My uncle was stationed in the pentagon on 911, his office was in the wing that was hit. He told me the wing was under maintenance and was empty when it was hit. He was in an outside office building when it happened. Sus.
why is it sus; E-Wedge was being rebuilt for years before 911. I spent a year in there prior to 911 putting up steel for new mechanical towers and elevator shafts
So much irrefutable evidence against a plane hitting the Pentagon. Several videos showing footage of a cruise missile flying towards the Pentagon on the day. The engine at the "crash" site was the wrong type for the plane that supposedly hit it. Every expert pilot ever interviewed about it saying it was completely impossible to fly a plane that low and not hit any of the lampposts on the way in. A complete la la fantasy.
It's not that incredible considering the broadcast was 325 lines at 10fps. Radio waves travel perpetually in space, so the 234,000 miles is nothing compared to Voyager 1's 14 billion miles, which is still broadcasting a signal back to Earth but with a 22+ hr delay. The delay from the moon and back is only 1.33 seconds.
@@pumaraebon80 Different radio frequencies and amplitudes. The signal from the moon was very low frequency and very high amplitude. Many times greater than the weak signal we get to our phones. You can complain to your service provider and they will be more likely to install a tower closer to your house, which may be more exposed to your master bedroom.
@@efficiencyinavanYeah but that just makes it all the easier to fake. Easy explanations and answers for the people. Why spend 26 bill creating a mission that might fail miserably and embarrass your nation in a time of competition, when you can spend 1 Bill or less just faking it.
You’re telling me that we had the technology back in the 60s and 70s. Then lost all technology we used and have never been back since. We’ve never left the atmosphere!!
@@javiii8337 sorry flat earth is absolutely one of them. Eddie is a fucking idiot but that doesn't discredit that the earth is flat. There's way too many government documents that admit it's flat, no curvature measured... Boats don't go over a curve when you can zoom in with a camera and they come back into view. This was the biggest round earth defense for centuries and now anyone with a camera with decent zoom can prove it wrong but nobody cares cuz they're all brainwashed like you bro. You see where Joe Rogan talks with others about flat earth, just says there all stupid and retarded over and over but no science to back his shit... Your god Joe Rogan wants you to feel retarded if you even question the globe, the dumb pos sold his soul to the devil long ago, uses his all seeing eye symbol as well. Idiots gather in giant crowds, turns out Joe has a bigger crowd than CNN. Y'all are fucking idiots and fell for the trump scam too lol
7:00 lmao what a load of bullshit, talk about believing in stupid conspiracies. They probably locked them in a cage with a bear and and eagle when they caught them stuffing diamonds inside their lower end 😂😂😂
@@alainportant6412 took me about 5 minutes to confirm this “conspiracy”… Von Braun used prisoners from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp for labor. They were regularly worked to death and publicly executed
2001 A space oddesy looks like shit compared to the apollo footage. Im tierd of people saying Kubrick did it when there is actually no way of "faking" it. how can you drive for miles non stop in a studio for example? xd
I’m telling you, Joe, that was a tomahawk cruise missile, the hole was not even big enough for a fuselage. There was no wings no engines no seats no luggage just tomahawk cruise missile pieces.
No sign of burn on the grass, it came in low. Also I was watching this live and Jamie McIntyre with CNN was interviewing someone at the Pentagon and he raced around the building with his cameraman and there was NO debris whatsoever. Tiny hole and no damage from the wings. This makes me so mad. And what they did to Jamie.
I cant believe the amount of times I've heard Joe explain operation paperclip and that theres still people who have never heard about it. I learned about it when I was like 9 years old only cause I was interested in WW2 massively at the age. But just goes to show, you dont even need to be into conspiracies to have heard about it lol.
The reason it isn’t taught is because that’s something the US doesn’t want people to know. They want us to believe everything made and done was by Americans. What good is it if the greatest feat by mankind was aided by Nazis
@@koreywilliams8418 that’s why I find it hilarious the fake moon landing conspiracy theorists always leave out the fact we even got to the moon was because Nazis helped us out and USSR Nazis backed it up that we landed on the moon lol
@@97NikeSb That's because nobody has ever gone to the moon, smart guy ! You should watch the video where the head guy at NASA says that we haven't gone back to the moon because we don't have the technology. You could ask to see the video footage of the moon landing that according to NASA was recorded over and that they habe absolutely no footage, pictures, voice recordings. You can watch them grab wires when they are supposedly on the spaceship floating in space. Go watch the valuetainment podcast with the dude who has footage that says "Do not release to public" and basically proves that it is bullshit. You do absolutely no research, fill in the blank parts of a story with your imagination and believe it to be 100% facts.
Tons of interesting guests since then, you just gotta pick and choice. I skip all the MMA live shows, and I only watch the comedian guests when I want pure laughs and bs.
