists of MX-series turret families-the MX-8, MX-10, MX-15, MX-20 and MX-25. These are all controlled by the US ITAR. [ International Traffic in Arms Regulations ] They are currently used by defence, homeland security, and law enforcement agencies as well as in televised sporting events, such as NASCAR. These products are typically mounted on fixed-wing, rotor-wing, UAV and Aerostat airborne platforms and also on numerous armoured vehicles, and marine-based platforms. : : The MX-15 is Wescam's most popular family of imaging systems. This turret can weigh up to 100 pounds (45 kg) with a diameter of 15.5 inches (39 cm) and a height of 19 inches (48 cm). The MX-15 Family includes the MX-15, .. [ "WESCAM MX-15, Air Surveillance and Reconnaissance" www.l3harris.com/all-capabilities/wescam-mxtm-15-air-surveillance-and-reconnaissance ] .. the MX-15HDi (High-Definition variant), the MX-15D (Designator variant) .. [ "WESCAM MX-15D, Airborne Targeting and Designating" www.l3harris.com/all-capabilities/wescam-mxtm-15d-airborne-targeting-and-designating ] .. and the MX-15GS (Ground System variant). These imaging systems are usually installed on manned fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft. The price for a single set is above $1 million US Dollars. [ Federal Contract Opportunity for L-3 MX-15D Sensor govtribe.com/opportunity/federal-contract-opportunity/l-3-mx-15d-sensor-turrets-w5r8gz17r0234 ] ============================= the same family of cameras filmed the 2014-11-11 Chilean Naval Helicopter UAF (declassified 2017) the full IR and visible spectrum footage is at documents3.theblackvault.com/casefiles/chile-11-11-14/faa.ts (1080p raw unedited 1gb download) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fk00f3Q_2rE.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NkUTGpegZN0.html analyses ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_1jUYFCMmos.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Cg2GyBF7-hg.html www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/documents-released-on-the-november-11-2014-chilean-navy-helicopter-ufo-encounter/
Maybe one day someone will do a photogrammetric analysis of that portion where land is shown; a fairly obvious choice of techniques, given this video has 1000s of overlapping images of the scene It would be super interesting to know whether the estimated object size in the two competing hypotheses matches the moving black blob shown in the video, or in other words, would a flIR camera with a decent telephoto lens depict a flame of a size commensurate with an appropriately-sized sky lantern from X number of nautical miles away. IE, can you see even see a candle sized flame with the Wescam MX-15D camera from the distances suggested, and if so, how big would it appear? If the lantern if close to the ground, its speed can be relatively slow, but it will be tiny in the video if visible at all, if that lantern is relatively close to the camera, its speed it going to be relatively fast. If you look closely at some of the frames in this and other similar UAP IR videos, you can see a biaxial cross surrounding that black blob, and that black blob alone. Take a look at the frames with the numbers in early 1500s, (0m50s) but this occurs quiet a few times in other parts of this video, and is super obvious in the 3D version - and yes, I am aware of the predictive motion algorithms used in compressed digital video. The same sort of cross can be seen at 04m20s and at other times, in the Chilean Naval helicopter video (look at the 1080p BlackVault 1gb 'transport stream' download called 'faa.ts', not the compressed to death RU-vid versions ***) - nobody seems to have commented on this. How stupid are people releasing sky lanterns proximate to, or within, the controlled airspace of an airport, where [1] they risk confusing the air traffic controllers and any pilots on approach to landing; are [2] a risk to being ingested by or otherwise interfering with aircraft engines; would pose a fire risk to areas of [3] wooded vegetation or [4] built up areas; could [5] distract car drivers with potentially fatal consequences; could [6] land over areas where there are obviously cows sleeping giving a risk of fatal ingestion of debris by such, or other, animals; or be visible over [7] water and be confused with distress flares. This video checks all those boxes. Additionally, [8] would a relatively delicate sky lantern (candle in a paper bag) physically survive the wind speed suggested over the entire time period implied ? [9] If the hotel releasing such lanterns is 10km from the airport, does the lantern have a large enough fuel cell / candle to reach the airport before the fuel is spent and the heat source extinguished? *** documents3.theblackvault.com/casefiles/chile-11-11-14/faa.ts (1080p raw unedited 1gb download) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fk00f3Q_2rE.html === www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/documents-released-on-the-november-11-2014-chilean-navy-helicopter-ufo-encounter/ --- interestingly, one of the reports in the document archives documents3.theblackvault.com/casefiles/chile-11-11-14/INFORME%20GEIPAN/INFORME%20GEIPAN%20EN%20INGL%c3%89S.pdf identifies the camera as french-made Euroflir 350-3, but the OSD is the same as the canadian-made Wescam MX series --- manufacturer's video of the Euroflir 350 showing the OSD is very different to what is shown in the UAP video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Lg-d6FT6J0g.html but somewhat closer in this video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-P27lMPRPi40.html en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safran_Electronics_%26_Defense
