Sir you got the N1 Ultra specs wrong ! 2200 CVI lumens is 4000 ANSi lumens and the XGMI Horizon Pro have 1500 ISO lumens which are 1875 Ansi Lumens, then both use pixel shifting and none of them are native 4k, and to finish you can't compare a led proyector with a 3 laser which the JMGO is, so fix this nonsense review !
Wow you’re an expert ! I wish I was able to ask u some questions before I bought the xgimi horizon ultra. I just got it today and though I love it I’m having issues it’s like the projector points upwards for some reason
Well, I bought the Hisense C1 because there are only 2 proyectors in this category with Dolby Vision and although the C1 image is outstanding but is too dim at 1,600 lumens so tomorrow I’ll receive a JMGO N1 Ultra which I know wouldn’t have issues with the brightness at 4000 lumens. I hope JMGO do a firmware update to make it Dolby Vision compatible.
Absolutely wrong and misleading the 1080p UPSCALING. NO, This has nothing to do with the upscaling. The XPR Technology can really display 4K image due to its lightning-fast pixel shifting speed. In short: You cannot tell the difference in quality by looking 4K resolution and 1080p x4 (XPR tech.) from internet: Pixel shifting is not the same as upscaling. Upscaling is taking a lower resolution image and displaying at a higher resolution. Pixel shifted 4K IS 4K. If the source material begins at a 4K resolution, it will end up at the display at 4K resolution, and there's no resolution lost.
I have the JMGO N1 Ultra and I can confirm that it actually does show a 4K image. I projected a 4K res image and you could see even the finest lines - not as clearly as a 4K LCD TV but you COULD see them.
@@wahidemran833 if you will be projecting to a normal white screen or a wall and want amazing picture even with strong ambient light, JMGO Ultra is the best.
Yo he tenido los dos al mismo tiempo pero al final me decanté por el JMGO, el Xgimi lo pude vender, hice unas comparaciones en el que el JMGO N1 Ultra tenía una mayor calidad sobre todo en los colores, el brillo también es bastante superior, y la calidad del sonido también es superior al Xgimi, aunque el Xgimi Horizon Pro también suena muy bien carece de bajos, pero suena más fuerte el Xgimi que el JMGO y los menus del Xgimi también son más fluidos que los del JMGO
También tuve el JMGO N1 Pro y también tiene más calidad de imagen que el Xgimi Horizon Pro y eso que el Xgimi es 4k y el JMGO N1 Pro es 1080p, los ajustes automáticos trapezoidal funcionan mejor en Xgimi
IDK what this reviewer is talking about, but the horizon pro is NOT in the same ballpark as the JMGO N1 Ultra, and I've seen no actual tests with data that show it is. If I had to guess it seems like someone got paid to give such praise to something so inferior to the product it's being compared to.
This video has to be a joke. There is no way in hell that that horizon is better at 4K content and anyone that has had these two projectors face to face knows that
So funny : 1 - both are native 1080p and use pixel shifting to simulate 4k. So NO "real" 4k Sir, although pixel shifting does a VERY good job to simulate 4k 2 - 34ms of input won't disturb any gamer. Cause the only gamers that would feel the difference are those doing e-sport...and anyway e-spart gamers NEVER compete using projectors. Everything under 50ms will be fine for all non Superman humans beings
XGIMI Horizon Pro is True 4K Technology. Even though I prefer JMGO N1 Ultra with XPR Technology, and NO, this is not a normal 1080p resolution. It is 1080p x 4 as pixels shift and display real 8.3 million distinct pixels