@@ActionJackson669 joe was a lot more relaxed then and he actually had civil arguements and would go at people when they were false. Now he agrees with every single body that goes on.
No I used to wonder about the same thing but in reality there's just so many episodes that the interesting ones become more scarce. When he only had so many episodes it made the 2 with Alex Jones, the alien shit, Elon Musk and conspiracy episodes etc more common. Now the 3rd time around with Alex etc is surrounded with 1500 plain podcasts.
I have always been a skeptic man walked on the moon. What I find perplexing is why would the astronauts comment on UFOs on the moon's surface observing them. Those types of comments would not be necessary, unless they were actually on the moon's surface.
What they mean is aliens were watching them, we were watching them, we are an alien hybrid but,,, aliens are not living breathing beings they are spirits
I love how homeboy in the pink shirt says the moon landing hoax is so laughable and then admits he never even looked into it. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Unfortunately, more people are like him than not. People say the education system in America has failed us. I say it's succeeded. The leaders of this country, whoever they may be, do not want intelligent critical thinking citizens.
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 I agree. I made this comment 4 years ago and it cracks me up today. I've become a giant MMA fan in the past 2 and a half years and I like Ben Askren. It's great to see evidence of me not knowing who he is once. I still don't agree with him here and I'm slightly disappointed that he would be so wilfully ignorant but regardless I still like the guy.
NASA is the protective layer to the truth. In 2007, when Google announced a 34 million dollar reward* for any private organization to send a rover to the Moon and live broadcast the Apollo landing sites, why do you think NASA immediately made the landing zones a restricted area? Do you really think it was to "preserve history"? No, they were more likely protecting the truth. *30m for landing on Moon, and an additional 4m for live recording the Apollo landing sites.
Just a suggestion - but it's always an idea to familiarise yourself with at best, the very basics of a subject before you declare it fake. Firstly, they are belts, since there are two, with a third that is transitory. Secondly, "like ten hours" - what on Earth are you talking about? Thirdly, if you really feel the need to continue this exchange, consider the following. If you have a shred of integrity the I'd like you to honestly ask yourself the following questions. 1/ How much do I genuinely know about the Van Allen Belts? - their shape extent and distribution? Energies and intensity? Type of radiation? 2/ What do I actually understand by alpha and beta particle radiation and shielding against it? 3/ What have I understood about the actual structure of the Command Module and the materials that it was fashioned from? 4/ What have I learnt about the trajectories flown by each of the Apollo missions and their passage through the belts? 5/ What do I know about what James Van Allen himself have to say about the belts and the Apollo missions? If the answer to these questions is nothing, then obtaining the answers first will prevent you form humiliating yourself in the future and avoid making such a dumb and ignorant statement on a public comments section with no actual prior knowledge about the subject.
POINT... they did not fly 35mm film and 16mm movie film through a radiation belt... of any kind considering you cannot even put film thru an X-ray machine at the airport and safely get properly exposed film.
@@chadkbrignall22 So chose not to exercise any humility or heed my advice and arrogantly continue to post nonsense about a subject that you clearly have zero understanding of whatsoever. Do you understand what charged particle radiation is? Why are you mentioning X rays? Why are you doing this to yourself?
In 10 mins Joe blew Ben's mind out his head and he went from saying "the moon landing conspiracy is the most bs" to saying "that's definitely faked I can see the strings" 😂😂😂
@@jdstox1 Exactly, these guys are at the same time admitting that the moon's gravity is much less than earth's but then refusing to acknowledge that what they are seeing is the obvious result of that. My mind is hurting from watching this, and I actually like Rogan.
Yea the result is too obvious. The moon landing is fake you just need to accept it already. Get over it. You guys don’t think it’s weird that these dudes would be bouncing around and literally rolling in jagged moon rocks when the slightest cut on your space suit would mean instant death and total mission failure? They seem to not care at ALL about getting a tear in their space suit…
@@JA-jx1hk Much of the surface is covered by regolith which while abrasive and troublesome like sand, it's not something that outright tears the suits. If the moon landings were faked, by now there would be incontrovertible evidence as such because so many people want to prove it as a hoax. Instead, all we have is a few people not at all educated in anything to do with space travel or rocket science saying the way the astronauts move "doesn't look right" to them LMFAO. Please.
Stephan Fry the actor made a great point about the if the moon landings were fake.If so then why did the Soviets not come out and say they were fake even if they knew they were real.They had their missles Aimed at America but they said nothing.The rock samples from the moon the Americans sent to the Soviets as a gesture of good will could confirm to the Soviets that the rocks were real samples from the moon.
The 'rock samples' are easily attained from Antarctica. There are a lot of them there, and they are easy to spot in a blanket of white...and it snows there very little. Also, the 'rock' that was supposedly picked up by one of the astronauts off the surface of the moon, and given to the head of some country, personally, turned out to be petrified wood.