AEROGELs - a third potential hypothesis - air-buoyant drone made with a vacuum chamber made of some aerogel analog - VLTAS - Vacuum Lighter Than Air Structures ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-S1Uex7KK_x4.html Why don't we fill an Airship with a Vacuum? patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/51/ef/a0/035d0116bc183d/US11027816.pdf patents.google.com/patent/US11027816 Air-buoyant structures and vehicles ========= ABSTRACT Air-buoyant structures, and vehicles incorporating air-buoyant structures, are provided. Hollow, air-buoyant structures may include a shell of ultra-low density aerogel material, foam material, or vapor-expanded material that is strong and stiff enough to withstand atmospheric pressure and lightweight enough to achieve buoyancy in air under evacuation. The shell may be reinforced with a suitable reinforcing material, such as helical nanofibers. The air-buoyant structures may also include vacuum pumps and valves operably connected to or integrated with the hollow shell. The vacuum pumps and valves may be configured to pump air out of the hollow shell and allow air back into the hollow shell to control buoyancy ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5ImWOfeWlbw.html Are some UFOs made out of Aerogel ??? ia904707.us.archive.org/5/items/aerogel-craft/AerogelCraftUpdate2.txt www.popsci.com/article/technology/when-nasa-launched-stardust-they-had-no-way-retrieve-its-samples/ discover.lanl.gov/publications/1663/2021-august/lighter-than-air/ twitter.com/korea_ufo ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xEFeoRJkgEw.html Aerogel - The Secret Link ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-O76IjyakRtI.html Aerogel Drones (part 2) - Chinese Drone Recovered ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zBC6dke7OM.html Aerogel Drone SUPERPOWER ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u_swdmg301k.html Calvine UFO - Aerogel Drone ? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-C18EuHvuzL0.html Was the Calvine UFO designed at Los Alamos ? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fjf7vdSWbb8.html Beginner's guide to AEROGEL! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hoFxq2CEoH8.html The Story of Aerogels: The Power of Porosity ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nctQVS8EJ-8.html How Making Graphene Aerogel in Space Will Shape Future Exploration ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AeJ9q45PfD0.html World's Lightest Solid! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GcdB5bFwio4.html I Waterproofed Myself With Aerogel! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qnOoDE9rj6w.html Flamethrower vs Aerogel ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Y0HfmYBlF8g.html Making aerogel ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-w1TMgvp7SfU.html AEROGEL synthesis ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9wsZf8xIJRA.html How to Make an Aerogel Out of Anything ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k8OhJKR3AA4.html Strong, Machinable Aerogels Now Commercially Available ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WREnMOheOMI.html Aerogel Holds the Weight of a Car ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-s2PiK5vPIhk.html Introduction to Aerogel Technologies and Airloy® Ultramaterials ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dDrGl3qLlAE.html Aerogel Nexus 7 Made With Ultralight Airloy X103-H Strong Aerogel etc, etc, etc there are lots of other videos on Aerogels www.aerogeltechnologies.com/ www.buyaerogel.com/ www.aerogel.com/ www.aerogel.org/ link to download web.archive.org/web/20230519003259/anonymfile.com/BXRmQ/s10853-022-07540-x-1.pdf direct download web.archive.org/web/20230519003259mp_/anonymfile.com/f/9344afbb-19f9-4c12-a83e-2cbcc517c16f www.researchgate.net/publication/362384903_Approaching_air_buoyancy_in_aerocryogel_vacuum_vessels laro.lanl.gov/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Approaching-air-buoyancy-in-aerocryogel-vacuum/9916362260203761?institution=01LANL_INST#file-0 : “Approaching air buoyancy in aero/cryogel vacuum vessels” 10 page pdf by Miles F. Beaux et al, Los Alamos National Laboratory ========= ABSTRACT Air impermeability has been observed in low-density aerogel and cryogel materials, which has led to a series of experiments to investigate the feasibility of an air buoyant vacuum vessel, as well as the fabrication and testing of sub buoyant prototypes. Bulk samples of silica aerogel were shown to isolate vacuum from ambient air for several hours with optimal vacuum isolation occurring at a density of approximately 85 mg cm-3 . It was demonstrated using polyimide aerogel and cryogel materials that the ability of these foam materials to provide an air impermeable layer between vacuum and atmosphere, in spite of being comprised of mostly void space, is related to material stiffness. It is hypothesized that this behavior is due to local deformation of the random nanostructure of the material. Spherical shell vacuum vessels were produced using the polyimide cryogel, and less than 133 Pa vacuum containment was demonstrated under active pumping. In order to approach the non-buoyant to buoyant transition for these vacuum vessels, a polyimide composite was produced using helical fibers for which preliminary mechanical testing was practical cited in www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/13hwu29/research_into_secret_advanced_technology_that/
Bon. Comme je disais. Vous êtes mal vu du côté des OVNI. Qui préfère vous enculée que de vous voir regardé le monde de haut. Allé tuée deux trois petites souris. Au-lieu de vous croire supérieur. Où d'attendre une Chute
And people STILL perpetuate the LIE!! Any time the , or any announcer mention Lee Harvey Oswald, I turn it off and immediately write them and tell them what really happened. The ‘Magic bullet’ only appeared when they ( the powers that be) found out the total amount of wounds). Bullets don’t hang around in mid- air for six- seconds or change direction. Ask any hunter what a spent bullet looks like. The powers that be were stupid enough to place an entire cartridge on the gurney in the hospital. Totally laughable but ( some) Americans bought it. Jack was killed from the gun of ROSCO White. He was dressed up as a Dallas policeman. They called him Badge Man for years until technology finally made his photo hidden in the bushes clearer. Oswald never fired a shot. He was low level CIA, recruited as many are, from the marines. His pay- stub was validated from the cia paymaster.( her name escapes me at this moment) That’s what happened. The why is Jack was going spill the beans about our knowledge of UFO’s. No President is ever told because they become citizens again. Sad because 60 years later, the American public is demanding the truth and they will get it all… in spades …within two years.