Oh, yeah. One more thing. If you're wondering why the astronauts are 'bouncing around' and 'springing back up' you might consider the fact that the astronauts were around 180 lbs each, and that their space suits each weighed about 180 lbs as well. (that's Earth weight guys). The Moon has about 1/6th Earth's gravity, meaning that the astronauts and their suits weighed about 60 lbs each on the lunar surface. Since the astronauts were in excellent condition and were therefore only carrying around about 60 lbs (again on the Moon's surface), bouncing back up really wouldn't be that difficult.
I remember being in Creative Writing Class in the 7th grade. It was 1976. It was the first time I had ever heard about a possible moon landing conspiracy from my teacher. He wasn't an advocate but he planted the what if in my mind. I personally don't believe it. I think they went there and some of the scenes were filmed somewhere else like Joe said.😅😅
@andrewgill2561 look I'm not getting into a discussion with some non-entity on RU-vid. If you don't where to look to do real research then there's no hope for ya. Bye.
Joe says he doesn't believe we didn't go to the moon anymore and then proceeds to bring up a dozen weird things that question the landings. It's so frustrating. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Its a little funny that this guest went from denying the moon landing conspiracy, calling it one of the most ludicrous conspiracies, to then being convinced it was probably fake and the moon landing conspiracy theory is actually true within like 5 minutes of joe "convincing" him
Well he said he had never looked into it. after hearing some facts and looking at some videos ( clearly faked videos) he's thinking "hmm this is clearly bullshit"
Seriously? Again? What on Earth does your inability to understand a weak 2.4 - 5 GHz signal from a router to your device have to do with the Apollo Programme? Incidentally, the last manned lunar landing was 52 years ago, not 55. Can I suggest that you leave your basement periodically? - and not simply in the interest of your wi fi signal.
All I'm gonna say if it genuinely was a plane that killed several people and crashed into the fucking pentagon, one of the most highly secured fucking buildings in the U.S. if not the most secured, there would be more than security footage that has about 3fps consistently and looks nothing like a plane, flies unbelievably low to the ground (In a 747 presumably btw which would have been torn to fucking pieces flying at that speed that low) and 20 years later cant give us any of the footage besides that. They confinscated camera feed from every local place that was in any location even remotely capable of capturing footage of it. How are people not supposed to assume they are feeding us bullshit. They wouldnt be hiding this shit for 20 years waiting for everyone to forget about it. The footage they gave us makes gas station CCTV look like 4k man.
It was 2001. There were no HD cameras or security cameras that were capable of that sort of resolution at that time. Hell, cellular phone cameras were more advanced and that’s simply due to bureaucratic government purchasing and procurement policies. 9/11 helped change ALL of that. Now there’s high res cameras everywhere. It just isn’t the way you’re saying it should’ve been on that day. A commercial jetliner hit the pentagon and did catastrophic damage to the structure. Nearly totally disintegrating the airframe and fuselage of the aircraft and killing 184. Altitude has nothing to do with the aerodynamic forces exerted on the plane. You’ve obviously never seen test footage of a 757 flying fast and low. They don’t just come apart. Wow.
@@marklewen9384 You can say that all you want, doesn't change the reality of the situation. Planes were hijacked by terrorists which crashed into buildings and one in a field. There are literal videos of the planes hitting the buildings, there's recordings of phone calls of people on the plane, there's literal records of all the people on the planes.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo there is zero evidence of hijackers. The planes were flown from the ground. No plane hit the pentagon. Even the pilot who Flew the exact plane that supposedly hit the pentagon 300 times said he couldn't hit the pentagon without help from the ground. 19 hijackers who just learned to fly on single engine cessnas COULD NEVER DO IT.
Russia's Belka and Strelka spent a day in space orbit aboard spacecraft 'Korabl-Sputnik 2' on August 19, 1960, before safely returning to Earth. They are the first two dogs ever to fly and survive in outer space. They were accompanied by a grey rabbit, 42 mice, two rats, flies, and several plants and fungi. All passengers survived.
Nasa sent a nagger and a monkey into lower earth orbit back before the fake moon landings. The monkey kept getting orders, instructions, and flight plan corrections which made the nagger feel unimportant,useless, and (of coarse oppressed). So the next time Nasa sent a message the nagger intercepted it and it read as follows. Correct coarse 19 degrees 13 minutes and forty-two seconds, hold coarse for ten minutes 35 seconds then return as programed. Clean air filtering systems and purge your ballistic vaults and jets. P.S feed the nagger
Conspiracy theorists show brief extracts to suit their claims. The entire Apollo 11 post-mission press conference is 1 hour and 20 minutes. There are also those from subsequent Apollo missions featuring far more ebullient characters and personalities that the crew of Apollo 11 that they conveniently ignore or aren't aware of.
Yeah such a humble guy. Scamming people through crypto scams without even bothering to look into what he’s promoting. Just taking his pay then scamming his fans.