"Any time the, or any announcer mention Lee Harvey Oswald, I turn it off and immediately write them and tell them what really happened." In other words, you bury your head in the sand and ignore the actual evidence.
Each of the 10 chapters is 2m15s long, so you can use RU-vid's predefined (0% - 90%) hot keys to jump to the chapter or particular format you want to view, and press that hot key to repeat that chapter if desired. The 'chapter' hot keys are [0] to [9], both the NumPad and row-above-QWERTY number keys work equally well. I included a map of additional RU-vid specific hot keys if you want to change the playback speed, scrub back or forward 5 seconds, go to previous or next frame, etc For the anaglyph versions you should adjust your display device's colour settings, so that the principal two colours are sufficiently saturated, colour settings such as sRGB are not recommended, go for gaming or standard settings instead You may need to increase your display device's colour saturation levels; try and get the starting reference (text over grid) looking as ghost free as possible, so that one eye sees only one coloured image with no or minimal ghosting and vice-versa for the other eye. Reducing brightness and contrast can also help. For the 3Dtv versions, I assume you already know the optimal settings for viewing 3D content, if not reduce brightness and contrast, if you see ghosting or cross-talk occuring between areas of bright whites and dark blacks For VR-HMD versions, none of this adjustment is required. I would rate this 3D stereoscopic conversion as a 6 out of 10 The source has had large triangular sections removed from it, has had a corner pin distortion or 3D rotation applied to it, and the remaining cropped image is a variable speed bi-directional pan across the original. The source also has a lot of blended frames, and over 80 duplicate frames which give an apparent stuttering motion in various places. I replaced each of the first of those duplicates with a frame blended from its neighbours, which is not a perfect solution, but less jarring on the eyes than removing one of each of the duplicates. Since I am right-eye dominant, the right eye sees the original video, whose corners have been restored to what i consider close to original, resulting in the target cross-hair being centre screen and the characters forming the top and bottom On-Screen-Display (OSD) text sit within cells of an imaginary checkerboard. The left eye sees a time delayed version of the right image, it is delayed by 2 or 3 frames in the first 2x-zoomed in portion, but in the second portion the camera panning velocity is much more variable, and there are portions where the camera pan is very slow, so the delay may be as much as 15 frames (1/2 second), mostly the delay in the second portion is 4 or 5 frames In addition to this time shift, the left and right images are also physically shifted horizontally with respect to each other, so that the background buildings and terrain are as close as possible to being identical. Obviously this is, technically, the worst method of creating a 3D video, no horizontally parallel dual cameras or split-lens single-camera system was used, but the substantially right-to-left pan does provide lots of perspectives than can be used to make stereo pairs. Where it fails is when the camera pans vertically / up-and-down. This occurs briefly in at least 4 places, but only for a second or less, so not worth disabling the 3D effect, for as such a disablement, would be more evident than the retinal disparity caused by such vertical movement. You can see these places in the anaglyph versions where colour in visible in the otherwise monochrome background, but there was one place where the vertical camera pan was too long to ignore, breaking the 3D effect, (which requires horizontally parallel images,) so I disabled the 3D effect for that portion. The 3D is set up so that the background buildings and terrain sit on the same plane or Z-axis-depth as the monitor, and the OSD (cropped from the anaglyph versions) target cross-hair and Jellyfish UAP pop out to float in the 3D space. Focus on the background buildings and terrain, as that is the place where you eyes should converge. It was necessary to include portions of an average of the OSD text to prevent 3D abnormalities / vertical disparities / vertical edge violations as the complete OSD is constantly being cropped by the horizontally panning image. I needed to create this OSD average anyway as a reference to restore the source video to its near-original aspect. In the anaglyph versions I cropped out the top-and bottom OSD text. The best viewing experience will on a large-as-possible 3Dtv or 3D computer monitor, but the anaglyphs work OK. I prefer GreenMagenta anaglyphs over RedCyan ones, as human eyes are most luma-sensitive to green, then red then blue, so Green & Red+Blue=Magenta is a good compromise. In VR-HMD it works, but to me, the sense of depth doesn’t feel quite the same in such a boxed-in-exclusive-of-the-rest-of-the-world environment, but your mileage may be different, 30% of people will have some difficulty with 3D anyway. I was purely interested in whether or not the Jellyfish UAP moved around in the camera’s Z-axis which it does, and you can compare its motion to the target cross-hair which acts as a reference floating in front of the background buildings and terrain.
Jeremy Corbell's description ============================ source twitter.com/i/status/1744567963309556045 3m48s extract from tubitv.com/tv-shows/200044921 tubitv.com/series/300002259 TMZ Presents: UFO Revolution - Season 1 Episode 1 - The Breakthrough at around 49 minutes It's in thermal. It was filmed on a weapons platform. You see that there's a dog there. See the animals are black. I'm assuming this is black hot. You see the object just went to white. And you'll see it going from white to black, white to black. And that's basically showing the heat differential. So it's going like hot and cold, hot and cold. The problem was that the optics platform was jammed. These individuals who target with these platforms, they can shoot out an Al Qaeda tire [tyre] at 27 miles away, but not being able to lock it was one of the first signs that something's weird. I was able to find direct eyewitnesses and corroborate that this event did happen. When individuals would target in on it, with the optics, the way it was described, each of these hanging things, they were stiff; like they weren't moving. They had geometric form like scales, what was said to be scales like an armor [armour]. There were also people with night vision, who were out and they were tasked to go look for it. Couldn't see it on the night vision, only in the thermal spectrum could it be seen. But anything that looks like that appears to have a payload, that's a big deal. It could be dangerous. So these are high priority. But what happened is, there were a couple other nations involved and the feeds were shut, just shut immediately. So that put me on high alert too. Why is it completely being shut down? But that's not all it did. It goes out over a body of water. I'm told, it stops on a dime, descends into the water; stiff into the water. And for 17 minutes, nothing. And boom, this thing comes up out of the water and shoots off at 45 degrees, just like that. It looks very much like what I've heard that has made incursions into nuclear facilities because I know for sure, fact of the matter, there is footage from inside a nuclear facility, and I'll just say it, Pantex, that's the one, man. Something that appears identical to this, moves between these nuclear silos, and shot off again at a 45 degree angle. What it is, I don't know, but now, when it goes over a body of water, I do have some footage of that. This is when, that same object, a jellyfish UFO, goes out over this.. You kind of get an idea by the distance now how far these optic systems can reach. When it gets to that point, where it's over the water, every source that I have talked with, who is aware of this footage, that footage exists. You've got a UFO or a UAP, descends into the water, stiff, comes back up, and then shoots off [at] 45 degrees. Now this was taken by an intelligence agency and buried. So I don't know man, these are the cases that sparked me. I don't know what this is. I just know when I get military-filmed, UAP footage designated, where people risk getting that to me, I take it as serious as it sounds and I try to get to the bottom of it, and it's hard, but I do have a number of direct eyewitnesses now. ====== ( transcribed by www.notta.ai/en/mp4-to-text ) ======
I first used this 3D method, way back in 1997, when I got a UFO crash video from Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan, who he visited New Zealand in March 1997 for a UFO Symposium over the Easter holiday period. He is the host of "Third Millenium [Tercer Milenio],” a long-running Spanish-language TV program, available to view at www.youtube.com/@MaussanTV This technique was possible, again, because the camera was panning substantially horizontally, meaning I could extract 100s of useful stereo pairs. Quality wasn’t great, as it came on a PAL VHS tape, that had been transcoded from NTSC, so there were both dimensional and frame-rate-timing changes. I captured the VHS onto hard disk, split the interlaced frames into their two fields to get 50 separate images per second, time shifted one set of images for one eye, re-interlaced the left and right eye video streams, viewed through LCD shutter glasses synchronised to field changes on an analog, ’glass bottle / phosphor tube’ monitor, and the result was surprisingly good. Even though source was noisy transcoded VHS, I could see a lot of hidden detail, such as the direction of impact dust cloud, and that the UFO was actually rotating like a spinning-top. I was interviewed at that time on that 3D version, by NZ investigative reporter Ian Wishart ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Wishart_(journalist) ), and that was broadcast on New Zealand national TV in 1998 on his show ‘RealTV’. I was out of the country that year, so I never saw the broadcast, I saw a copy on VHS later, but my friend, who had that copy, can’t find it again as he has 1000s of videos and books - I did look for hours and hours - so I guess that interview is forever lost in time. I don’t have that source data or 3D version any more, but you can see a dirty low resolution NTSC mpeg1 source 2D version of the UFO crash at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YwexZuCotJ4.html and a photoshopped panorama of the crash at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RVUvMG6AGGg.html That video has some interesting features, such as there are two apparent thrust vectors, one always trailing the UFO from its rear, but one coming from underneath the UFO which is always perpendicular to the ground. Make of it what you will.