He was able to stand up like that because he was pushing himself with his left hand leaning on the other astronaut. Once you see the hand you can never unsee it :)
Zero-G...Nothin But Net Ride - net force zero Weightlessness In free fall is the complete absence of the sensation of weight, i.e., zero apparent weight. It is also termed zero gravity, zero g-force, or zero-g (named after the g-force of 1G). NIST WTC Towers FAQ 31 - "the upper section came down essentially in free fall"
"we lost that kind of technology, we wish we could go back" " We taped over all the video and data records from the moon landing" - NASA scientist talking about going to the moon
I was literally yelling at my phone for him to play that clip..or to talk about them recording over all the original footage of the moon landing. Or the weird way they broadcasted it..by playing on a projector screen first than having a camera record that so it would be way more blurry and hard to see details. There's 1000 other things. But simple stuff like the way they broadcasted it on tv like that really points to hiding shit. There's no other reason to do it that way unless you were trying to hide shit...no other reason. Can you imagine if a guy shot a video of bigfoot today and he swore up and down it was the real deal. He makes a youtube video and he has the video shot in 420p than projected on to a screen than he records that screen with his phone and puts it up on RU-vid. Not a sole alive would look at that and be like yup looks lagit.
youtube used to have a ton of videos on this subject, now i cant find any of them, except for the ones that say if you dont beleive we landed on the moon then you are a fool
You can thank all of the internet's crazy conspiracy nut jobs for that. Once really dangerous conspiracy theories started becoming a lot more mainstream like anti-vax, qanon, etc. big tech decided to crack down hard on conspiracy theories. Thanks to that there were many innocent casualties like moon landing conspiracies. It's like they say. This is why we can't have nice things. Someone always has to ruin it for everyone else.
@@bestieswithtesties i dont see what is dangerous about different opinions, but i do think coraling us all into thinking and believing the same things and removing any opposing view is super dangerous, communist china levels of bad. i personally know people that are crazy and believe some really bad information, but our society once cherished freedom of speech and free press for all ideas. let the bad information speak for its self and let everyone see just how bad it is, removing opposing ideas only makes those who have power afraid of something, imo thats worse than some of the meth head ideas i hear.
@@jasonbrown467 Because when you disregard facts and reality and replace it with your "opinion" things get extremely dangerous. For example, believing that vaccinations cause autism despite there being no evidence of it. This causes people not to vaccinate their kids which puts both the kid in extreme danger and any kids they come in contact with in danger. Or the crazy qanon conspiracy that has led to real life violence and death. Including the insurrection at the capitol which left 5 dead. It is a simple fact that conspiracy theorists in America, specifically the far right, have gotten completely out of control and they're spreading straight up lies and misinformation that is causing people to take to the streets in the real world and hurt or even kill others because they're so far gone and out of touch with reality. It is a danger to all of society without a doubt. Our country still has free speech. Anyone who complains about private companies not respecting free speech clearly don't understand what free speech even is. All it means is that the government can't arrest you for what you say (with exceptions) it doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want without repercussion from other citizens, your employer or superiors, or privately owned companies. On TOP of that, the people running these websites/companies like youtube and twitter ALSO have the freedom of speech which means they can't be forced to publish things on their platforms that they don't want to. THAT would be unconstitutional.
@@bestieswithtesties you are not being honest with your self if you think the right doesnt feel the same way about the left's propaganda. that is why a healthy compromise is important, or you end up in a civil war. your fact really are just your feelings btw. for example the left feels having open borders will solve all the problems of this country, sure they can spit out some numbers to "prove" their position but its all just feelings and perspective. if we cant even agree to let one said have their opinion and talk openly about it, what does that say about your side? if people think that hitting them selfs in the head with a sledge hammer will cure their disease it is not your right to tell them that they cant even talk about it. dont try to correct me about what free speech is, your team has lost credibility on your understanding the constitution. when a teacher gives a lesson to children about ho evil trump is you claim free speech, when nfl players take a knee, you claim free speech. also social media needs to decide if it is a platform or a publisher. i appreciate your toning down your insults, but i think we should go our separate ways, we cant even agree on how important it is that ideas from both sides should be heard, there no fixing that at right will not submit to your team such a fundamental concept that your team takes for granted with your 4 years of "mostly peaceful" protesting, where lives were lost and billions in property damage occurred
i think Joe has realized that he can't change minds while admitting he believes in it. I don't think he's sold out, but like everyone who's looked in to these things knows, you can't change people's minds if they think you're crazy.
He's talked to enough astronauts to understand that he was just mistaken. Everything in life will always seem "shady" or "weird" if you look into it too much. It's like saying a word too many times; eventually it loses its meaning.
Which is exactly why the powers that ought not be coined the term "conspiracy theorists ". Now when you hear someone being called a conspiracy theorists it automatically discredits them and people think they are nuts! 9 times out of 10 the conspiracy theories are true..