IDENTIFYING THE CAMERA - Wescam MX series the capabilities of this camera family is shown in ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eZcFUYMAWBY.html L3 Wescam - kamera MX 15HD After making and publishing this 3D conversion, I saw a video which has the complete uncropped OnScreenDisplay text very similar to the one used to video the Jellyfish UAP .. it would have been really helpful had I known about it at the time .. it was only published a week ago, but existed elsewhere as the UAP discussed, was videoed in 2013 * * * ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HlYwktOj75A.html www.youtube.com/@_SolFoundation Kevin Knuth [Associate Professor of Physics at the University of Albany] on The Physics of UAP Presented by Nolan Laboratory and the Stanford School of Medicine in November 2023 at Stanford University ////////////////////////////////////// * * * subsequent research ================= ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Hee70AwwUJ8.html original post, dead link, video no longer exists ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2ZZlOvDeKQY.html 2013 Aguadilla Puerto Rico UAP ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-q6s5RwqnnLM.html 2013 Aguadilla Puerto Rico UAP/USO ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-c1qiZ_L8wX4.html Un ovni au-dessus de l'aéroport de Puerto-Rico ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Pm-Sg_J_hB8.html Ovni captado por helicóptero federal en Aguadilla, Puerto Rico (handheld video capture, not videoed from a helicopter, but from an aeroplane) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FAMCx6Kr1k8.html UFO SIGHTINGS CAUGHT ON CAMERA | A compilation of the internet's most divisive videos Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) 162 page report "The 2013 Aguadilla Puerto Rico UAP - The detailed analysis of an Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon captured by the Department of Homeland Security." docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/299316_9a12b53f67554a008c32d48eff9be5cd.pdf 24d63f27-e686-40c4-adce-0870e805ceec.filesusr.com/ugd/299316_9a12b53f67554a008c32d48eff9be5cd.pdf www.academia.edu/40212895/2013_Aguadilla_Puerto_Rico#:~:text=...read%20more-,Download,-PDF " The object in this video was tracked using a state of the art Wescam MX-15D multi-sensor multi-spectral targeting system. The MX-15D was mounted on the underbelly of a DHC8 turbo prop aircraft operated by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This system has high definition thermal imaging, short range IR for enhanced haze penetration, a laser rangefinder and illuminator, and stabilization features. " ------------------------------------------------------------------ Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France (3AF) report "The Aguadilla Airport case" (2013-04-25) 28 page report www.3af.fr/global/gene/link.php?doc_id=4566&fg=1 " The video images have been recorded from the WESCAM MX-15D airborne imaging turret video output. The WESCAM MX-15D is mounted under the nose of an American DHC-8 customs and border protection (CBP). The system's infrared sensor operates in the MWIR mid-infrared band between 3 and 5 microns " ------------------------------------------------------------------ Centro de Identificación Aeroespacial (CIAE) 24 page report "Alleged UFO Captured by InfraRed Camera from U.S. Customs & Border Protection Airplane over Aguadilla, Puerto Rico" www.ipaco.fr/EN_IFO_B_heart_130425.pdf " Equipment involved : The Infrared rotating camera used by the Bombardier DHC 8 airplane was a Wescam MX-15 (a gimbal scanning type of system based on a rotating and elevating portholed turret). Full details are depicted here: www.wescam.com/productsservices/airborne-surveillance-andreconnaissance/mx-15/ " ------------------------------------------------------------------ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2nSIKYlm2eE.html CBP releases videos of unidentified aerial phenomena 10 zipped videos are at www.cbp.gov/document/foia-record/unidentified-aerial-phenomenon The 2013 Aguadilla Puerto Rico UAP has the title "Video pertaining to Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon 9" ////////////////////////////////////// so that rabbit hole showed me, the OSD is from Wescam MX series of cameras manufactured by L3Harris Technologies www.youtube.com/@L3HarrisTechnologies www.youtube.com/@L3HarrisTechnologies/search?query=mx ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6JMmpwRVDAU.html L3Harris | WESCAM MX™-8 Best of ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eZEcG3BEvFE.html L3Harris | WESCAM MX™-10 Best of ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-D5fQ_sfxPvs.html L3Harris | WESCAM MX™-10MS Best of ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MOUuxITR4eA.html