@@jamiesuzanne5781 9 out 10 time the conspiracy freak is either an ignorant clown with a room temp IQ, or a con man like Kaysing, preying on the dimwitted and gullible.
I used to sell autographed Pictures at a Gallery. We had 1 Neil Armstrong that was signed by him. It was more valuable, because Neil was buying them all up before he died. He and the other crew members had many of them signed for their wives , prior to the Mission. It's obvious they never went
Neil Armstrong lived in the same town as me…….Lebanon, Ohio. In 1993 I took a front desk job at a professional building in Lebanon. Armstrong had a food company he ran from that building. The VERY FIRST thing I was trained on was to NEVER speak to Neil Armstrong or make eye contact. Armstrong was EXTREMELY reclusive and didn’t want to speak to the public. At the time me and my family thought it was funny. Years later as I learn about the questions on the moon landing my mind went BINGO! I recalled the weirdness around Armstrong and the public and how he demanded to be left alone.
..... but Armstrong was reclusive even before the landings. He was notorious for hating interviews when he was a test pilot and even his teachers and classmates described him as that person that barely talked.
@@kevinskinner4986 I’m sure that’s true, but it went into OD after the moon landings. In fact, watch that press conference the astronauts did after the moon landing! Wow! They ALL acted extremely bizarre!
@@reneesantiago6496 Have you watched the Gemini 8 press conference? Armstrong spends the entire time he's talking fidgeting in his seat like he's sitting on an anthill and describes space flight as one of the most thrilling experiences you can experience in a complete monotone like he's reading from the dictionary. Aldrin's personal life is absolute garbage. His mother lost her battle with depression and committed suicide about a year before the mission and his marriage is falling apart. Aldrin looks angry, and there's a possible reason why that the hoaxers will never, ever tell you. Under the previous mission protocols, Aldrin should have been the first man, not Armstrong. They changed this just a few months before the mission and made excuses why, leading to Aldrin having a big shouting match with them. He's probably still salty about that. Collins mostly looks bored. I caught him stifling yawns like he was going to fall asleep.
@@kevinskinner4986they did not go to the moon, I watched the conference, they could not describe it properly and one said seen stars and other said no stars. They were told to lie.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
Yes and I really like that he doesn’t say that he doesn’t believe it but behind closed doors there’s so much more that I would like to talk about with joe Rogan
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
The conspiracy is not that they didn't go to the moon. The conspiracy is that they have been to the moon. Exactly like the globe model. Conspiracy is that they said it is a globe. Not that the earth is flat and motionless. Like Einstein said " there is not even one experiment that can detect the motion of the earth".
Since when does looking into the moon landing equate to being intelligent? This comment in itself is idiotic. Some people don’t have time or simply don’t care about space and what happened in 1969.
@@tyler6971 good point. But the OP is correct overall though. They don't teach you sh*t in school. My little sister thought the Civil War was fought between the American and the British until highschool when they finally decided to put that into curriculum
Zero-G...Nothin But Net Ride - net force zero Weightlessness In free fall is the complete absence of the sensation of weight, i.e., zero apparent weight. It is also termed zero gravity, zero g-force, or zero-g (named after the g-force of 1G). NIST WTC Towers FAQ 31 - "the upper section came down essentially in free fall"
Joe, before it's too late. There are still 4 Apollo astronauts that walked on the moon for you to have on your show as well as the crew of Apollo 8. As of today May 12, 2013, Buzz Aldrin, David Scott, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt are still alive. Talk to one of them for God's sake!
The problem is none of these men give interviews about the moon landing. They never have. They only gave the initial press conference after the initial landing and that’s it.
What does Buzz Aldrin do now? Designing rockets, deep sea exploring, speaking all over the world for privatizing space and stimulating support for America's space program. Buzz is as active today as when he walked on the moon. He has written six books and numerous articles advocating concepts for the future of space travel.
we never went there. the earth is an enclosed ecosystem. satellites do not exist they are giant cords that run along the bottom of the oceans. Joe changed his stance when they started to control him. the earth is flat, it's been proven over and over with thousands of experiments. most ppl know this they just don't report it
@Zane 778 giant cords running along the bottom of the ocean? Yeah. Oil pipes, internet/electric. There's legitimate reason in some conspiracy theories, but people like you shy everyone else away from the truth with bullshit like flat earth and enclosed ecosystems
"truths protective layers" is referring to the Scientific pursuit of the answers of how things work. Science generally makes discoveries in a piece by piece or layered way. Going to the moon wasn't send a rocket to the moon, it was a step by step process or uncovering the final answer a layer at a time.
Exactly. But some people see a conspiracies in their coffee. In the RU-vid Age, everybody and anybody gets to say whatever crap clogs their heads and spit out. Include me in.