L3Harris | WESCAM MX™-15 Best of ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JlEf7vzgLmg.html L3Harris | WESCAM MX™-20 Best of ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ImAYRHbWaC8.html L3Harris | WESCAM MX™-25 Best of OSD is the same as these MX-series cameras from 2015, -------------------------------------------------------- ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-F9TucwLoK-Q.html L3 WESCAM - The History of WESCAM ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CeQlkvzLGY4.html L3 WESCAM's MX Targeting Family ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XE4y3PArOmw.html L3 WESCAM's MX™ 15 Product Video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jtYaejwd1Y0.html L3 WESCAM's MX™-20 Product Video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_yFP2nvMsTI.html L3 WESCAM's MX™-25 Product Video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MRDV3cxO_G8.html L3 WESCAM's MX™-25 ----------------------------------------------------- lots of Wescam videos from that period www.youtube.com/@Kskelton880 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wescam =============================== Wescam's primary product line is the MX-Series, which consists of MX-series turret families-the MX-8, MX-10, MX-15, MX-20 and MX-25. These are all controlled by the US ITAR. They are currently used by defence, homeland security, and law enforcement agencies as well as in televised sporting events, such as NASCAR. These products are typically mounted on fixed-wing, rotor-wing, UAV and Aerostat airborne platforms and also on numerous armoured vehicles, and marine-based platforms. MX-10 Introduced in 2009, the MX-10 is Wescam's newest imaging system. Its fully integrated weight is 38 pounds (17 kg). It has a 10-inch (25 cm) diameter and stands 14 inches (36 cm) tall.[4][5] This small size and low weight reduce the weight and clearance requirements for installation on manned and unmanned airborne platforms. The MX-10 can incorporate several different types of sensors (up to six), including high-definition daylight and infrared sensors.[6] Wescam has been in the process of creating variations of the MX-10 for use in a wider range of applications. The MX-10GS (GS: Ground System) has been adapted for mounting on a ground vehicle where it can sit atop a mast or tower for a higher point of view, whether the vehicle is moving or stationary. The MX-10MS (MS:Marinized System) has also been created,[7] and Zyvex Technologies has operated it on the Piranha Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV). WESCAM's MX 10 is a compact Multi-Sensor, Multi-Spectral imaging system for surveillance missions from light aircraft. The Wescam MX-10 thermal imaging system houses two cameras. A color camera used primarily during the day can read an object the size of a license plate from more than 750 feet away. The second camera, an infrared thermal imager, can be used during the day and at night. Infrared technology permits the flight crew to see objects that may otherwise go undetected at night. The MX-10 system costs more than 400.000 US Dollars. MX-15 The MX-15 is Wescam's most popular family of imaging systems. This turret can weigh up to 100 pounds (45 kg) with a diameter of 15.5 inches (39 cm) and a height of 19 inches (48 cm). The MX-15 Family includes the MX-15,[8] the MX-15HDi (High-Definition variant), the MX-15D (Designator variant)[9] and the MX-15GS (Ground System variant). These imaging systems are usually installed on manned fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft. The price for a single set is above $1 million US Dollars.[10] MX-20 Of the MX-Series, the MX-20 is the largest imaging system, weighing in at up to 198 pounds (90 kg). It has a diameter of 21 inches (53 cm) and a height of 26 inches (66 cm). This larger system is typically installed on large, fixed-wing aircraft,[11][12] such as the P-3 Orion, Bayraktar Akıncı and Aerostats. This turret is used for long-range surveillance, as it can identify and engage subjects from over 20 km away. bottom line ========= www.l3harris.com/sites/default/files/2021-05/WESCAM%20MX-15-0503AA-Sell.pdf www.l3harris.com/sites/default/files/2020-07/ims_eo_brochure_wescam_MX-20-0102AB-Brochure.pdf The best resolution version of the MX-series OSD I subsequently found after what is discussed above came from the 2014-11-11 Chilean Naval Helicopter UAF (declassified 2017) footage. The full IR and visible spectrum footage is at documents3.theblackvault.com/casefiles/chile-11-11-14/faa.ts (1080p raw unedited 1gb 'transport stream' download) viewable on RU-vid slightly downscaled from 1080p source: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fk00f3Q_2rE.html clean 480p: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NkUTGpegZN0.html
in 2011 I did some object tracking analysis on "Mission to Mir" ((c) 1997) IMAX & Lockheed Martin Corporations ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OQeQR_Oz3xM.html ufo's visible on the film and dvd - IMAX - Mission to Mir - analysis - part 1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BesaR1Lor78.html ufo's visible on the film and dvd - IMAX - Mission to Mir - analysis - part 2 Interesting footage for a number of reasons -- the camera is fixed in relation to the Space Shuttle, not handheld -- no focus or zoom changes -- footage shot on IMAX 70mm format film, not (image intensified) video -- anomalous objects floating around and changing direction over time -- two objects do sharp U-turns (top left) -- one object does an abrupt right angle direction change (bottom right) -- some objects suddenly appearing and disappearing -- increasing contrast/brightness reveals more objects than originally visible part 2 secondary analysis most clearly detailing trajectories of moving objects
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-j8zysc0DGaI.html The Aguadilla UAP in eight 3D formats for VR-HMDs, 3Dtv's and coloured glasses (anaglyph)
it is interesting that its forward motion is relatively constant, like balloon in the wind could be, but its lateral movement, ie, what the camera perceives as movement in the Z axis, relative to the target cross-hair isn't. It definately goes both in-front of, and behind the target crosshair reference, only viewing in 3D with a reference point will reveal this detail
@@antdavisonNZ : Yes I enjoyed staring past the plane of my screen to achieve the 3-D effect. I didn't monitor the frame edges to see if the craft filming was itself jarred up or down or right or left, so I'll take your word for it, whole also pointing out wind currents can have complex interactions with ground generated air currents, temperature variances, vortices, etc. I especially noticed in your close ups when the "squid" or "octopus" crossed the edge of screen into view the resolution of the object was crystal clearly a collection of balloons or something identical to balloons. . . Hell, maybe they're what Trevor James Constable called "sky critters". And I've admired your rendition of the Zapruder film for a long time. Thanks for your research.
@@rogerscottcathey www.youtube.com/@davefalch1038 has some balloon videos filmed through military and consumer grade flIR cameras ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-S9qbB23BuhI.html "Jellyfish" UAP analysis! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IlF8bMsU6-U.html Balloons viewed in infrared, auto gain/level results I converted the middle portion the Aguadilla video to stereoscopic 3D. The Aguadilla UAP in eight 3D formats - for VR-HMD, 3Dtv's and coloured glasses (anaglyph) SBS, TAB ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-j8zysc0DGaI.html another potential hypothesis - drones formed from nano-tech vacuum chambers made of some aerogel analog - VLTAS - Vacuum Lighter Than Air Structures using aerogel ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-S1Uex7KK_x4.html Why don't we fill an Airship with a Vacuum? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5ImWOfeWlbw.html Are some UFOs made out of Aerogel ??? ia904707.us.archive.org/5/items/aerogel-craft/AerogelCraftUpdate1.txt discover.lanl.gov/publications/1663/2021-august/lighter-than-air/ twitter.com/korea_ufo ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xEFeoRJkgEw.html Aerogel - The Secret Link ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-O76IjyakRtI.html Aerogel Drones (part 2) - Chinese Drone Recovered ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8zBC6dke7OM.html Aerogel Drone SUPERPOWER ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u_swdmg301k.html Calvine UFO - Aerogel Drone ? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-C18EuHvuzL0.html Was the Calvine UFO designed at Los Alamos ? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fjf7vdSWbb8.html Beginner's guide to AEROGEL! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hoFxq2CEoH8.html The Story of Aerogels: The Power of Porosity ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nctQVS8EJ-8.html How Making Graphene Aerogel in Space Will Shape Future Exploration ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WREnMOheOMI.html Aerogel Holds the Weight of a Car ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9wsZf8xIJRA.html How to Make an Aerogel Out of Anything etc, etc, etc there are lots of other videos on Aerogels
This video is the proof that the fatal shot came from the rear, not the front, frame 313 is the headshot, frame 314 shows the glass fragments of the front windshield fly into the air from that bullet, or bullet fragments.