It's pretty simple, cost vs reward of going to the moon is a very one sided story. If there were potential habitable areas or valuable assets there, we would have colonized and or strip mined it by now. As far as the argument of the technology differences of then to now only reflects progress. Does anyone remember seeing photos of the first contraptions people were trying to take flight with? Now compare that with a SR-71. If those first guys hadn't tried, the latter wouldn't exist. It's always trial by fire when attempting such phenomenal new feats. So the first missions to the moon were indeed extremely risky (especially by today's standards) but they were the first steps in seeing how far we could go. While I will agree somethings do seem out of place with the moon landing, (but what hasn't had things out of place when a government is behind the wheel) the fact that we now certainly have the technology to get people there and back but don't, leads me to believe they had seen what they needed to see and the results didn't yield a worth while reward to merit continued expeditions. And yes, a lot of scientists and engineers of that time were plucked from Nazi Germany. Now the video showing the guy standing up after falling, if you look his right hand is down as well as his right knee. His left hand appears to be holding onto the standing astronaut. Standing up from that position in 1/6 gravity using your right knee and hand to push off of the surface and your left hand pulling down on the other astronaut, wouldn't be that big of a grasp.
Lmao yea dude sure it’s not like don Pettit made an entire Ted talk about why the moon would be of ultimate scientific importance. Stop lying to yourself in order to just go along with what the elites that hate us want us to think. We didn’t go and it’s the most logical conclusion we can come to seeing the modern state of nasa and what happened after the “moon landings”.
@@JA-jx1hk When you read a posted reply that begins with LMAO, you just know you're in for a wealth of well thought out statements, arguments and fact.... (FART SOUND).....
@@jeffmiller3499 The US was way to proud to lie about something like this. We went to the moon. The US always took every chance to flex. They had the money and tech, it's easier to say "here's a blank check. get us to the moon before the russians do".
Anton, No, faked them all. When I first looked at this just 5 years ago all the photos were available on nasa;s web site. I read, never went there. year or so later learned they started "re-mastering" all the photos. Used to be you could look at that picture of the stand in that suited up to pose for the picture of buzz and find several objects in back ground. Now the picture has been cropped to just a fraction of the original size but they also relocated the crosses to hide that fact. Used to be able to just turn up saturation and brightness and see the quite clear outlines of buildings complete with doors, trees, autos and trucks in parking lot and ac equip on roof. But a few good videos available that make it clear it was a hoax. Just so sick of all the lies and everybody thinks they so smart cuz they are believers in all the lies. crap. Basically, everything the government wants you to believe is bs. Also the trolls that are all over these comments is another tell. I hear your comment is honest. I know I struggled with this stuff too cuz i was the guy that thought oswald kennedy alone. watch the video funny thing happened on the way to the moon. So I just saw a video this morning where it shows stars clearly vixible through the moon when more than half the moon is black. Then video called this the occluded stars like in the arab star and crescent flags. How did I not know this before. ? She read a quote from somebody back like 1760 or so describing this cuz he couldn't have been fooled by a satellite at least. ha. The truth really does make you free.
I think he still believes that they faked it and no human ever touched the moon, but he realized that it's silly to say it publicly. Because there are way too many people who believe it and will call him ignorant and whatnot.
Actually, you're wrong on that Joe. Jesse Ventura interviewed employees of the Pentagon. Every one of them, said there were no plane parts, amongst the ruble. The most heavily surveilled place in the world, should have more than one tape, from a security booth.. Just sayin
If they did show simulations and passed them off as the real thing...my next question would be why/how would you make a simulation to look exactly like space including the black background? Why go for over the top realism unless they were purposely trying to pull one over. I've seen some of the tests and simulations and they didn't bother making it look like it was in space. I'm with Joe, I'm not convinced either way but something squirly was going on. You know how you can be certain shady business was going on? Government was involved.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
@Ned Simlish im not agreeing or denying anything. Im just saying that if I weighed like 15kg instead of the 60 I actually weigh, i could probably pull that off. It could still be fake tho
@Ned Simlish also we weren’t there so we don’t know what actually happened. For all we know they could’ve stayed home that day or they could’ve gone to the moon and back twice. They could’ve even gone at the ISS for a beer and then came back down. Only they know what actually happened and unfortunately everything we’re left with are theories and speculations :/
Is he not pushing up with his right hand? Impossible on earth, but it seems plausible your tricep could do the job if you are strong and in low gravity.
Joe, u probably won’t see this comment but Neil was talking about the firmament that God put in place in creating earth to protect it, they couldn’t figure out how to break it to even make it outside of earths atmosphere.
Every conspiracy theorists favorite argument is why haven't we gone back. The question is not why anyone haven't gone back to the moon but rather why should we send people back. It's extremely expensive, dangerous and totally unnecessary as the moon don't have many secrets left. At it's peak the Apollo program cost the US 2,5% of it's gross national product and the program only brought back 842 pounds of rock. It also caused the death of Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee. So to go back to collect more rocks like the one already brought back for that price would be madness. Imagine passing that bill through congress. LOL. Besides the moon isn't even a grain of dust compared to the whole universe and the secrets we have yet to discover there. Thanks to Hubble, James Webb and all the other different kinds of space telescopes we are just at the brink of greater discoveries like exoplanets, galaxies, stars dying and being borne, the immense gravitational forces of black holes. We can even see back in time as the light from events like galaxies forming a billion of light years away just reaches us now. The moon have some interest today as it may be used as a springboard for manned exploration of Mars. Personally I think that with today's speedy development of drones/robots and artificial intelligence we will be able to get the answers we want from Mars a lot quicker if we ditch human cargo. The US could choose to take a leading role in Mars exploration but politics in the US is far too dysfunctional to be able provide what is needed for them to play that role. China and India will most likely take the lead.
In the video where the astronaut stands up he could for sure stand up like that. He is holding the other astronaut with his left hand as support while getting up and he weights 1/6th of his normal weight...
The conversation is such a non-conversation. As one knows, it's not even worth contributing to the diatribe. Moon landing deniers - without realising it - are treated with just as much disdain as "Flat Earthers" are to the academical world. Dunning-Kruger syndrome...
Says ppl look for conspiracies in everything then goes on to bring up conspiracies that were true and ones they were in to. When we find out they were lying, why wouldn't we question everyhting. And what the fuck is wrong with questioning? WHY can't we question the narrative.
'Researched from home', using the 'common-sense' which is available to 'everyone'.. Oh my God. I could make ten-thousand piles of info that put it past the shadows of doubt. What the actual 'fu(k' have you been doing with your time?
There was literally a CNN reporter walking around the scene right after it happened, and said there was not a single piece of anything that looked like any sort of plane debris in the entire mess.
@@Coopdog1911 I remember this. There was a hole in the pentagon that was smaller than the plane. No wings left outside the building - and no marks on the building where the wings would have hit. The wings just disappeared. The surveillance clip from the gas station across the street conveniently had the frames removed from the video which would have shown what flew past. All we got was a few frames of an approaching shadow, skipped frames, then a few frames of a fireball then it cuts
@@alphanerd7221 Don't you know? After the moon travels NASA ""lost"" the technology and doesn't know how to do it again. Mysteriously it got destroyed, somehow, somewhere, after people started doing questions.
@@GranMaese Yeah that's BS. The did lose the designs for the Saturn 5 but they were never going to build it again. That really isn't any kind of point. It isn't destroyed. The plans are in some filing cabinet in a room full of filing cabinets. It's not like they would have showed them anyway. They are classified. If NASA just never said anything you would have no idea. The questions are stupid. Everyone who isn't dumb knows we went to the moon.
@@alphanerd7221 Damn, you are so nervous and scared, your passive-aggresive attitude demonstrates that. So gullible... They were ""destroyed"" (never existed if you asked me). That's literally the reason they give on why they can't reach it ""anymore"". They are clueless on how to do it ""again"". Everyone who isn't dumb and indoctrinated knows we did not go to the moon.
All of the passengers from the "plane" that hit the Pentagon were vaporized, but they found bodies of military and civilian accountants who were killed while investigating what happened to the trillions missing from the budget (interesting how the "plane" made an impossible turn, pulling g's a military pilot would have trouble with, to hit that specific part of the building). Oh, and Donald Rumsfeld was on the opposite side of the Pentagon just finishing up some paperwork while being informed that a "commercial aircraft" was headed toward the pentagon (Don't need to run for cover. I'll just chill here because I have an idea of where it's going to hit). His photo op while he was helping "save" some of the victims after the explosion in question is great too. Hahaha. The whole thing reeks to high heaven.
There were some bodies situated at the back of the plane which remained relatively intact. There are first responder accounts of the charred remains of passengers still strapped into their seats, images of which were used in court as evidence during the Moussaoui trial. There was NOTHING "impossible" about the turn Hanjour made as it was a standard manoeuvre used by pilots to reduce altitude. There were no insane levels of G that military pilots wouls struggle with, that's total horsesh!t like everything else you've said. Back up your claims or quit spreading lies. As for Rumsfeld, the Pentagon is THE largest office building on earth so it was quite likely he would be in another part of the building. Such dumb reasoning. For the record, the alleged missing 2.3 trillion was later accounted for, was announced back in 1999 (as opposed to the day before as truthers like to claim) and was never missing in the way truthers say. It was merely a case that they were using computer systems that were incompatible making it extremely difficult to track between departments.