its an 8mm film, not a video, colour video wasnt available in the US (only in Japan) in 1963, black and white video machines were huge, expensive, reel-to-reel devices restricted to broadcast facilities. In 1964 the Ampex VR-2000 colour VTR was introduced to the US market, it was still huge and used 2" reel-to-reel tape, in 1967 Ampex introduced the first 'portable' colour VTR -3000, 'portable' meaning it was back-pack sized, again using 2" tape. Im not sure how much detail you expect to see out of 8mm film as the actual gated frame size (excluding the area between the sprocket holes) is tiny, 4.8mm x 3.6mm or thereabouts My source was compressed pin-cushion distorted jpegs which came from compressed 720x480 pixel interlaced mpeg2 dvd footage from 'image of assassination, circa late 1990s, my video of the Zapruder film as posted to u-tube was again heavily compressed, to mpeg4, so there is digital noise being introduced throughout these processes as well as image prediction algorithms which are fundamental to how digital video works, only 1 frame in 30 on u-tube is a full frame lossy jpeg type image, some of the rest are differences, the majority are algorithmically predicted .. i wouldnt give u-tube videos any forensic weight, you need the original source or at least as close as you can get to it, there is insufficient resolution and quality to depict transparent windshield fragments or their possible trajectory additionally this comment is posted to the 30 frames per second interpolated version of the motion panorama i made. the original 8mm film had an approximate frame rate of 18fps, what you are seeing in this particular clip has been interpolated, by 5x frame multiplication from 18fps to 90 fps for the slow motion portion, then decimated to 30fps for the normal speed portion, it uses pixel motion estimation to create this interpolation, this is discussed in the clips description, only 1 frame in 5 of the slo-mo frames are real, the other 4 out of every 5 frames are made up by computer estimation of the motion of pixels you would be better off watching the 18fps version which doesnt have estimated pixel content, i posted this a few months later and is the last Zapruder panorama i made, also the 18fps is more zoomed in on the panorama
The Muchmore film shows (concrete steps) Emmett Hudson not moving while the 2 younger looking guys jump out of their skin. The Nix film shows them all jumping. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gWEXZyMJMtA.html
@@moonlightbay4814 It is exactly how you describe it. The reactions of Emmett Hudson and the other 2 gentlemen who were beside him at the instant of the headshot plus Emmett Hudson's WC testimony prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that there was a second shooter.
@@claytonbigsby No, they don't. Why would these people, on hearing the shots, run towards the place where they thought the shooter was? Here is Emmett Hudson's WC testimony... Mr. LIEBELER. After you heard these three shots and saw the President get hit in the head, you turned around and you ran up on the little knoll there and you got away. Mr. HUDSON. Yes. Mr. LIEBELER. While you were standing there, did you ever look up toward the railroad tracks there where they went across the triple underpass? Mr. HUDSON. No, sir; while I was laying there I didn’t-I was looking down towards Elm Street. Mr. LIEBLER. So, you never looked up towards the railroad tracks that went across the underpass? Mr. HUDSON. No, sir. Mr. LIEBELER. But you are quite sure in your own mind that the shots came from the rear of the President’s car and above it ; is that correct? Mr. HUDSON. Yes. Mr. LIEBELEK Did you have any idea that they might have come from the Texas School Book Depository Building? Mr. HUDBON. Well, it sounded like it was high, you know, from above and kind of behind like in other words, to the left. Mr. LIEBELER. And that would have fit in with the Texas School Book Depository, wouldn’t it? Mr. HUDSON. Yes.
Moi je sais que les Américains n'ont aucun vaisseau. Parce-que ça. C'est la preuve même que les OVNI préfère crashé leurs vaisseaux. Plutôt que d'imaginer les Américains en leurs possession. Imaginons. Je suis salvateur, et les OVNI veulent venir avec moi. Bah ils donneront jamais leurs vaisseaux aux raté que représente les Américains. Caché dans le pillage. Enfin ce qu'ils appellent la richesse. Lol D'autant plus que là d'après ce qu'ont en croit un OVNI serait aux commandes du vaisseau. Pour bien signifié. Vous voyez. Après votre harcèlement. Parce-que ce que vous faites avec votre travailleurs sociaux etc... C'est du harcèlement. Et là ils disent. Allé niqué vos mères Les vaisseaux vous les aurez jamais. Vous méprisez le monde réelle. Et préféré resté dans vos mensonges. Bien tchiao Sans oublié que des gens comme vous ont conduit le monde à vouloir s'euthanasié. Alors au-lieu de raconté vos mensonges. Vous avez de quoi vous euthanasié. Alors la question c'est ! - C'est quand que vous vous euthanasié. Car moi en tout-cas. Je vous lacherez jamais ! La guerre est déclarée face aux impies comme vous. Si si
Dire que les Américains qui m'attaquent ce disent sauveur des OVNI. Vous supercherie ne passera pas. Les OVNI ne veulent pas de criminels. Qui s'en prends à des pauvres enfants. Avec des bombes d'une tonnes. Ah ouais dents de lapin. Toi qui veut te raconté sauveur des OVNI avec ta diplomatie de la bombe que t'as crû appliqué plus que moi. Comme t t'expliques sauvé les OVNI. Si tes effets les conduits à la mort Vous inquiétez pas. Ont va vous localisé. Et ont va rependre le feu sur vous !