@@dirkdiggler8260 lol. Shut up you shill. You just joined RU-vid 4 months ago and you're just spreading misinformation in favor of the federal government to fool the public. All you tell is lies
@brettski I'm sorry but you're talking like this is in question when it isn't. We have public documents proclaiming this missing money from 1999 so anyone stupidly claiming it was announced the day prior in an attempt to cover it up is easily refuted and demonstrably wrong. Why would they bother announcing it at all if it was as truthers claim?? It makes zero sense. Just another half truth, truthers seize upon in another desperate attempt to make the ridiculous conspiracy theories fly.
So you are unaware that low Earth orbit is essentially a vacuum? Vacuum does not as you say "meet the atmosphere". Vacuum is simply the absence of matter and as altitude increases the air becomes thinner and molecules more sparsely spaced.
Conspiracy Theorist ™️ is over user. It’s a CIA term to discredit. All it means is a theory that someone or thing has conspired to deceive. Of course if someone has a theory they’re going to defend it.
@@JarodJoseph Conspiracy theory is not a CIA "term". Absolutely false. What's hilarious here is that you are resorting to a baseless conspiracy theory about conspiracy theory to defend baseless conspiracy theory. The unintentional irony is as excruciating as it is amusing.
@@harryevans1786 but it's conspiracy fact. Especially in the JFK and RFK cases now. And tin foil won't save you against the radiation in space. There was no way NASA could possibly trace an obstacle free course to moon. They were always in the blind.. Travelling at those speeds in a thin tin can was perilous and tempting disaster at every attempt. The chances of getting away with it every time would be astronomical to use a pun.
Joe sits on the fence to be liked not because he isn't biased.. He is very bias on a lot of subjects. He just doesn't want to come off as a conspiracy theorist because he likes the idea of coming off as a "intellectual" and of course he gets more views which makes more money if he plays the intellectual.
Iz G Maybe so..He aint perfect..we all flip on things..Best to look from all forms to form the best opin on things..butt no ones perfect..but i here ya..
For those thinking we didnt go to the moon you have to answer the question why the Soviet Union in the middle of the Cold War went along with us and humiliated themselves with their failed attempts at Baikonur? They would have known if we faked it and even they didnt pretend we didnt land men on the moon.
Quick tip. If you really feel the need to brand something as fake, obtaining even the most basic knowledge about the subject is preferential before you do.
@@matshanssen2070 And you "seem" to have none. No 'special knowledge' that isn't out there and instantly available. Nothing to do with me, you can dispel your personal incredulity by actually learning about the subject as opposed to parroting dumb conspiracy theory and declaring something that you demonstrably have zero knowledge about as fake. Quick question though, because I'm curious. Why do you people almost invariably feel the need to employ puerile emojis at the end of your asinine posts?
@@yassassin6425 You must be a young ignorant lad that just came out of the egg and thinks he knows it all.. Ever heard of the propaganda-wars in the sixties, einstein? And by the way : where is your absolute proof?? Where?? Show me, young sleepwalker......😴😂
@@matshanssen2070 *_"You must be a young ignorant lad that just came out of the egg and thinks he knows it all"_* You're the one insisting on employing childish emojis after everything that you type. To reiterate, I am irrelevant to this exchange - do try to stay on topic. The answers to your questions can be easily obtained should you either have the will or the capability to do so. *_"Ever heard of the propaganda-wars in the sixties, einstein?"_* The technological, historical, scientific and independent evidence in support of the Apollo moon landings is axiomatic, demonstrable, irrefutable and has a voice of its own. *_"And by the way : where is your absolute proof?? Where??"_* You are the one that said the crews of Apollo travelled to the moon in a "crappy metal vehicle filled with fuel", insinuating that there wasn't enough to reach there. As the one making the positive claim then the burden of proof is incumbent upon you alone. Why is it that none of you conspiracy believers are able to comprehend that? Surely you have a basis for making that statement and are able to substantiate it? *_"Show me, young sleepwalker"_* Never ceases to amuse that the ones still insisting upon parroting such cringeworthy clichés are precisely those that snoozed through science classes.
G.Gorrell what are you talking about it's proof the twin towers were engineered for an impact frrom a full size jet linear. Because of the plane that crashed into the new York skyline in the early 1920s
Definitely intervention of some kind. There's molten steel pouring out of the sides of the building before the towers fell. Joe has his 3 that he'll bring up: moon landing, northwoods, gulf of tanken. There is so much evidence of foul play in 911 but he always treats that as nuts. There is more evidence there than the moon landing that's for sure
Until there is another moon landing, I will remain skeptical about the moon landing. I don't know if they did or didn't land on the moon. Let them do it again.
Nice burn but we have Billionaires that would do it in a second if they could. Going to the moon is one of the few things money can't buy. Think about that.
Hahaha. No there hasn't. There have been ZERO. Next they'll tell you they are going to Mars, ahahaha.. ha. ZERO CHANCE. What did you 'Wiki' it.. That's good cointelpro.. If it's on Google it's true..
